Kansas Judge Blocks Law Banning Telemedicine Prescriptions for Medication Abortions
Last week, a Kansas judge halted the enforcement of a law requiring a doctor to be in the same room as a patient taking abortion pills—a move hailed by abortion advocates as an important step to increase medication abortion access in the state.

Last Wednesday, a district court judge in Kansas temporarily blocked a law that banned doctors in the state from prescribing abortion pills to patients using telemedicine. While the ruling is likely to be appealed, pro-choice advocates see the decision as a step forward in increasing access to abortion in a state where many women may live hours from the nearest clinic and where many abortion providers are inundated with out-of-state patients.
In 2019, Trust Women, a chain of abortion clinics that has a location in Wichita, filed a lawsuit seeking an injunction against two Kansas laws that banned doctors in the state from prescribing abortion pills to be taken at home and requiring that patients take the drugs at a treatment location with the prescribing physician present. In its lawsuit, the clinic argued that the state laws—the one mentioned above and another that removed protections for telemedicine abortions from an existing telemedicine law—violated women's right to obtain an abortion guaranteed by the state constitution. (A ballot measure intended to remove that protection from the constitution was rejected by voters in August.)
In their lawsuit, Trust Women argue that medication abortion is safer for pregnant patients than taking "Tylenol, penicillin, or Viagra." Taking the drugs without physician supervision is low risk. The clinic's suit says that the success rate for medication abortion is slightly higher among telemedicine patients than in-person ones. Increasing access to medication for abortion also reduces more dangerous procedures. As Trust Women wrote in an appellant brief, "telemedicine expands abortion access earlier in pregnancy when it is safer, thereby furthering public health and reducing second-trimester abortions."
The Kansas District Court in Shawnee County originally sided with the state and against the plaintiffs. However, the clinic appealed two of the Court's three decisions in the case to the Kansas Court of Appeals, which sided with the clinic and remanded the case back to the Shawnee County District Court. Last Wednesday, the District Court, in compliance with the Appeals court's ruling, granted the Trust Women's request for an injunction against a state law that required doctors to be in the same room as a patient taking abortion pills and reinstated the claims against the lawsuit's defendants. While the decision leaves abortion-related sections of a state telemedicine law intact, it nonetheless secures a crucial victory for medication abortion access in the state.
"Expanding access to abortion care through telemedicine is a critical component of addressing the health care needs of our region, especially in the face of the manufactured health care crisis caused by abortion bans in Texas and Oklahoma, and backed by the disastrous decision by the Supreme Court in Dobbs," Trust Women co-executive director Rebecca Tong said in a statement. "Access to telemedicine services for Kansans will go a long way to easing the strain on our reproductive health care systems in the state."
While this case's journey through the legal system is likely far from over, for now, Kansas women can more easily exercise their state right to an abortion.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sociopaths advocating irresponsibility and murder, there is no other way to describe such ghouls.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by cd04 doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply
COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE________ http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
Roe v wade was responsible for 50 years of murder and the loss of over 60 million helpless innocent US citizens lives.
Now that it’s gone, the courts have to decide if the right to life is inalienable for the helpless and innocent, or not.
As with RvW, mistakes will be made.
OMG.. Someone took a white pill... "Murder! Murder!".....
That day all sense of reality was lost.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
Google pays $100 per hour. My last paycheck was $3500 working 40 hours a week online. My younger brother’s friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 30 hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it was once.
For more details visit this article.. http://www.LiveJob247.com
"Sociopaths advocating irresponsibility and murder, there is no other way to describe such ghouls."
There are a lot of other ways. Hateful people would describe them your way.
should start these w/a paragraph about why celebrating death works so well for you
I have no problem with murdering and causing death to my fingernails and I'm pretty sure you don't either.
conception = distinct dna sorry dude ... not a fingernail
Organ transplants = distinct dna = not a person.... sorry dude. DNA is not a person.
Another meetings of Libertarians For Statist Womb Management And Big-Government Micromanagement Of Ladyparts Clinics is convened, sponsored by The Right-Wing Superstition Society.
Carry on, clingers. So far as your betters permit, and not a step beyond. You get to whimper about it as much as you want, but you will continue to comply with the preferences of better Americans. Thank you for your compliance, as always.
SCOTUS should've defended Individual Liberty.
Thank goodness some States will.
The Power-Hungry [WE] mob RULES narrative needs to stop.
Manage your own 'parts' not someone else's wife parts.
i.e. Mind UR own F'En business...
If you want 'unborn children' then *allow* 'unborn children' by Fetal Ejection.
If you cannot support ?baby? freedom
UR supporting Gov-Gun forced reproduction.
I made over $700 per day using my mobile in part time. I recently got my 5th paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now...................>>> onlinecareer1
I can call my doctor for any number of health issues and get a prescription. Even if the doctor needs more information, they can often order a test and send me to the laboratory. And if they need to see me, they often do that with a tele visit. In a day and age in which telemedicine is so common it seems silly to treat medical abortions differently. Abortion is a medical procedure and should be treated as such.
abortion is murder of an intelligent life form....you might have the freedom to do so but karma....life comes back at you..or whatever you call justice in the universe will eventually occur.
And a lot times the karma is nature itself murders your precious unicorn in someone else's body. Heck; protected sex is probably murdering some 'potential' life (as the term SCOTUS stupidly ruled).
Still haven’t learned how the whole process works, huh?
Rights are 'inherent' including the right to life.
It is incorrect to assume a right to life is an *entitlement* to someone else's body.
I can understand your beliefs but think that your efforts are not focused on best solution. Abortion has existed through history and will continue. The answer is not to make it illegal, but rather make it unnecessary. Good sexual education and easy access to contraceptives. Better prenatal care. Support for mother so economics is never the reason for an abortion. Abortions will never be completely eliminated but they could be reduced and in a more effective manner than just making them illegal.
Making abortions safe and legal has not made them less common.
Summation Point being Made --- The "ends" justify any "means".
There is no moral right to murder a child. Take accountability for your actions...sex whether you like to admit it or not is about procreation..evolution made it that way. So use birth control but if you find yourself with child, celebrate the creation of a sentient being in a cold dark cosmos.
What child?
Maybe you should take some accountability for your choice of words.
If you cannot support ?child? freedom (i.e. Fetal Ejection)
UR supporting Gov-Gun Forced Reproduction.
“Gov-Gun Forced Reproduction.”
Who is the government forcing to have sex?
You theory only works in fairy-tale land where a stork drops off children from the clouds.
"Still haven’t learned how the whole process works, huh?" -- Right back at ya.
My theory that sexual intercourse is part of reproduction is literally the opposite of thinking children come from storks.
I’m sorry your father never taught you about the birds and the bees, but you can still learn.
Here's what I was taught.
sexual intercourse (fertilization) -> human reproduction process (~8 months) -> birth -> baby exists.
Here's what you're selling...
sexual intercourse = baby exists.
I'm not buying such stupidity.
No that’s not what I’m selling. Try re-reading.
If you cannot support ?child? freedom (i.e. Fetal Ejection)
UR supporting Gov-Gun Forced Reproduction.
You, "Who is the government forcing to have sex?"
You tried to sell..........
Sex is exactly the same things as Reproduction
So.... I guess the law is once you start sex Gov-Guns must force you to keep having sex for 8-months? lol.. UR pretty funny.
Are you retarded?
"There is no moral right to murder a child."
No one is murdering a child. Literally. By the legal definition of both murder and child.
How about this: If it's not your body, nobody cares what you think and you don't get a say in what happens.
But then how will cultural conservatives force everyone else to stop rejecting yesterday’s values?
Freedom and liberty are only good when provided in a restrictive moral environment, dictated by traditionalists, and backed by government force.
Jeez. It’s like you don’t understand what liberty is, you Marxist baby murderer!
*For those of you nodding your head in agreement, this is sarcasm.
"yesterday’s values" for Republicans was Roe v Wade.
It's quite humorous to watch Republicans fight their own ruling and Democrats cheer it (sort-of) anyways.
Thank you
Stupid judges. Defending personal liberty and bodily autonomy.
Thanks you
https://12tchouf.com/%d8%ad%d8%a8%d9%88%d8%a8-%d9%81%d9%8a%d8%a7%d8%ac%d8%b1%d8%a7-viagra/