Former Arizona AG Found No Evidence of 2020 Election Fraud. He Kept Quiet.
Mark Brnovich left office without issuing a final report, according to documents released by his successor.

Former Republican Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich declined to publish investigative findings by his office that disproved 2020 election fraud claims, according to documents released February 22 by his Democratic successor, Attorney General Kris Mayes.
Mayes, who assumed office in January, released three documents: a previously unreleased "interim findings summary," a draft with staff comments of a published "interim report," and a September memo summarizing the investigation's conclusions. Brnovich's team did not draft a final report, a Mayes spokesperson told The Washington Post.
According to the memo written by Reginald Grigsby, a senior agent in the Arizona attorney general's office, Brnovich's investigators assessed 638 complaints, opened 438 investigations, and as of September 2022, submitted 22 cases for prosecution. Though his team identified supposed structural and operational flaws in the state's election procedures (outlined in the interim report), its unpublished findings debunked each theory that alleged significant—let alone potentially outcome-shifting—election-fraud theories tied to the state's 2020 presidential election.
"Agents and support staff have spent more than 10,000 hours investigating allegations of voting irregularities and reviewing alleged instances of illegal voting submitted to our office by private parties.…In each instance and in each matter, [Cyber Ninjas Incorporated, True the Vote (TTV), Verity Vote, and elected officials] did not provide any evidence to support their allegations," reads the memo. "The information that was provided was speculative in many instances and when investigated by our agents and support staff, was found to be inaccurate."
State lawmakers who had publicly alleged fraud recanted when questioned by investigators. "In interviews with the various media outlets, Arizona State Senator Sonny Borrelli alleged there was a cover-up with regards to election irregularities," reads Grigsby's memo, which also adds that "In an interview with agents, he did not repeat that allegation." Similarly, the memo says, then State Representative Mark Finchem publicly alleged more than 30,000 fraudulent votes. Speaking to Brnovich's office, however, Finchem said "he did not have any evidence of fraud and he did not wish to take up our (investigators') time."
The memo also targets supposed proofs of fraud supplied by private entities Cyber Ninjas and TTV (the latter's "evidence" was central to Dinesh D'Souza's debunked documentary, 2000 Mules). "Our comprehensive review of CNI's audit showed they did not provide any evidence to support their allegations of widespread fraud or ballot manipulation," the memo reports. "Based upon our review of CNI's audit, we identified 1 instance of deceased voting, which was not prosecuted as it was accidental. There were 2 instances of double voting that were submitted for prosecution." Instead, Cyber Ninjas' allegations relied on inaccurate databases, fabulist interpretations of routine events, and baseless accusations, Brnovich's office found.
TTV simply declined repeatedly to provide to investigators its purportedly conclusive evidence of fraud—despite myriad promises to do so. Further, at various intervals, TTV asserted that it had already disclosed the evidence to Brnovich's team or to the FBI, claims Grigsby disputes. "TTV says they gave the information to the FBI's Phoenix office, while also saying they were informants for the FBI office," he wrote.
Having never provided the information to us as promised, TTV said we should contact the FBI to obtain copies of the information they had provided to them. Checking with the Phoenix FBI office, they tell us they met with TTV but they never received any such information from TTV. TTV also reported giving the information to the San Antonio office of the FBI; we have not been able to verify this assertion. The Phoenix office says (TTV representatives) Ms. (Catherine) Engelbrecht and Mr. (Gregg) Phillips are not informants for the FBI; they also said they were told by both of them they had provided the information to our office. This is patently false.
Here is Grigsby's account of investigators' attempts to obtain that evidence:

Immediately after Election Day, 2020, Brnovich forcefully and publicly rejected allegations of election fraud. "It does appear that Joe Biden will win Arizona," he told Fox Business host Neil Cavuto in an interview on November 11, 2020. "There is no evidence, there are no facts that would lead anyone to believe that the election results will change."
Arizona Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbes has advocated an ethics investigation into Brnovich's conduct, The Post reported Saturday.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"The information that was provided was speculative in many instances and when investigated by our agents and support staff, was found to be inaccurate."
Signatures, where they existed, matched-ish.
I'm more inclined to believe that the current online-gentsia wouldn't know how to make a persuasive case to save their lives.
Snark and handwaving doesn't hold up in court.
The argument that no convictions means no fraud is an idiotic assertion. Sorry. Just look at the evidence presented at trial and the ruling focusing on intention being the reason for the ruling.
Home earnings allow all people to paint on-line and acquire weekly bills to financial institutions. Earn over $500 each day and get payouts each week instantly to account for financial institutions. (bwj-03) My remaining month of earnings was $30,390 and all I do is paint for as much as four hours an afternoon on my computer. Easy paintings and constant earnings are exquisite with this job.
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
People who don't understand math, psychology, or history and still have blind faith in the most corrupt humans who have ever existed aren't persuade-able.
They weren't even close to matching. The pictures posted to the state legislature as a visual were laughable. Of course the new Dem AG and SoS are now threatening anyone who posts the signature matching presented during a public meeting.
King snowflake, back again with bullshit.
Keep trying. I'm sure if you guys lie enough then maybe more rubes will believe your crackpot theories.
What was the bullshit? Your feels being interrupted?
Quit sockpuppeting Tony, and either explain how pointing out fraud is being a “snowflake” or fuck off.
Do you even know what calling someone a snowflake means?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
No, no he doesn’t.
Nobody is "pointing out" fraud, they're just endlessly repeating claims that either have no evidence or have been positively confirmed as false. I've heard a lot of outrageous claims, but none of them have been proved. People with plenty of resources and every incentive to find evidence of large scale fraud have repeatedly failed to do so. When people systematically search for something and utterly fail to find it, a reasonable person can't help but suspect that it's just not there to be found.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/31/politics/fact-check-kari-lake-140k-fraudulent-ballots/index.html
Just an excerpt. There's more on why Kari Lake is spouting "that which is not so":
"The problem is that We the People AZ Alliance put the signatures through a narrower verification process than the one Maricopa County itself uses. The county doesn’t only compare a voter’s signature on their new ballot envelope to the voter’s signature on their registration form. It also compares the signature on the new envelope to the voter’s signatures on other election documents that outside groups like We the People AZ Alliance don’t have."
Wow, you went all out on a full-fledged leftist fact check there, Mike.
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/facts-first-cnn-media-bias
The review found that the page fact-checked right-wing leaders and claims far more than those from the left. Furthermore, it sometimes failed to provide sources for claims, such as when it said Rep. Lauren Boebert was “known for her outspoken right-wing views” without providing a source — an example of an unsubstantiated claim. While Boebert may be well-known for having outspoken right-leaning views, without a source, readers must take the author’s word on that description.
Oh fuck, a CNN "factcheck". That's bound to be legit.
Signatures, where they existed, matched-ish.
Where they didn't, we assumed they identified as matching.
Nothing to see here.
D’Souza was “debunked” by the same people that debunked alleged spying on Trump, and the racist nut bag “Lab Leak” Theory, and other misinformation
Let me know when it is revealed that he lied to a court to ovtain a warrant to spy on a political canpaign.
Usually when one does a "whatabout" one tries to keep it in the same general sphere of human activity.
Whatabout?
What about what?
This is about the people who lied about russiagate lying about elections. They lied about covid origins as well.
Brainlet, every single 'conspiracy theory' they wax rhapsodic upon is proven to be no theory at all, but rather what they actually did.
This 'report' is just one more admission that Joe Biden did not win the election.
Crooked activity to benefit Democrats is called democracy. Get with the program.
I get paid more than $140 to $170 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.…………>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
Don't see something, don't say something.
Only in Reason's world are 22 prosecution recommendations considered "no evidence of election fraud".
Maybe if we switch to "illegal voting activity", there might be a small amount of a slight hint of the faint suspicion of something happening?
I love how 2022 elections in AZ do not qualify as dirty or illegal.
Well the "right" person won so there couldn't be anything wrong.
Hey Damiksec, damiskec, and damikesc, and ALL of your other socks…
How is your totalitarian scheme to FORCE people to buy Reason magazines coming along?
Free speech (freedom from “Cancel Culture”) comes from Facebook, Twitter, Tik-Tok, and Google, right? THAT is why we need to pass laws to severely constrict these DANGEROUS companies (which, ugh!, the BASTARDS, put profits above people!)!!! We must pass new laws to retract “Section 230” and FORCE the evil corporations to provide us all (EXCEPT for my political enemies, of course!) with a “UBIFS”, a Universal Basic Income of Free Speech!
So leftist “false flag” commenters will inundate Reason-dot-com with shitloads of PROTECTED racist comments, and then pissed-off readers and advertisers and buyers (of Reason magazine) will all BOYCOTT Reason! And right-wing idiots like Damikesc will then FORCE people to support Reason, so as to nullify the attempts at boycotts! THAT is your ultimate authoritarian “fix” here!!!
“Now, to “protect” Reason from this meddling here, are we going to REQUIRE readers and advertisers to support Reason, to protect Reason from boycotts?”
Yup. Basically. Sounds rough. (Quote damikesc)
(Etc.)
See https://reason.com/2020/06/24/the-new-censors/
(And Asshole Extraordinaire will NEVER take back its' totalitarian bullshit!!!! 'Cause Asshole Extraordinaire is already PERFECT in every way!!!)
This (above damikesc quote) is a gem of the damnedest dumbness of damikesc! Like MANY “perfect in their own minds” asshole authoritarians around here, he will NEVER take back ANY of the stupidest and most evil things that he has written! I have more of those on file… I deploy them to warn other readers to NOT bother to try and reason with the most utterly unreasonable of the nit-wit twits here!
Fuck off, Shillsy. Salon is missing you.
Like MANY “perfect in their own minds” asshole authoritarians around here, Reich's-Wing Mammary-Fuhrer blames ANYONE and EVERYONE except Her Perfect Self!
You do realize that ML is a "he", not a "she", nutter?
Sqrlsy was never big on sexual dimorphism, which is fair because I'm pretty sure that he was conceived via sodomy.
That would fit as Sqrlsy is a shit.
I love it, too. It's nice to know that elections in this country aren't as fraudulent as some people want everyone to believe they are.
I love when you pop your head into a conversation you've done no leg work on.
Maricopa County admitted to election failure in 2022. They literally argued mistakes were made but not intentionally, which arizona law requires. You take this and run with no fraud or mistakes were made, nothing to see here.
Cook County thanks you for your support.
You literally spent the entire four years of the Trump administration screaming about Russian fraud, Mike. Who are you trying to kid?
Only in nitpicking-Reason-in-the-comment-section world is a prosecution recommendation evidence, rather than evidence being what would be presented in the prosecution.
Mike, it helps to understand what arizona election law is before looking like a leftist idiot.
Under no cirmcumstance will he not look like a leftist idiot.
No one is claiming that fraud is utterly non-existent. What the reality-based community is claiming is that there is no evidence for the kind of organized, large scale fraud that could "steal" elections.
A lack of evidence is proof of a conspiracy. Don't you know anything?
Don't Ask, Don't Tell
I don't care how you got into the military. That's between you and Clinton.
This is about elections. I was of course talking about Santos.
Sure it is. 😉
The evidence was presented in court dumbass. At least try to understand the basics before stating something idiotic. Judge relied on intention to dismiss the findings. As if someone would email they intentionally committed fraud.
"At least try to understand the basics before stating something idiotic."
Sarcasmic has a history of deliberately not doing that.
Hunter emailed about his fraud
Yes, and the "evidence" was routinely laughed out of court because it was garbage. And then there were all the cases dropped by the plaintiff before they went to trial, probably because their lawyers explained to them that lying on Twitter only makes you an asshole, but lying in court makes you a felon.
Hey, the Democrat elected in THIS questionable election wants everyone to know that the Democrats elected in the last questionable election did not get there because Democrats committed vote fraud.
So everything's fine. Just fine.
>>Dinesh D'Souza's debunked documentary
didn't Robby "debunk" the fact-checkers just yesterday?
Plus, the site cited, The Dispatch is a neocon news site.
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/dispatch-media-bias
The Dispatch is a right-leaning digital media company offering original reporting and commentary on conservative news and politics through podcasts, newsletters and articles. It was co-founded in 2019 by conservative journalists Stephen Hayes and Jonah Goldberg, a former National Review editor.
In this case, "center-right" is really "neocon" and "never-Trumper". Note the founders.
In November 2021, Jonah Goldberg and Stephen Hayes quit contributing to Fox News (Right bias) to protest Tucker Carlson's January 6th documentary, which they called "a collection of incoherent conspiracy-mongering, riddled with factual inaccuracies, half-truths, deceptive imagery, and damning omissions." An article in The Daily Wire (Right bias) called the Dispatch founders "never-Trumpers."
>>conservative journalists Stephen Hayes and Jonah Goldberg
the grandeur delusions have been entirely more entertaining than their actual works.
On a completely different topic (the Chinese lab leak theory), but, hey, what's a little equivocation among friends.
sure. the operative word was in quotes ...
Did facts evolve?
Well sure, but this Trump related in some capacity. That is reason enough to take anything said about him at face value no matter the source.
Frankly, journalists need to take a remediation course on the difference between "debunked" and "disputed" and the difference between "no evidence" and "no definitive proof."
One can have evidence without definitive proof (e.g. circumstantial evidence is still evidence). The Trump team and his supporters have assembled a lot of circumstantial evidence of fraud, but it's not at the "beyond reasonable doubt" threshold. I say all this because the media vastly ignored what evidence that did exist of fraud (sufficient or insufficient as it may have been) to write that Trump/his team made "evidence-free claims" of election fraud. The media also broadly ignored the fact that, in many cases, evidence was not allowed to be presented and complaints were dismissed on the premise that they lacked standing, rather than because the evidence they had was simply insufficient.
There is plenty of evidence provided in the court records. There is none actionable based on current laws to target for prosecution as the Arizona laws requires a willful act. Ie a smoking gun for intentionality. Courts showed 300k ballots violating chain of custody. This is not a chargeable offense unless done intentionally, but violation of Arizona election laws. 25k votes posted by the SoS office still not accounted for. No emails or statements stating who posted or found the votes, no charges. Signature matching beyond laughable, but sig verification flaws not a chargeable offense.
Because nobody is charged, idiots claim no fraud. It is one of the dumbest assertions made and continue to be made by the cleanest election ever narrative pushers. This evidence is in the court records. It was accepted by the courts. The judge ruled on intentionality. Reason uses this as proof of no fraud when it simply admits no evidence of fraud being done intentionally.
So tiresome.
So, the election was somehow magically stolen by unintentional fraud? Trying to follow your logic makes my brain hurt.
Former Republican Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich declined to publish investigative findings by his office that disproved 2020 election fraud claims
Well, have you ever had Donald Trump calling you "Erin Brnovich" on TRUTH Social? It wouldn't be fun.
Was that while he was prosecuting the BackPage guys with his wife as the presiding judge, refusing to recuse herself, or for some other reason?
I don't do Truth Social.
No, I was just assuming what sarcastic nickname Trump would have come up with for Brnovich if he had published the reports.
Why don't you go there and ask Trump himself?
The Meeting of the Right Rightist Minds will now come to Odor!
Years ago by now, Our Dear Leader announced to us, that He may commit murder in broad daylight, and we shall still support Him! So He Has Commanded, and So Must it be Done!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/24/donald-trump-says-he-could-shoot-somebody-and-still-not-lose-voters
And now, oh ye Faithful of the Republican Church, It Has Become Known Unto us, that it is also in His Power and Privilege Ass Well, to murder the USA Constitution in broad daylight. Thus He Has Spoken, and Thus Must It Be Done! Thou shalt Render Unto Trump, and simply REND the USA Constitution, and wipe thine wise asses with it! Do NOT render unto some moldering old scrap of bathroom tissue! Lest we be called fools, or worse!
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html
Proud Boys, STAND with TRUMP, and stand by! And if ye don’t agree 110%, then we don’t need you polluting our world, because all who disagree with us in ANY way are LEFTISTS!!!
There, I think that’s a wrap! I’ve covered it ALL! You can take the rest of the day off.
(You’re welcome!)
Of course not- wouldn't want the idiots (a good portion who are commenting here) thinking that this is all the absolute bullshit it is.
God the amount of dumbasses who still believe this shit is astounding. GTFO it, you lost. JFC- move on already and stop hanging on to all this bullshit. Maybe your life will improve if you actually focus on the things that are real.
Unless the ultimate goal is to shove responsibility of everything going wrong in your life on made up bullshit like this.
Your feels are all that matter. Ignore the evidence presented at trial. It goes against your feels which is what ultimately matters.
"GTFO it, you lost. JFC- move on already and stop hanging on to all this bullshit."
Pretty gutsy coming from a guy who spent six years shitting his pants over the 2016 election and peddling the Trump/Russia hoax.
Remember #NOTMYPRESIDENT? Everyone else sure as hell does, you fucking hypocrite.
Maybe you could write slogans for ISIS.
So beyond stupid. There was no evidence under existing law is meaningless when you have a system that allows millions to dump ballots into garbage cans. Same type result happened in Alabama, 1830, i.e. '...using existing law, we found no evidence of discrimination against Negroes...'
"No evidence because we got rid of it" isn't as compelling an argument as McGarry and our fifty-centers seem to think.
Is this what you are alluding to?
https://www.cnn.com/factsfirst/politics/factcheck_f36b70fe-486e-4c95-9382-e9ca326972b1
Dude, that’s CNN. You can only trust sources affiliated with FOX News, Alex Jones, and the Republican party. Everyone else is lying.
Besides, no evidence is proof that evidence was hidden.
One false statement means all statements made are false.
The idiocy of you two is mind-boggling.
"mind-boggling idiocy"
I've gotten used to it. It's become predictable really.
What actually still amazes me on occasion is the scale of their dishonesty.
Speaking of mind-boggling idiocy...
Now, here’s where the cognitive dissonance is going to be rough:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64806903
“FBI chief Christopher Wray says China lab leak most likely”
FBI bad … no, FBI good … no FBI bad …
^ fed
The FBI can admit to the truth and still be corrupt and compromised, Mike. Can't wrap your head around that, can you?
True heroes to repeat what had been denied for years. There's no way they would do anything wrong or be biased because one time in a TV interview, the director agreed with the people that had been right all along.
Hunter Biden art does concern me, to be clear about it. However, this is an opportune time to call attention to the hyper-partisans, who will “refute” what you say, by pointing out that your source is “from the wrong tribe”!
Leftist media bias by Vox is a fib sometimes! Hunter Biden art…
https://www.vox.com/2021/8/3/22601671/hunter-biden-art-sales-walter-shaub “Why Obama’s former ethics czar is highly critical of Hunter Biden’s lucrative art sales … There have been many bad-faith “scandals” linked to the president’s son. Walter Shaub thinks this one should be taken seriously.
I wonder if the Trumpaloos will now show up to say that Vox is liberally biased, and can't be trusted? This here “Vox” article MUST mean that Hunter Biden is a GREAT artist, and there are NO opportunities for corruption, here!
https://www.allsides.com/news-source/vox-news-media-bias
“VOX” rated as far-left as is allowed… The needle is pegged!
PROOF, then, that Hunter Biden art is of NO concern to stalwart conservatives and Trumpaloos! (Since Vox always lies, of course).
Now, here’s where the cognitive dissonance is going to be rough:
Yes.
For you.
Lab leak conspiracy theory
Lab leak real
We were never the ones promulgating a lie. So what the FBI says is irrelevant to us
But they just undermined YOUR lies.
This might be the most disingenuous thing you’ve ever posted.
Well you got us there Sarc. After all, it's not like CNN would ever do something unethical like cover up the crimes of a governor who happens to be related to one of their hosts. They certainly would never do that.
Nor would they ever do something like, oh I don't, manipulate footage of a certain orange president to make it look like he was feeding koi fish incorrectly.
Oh, by the way, I just heard about this racist school called Covington Catholic were the kids attacked a Native American Vietnam veteran. He was peaceful protecting black Jews against the kid who was standing there, menacingly.
The journalist class has somehow convinced themselves that the average person is horrified and offended by the very notion of distrusting an election process/outcome.
They think that beating this drum will convince large swaths of borderline voters to support Democrats out of sheer outrage about "election deniers". This will of course all reverse once Democrats lose a fishy election.
Hell it wont even have to be a fishy election. See "trump russia!" for 4 years wholly made up out of nothing.
As soon as a high profile Dem loss happens we're back to election deniers are the #Resistance!
I will give another example of the idiocy claims and inferences of this article.
Both video and witnesses were submitting of people dumping dozens of ballots into boxes in Arizona. Ballot harvesting is illegal in Arizona. Law taken and upheld by the USSC. Because the AG could not identify who committed the dumps, no arrests were made.
The idiots here claim this clear violation of law never happened because nobody was charged.
Both video and witnesses were submitting of people dumping dozens of ballots into boxes in Arizona. Ballot harvesting is illegal in Arizona. Law taken and upheld by the USSC. Because the AG could not identify who committed the dumps, no arrests were made.
So the video and witnesses were good enough that you can categorically claim that dozens of ballots were dumped into boxes, but were not good enough to identify the people doing it. Riiiight.
So the video and witnesses were good enough that you can categorically claim that dozens of ballots were dumped into boxes, but were not good enough to identify the people doing it. Riiiight.
How stupid are you?
You can clearly see, on the video, people putting multiples envelopes into the boxes. But you cannot make out their faces well enough to identify them.
Likewise, someone seeing someone stuffing a drop box probably doesn't know who it is. But they can see that they're putting more than one envelope in.
Duh.
What the hell is wrong with you people? All kinds of irregularities were admitted to in court. The only reason Lake isn't governor is because those irregularities have to be coupled with intent and for some reason, the election officials who started an anti-Lake PAC are assumed to not have intended that all those 'mistakes' affect her.
Hey moron:
You can clearly see, on the video, people putting multiples envelopes into the boxes. But you cannot make out their faces well enough to identify them
And neither can you therefore make out exactly what they're putting in and what is happening to those boxes.
.
So, they just mistook the ballot box for a trash can?
You’re really trying to out stupid shrike, eh?
Wow. You actually thought that was a smart thing to say.
Sort of like the falling crime rate in San Francisco.
Lots of Millerite thinkers here still claiming fraud.
Lots of Stalinists here pretending otherwise.
Captain Renault found no evidence of gambling.
"...and as of September 2022, submitted 22 cases for prosecution."
So, they investigated voter fraud, are prosecuting 22 cases, but there was no fraud? What are they prosecuting?
No one is claiming fraud is non-existent. Those of us in the reality-based community are merely claiming that no one has so far shown one iota of evidence of the kind of systematic, large scale fraud that would be needed to "steal" elections. When people with generous resources and every incentive to find something repeatedly and systematically search for that something and fail to find it, it's hardly unreasonable to suspect that it's just not there to be found.
I am not particularly a fan of conspiracy theories, especially the "steal the vote" narrative, but I would like to point out that just because the Arizona AG failed to find evidence of massive fraud doesn't mean there wasn't any. The article says that they investigated complaints and that those complaints were inaccurate and without supporting evidence. The article also says that the AG referred a number of findings for prosecution, so there were at least several examples of actual fraud. And the elephant in the room is that there is overwhelming evidence of systematic voting system problems which, if localized to "red" voting districts certainly had the potential to swing the outcome of the election. So the "Reason" editorial narrative here is, once again, "Orange Man Bad" and ignoring serious non-partisan or actual intentional problems with the election system in Arizona.
The foxes assure us that the henhouse is secure.
"Agents and support staff have spent more than 10,000 hours investigating allegations of voting irregularities and reviewing alleged instances of illegal voting submitted to our office by private parties.…In each instance and in each matter, [Cyber Ninjas Incorporated, True the Vote (TTV), Verity Vote, and elected officials] did not provide any evidence to support their allegations," reads the memo. "The information that was provided was speculative in many instances and when investigated by our agents and support staff, was found to be inaccurate."
---------------------------------------------------
How do you spend 10000 hours and not show anything for the time and money ? Not a confirmation, not a denial ... just up and walked off without saying anything about it. That alone should be criminal misuse of funds.
When someone declines to release a document, maybe it's because they don't agree with it?
Not sure how that absolves him from doing his job and releasing it, anyway.
Article Summary; 22 cases of Election fraud were found and then a Democrat went in and said it was all "conspiracy theory".