Maintaining the Student Loan Forgiveness Application Will Cost an Estimated $100 Million
This latest expense is yet more evidence that sweeping student loan forgiveness will end up doing considerable economic harm.

While the incredible costs of the Biden administration's federal student loan forgiveness plan are widely known, yet another expense of the program is stirring controversy: maintaining the online application for loan forgiveness is expected to cost nearly $100 million annually.
This latest expense—not included in the Congressional Budget Office's recent estimate of the program's cost to taxpayers—is yet more evidence that sweeping student loan forgiveness will end up doing considerable economic harm.
In August, President Joe Biden announced a sweeping federal student loan forgiveness plan. Under the proposal, most borrowers making under $125,000 annually and married couples making less than $250,000 would receive $10,000 each in loan forgiveness. For borrowers who received a Pell Grant, forgiveness is increased to $20,000.
The program stands to be wildly expensive, with recent estimates from the Congressional Budget Office predicting that its cost will be $400 billion. However, as the Biden administration gears up to formally release the online application for loan forgiveness, other large costs are also becoming clear. Documents submitted by the Education Department to the Office of Management and Budget show that the department estimates it will cost $99,900,000 per year to maintain the application and the program's associated communications through March 2024. According to the Department of Education, these costs are "related to development of website forms, servicer processing, borrower support, paper form processing and communications related to this effort."
While the current estimate for application maintenance and support is high, there is reason for concern that the cost will come to exceed that. For example, the ill-fated HealthCare.gov website was originally estimated to cost $93.7 million—yet it eventually grew to cost taxpayers over $2 billion. Considering that the Biden administration already appears to be lowballing the cost of student loan forgiveness, estimating that federal student loan forgiveness will only cost $240 billion over the next decade, there is reason to worry that it is underestimating the cost of maintaining its application website as well.
"You might think, well, why not just link federal student loan records with IRS data so that we have automatic income verification? Because that would essentially do the trick in terms of the Department of Education knowing who would be eligible," Beth Akers, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, tells Reason. However, Akers notes that "there is a legislative ban on the creation of what is called a unit records data system. The idea is that the Department of Education should be prohibited from following student borrowers' income across time which would be enabled by the creation of that data set. And I guess the motivation for that initially was privacy."
Akers says this problem could have been avoided if student loan forgiveness had been enacted through the legislative process rather than by executive fiat. "If our lawmakers in Congress had decided that this is something they wanted to do, it wouldn't have been unreasonable to think, at the same time, they would have lifted the ban even momentarily to allow for the processing of these cancellations," Akers explains.
The staggering price the Biden administration places on upkeep for the student loan forgiveness application is yet more evidence of the true, bloated nature of the policy. It should come as no surprise that student loan forgiveness will be riddled with extra costs—costs that will no doubt be pushed onto taxpayers.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good Kid Productions just dropped their latest. You need to watch this sort of now-ish. 14 minute video.
Covers the criminal issue surrounding the US's refusal to even consider repurposed drugs for COVID with a ton of bombshell info in this report. This is how you do COVID reporting. Take notice, Reason, you're being outdone at every possible angle.
How is that video still up? Isn't questioning ivermectin still verboten misinformation?
Everyone featured in the video was already banned, demonetized or fired when they needed to be banned, demonetized and fired.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a (ad-05) lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
What the heck is Good Kid Production?
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [res-32] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://workopportunity23.blogspot.com
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [res-22] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE........>>> OnlineCareer1
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a (ad-11) lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://googlejob26.blogspot.com
So, who cares about this? That's the cost in 2023 and 2024. The election will be past, so it won't matter at all.
I will gladly pay you on Tuesday,
for loan forgiveness today.
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this site.. http://www.Profit97.com
I wonder how much it costs to service a $31,000,000,000,000 debt?
5% interest for 30 years
Results:
Payment Every Month $166,414,703,133.76
Total of 360 Payments $59,909,293,128,154.59
Total Interest $28,909,293,128,154.59
While I support the ban on a monolithic Federal data system linking all the different departments and functions of government together, there is no possible objection to linking any two databases to make legitimate functions of government involving two different departments less expensive and more accurate as long as there is informed consent from the applicant for a specific purpose. In other words, the applicants for Student Loan Forgiveness could give specific consent to the IRS to share their income records with the Education Department for the limited purpose of verifying their income. Of course a key concept in that possibility is "legitimate functions!" Since neither federal student loans nor federal income taxes are "legitimate" ... well, never mind ...
It's cute that you think the consent would be either fully-informed or actually voluntary.
No business could possibly get away with what you're proposing without being sued into oblivion by privacy advocates and industry regulators. Companies get sued when the "coercion" is a couple dollars on a coupon card.
Since it is government, forcing applicants to consent as you propose would be a prohibited "requirement to surrender rights in exchange for discretionary benefits".
I can't wait for Reason's leading economics expert to appear in this thread and deploy a tactic from #DefendBidenAtAllCosts Category A: change the subject. He'll explain that this isn't worth discussing because of something Trump or Bush or Warren G. Harding did.
#LibertariansForBiden
Teapot Dome was just a giveaway to big oil, who are gouging is at the pumps right now!
We need to tax big oil out of existence so we can bring gas prices down!
Man, even the greatest thinking of these comment sections (Buttplug) couldn't explain what the fuck Teapot Dome was.
If anything shows how our attention span and collective political intelligence has dwindled, it's that Teapot Dome was a major scandal over several years and I think it would be incomprehensible to many modern audiences. We couldn't even explain Futures well enough for people to care about Hillary's pretty obvious fraud.
Just more wasted money following more wasted money that in the end no one will really care about. No problems will be solved. More problems will be created. Each side will yell and scream at each other. And nothing will change.
The national debt will definitely change.
Good point.
You worry about the 100M waste involved in running the program.
I'll worry about the 400B spent without Congressional approval, an impeachable offense.
But COVID!!!!
EMERGENCY!!!
And if it was 2 years ago, some clever lawyer could make the case that it was somehow related to the public health emergency.
It's not 2 years ago and some clever lawyer is trying to make that case that this is somehow related to the public health emergency. Or maybe not-so-clever. But that is the actual legal justification being used to bypass Congressional authority.
The problem with that is that the President declared the emergency is over, because being in the midst of a public health emergency during election season would be bad for his friends.
So we're simultaneously in a perpetual state of emergency AND everything is totally fine, it just depends on what the subject at hand is.
They officially extended the emergency.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/biden-administration-extends-covid-19-public-health-emergency
The Biden administration said Thursday that the COVID-19 public health emergency will continue through Jan. 11 as officials brace for a spike in cases this winter.
$100 MILLION??!!
For a web site?
Damn, I got out of IT too soon.
On the other hand, after the republicans repeal the executive order, then cancel the program, the cost will go to zero.
I could do it for 50 million, and have it finished faster than a bullet train.
I’ll do it for $40M if we can actually peg the completion date to that of the bullet train.
I want the $40M up front, though.
My computer program skills, amount to a few years of c++ in hs. Can I be hired on as a consultant for a mere 10 million, if i donate 10k to Biden?
Math is racist.
Try again to compute 10% of 10 million.
(Hint: It ain't 10K)
The rate is 10% . And that is just for the big guy. You won't make it in DC.
Dang, you could get it done THIS century.
It will never become reality. It's unconstitutional and the regime will abandon the vote buying stunt after November.
I do find it hilarious when Reason argues facts like costs, or the estimates of costs, on a story like this.
Doesn't matter if it's $100 million or $400 trillion, or just $400. It's a vote buying scheme. And one the president shouldn't be able to authorize without congressional approval. The arguments should largely be around constitutionality and/or possible recourse. Not about whether he spent more than he said he would.
It won't cost taxpayers anything if nobody raises their taxes.
How much extra did you throw in the pot?
Then it goes on the debt and costs future taxpayers.
^ Some people really believe this.
Most are just lying though.
Nobody raised my taxes recently but I am paying more taxes today due to inflation. Dumbass Tony speaks stupid crap as usual.
It's always the government's revenue that is the problem, not the way the government spends the money.
I may have discretely supported this if it included loans that have been consolidated, but it doesn’t. So fuck this shit.
I can't support anything which forces a 19 yr old forklift driver or a single mother working two fast food jobs to pay for someone else's college degree.
I believe you are providing the definition of Hell, i.e. complaining when someone else gets a benefit. In your world, no one gets jack be/c someone always complains, "what about me."
Libertarians don't believe in taking from one person to give to another. You want something? Go earn it.
There's a difference between theft and voluntary exchange.
Yet he pretends to be a principled libertarian.
Why do so many people complain about the cost of doing good things as if the short term cost is all that matters? Some people always see only the downside of what other people want to do, while believing that everything they want to do is sanctioned by God.
Why do so many people complain about the cost of doing good things
What an empty headed worldview. Someone has to pay for these "good things". I'd like to go out tonight on you, if you object you just hate other people getting things.
Ridiculously childish but indicative of how leftists believe in the Magic Government Fairy.
Please compost yourself alive. It's clearly your highest and best use.
Now now, don't complain about the cost of doing good things.
I am making $35 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $9,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website …http://www.workonline1.com
Gov't projects (many state and particularly federal) are "Gravy Trains". The reality is that everyone but most of the public knows this. Politicians always underestimate costs (in for a penny, in for a pound) and always overestimate benefits. In reality the general public who has to pay to build and maintain the projects almost always lose in the end.
...and the massive amount of ignorance it takes NOT to realize that the only 'tool' in 'governments' toolbox is a monopoly of Gun-Force.
"more evidence that" ... Gov-Gun theft [WE] criminals like to call 'sweeping student loan forgiveness' or just 'charity' ... "will end up doing considerable economic harm"
"What are you trying to say? That Gov-Gun toting criminals aren't positive effects on an economy? [WE] got 'ideas' how maximizing armed robbers will make every nation better.", every criminal-minded Democrat.