New York City Public Schools Will Now Be Required To Actually Teach Kids To Read
Education officials unveiled new rules on Tuesday which will mandate that city elementary schools use one of three "research-backed" reading curricula.

New York City has announced that the city's public elementary schools will now be forced to use a curriculum that actually teaches children how to read.
On Tuesday, David C. Banks, the chancellor of the city's Department of Education, unveiled new rules governing reading instruction in New York City public schools, mandating that schools adopt one of three evidence-based reading programs. A school can only apply for an exception to the new rules if more than 85 percent of its student body is deemed "proficient" in reading—a distinction held by only around 20 schools in the entire city.
The move comes in the wake of increased criticism toward how reading is taught in American schools, sparked by a sharp national decline in post-COVID reading scores, and a popular podcast from American Public Media that detailed the failures of the commonly used "balanced literacy" approach.
Notably, Banks implemented new rules last year requiring that New York City public schools include phonics in their reading instruction. However, the new guidelines build on these changes, ushering in what is effectively a ban on balanced literacy—a popular, though unscientific, approach to teaching reading that some experts say undermines the skills children are taught in phonics instruction.
Balanced literacy, which also goes by other names like the "whole language" method or "three cueing," focuses on having children read whole words, rather than sounding them out. The method also encourages children to simply guess unfamiliar words by relying on context from factors like pictures in a book. In contrast, phonics teaches children to read by focusing on the sounds that different letters and groups of letters make.
"The prevailing approaches to reading instruction in American schools are inconsistent with basic things scientists have discovered about how children learn to read. Many educators don't know the science, and in some cases actively resist it," journalist Emily Hanford noted in "Hard Words," an episode from the Educate podcast about why science-backed reading methods aren't being adopted in American schools.
"The basic assumption that underlies typical reading instruction in many schools is that learning to read is a natural process, much like learning to talk," Hanford adds. "But decades of scientific research has revealed that reading doesn't come naturally. The human brain isn't wired to read. Kids must be explicitly taught how to connect sounds with letters—phonics."
Even though research has long shown phonics to be the most effective way to teach reading, the balanced literacy approach has been surprisingly difficult to dislodge. Public schools—like other government agencies—have little incentive to innovate, even in the face of new evidence. And most American parents who realize their children need better reading instruction can't simply enroll their children elsewhere.
"Government agencies tend to be sluggish monopolies, with little incentive to improve and subject to political influence," wrote Cato Institute Senior Fellow David Boaz last year. "Private organizations, especially profit‐seeking businesses, are under constant pressure to serve customers better than their competitors. Businesses fail to meet that test every day and go out of business. When's the last time you heard of a failed government agency being shut down? That includes schools. Private schools must keep families happy or they can go elsewhere, and the school could be forced to shut down. Public schools, no matter how unhappy parents are, are almost never closed. As long as the tax money keeps coming in, they stay in business."
"You can bet that if schools had to depend on satisfying customers, there wouldn't be many that decided to skip phonics and math for 10 years and then say, 'We made an honest mistake,'" Boaz added. "Long before 10 years had passed, the students and their families would be gone."
Making matters worse, cities and states with powerful teachers unions frequently find it difficult to impose important changes to outdated curricula. While the New York City teachers union actually supports this latest measure, union leaders frequently oppose similar laws or policies—citing concerns that the rules limit teacher autonomy.
Despite pushback, the gap between what scientific research shows and what kids are actually being taught has gained wider attention following the national decline in reading scores following the COVID-19 pandemic. Then, in 2022, Hanford released a six-part podcast, Sold a Story, that made national headlines after it covered in granular detail the rise of "balanced literacy" and its contribution to dismal reading ability among American schoolchildren.
New York City's new policies are designed to tackle the city's poor reading scores—which officials view as at least partially caused by the prevalence of unscientific reading curricula in New York City schools. In 2019, only 27 percent of New York City fourth-graders tested as "proficient" or "advanced" on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading exam. Forty-three percent of fourth-graders were deemed "below NAEP basic" level in their reading skills. And while the pandemic was largely to blame for the drop in national reading scores, the city's low scores have remained roughly consistent since 2003.
"Teaching children to be confident readers is job number-one," said Banks on Tuesday. "Literacy is the foundation for all learning, and it is absolutely essential to a clear path to our students' bold futures…. It is our collective responsibility to ensure every child has the tools, resources, and support needed to unlock their full potential and open every door of opportunity."
Especially with New York City reading scores at their lowest in two decades, continuing to teach children to read with a scientifically debunked method isn't going to help repair the severe educational deficits left by COVID-era school closures. With these new rules, many more New York City schoolchildren may actually learn to read proficiently.
Since 2020, 18 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws or implemented policies around science-based reading instruction.
"The most basic thing we can do at our schools is ensure that all our students learn how to read and have the resources to thrive," said New York City Mayor Eric Adams on Tuesday. "But with more than half of our city's public-school students reading below grade level, now is the time to act."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Since when should teachers have “autonomy “?
You want to do things your way? Start your own school.
Charter schools? In New York? Are you crazy?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,200 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
I'am making over $140 an hour working online with 2 kids at home. I neverthought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 17k a month doingthis and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless .And bestthing is..It's so Easy..Copy below website to check it..,
.
.
This Website➤-------------------------------------------➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
Since forever until recently, they've had a great deal of it. Maybe they shouldn't have, but it doesn't seem like education has been improving with all this top-down education policy.
Fucking Libertarians want the nanny state to do everything for them.
Whahhhhh. Whahhhh.
Force children to read.
Whahhh Whahhhhh... Protect me from economic competition from immigrants...
Whahhhhh Whahhhhh Government is making it harder for businessmen from sending more American Jobs to low wage countries.
Damn Libertarian anti-American Fascists.
What in the actual fuck are you talking about? All the article says is that if we're going to have government schools teaching kids to read, then they should be using methods that actually work. As for the rest of your raving, you've long since demonstrated that you literally know less than nothing about libertarian philosophy.
No "New York City Mayor Eric Adams Adopts DeSantis' Anti-1A, Anti-Woke Authoritarian Education Policies"? Huh.
Reading has roots in white supremacy. How could the NY public school system be so racist? What a bunch of bigots.
You joke, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a lawsuit over this.
Pretty sure writing, and therefore reading, originated in Mesopotamia, invented by distinctly brownish people.
This is the type of mob rule Jeff was decrying this morning.
If we Libertarians don't force children to read, who will? The parents?
As long as we're stuck having public schools, they should teach kids using methods that actually work. If that's "mob rule", then I think it's time to start passing out the torches and pitchforks.
With these new rules, many more New York City schoolchildren may actually learn to read proficiently.
No they won’t. The teachers will make sure of that so that they can ‘prove’ phonics doesn’t work. You gotta change up the accepted methods for teaching every ten years or so, by the time anybody catches on that the new methods didn’t work you’re on to the next new thing. It’s how shitty teachers hang on to their jobs. Besides, nobody told the teachers they were expected to teach kids reading, writing, and math. They're just there to indoctrinate the kids in between molesting sessions.
lol if your child is in a New York City public school reading skills likely not the worst of its problems
All children need do in in accordance to Libertarian doctrine, renounce their childhood and take responsibility for their own lives.
If they are enterprising enough the little girls can find a sugar daddy to assist them in their transition to adulthood.
In accordance with Libertarian ideology of course.
Candy little girl?
You've proved your point, we all know you're beyond ignorant. Please feel free to go stick your head in a pig.
Balanced literacy, which also goes by other names like the "whole language" method or "three cueing," focuses on having children read whole words, rather than sounding them out. The method also encourages children to simply guess unfamiliar words by relying on context from factors like pictures in a book.
Note that "whole language" is a derivative methodology of marxist shithead Paulo Freire, whose theories have been increasingly implemented in the educational system for over 30 years now. These systems are great at creating marxist activists, which is why universities promote them, but they are shit at actually teaching students to read.
Literacy often leads to the reading of unwoke publications which in turn may lead to critical thinking. The education establishment has spent decades battling critical thinking. No way are they going to take a chance on phonics.
It's a bit funny in the "both sides" sense. When/where I grew up phonics was the socialist jobber method. The means by which equity was achieved by restraining kids who could read and summarize pages of Bible verses on Sunday by making them slog through "'Oh, look!' said Jane. 'See it go! See it go up!' said Dick." with all the barely-literate kids during the week.
Not to mention that much of the "settled science" of the time which said things like "The word guessing game doesn't work because we don't recognize shapes of words, we recognize individual graphemes and phonemes." has been successfully challenged if not wholly debunked (JustAskAnyoneWhosHadToDebugAButtloadOfShittyCamelCaseJavaCodeHowMuchWordShapeMatters).
Whole language was in use well before Freire was born and it's not like Dewey or anyone else who advocated phonics wasn't also overtly opposed to capitalism.
Sure, but the use of phonics in American schools goes back to the McGuffey readers, with a long track record of success. Every time it's abandoned in favor of whole language concepts, the results always suffer in comparison. Just look at what happened in Oakland schools for a recent example.
Sure, but the use of phonics in American schools goes back to the McGuffey readers, with a long track record of success.
I wasn't clear enough in my point. We're debating chickens vs. eggs when the real issue is people progressively more committed to cracking eggs to make omelettes: phonics vs. whole language is a Mott-and-Bailey. Comenius and whole language predate McGuffey by a century. McGuffey liberalized, while still being very religious and conservative by today's standards, reading education. Sharp (which updated McGuffey with 'sight words' and similar whole language concepts) succeeded McGuffey by being similarly (one step further), more liberal and less religious. Sharp largely fell out of favor because Dick and Jane were both white and had gender roles. I don't consider whole language vs. phonics to be a critical educational debate. Both are susceptible to (rejection in favor of) political indoctrination and manipulation.
IMO, it's distinct from something like New Math. We want readers to be able to read/comprehend Shakespeare, Dumas, Wolfe, Lincoln, Payne, or Jane Austin at a roughly similar, adult level. Not everybody can/will attain that level, but for a general awareness of civilization and reality, it should be attainable (whether by whole language explicitly first, phonics implicitly second, or vice versa). Whereas nowhere near everyone needs to, or even can, understand set theory in order to stay abreast on how to put and keep Sputnik in orbit.
“‘Oh, look!’ said Jane. ‘See it go! See it go up!’ said Dick.” with all the barely-literate kids during the week.
Fun With Dick and Jane is whole language, not phonics. It is short repetitive phrasing coupled with pictures of the actions described in the sentences.
My first-grade teacher in 1959-1960 taught phonics from Dick and Jane. She was an old lady and wasn't going to let the idiots on the school board switching the books stop her from using the instructional methods she knew worked. It worked well for me - I was reading 7th grade level books at home by 2nd grade - except for getting bored as the teachers kept hammering on lessons long after I had mastered them.
I recall some kids were struggling, but they may have been struggling no matter the teaching method. It's also possible that what they needed was either instruction in their native languages (including Navajo, Hopi, Spanish, and maybe Ebonics) or instruction aimed at getting them up to par in English before beginning to teach them to read English, but it's rather impractical to hire teachers speaking four or five languages for a class of under 30.
When I was in first grade back in the stone age, reading books like Dick and Jane were used in addition to instruction in phonics, not instead of.
Children don't need to read and write or do numbers cause that isn't in their drug mule job description.
Put them to work in the mines. Maintaining them until they die will cost less than the machines they can replace.
"...a well-grown, fat, yearling child,...roasted whole will make a considerable figure at a lord mayor's feast or any other public entertainment."
concerns that the rules limit teacher autonomy.
Why do teachers need any more autonomy than the cashier at a McDonald’s drive through? They can decide on what they wear and they can teach what they are told to teach, the way they are told to teach it. Or they can fuck off.
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18000 to $21000. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26000 in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job by.
Just Open This Website……………..>>> http://www.works75.com
The "Balanced Literacy" hoax allows teachers to teach children they have given up on to simulate reading well enough for them to make a temporarily plausible claim that they have been taught to read. Teachers who truly believe that minority students are too stupid to actually become literate don't want to put in the work to teach real reading. They see it as a waste of effort. They know that white, middle class kids will learn to read anyway with much help from teachers.
But how can they embed CRT/DEI in evidence based reading curricula?
"Since 2020, 18 states and the District of Columbia have passed laws or implemented policies around science-based reading instruction."
Nonsense! Chemjeff was telling me as recently as this morning that Teachers are the experts who should be trusted to choose the method of instruction for their charges, without micromanagement. That it took 5+ years of effort from an activist journalist and in some cases legislation to get them to "follow the science" would significantly undermine his argument.
I suppose I should clarify here, before someone jumps in trying to show me that "conservaturds" and religious nutballs have also made stupid decisions about the education of children.
Understand that I agree. We are all fallible humans and we often make mistakes, letting our pride and bias lead us down the wrong paths. The main difference is that I understand- and the story above, and 3 years of COVID policy reinforces- that the "experts" are included in that long list of fallible humans.
The "experts" just wasted decades teaching kids reading that largely did not work. And for years they resisted efforts to change it, to the point that administrators need to make rules and legislators have to outlaw it.
Likewise teachers are pushing the 1619 Project in schools- despite very serious problems with its scholarship. And teachers are pushing CRT-derived lessons on race, that fly in the face of pretty much all moral, ethical, and historical teaching prior to ~2015. And they are pushing gender-queer teachings that say biologically untrue shit like "some red kangaroos have pockets" and "male deer spend part of the year as females". And yes, there have been teachers who push shit like Abstinence Only or Intelligent Design theories which are also not supported by data. That proves my point.
If you are looking for a benevolent and wise 3rd party to be the arbiter of what is valid academic material, then I'm sorry to tell you that you are on an impossible mission. If they exist, they are nowhere near our education system.
Since we cannot rely on our "experts" to make the right call, we must instead leave the decision of what makes a "correct education" to the parents. I would love a world where parents are given maximum latitude to execute their will, but we do not live in that world. Instead parents have to fight it out in the classroom, school, school board, district and ultimately the state or nation.
It sucks that exercising their right to direct the content of their kids' education means a democratic, "majority rules" system. But that isn't the parent's fault. And they have every right to use the redress available in our democratic system to push for change. And if a majority of parents feel their kids should be taught phonics, then in this zero sum system, that is what will happen, because that is how statists built it.
Abstinence Only or Intelligent Design theories which are also not supported by data.
Yes, and they were mocked, derided and redirected by the educational establishment.
When are we going to start firing teachers who say "sex assigned-at-birth"?
And they have every right to use the redress available in our democratic system to push for change.
I will admit to being petty, but I checked the party affiliation, profession, and statements made by local school board candidates so I would not vote for anyone pushing CRT or other things I find abhorrent.
I don't even have kids in school, but this is one of the few places people's votes count. Local elections where it's tens of thousands of possible voters vs national where you're one of a hundred million, or whatever. I wish more folks would pay attention down ballot and local.
I dont find it odd, but want to point out Jeff not involving himself in this thread. He only cares about student sexual grooming and transing. Yet earlier he was telling you he wanted truth and science taught.
It is noteworthy none of the usual suspects are here.
One million dead - killed by covid vaccination - proves that science is nothing but an anti-libertarian scam created by cheese eating wine guzzling elitist's out to destroy the working class and create a communist government with them at the controls.
Donald Trump and the true logic of Christianity are America's only hope against the Satanism of science.
My Mom taught all five of her kids to read before Kindergarten. By First Grade I could read anything they put in front of me. She also said that there is no job more important than raising your children. May she rest in peace.
Check out Jordan Peterson over here.
Same here. I was reading at age four. My son was also. Any literate parent can teach a child to read in a fraction of the time the educrats spend failing at the task.
When we lived in Pasadena, we explored several private schools before kid #3 convinced us it wasn't worth the cost. One of the more rigorous private school teachers basically said, "I get all types of kids in pre-k. Some read, most don't. By kindergarten we still get some kids who can't read. But by the end of first grade, all our kids can read. All of them."
The point is that its nice when kids get a jump on education. But it won't make any difference in the long run if one learned to read 4 months younger than another. By the time they are 6, many of those differences are gone. And when they are in their twenties it is a rounding error. The important thing is setting good expectations and giving a shit about results.
One of the broodlings, young enough that he still told people his age with fingers, wanted to work with Dad in the garage. So I handed him a scrap piece of 2x4, some wood screws, and a screwdriver. Showed him how to drive the first one with the quintessential "Leftie loosie, rightie tightie.", which elicited an "OK. I got it." with an elbow-reach for the screwdriver. So, I go about setting up my work and recall something unique to this specific broodling (given his age) and ask, "Do you know which hand is your left and which hand is your right?" He puts down the screwdriver, looks at both hands, and says, "No." Then picks up the screwdriver and proceeds to start the 4th screw in a line down the board. "OK, well, you've got the screwdriver in your right hand." and go back to my work. After about 20-30 min., he lined up, by sight, 8 screws and turned them all down by hand before deciding to go play.
Now, of course, all the boys know their left from right hands and can drive screws, but he's the one I can most confidently assign a home repair task to without needing to demonstrate or say, "Well, figure it out." as a follow up.
This memory makes me chuckle every time I see the recent spate of (hopefully, oddly, Mother's Day-oriented) Home Depot commercials saying "Give a girl a power tool and she'll grow into an empowered woman." Sure, give a girl a power tool, but boys OTOH, you need to keep your own power tools out of reach *and* make sure they know how to avoid cutting their own fingers off.
New York City Public Schools Will Now Be Required To Actually Teach Kids To Read
Education officials unveiled new rules on Tuesday which will mandate that city elementary schools use one of three "research-backed" reading curricula.
Interfering with academic freedom again, eh?
Question for the group: if a set of reading curricula falls outside of the ‘research-backed’ criterion, would that amount to a “ban” on that curricula?
Discuss.
They law says that if the school can show that another method is working, they're OK.
How much pushback is there from the teachers union. They don't like their members to be held to account.
Has anyone checked with AOC?
Have we declared this fascism yet?
I believe this what our credentialist calls micromanaging.
Research shows that kids achieve the best educational outcomes when their parents are actively involved in their education. And there's not better way to make sure the parents are involved than to start charging tuition.
"And while the pandemic was largely to blame for the drop in national reading scores, the city's low scores have remained roughly consistent since 2003."
Is this what they mean by self-contradictory?
Maybe, but it does say national vs. city. Could make the difference. Perhaps the low city scores couldn't get any lower?
Make money online from home extra cash more than $18000 to $21000. Start getting paid every month Thousands Dollars online. I have received $26000 in this month by just working online from home in my part time. every person easily do this job by.
Just Open This Website……………..>>> http://www.works75.com
Commie-Education.
Where only Gov-Guns can teach children.. /s
"Education officials unveiled new rules on Tuesday which will mandate that city elementary schools use one of three "research-backed" reading curricula."
"Research-backed" like, did they pass the 1st grade test? This is not rocket surgery, folks.
There were and are standards of 'grade-level' reading and math; in SF, they are commonly ignored and the student is 'advanced' to the next grade to end up 'graduating' as mostly illiterate.
In the '60s, I was asked to accompany an employee to the bank to witness his "X" as a signature, but he grew up on a tobacco farm with no school in sight.
There is no excuse for what the teachers' unions have done to the gov't school system.
Sounds good on paper. Now where are you going find teachers in NYC that know how to teach science based education to kids who don't have two parents much less two books in the home and are told from birth they cannot succeed by reading writing and arithmetic because white supremacy will prevent that from happening?
Now where are you going find teachers in NYC that know how to
teach science based education to kids who don’t have two parents much less two books in the home and are told from birth they cannot succeed by reading writing and arithmetic because white supremacy will prevent that from happeningread?Fixed it.
Listen to me: it's too freakin' late! If a child is not reading at grade level by the third grade, they are NEVER going to catch up without SIGNIFICANT remedial efforts. Not "OK, see you back here tomorrow" but "take this home, read it tonight, there will be a test tomorrow, and that's how it's going to be ALL YEAR."
Then accompany that with intense drills, assistance with phonics, vocabulary lessons, and articulation lessons (you can't do phonics if you can't pronounce the language correctly - dump the ebonics, dump the drawl, dump the regional accents, dump the slang murder of the language).
No NOOkular; make sure the soft vowel sounds are clearly understood - that's how phonics works. It's based largely on the premise that you KNOW the word, because you've heard it. So you need to use phonics to say it out loud so that your ears make the connection between the written word and the word's sound.
This problem needs to be dealt with NOW, with the energy level of: "your hair's on fire, and you need to run fast enough to blow it out." Trust our politicians to have that urgency? Yeah - me neither.
you can’t do phonics if you can’t pronounce the language
That’s right. The connection between spoken words and written words makes no sense if you don’t know how to speak properly. That’s part of the reason teachers despair of teaching real reading to the often nearly-feral first graders they have to teach in debased communities. If they can just barely talk, you have to fix that before you can begin on reading.
Fucking Libertarians want the nanny state to do everything for them.
Whahhhhh. Whahhhh.
Force children to read.
Whahhh Whahhhhh... Protect me from economic competition from immigrants...
Whahhhhh Whahhhhh Government is making it harder for businessmen from sending more American Jobs to low wage countries.
Damn Libertarian anti-American Fascists..
Wow - what dictionary did you look up the word "Libertarian" in? If there's a single anecdotal statement that epitomizes Libertarianism, it's "That government is best that governs least."
This story is yet another case for universal school choice.
My wife is now a retired public high school English teacher. She also taught grad school teacher students at SDSU.
Years ago, when our son was starting public school, the new rage was "Whole Language." It was being UNVERSALILY taught in all CA public schools. "One size fits all" was the usualy pubic school thinking.
My wife QUICKLY realized that "whole language" teaching wasn't working for our lad.
Fortunatety we had enough money to pay to send him to an inexpensive Catholic school, where "phonics" was still being taught. That worked FAR better.
We had a CHOICE. Too many others did not. And still do not.
With two sons with two very different educational needs, from grades 1-12 we used three Catholic schools, one special needs private school, one posh private school and several public schools -- in each case, seeking what was best for each of our sons.
It worked!
The hazard with choice is that ignorant, illiterate parents will be loath to subject their children to the strong intervention needed to bring them up to civilized standards. They'll look for a program that accepts their dumb kids as they are and caters to them.
Spiritual Solutions | Puja Samagri | Pooja Products
I think it can be actually beneficial for students, and in that case, the need for tutors may be reduced. Even though there's a wide range of sources and useful blogs on the internet, and I've been checking Promova to learn more about Verbs in English, I think working with teachers is a more effective way to absorb the information.