A Top-Ranked High School Got Rid of Merit-Based Admissions. Then Students' Grades Tanked.
Data show that students admitted by lottery to San Francisco's Lowell High School are academically faring much worse than their peers.
In 2020, one of the nation's best public high schools abruptly changed its admissions policy from merit-based to a lottery system. According to district data, when academic ability was no longer considered, the admitted students ended up with significantly worse grades—and the school tanked in national rankings.
San Francisco's Lowell High school has long been regarded as one of the best public high schools in the nation. Historically, admission to the school was gained through a complex, merit-based system, wherein most students were admitted based on middle school GPA and test scores. However, in 2020, San Francisco Board of Education members voted to temporarily make admissions into the school lottery-based for the 2021–22 school year, citing COVID-related barriers to grades and test scores, as well as diversity concerns. The school board then voted in February 2021 to make the admissions change permanent.
Following a contentious debate, the school board finally voted in June of this year to return to merit-based admissions for the foreseeable future. However, the decline in academic performance from Lowell's lottery-admitted freshman class shows the steep consequences of discarding academic ability in order to meet diversity goals.
Last May, the San Francisco Chronicle released data showing a dramatic decline in student academic performance among Lowell's ninth-graders—the only grade attending the school who had been admitted by lottery. Almost a quarter of Lowell ninth-graders received a D or F grade in fall 2021, a threefold increase from the 7.7 percent and 7.9 percent receiving such grades in 2019 and 2020, respectively.
The fact that "half of our student body new to in-person instruction at the high school level and absences among students/staff for COVID all explain this dip in performance," Joe Ryan Dominguez, Lowell's principal, told the Chronicle. "It is important not to insinuate a cause on such a sensitive topic at the risk of shaming our students and teachers who have worked very hard in a difficult year."
However, grades 10 through 12 at Lowell showed only mild declines in performance, indicating that the problem is much more pronounced among lottery admits. The Lowell, Lowell High School's student paper, conducted a survey that found that 77 percent of teachers "believe the freshmen class is performing worse academically compared to previous years." Unsurprisingly, students admitted based on chance are less likely to perform as well as classmates who gained admission based on merit.
"I have three times as many students as usual failing—instead of one or two, I have three to six. I have some students who have done no work the whole first grading period," Mark Wenning, a biology teacher at Lowell told The New Yorker. "I don't think some of these students would be doing well at any high school, which makes me wonder why they wanted to come to Lowell."
Under Lowell High School's merit-based admissions process, 70 percent of seats at the school are distributed based on applicants' middle school GPA and test scores. Fifteen percent of seats are distributed based on GPA, a minimum test score, and assessment by a committee from their middle school. The final 15 percent of seats is reserved for those attending "underrepresented" public and private middle schools. These students are admitted based on their GPA and statements from their school principals.
While this system consistently created a student body that gained acceptance to elite colleges and achieved top test scores, it also created one that was noticeably less diverse than other, less-selective high schools. According to the San Francisco Examiner, in 2019 more than 50 percent of the student population was Asian, 17 percent white, 12 percent Hispanic, and less than 2 percent black. In contrast, the San Francisco Unified School District as a whole is 35 percent Asian, 15 percent white, 27 percent Hispanic, and 7 percent black.
Attempts to adjust the merit-based system to gain more black and Hispanic students occurred as recently as 2018. But when the school board voted in October 2020 to switch to a lottery system, controversy erupted among families and students.
"I've been working very hard to get good grades to have a chance to get into Lowell," said one middle school student during an October 2020 school board meeting. "I feel like my rights are being violated."
"If your motivation is defined by an acceptance into a school, you clearly don't value education and learning," said Jessi Yu, Lowell's student body president, during the meeting. "I think this resolution is a huge stepping stone for achieving the equity that Lowell and SFUSD have been looking for."
When the school board voted to make the change permanent in February 2021, it cited the "ongoing, systemic racism at Lowell High School" as the primary motivation.
In addition to declining student grades, Lowell has also suffered in national high school rankings. In 2022, Lowell was ranked the 82nd best public high school by U.S. News and World Report (which publishes yearly rankings of U.S. high schools)—down 28 spots from 2019, and down 14 spots from 2020.
The decline in student performance at Lowell High School is a cautionary tale, showing what happens when merit is sacrificed in favor of diversity. Yes, diversity is good. But discarding merit and casting it as "elitist" allows public school leaders to avoid tackling hard questions about why merit-based systems—systems that judge individual achievement, not immutable characteristics—lead to low racial diversity at specialized high schools.
Rather than doing the hard work of examining how public schools fail poor and minority students, leaving them disproportionately ill-equipped to gain admission to selective high schools, education officials in San Francisco discard merit and disguise the much larger issue of the failure of government schools.
Merit-based admission to schools like Lowell High School has been highly successful at providing incredible opportunities to talented students regardless of their families' resources. While Lowell's return to merit should be celebrated, we should not soon forget the lessons taught by its decline under a lottery system.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Studying hard is racist!!!! Being data-driven is even MORE racist!!!
(Butt being the first to post, is THE most racist of ALL things!!!)
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this article… https://incomebuzz7.blogspot.com/
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a (ad-07) lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
You actually believe that, don't you?
How do you tell what the spastic asshole stating?
No shit. Kids who had lower grades in 8th grade will have lower grades in 9th grade.
It says nothing about the merits of the lottery system, however. The purpose of the high school is to maximize the learning of the kids who attend it. It's not to put all the straight A kids on the same list.
The real question is what happened to the kids who would otherwise have attended the school? And are the kids attending the school doing better than they would have elsewhere?
These are all very good questions, and very hard to answer, in a data-driven manner.
The only thing fairly clear in my mind is, if you ask these questions of the teacher's unions, they will give whatever answer(s) get them some more money and power!
Or make their job easier.
Its easy to teach motivated kids, much harder if all they want to do is play COD.
Not COD, Basketball.
The author didn’t address that less important issue. She addressed a bigger issue: “Discarding merit and … allows public school leaders to avoid tackling hard questions about why merit-based systems … lead to low racial diversity at specialized high schools. Rather than doing the hard work of examining how public schools fail poor and minority students … education officials in San Francisco discard merit and disguise the much larger issue of the failure of government schools.
In objective metrics/tests or whatnot to decide on placement in limited slots if you don't get the social outcomes you want, is the system "racist"? I recall Jesse Jackson saying Black kids did bad on the Math SAT because it was racist..why? He found one math problem that had yachts in the rate problem, and he said "black folks" don't know yachts are. Seriously he said this.
If you don't get the social outcomes you want, focus on raising your tribe up with education and better culture..don't lower standards. it isn't fair or equitable.
Also, what happened to the prospects and performance of the smarter kids who couldn't get in with the lottery system?
A lot of them post in the comments about money making opportunities.
Oh, so they're doing just fine, having made one hundred thousnd united states greenback dollars per week working part time from home.
LOL - not quite keyboard replacement funny, but funny enough.
The purpose of the high school is to maximize the learning of the kids who attend it.
Nope. It's a government school. Its purpose is to demoralize and destroy the children subjected to it.
-jcr
Talented students who are put in low performing classes figure out they don't have to put any effort in to get A's. They disengage and stop caring, at best. They learn less, and more importantly, they don't learn any study skills (because they don't need to study) or work ethic.
Placing talented students with other talented students in classes that will challenge them is important for their education.
There is actually a potentially interesting statistical issue here. Which is that the relationship between the input (merit-based admission) and the output (school test results) is not linear. Maybe it is Pareto-based (meaning that merit factors tend to compound and correlate with each other even if not measured) or something else.
Not that anyone will care about that because political narratives are what matter.
After leaving my previous job 12 months ago, i've had some good luck to learn about this website which was a life-saver for me.They offer jobs for which people can work online from their house. My latest paycheck after working for them for 4 months was for $4500.Amazing thing about is that the only thing required is simple typing skills and access to internet.
Read all about it here.........>>> OnlineCareer1
A political narrative is why they moved to a lottery system.
Not everyone is the same. Some kids are smarter than other kids.
Deal with it.
We also have to deal with this: The smarter students get bored out of their minds, trying to focus on learning stuff that is new FOR THEM, while wallowing in the mire of listening to "how to tie your shoes, 101"-type stuff.
A Top-Ranked High School Got Rid of Merit-Based Admissions. Then Students' Grades Tanked.
It's California. The California solution to this problem is to get rid of grades.
No, it's San Francisco. Which is not California. It's way the fuck worse.
And headed into the pandemic that shithole city had gone full progressive retard. Worse even than Berkley was historically (though that place somehow remains the worst of the worst).
What's really ironic about this whole thing regarding Lowell High School is that the race that was the most penalized, by far, were Chinese Americans. Chinese Americans made up more than 80% of Lowell students prior to the lottery system being implemented. How's that for diversity !!
Wow who could have seen this coming?
Why didn't they try renaming the school first? I'm sure this Lowell guy was a white supremacist, his name practically smacks of whitism, and here they have a school bragging on its supremicism.
Man these SF school board Karens are incompetent! Are they all white too, and identify as male? I wouldn't be surprised.
"In 1894, because the name Boys' High School was not in accord with the growing number of girls taking its college-preparatory classes, the school was renamed to honor the distinguished poet James Russell Lowell, chiefly through the efforts of Pelham W. Ames, a member of the school board and an admirer of Lowell."
Yep, White guy.
"Until 1988 the Lowell mascot was the Indian. In 1988, School Superintendent Ramon Cortines ordered that the name be changed to something less offensive."
Yep. Woke.
"Lowell was selected as one of the 44 SFUSD schools considered for renaming in 2020. The school's selection, by a committee formed by the San Francisco Board of Education, was due to James Russell Lowell's documented racist views. Opponents have said that evidence for Lowell's anti-war beliefs and abolitionist views far outweigh the negatives, citing his lasting influence on Martin Luther King Jr. and within the NAACP."
Yep. Woke beats white.
School Superintendent Ramon Cortines
NEEDZ MOAR DIVERSITEE!
I knew about the 44 name scandal, that's what inspired my comment. I just didn't expect such a thorough response! Well done 🙂
Well, I gotta do something while I drink coffee - - - - - - -
Was anyone not racist by today's standards in 1894?
The black and Hispanics couldn't be racist by today's standards regardless of their views or actions.
That us fast changing. Black hate and bigotry is getting out of hand.
They will change their mascot to dinger the destroyer of math skills
The school was 50% Asian and that was a problem, but this Yu-character totally isn't the direct product of such a problematic system and almost certainly represents the diversity of the SFUSD.
Same teachers?
Any comments on basing teacher pay on test results?
What does Queen Randy say?
So many questions, so few answers at Reason.
Fire the teachers because classes are too hard, like they did the Organic Chem professor at NYU.
According to the article, a small group of kids in the lottery class simply did not work in the entire grading period. How does a teacher change that kind of lack of work ethic or arrogance?
Cattle prod?
Well whips are too old school and, you know, the racist imagery thing.
"If your motivation is defined by an acceptance into a school, you clearly don't value education and learning," said Jessi Yu, Lowell's student body president, during the meeting. "I think this resolution is a huge stepping stone for achieving the equity that Lowell and SFUSD have been looking for."
If your motivation is defined by simply keeping a bureaucracy and the customers it serves at a subsistent level of functionality among a group of randomly chosen participants, we should readily be able to find someone else to do your job. I think such a resolution would be a huge stepping stone for achieving the equity that Lowell and SFUSD are looking for.
She is so ready to sacrifice the opportunities of others so she can virtue signal how compassionate she is. Her classes won't change or be disrupted, just the lower classes. I'm sure she would fit right in with Mao.
"in 2019 more than 50 percent of the student population was Asian"
Clearly, Asians are privileged and have never experienced raysisms.
I wonder what percentage of those Asian kids are 1st generation Americans. As opposed to the percentage of kids admitted based on their race.
Perhaps a lesson on the effects generational welfare plays on society.
Nice article Ms. Camp, hard to argue with the conclusions.
Well:
"SF School Board Member Accused Asians of Using ‘White Supremacy’ to ‘Get Ahead’"
https://news.yahoo.com/sf-school-board-member-accused-170126722.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20v&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADVGIjRo3eTf_RXEtbPBTYwcWp6UCBhJmzhEwMcalCGY4AtIm6y0feXqNsb3CTCR8pAOVXhYV8EAwmNs6io4fElfk2wB6BSAajfrNwI-Nit3XtOslLuhQwLvKFAHQ951oNVc6YpHlSFfs68kZfkrQrF5TwwAE0rn1jK0Yfrf5H9d
What's really ironic about this whole thing regarding Lowell High School is that the race that was the most penalized, by far, were Chinese Americans. Chinese Americans made up more than 80% of Lowell students prior to the lottery system being implemented. How's that for diversity !!
Racial diversity is more important than old-fashioned Eurocentric concepts like "GPA" and "standardized test scores."
#LibertariansForRacialPreferences
Just redefine GPA as, I dunno, Grappling with Persistent AntiAntiRacism.
The diversity card is over played, and the adults in the room are losing patience. In short order, we must hope, they will quietly shut it all down.
I think Hasbro should put a "Racism" card into it's Uno decks making all white players draw 5 cards.
It's almost like common sense and reality will always exist even when people pretend otherwise.
In other news, the Pope is Catholic.
I wouldn't be too sure of that.
One argument I see against charter schools is that they can say no, while public schools can not. So the public schools get all the dumb kids while the smart ones get to go to the charter schools.
Frankly I don't see a problem with this.
Dumb kids bring everybody down. Put a few dumb kids in class with smart kids, and they're going to be a distraction. While the smart kids are trying to do smart kid stuff, the stupid ones will be forming cliques and calling the others names. They'll be saying shit like "sad" and "broken" to the kids who ace the tests while they get straight Fs. And the entire time they'll feel that they are the smart ones.
*Some* charter schools can say no. Depends on the charter school.
The smart kids roll their eyes when the dumb kids say shit like "You said 'all' not 'some'! That means everything you said was wrong!" but they have to put up with it because someone thought they should all be in the same class.
*sigh*
Correcting a single statement in a speech does not equate to saying the entire speech is wrong. You'd think a smart kid would have known that and wouldn't have wasted everyone's time by make false allegations.
The kids who think they're smart may roll their eyes but the smarter kids note that the fact that those charter schools who can't say no still out-perform the public schools, it torpedoes your implied hypothesis about adverse-selection.
That is not directly relevant to the rest of your comment (which I read as a complaint against mainstreaming) but that doesn't make the reply inherently wrong.
That's not your problem. Your problem is that you are equivocating. That is, you deliberately abuse the ambiguity in statements like "charter schools can say now". And since you can't be bothered to debate honestly, people can't take seriously what you say at all.
"While the smart kids are trying to do smart kid stuff, the stupid ones will be forming cliques and calling the others names."
The stupid and EVIL ones will ALSO be practicing identity theft and telling the others (smarter and more benevolent ones) to commit suicide! And THEN they will tell you that they are "Expert Christian Theologians"!
(Some of them hail from Inner Islamic Canuckistanistanistanistan, I am told. And they are NOT satisfied with Der BidenFuhrer sniffing their hair, for them... They DEMAND being pussy-grabbed by Der TrumpfenFuhrer Himself!)
Your posts make my eyes hurt.
what?
And the entire time they’ll feel that they are the smart ones.
Ohhh, I spelled Taser wrong. That invalidates my entire post. Glad you pointed that out. You're so smart.
Did I say you spelled taser wrong? Did I even indicate my intent to invalidate your post? As far as I can tell, you posted complaining about stupid, clique-y adults with superiority complexes and I simply reiterated, without editing or additional commentary, a comment you made about stupid, clique-y adults with superiority complexes.
Stop reminding people of what they said before! If libsoftiktok has taught us anything, it's that there's nothing more violent and bigoted than repeating stupid things other people say!
It's so cute sarc thinks he's one of the smart kids. But it's not surprising since stupid people often lack the ability to understand they are stupid.
Where are your girlfriends saying "Poor sarc" "so sad" "broken" and all the other wise and intelligent retorts to my comments?
I'm waiting....
Where are your girlfriends
I'm so old I remember when sarc pretended to be against schoolyard taunts. But I'm also even old enough to remember when he used them, so we always knew that was a lie.
"poor sarc” “so sad” “broken” and all the other wise and intelligent retorts to my comments?
Compared to the inherently obvious brilliance of this comment of course. He wants people to believe he's above this but can't help himself because it is who he is.
That “whoosh” sound you might have heard when you read Where are your girlfriends was my point sailing over your head. You see, I’m not issuing schoolyard taunts. I’m mocking you and your friends for acting like schoolyard bullies. It’s ok though. I never expected you to get it, being that you sit at the back of the class and throw pencils at the ceiling all day.
my point sailing over your head.
It's cute you think such childishness could be above anyone's head. I suspect many middle school teachers regularly deal with students misunderstanding their juvenile perspective as insightful.
"Why are there a bunch of pencils stuck in the ceiling tiles in the back of the class?"
"That's where Marshal sits."
"Oh."
The amount he embarrasses himself would be really sad if he was ever able to realize how embarrassing he is.
The steaming pile of lefty shit is entirely too stupid to do so.
Sooo you're taunting him by asking where his taunting is so you can point and say how wrong taunting is? Did I miss something?
There is also the claim that smarter kids in a class with less smart kids lifts up the dumb kids. From what I've seen, it doesn't really work that way. And it's also unreasonable to demand that the smartest kids make sacrifices for the "common good".
We need to stop sacrificing our best and brightest on the altar of 'diversity" and "common good."
The smart kids are not junior teachers. They deserve appropriate education, at a speed and depth appropriate for them. We are putting too much time and resources into the students least likely to contribute in the future.
Harrowing prison footage shows how Army vet inmate, 62, died after being left paralyzed and in excruciating pain for FIVE DAYS after guards broke his neck - then walked past his cell 170 TIMES and ignored his screams
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11307391/Army-vet-prisoner-died-left-paralyzed-staff-broke-neck-Florida.html
And nothing else happened. The official report said he died of cancer.
One might say The State is a cancer on the human race.
I'm not an anarchist mainly because I don't see how a state of anarchy can exist for any period of time before gangs of violent men start demanding protection money. Death and taxes.
“Who said you wuz in charge?”
“Who gon’ tell me I’m not?”
The problem with any real anarchistic enterprise is... not everyone involved is an anarchist.
Burning Man works for a week. I doubt it would work for two.
Even Burning Man has rules, and rule enforcers.
I'm shocked that students with lower average scores achieved lower average scores.
Shocked.
However, the decline in academic performance from Lowell's lottery-admitted freshman class shows the steep consequences of discarding academic ability in order to meet diversity goals.
Everyone understands and accepts that kids who train for specialty athletics far more than their peers are going disproportionately succeed in those sports compared to those whose training is casual. But somehow when we change the subject to academics a large proportion of people pretend to believe this same disproportionate outcome can only be due to racism.
Then consider the result. A basketball team created by lottery has no chance against one whose players were selected by merit. Left wingers insisting to the contrary is simply their refusing to accept reality.
"A basketball team created by lottery has no chance against one whose players were selected by merit."
This a very clear and effective analogy. I'm adopting it! Thank you.
Competence is a right-wing concept. Prove me wrong.
Competence is a white cultural attribute. It's offensive to expect other cultures and races to be competent, because that would be cultural appropriation. They have a duty to be incompetent, lest they be accused of "being white."
Expecting someone to be competent is racist, culturalist, and bigoted.
How dare you!
Somehow, mysteriously, many Asians have become even more white than most whites are!!! Mighty White of them!!!
(All must be FORCED to become more equal! Send all the smart and hard-studying kids to stupid-school!)
Great point. You got me. Competent whites are engaging in cultural appropriation from Asians.
Depends on how you define "competence".
Well, the way the left defines competence they think black people can't achieve includes things like being on time, being respectful of others, having motivation to succeed, and understanding the subject matter.
The soft bigotry of low expectations from the left is really just becoming straight bigotry.
“The fact that "half of our student body [is] new to in-person instruction at the high school level….” Um, that happens every year. Logical thinking is not a strong suit of this principal.
It shouldn't be "half" happening each year. For a high-school serving grades 9-12, it should be a quarter new each year. The principal is probably correct that with covid, half (that is, all the 9th graders and half-each of the 10th and 11th graders) were "new to in-person instruction" that particular year.
The principal's failure in logic is that only the 9th graders (who were not selected by merit) suffered the performance loss. If it were a consequence of covid lock-outs, you would expect to see proportionately similar losses in the 10th and 11th grade populations - but they didn't.
Math and statistics are racist anyways so you can hardly blame the guy for refusing to use or understand them.
Some statistics are anti-racist though and I'd wager he understands those as deeply as he needs to for his employment.
I would also expect in person instruction to improve performance. Unless standards were also lowered a lot in that time.
I guess if you're trying to steelman retardation this would be it, but that is double dipping on COVID. All the kids were out for COVID so the numbers are either 25% or 100% neither of which would begin to explain why the drop occurred primarily on the lottery students with no merit requirements and not the merit based classes.
The truth is they will tell any lie so they don't have to believe that the merit standards are better indicators of success than skin color.
In fairness, the principal said "new to in-person instruction at the high school level" (emphasis added)
Maybe that is a steelman but there is a credible argument that the high-school experience is qualitatively different from the prior schools and also a credible argument that you didn't really experience that difference in the remote environment.
I agree that the principal is wrong - just not for the reason Buckminster said.
When I was a kid, uphill in the snow both ways) we had four grades in high school. Hmm, actually they still do. They did through in sixth grade into junior high and renamed it "middle school".
Almost a quarter of Lowell ninth-graders received a D or F grade in fall 2021...
Did they even consider making tests easier or lower the requirements for a passing grade? Do I have to think of everything?
Just make 'F' stand for fenomenal and call it a day.
"Yes, diversity is good."
No. It is not. 'Diversity' is what got us into this mess. And if you think this in something new? Years ago, now, Boston public schools changed the system at Boston Latin, one of the other premier high schools in the country. Previously, if youi couldn't keep up, they sent you to another public high school. In the change, the student could not be removed from the school without parental approval. The example publicised was a student who was failing courses, to the point of being kept back a year - unheard of at Boston Latin. The mother didn't want him going to a local high school and getting shot, so she preferred he fail and get kept back at the safer Boston Latin. And there was nothing they could do. Because racism.
Not getting shot sounds like a damn good reason, the logic behind the policy may be shit but I'd take a living and stupid kid over a dead one most days.
If "diversity is good" with no specific qualifiers as to what that means, then Wakanda could be improved dramatically by an influx of a million Scotsmen.
The curt statement “Diversity is good.” without qualifiers sounds *exactly* like the sort of full-plot-as-secret-code Hydra would use to infiltrate any given insufficiently diverse organization and virtue signal to one another.
I'd pay to see that movie.
I saw the trailer for the "The Woman King" movie...not a lot of diversity in that cast. They ought to have gender-, orientation-, and race-swapped characters until the cast reflected the society we have today. Maybe they could have tossed in a few trans characters and at least one character "on the spectrum", too.
As one critic wrote about "Rings of Power"
'By making some of the prominent and respectable characters of the world people of color, or by fleshing out the story arcs of a few female characters, the Rings of Power writers made the world more accessible to a broader audience. Now, a whole new generation of young people, at a greater number, can watch this series and see themselves in the characters. That is the purpose of diversity in film, so that the immersive, connecting effect of the characters is not reserved for only one group of people.
How is a little trans-sexual autistic Korean girl going to identify with "Woman King" since there is no one in the film that looks like her?
> "It is important not to insinuate a cause on such a sensitive topic at the risk of shaming our students and teachers who have worked very hard in a difficult year."
I'm not going to blame the students or the teachers, I'm going to blame the school board and the administrators for being total cuntwads. Congrats, Lowell High School is now the poster child for why the public school system needs to be abolished.
It's a common problem with all school (and college) rankings. They rank based on the outputs, not considering the quality of the inputs. And the best students go to the highest ranked schools (in general), so the rankings perpetuate themselves. Sort of like college football rankings and preseason polls.
Why is sorting a problem to you? Did your local commissar tell you that was to be your belief?
Of COURSE that is what happened.
How would that NOT happen?
If the US Olympic Track and Field team took runners based on a lottery rather than time trials, how do you think the team would perform in the Olympics?
This is precisely what happens EVERY time "woke" admissions officers admit students based on "equity" or chance rather than grades and test scores.
And they fool nobody.
It happens at the university level, including the top schools.
When your school touts its diversity, and then files a brief in SCOTUS claiming that without considering race in the admissions process, there would be far less diversity, they are admitting that most of their minority students would not have been admitted based on merit alone. The results are well-known - the students admitted based on merit thrive, and the students admitted based on "equity" struggle and need support just to graduate. As a Georgetown Law professor found out the hard way, you get fired for talking about those results, but that does not change those results.
And recruiters are well aware of this. Social justice warriors want to diversify the classes, thus the alumni, from top schools, because "a degree from one of those schools is a ticket to a high paying job," which will over time change society. But that's not right. A degree from one of those schools is a LABEL that says that the graduate has performed at a high level academically and can perform the work required to KEEP one's "high paying job." Pol Roger started selling Martini and Rossi, in 15% of their Pol Roger bottles, and charging $100 per bottle for all the bottles, people would know the difference and stop buying Pol Roger. If they put Martini and Rossi in red bottles and sold the genuine article in green bottles, people would stop buying the red bottles.
Recruiters are not stupid. If you claim that without race-based admissions, you would not have a diverse graduate pool, then you are telling recruiters the truth - that your degree should be discounted in the hands of the graduates who were admitted based on non-merit factors. And that is exactly what happens - everyone looks at someone in that category with a Yale degree as someone who would have a degree from BC or Villanova.
The biggest victims of this are not the white or Asian students who end up at the next level school - you can do very well with a degree from Holy Cross or Trinity instead of Harvard or Yale. The biggest victims are the minority students who would have been admitted to Harvard or Yale based on the merits, but whose degrees are discounted by recruiters because Harvard and Yale consider race in admissions.
If the US Olympic Track and Field team took runners based on a lottery rather than time trials, how do you think the team would perform in the Olympics?
Too many Kenyans winning at running sports, we need to bring in more Welsh people into the sport.
Ah, but you see, for neo-Marxists that is entirely different. While sports performance obviously has a physical and genetic component, the brain is entirely malleable to them. They think that if they send someone to Harvard, they'll come out a Nobel-prize worthy scientist: they believe it's all about access, opportunity, and privilege.
"If the US Olympic Track and Field team took runners based on a lottery rather than time trials, how do you think the team would perform in the Olympics?"
Of course, in sports the woke accept the meritocracy but only "on the field". No woke person will ever complain that the racial makeup of the NFL and NBA do not reflect the racial makeup of American society. But they *will* demand racial quotas for coaches.
"Yes, diversity is good."
Why? This assertion seems to be trotted out as if it is obvious. Japan and China are not "diverse", for example, and they seem to go quite well academically.
Speaking of obvious, the US has been on a diversity binge for many years and ranks something like 25th in the world for academic competence. Diversity, of the sort demanded by the insane left, is obviously counter productive to a functioning society.
If the former woke school board had been reelected last February, they would have kept the lottery system and ordered a "normalization" of school grades to hide any differences in accomplishment.
Let me get this straight, if you pool talent from the top 5% of the students - your test scores are top 5%.
If you pool more broadly, your test scores are lower.
WOW.
The only real question is when they pooled from more of the average, did THOSE students benefit more?
Is it the goal of the school to educate only the top 5%?
And BTW, this is a high school - no one gives a crap which high school you went to.
Leftists believe that test scores are a social construct designed to oppress minorities; leftists believe that all humans are mentally the same and interchangeable, and that you are completely a product of your environment and the privileges you are given. And so they conclude that if they take kids with bad test scores and put them into top schools, those kids will become top performers.
Of course, we have known for a century, that all of that is completely false; that mental abilities are a combination of a strong genetic component and very early childhood experience and are not particularly malleable after that. But leftists aren't particularly strong on scientific matters.
"no one gives a crap which high school you went to."
That is a false assertion. By the very existence of this article, the people who strive to get into this school ~do~ care. Selective colleges stealth care when they aren't touting their woke bona fides.
Apparently ~you~ don't care about what high school someone went to, but maybe leave open the thought in your head that others do.
No, the kind of “diversity” we’re talking about here is most definitely not good. OBVIOUSLY.
A “diversity” of irrelevant personal attributes is still irrelevant. Say it with me: “Zero times a number is still zero“. If the attribute has zero to do with academic achievement, it doesn’t matter how many of them you have, or whether they are equally distributed or not. They’re literally of zero consequence.
When we moved to CA from MD many years ago, both my kids lost a year of school. What one did in 2nd grade in MD they did in 3rd grade in CA. What the other did in 5th grade in MD they did in 6th grade in CA. Public schools in both states. Sadly, couldn't afford to send them to private/religious schools, as I did in MD and TX before that. Far as I'm concerned CA public schools have long since gone straight down the shitter. When I was a kid everyone knew CA public schools were some of the best.
The irony of a top ranked school obtained that ranking by merit, did away with merit. You can't fix stupid. How's that for more irony?
“Yes, diversity is good.”
Is it?
To achieve 'diversity' standards are 'altered' to allow more diverse peoples access.
Under the new standard the old standard plummets.
This is an extremely clear indication that diversity, as it is currently sought, is NOT good.
And it happens in all arenas. From academia to manufacturing.
Worse, it has unseem ramifications.
As society adopts 'altered' standards in ever wider areas to facilitate 'diversity', the distance between what the diverse can actually do, and what is actually needed becomes ever greater until one reaches a point at which the diverse are in roles in which they can't even fail with any semblance of being in the parameters of the original standard.
They become so far out of sync with the rest of the society they inhabit that there is simply no easy way to correct the issue.
Diversity becomes a major detriment.
It will fix itself. One way or the other.
The best survive.
"If your motivation is defined by an acceptance into a school, you clearly don't value education and learning," said Jessi Yu, Lowell's student body president, during the meeting. "I think this resolution is a huge stepping stone for achieving the equity that Lowell and SFUSD have been looking for."
WTF?
If you value education and learning, you want to get into the best, most challenging school you can! Getting accepted by a challenging school is a very effective demonstration of valuing education and learning.
What the woke student-body president meant to say was something more along the lines of "Skin color is the most important thing. We want skin color to decide everything, and have little use for any other facets of society."
"Yes, diversity is good."
Objection! Facts not in evidence.
Really seems to be begging the question, especially since "diversity" here is based on skin color. Diversity of thought, diversity of opinion, diversity of culture is not tolerated or desired by these people.
Skin color is THE MOST IMPORTANT THING, until someone with the right skin color (not white) has the wrong ideas.
As we saw recently with the new British cabinet...New British Prime Minister Liz Truss has assembled the most ethnically diverse Cabinet in the United Kingdom's history, with several top jobs given to Black and other minority ethnic lawmakers. None of the top jobs is held by a white man.
"Instead, Liz Truss has undoubtedly appointed the most right-wing, anti-woke, culture-war cabinet in British political history and it’s somehow being praised as diverse. "
"Basically, like Boris Johnson, I feel like Liz Truss is using Black and Brown faces to prop up an already abysmal Tory government that has brought the UK to its knees"
James Cleverly whose mother is from Sierra Leone, West Africa, is Foreign Secretary and doesn’t believe that racism is getting worse in Britain.
He was Conservative Party Chairman when at least four ministers (including Thérèse Coffey, now Deputy PM and Health Secretary) endorsed Tory candidates that said Muslims have divided loyalties and blamed immigrants for bringing HIV to Britain. Cleverly later apologised.
Home Secretary Suella Braverman, of Indian heritage, called equality training ‘woke witch trials’ and scrapped it from her department as Attorney-General. She was condemned in 2019 for using the phrase ‘cultural Marxism,’ an antisemitic conspiracy theory often used by the far right.
Kemi Badenoch, of Nigerian heritage, is International Trade Secretary and said that teaching white privilege as ‘uncontested fact’ is illegal. In her previous role as Equalities Minister, she said that institutional racism does not exist in Britain.
Nadhim Zahawi, of Iraqi heritage, is Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Minister for Intergovernmental Relations and Minister for Equalities - he said pupils should be taught the benefits of the British Empire as Education Secretary, and denied institutional racism existed in the Conservative Party.
In my opinion, this new cabinet normalises and legitimises systemic racism. They have done nothing to address, acknowledge or work to fix the structural racial inequalities and systemic barriers marginalised communities face – if they didn’t do it before in their previous influential positions, they are unlikely to do it now.
https://metro.co.uk/2022/09/08/liz-truss-most-racially-diverse-cabinet-ever-is-only-skin-deep-17327706/
"Data show that students admitted by lottery to San Francisco's Lowell High School are academically faring much worse than their peers."
I hear that some people are surprised at this.
Why work hard if there is no immediate reward? Kids are immature, most can’t look to the future and see what slacking now will cost them. This is a perfect example of why under age kids can’t decide on puberty blocking drugs or trans surgery and why kids need a parents guidance.
As others have said, I’m amazed they didn’t just drop grades.
If the goal is to get more black kids, why don’t they seek out black students with high test scores.
They would have the best chance of doing well and contributing to Lowell.
That would be blatantly racist against the white and Asian students.
I think you missed a big point. Lowell High School was only highly ranked when it used merit based entry because they could choose from the cream of the crop, not because they helped a average students reach higher levels. You see this effect in a lot of high achieving schools when they have to work with average students. They don't know how to actually teach because they are so used to having hand picked high achieving students.
Next thing you should look up... The chilling effect that grades have on innovation.