Lawsuit: It's Time To Start Paying Off Those Student Loans Again
The lawsuit claims that the pause has cost taxpayers "$160 billion and counting."

Student loan payments have been paused since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. However, in the three years since the pause began, the economic and legal justification for the continued moratorium has grown increasingly weak.
Not only has the economy recovered in full force—leading to the lowest unemployment rate in over 50 years—but President Joe Biden himself has declared that "the pandemic is over." Yet, student loan payments are still paused—with the same, flimsy justification that the pandemic emergency rages on and student loan borrowers simply can't be expected to shoulder the unsurmountable burden of paying back their loans, especially with a Supreme Court ruling on sweeping student loan forgiveness eminent.
However, a new legal challenge has emerged to try to end the absurdity. On Thursday, the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a conservative think tank, filed a lawsuit seeking a preliminary injunction to end the pause.
The suit argues that, while a six-month pause on student loan repayments was authorized by the CARES Act—which was signed just seven days after the Trump administration announced the original 60-day moratorium on student loan repayment—all following extensions have occurred without congressional approval or any other legitimate legal justification.
"In all, the Moratorium and its serial extensions have effectively extended Congress's six-month suspension of student-loan payment obligations and interest accrual for an additional 32 months and counting—more than five times the length of the suspension Congress legislated to expire September 30, 2020," the 37-page complaint states. "The Department has shifted among different purported legal bases for these extensions and, for some extensions, has failed to invoke any legal basis at all."
While the Department of Education has invoked several justifications for the eight separate extensions on the moratorium, the complaint directs particular attention to the DOE's use of the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students (HEROES) Act—a 9/11-era piece of legislation that was used, at least in part, to justify seven of the eight extensions to the moratorium.
The HEROES Act was passed in 2003 and allows the federal government to provide student loan relief to college students who withdraw from school in order to enter active military duty during a time of "war or other military operation or national emergency."
While the Department of Education has long claimed that the COVID pandemic presents such a national emergency, the lawsuit contends that a yearslong student loan repayment pause is simply out of the HEROES Act's scope.
The Act was explicitly designed to help a very specific group of Americans—those that leave school to serve in a war. "Recasting the HEROES Act from a statute permitting limited modifications for targeted groups (primarily those serving in the military during wartime) to one that can suspend payments and cancel interest for all 45 million borrowers is a change so significant" that it fundamentally revises the statue, the lawsuit states.
Following this claim, the lawsuit argues that because both supposed legal justifications are illegitimate, the extended moratorium violates the Constitution's Appropriations Clause. "Congress only authorized the expenditure of funds to pay for a six-month debt-relief program—approximately $30 billion—and not a penny more," the complaint states. "Every additional month of the Moratorium has resulted in unlawful cancellation of approximately $5 billion of debt owed to the U.S. Treasury."
The student loan repayment moratorium is one of the strangest holdovers of the COVID-era government spending spree. Whatever economic—and legal—justification to suspend loan repayment has long since expired, making each new extension seem more bizarre than the last.
In the meantime, the cost of the payment pause keeps ticking up. As the lawsuit notes, "The Moratorium has been wiping out $5 billion of assets owned by the United States every month for the past 32 months without any statutory authorization or appropriation, at a cumulative cost to taxpayers of $160 billion and counting."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Who argues these debtors don't have the income vis a vis March 2020? Even a holder of a worthless degree has seen their fast food joint salary soar since then. A 50 percent increase in the salary for many entry level jobs is not unknown.
If nothing else, they can serve as organ donors. Biden needs to create such a plan, student loans swapped for a pound of flesh. Kidney, liver lobe, lung - you've got two of them, surely you can spare one for the less fortunate.
Eye is for interest.
Start now making every month extra $19k or more by just doing an easy online job from home. {hj-02} Last month I have earned and received $16650 from this job by giving this only 3 hrs. a day. Every person can now get this job and start earning online by:-
.
Follow details: → → http://www.cashapp1.com/
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tellme how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, itwas all true and has totally changed my life.last month my pay check was $13583just working on the laptop for a few hours.Simply go to this website and followinstructions to start earning….Have a good Day..
.
.
For more detail visit the given link……………….➤➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
to be dismissed for lack of standing...
My reaction as well. No matter how bad the policy, the current rules offer no possible relief.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,400 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
Huh.
If the SCOTUS nixes loan forgiveness, then repayments are going to resume anyway. If the SCOTUS permits loan forgiveness, do they really think it'll then go back and say "oh, but you owe three years of payments first"?
And honestly, even if the courts agree that the moratorium was invalid, going back and telling borrowers they owe three years of back-payments for the government's error seems... well, very unlikely.
This case seems very odd. Not sure what the point is.
The point is that these folks owe the government, and the taxpayers, $160 million plus. I realize that’s just chump change nowadays, but…
$160 BILLION plus...they still think of that as chump change. And we'll never see it.
Yes even trillions is no longer considered serious money in DC.
One trillion (1,000,000,000,000) is the equivalent of 1000 billion or 1 million millions.
Biden sees it as chump change, but then he is getting a lot of money from all over the world funneled into his families bank accounts. But don't expect Reason to do story on that!
Yes, that's the rhetorical point.
But what's the actionable remedy they're seeking, and does it have a logical path to get there? If there is remedy, the case should get thrown out. If there is no logical path to get there, then they're just wasting their own money.
And as I said, student loan forgiveness is already in front of the SCOTUS, to be decided in the next month-and-change.
So what specific action are they seeking? Resumption of loan payments? If SCOTUS permits forgiveness, that's not going to happen. If SCOTUS prohibits forgiveness, then that's already going to happen. So this can't be the remedy or the lawsuit is pointless.
Back-payments (possibly with interest) for the inappropriately granted forbearance? At that point, you're saying that borrowers need to cough up money because the government acted improperly. Which justices do you think are going to sign onto punishing borrowers for the government's actions?
If you don't have an actionable remedy, you don't have a real lawsuit. And if your lawsuit doesn't have a realistic goal, then you're wasting money for a message.
So I ask again: what's the point of this lawsuit? Is it really just so this guy can say "I pointlessly sued the federal government"?
Certain individuals cannot sleep at night without the sound of the crushing weight of debt bowing the backs of American citizens to lull them into sweet slumber.
This whole thing is ultimately fruitless for the reasons you pointed out.
I cannot recall ever hearing of a case of some college freshman having a gun pointed at their head to take on debt. Can you link me to such a tale? Or are you just here to shill for the communist wing of the libertarian party?
Lucy . you think George `s storry is impossible, on sunday I got a brand new Saab 99 Turbo after having made $8551 this past four weeks and just over ten-k last month . it's by-far the most comfortable job I have ever had . I started this five months/ago and almost straight away began to bring home over $95... per-hour..
🙂
AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
The government backed these loans. Therefore, if they’d like to pick up the debt on the taxpayer’s dime it’s likely totally Constitutional. That being said, I have a couple kids in college and it is nauseating to see the same elites that run the government congratulating themselves for ‘educating’ the kids when all they are doing is keeping costs high because they will be paid back. Meanwhile the good kids that tried their hardest are crippled with debt that keeps them from buying houses or having children.
“The HEROES Act was passed in 2003 and allows the federal government to provide student loan relief to college students who withdraw from school in order to enter active military duty during a time of "war or other military operation or national emergency.””
So, volunteer for the military for three years and we’ll forgive your student loans. Two years if you volunteer for the Ukrainian military.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, now I make over $15,000 per month (SW-01) just doing an easy j0b 0nline! I KNOW YOU MAKE MANY DOLLARS RIGHT NOW online from my $28,000, TS JOB EASY WORKING ONLINE…
Just copy and paste………….>>> http://www.works75.com
They've also gotten the benefit on any remaining balance from the devaluation of the dollars they borrowed due to inflation, so they're paying back with cheaper dollars of which they are earning more now. Not that many who took out those loans understands anything about time-value of money or devaluation based on inflation.
Not at all, their interest payments are through the roof. They started school when private loans were at 5.5 and now in their senior year, which they have to finish they are already in, they are at 9%. Young adults are being abused by this system.
How's that? They're not getting their deflated debt?
I find it amazing how arrogantly selfish people can be.
I agree! We must stop the abuse, stop lending them money they cannot repay.
The Supreme Court decision is eminent?
I missed the part in the Constitution that said everyone gets ?free? education on the worker-slaves back...
F'En [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s].