NYU Finally Allows Students To Choose Whether They Mask
The decision was long overdue.

As part of New York University's class of 2024, the entirety of my college career has been masked. Starting last week, however, NYU announced it was lifting our pandemic mask mandate and finally allowing students to make their own health decisions.
This policy change could have—and should have—come sooner.
At the start of the 2021–2022 academic year, NYU announced a 100 percent vaccination rate for students in university housing, with similar rates for other students. Boosters and mandatory testing were also required. The payoff for full compliance with these policies was supposed to be a return to normal, with a promise to evaluate after spring break in 2022. That deadline led to masking being made optional in outdoor spaces (something that was never necessary) with the classroom masking requirement remaining in place and an update from the university saying, "Over the coming days and weeks…we anticipate being able to ease mask-wearing restrictions further."
Yet the mask mandate remained in place despite low positivity rates and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's lifting of the state's mask mandate for New York public schools in March 2021.
Mask mandates in educational settings involve real trade-offs. Spending most of my college experience online made it challenging to get to know my classmates. Once we moved to in-person education in the fall of 2021, mask-wearing complicated the social aspect of college in new ways. Research in Trends in Neuroscience and Education validated this, saying, "hiding the lower part of the face with a face mask markedly impairs face recognition and face identification" something that is "taken for granted, and – like air for breathing – it does not come into focus unless it is lacking."
NYU says it is "home to the highest number of international students in the United States." Extending the mask mandate created a barrier for many students who do not speak English as a first language, as well as the students who study a second language, such as myself. The Trends in Neuroscience and Education study also highlighted how masks hinder verbal and nonverbal communication, especially in the context of multilingual learners. The study found that "we are forced to rely only on language and gesture, which limits the extent to which we can interpret nuance."
Despite these costs, NYU announced over the summer that masks would continue to be required heading into the 2022–2023 school year. On the first day of classes, however, students learned that faculty had the option to teach in-person classes without masks. While this likely improved communication and the quality of instruction, students, the vast majority of whom were vaccinated, were not permitted to make the same choice.
As of last Wednesday, I get to choose whether to wear a mask in class and on campus. It's not clear what makes last week different from the week before, or the week before that, but it's nevertheless a welcome change that NYU is finally treating its students like adults and paying customers.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
NYU Finally Allows Students To Choose Whether They Wear Certain Masks
Some masks will still be verboten, others still mandatory.
Well, what do you expect from a “kindergarten” for leftist wannabe brats, disguised as a mediocre university, situated in the land of thin skin & tight sphincters, where academic/media indoctrination reigns supreme.
I work from home providing various internet services for an hourly rate of $80 USD. I never thought it would be possible, but my trustworthy friend (aps-06) persuaded me to take the opportunity after telling me how she quickly earned 13,000 dollars in just four weeks while working on the greatest project. Go to this article for more information.
…..
——————————>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
I took a friend to a doctors office the other day. They insisted everyone wear a paper mask.
I openly and loudly questioned their medical and scientific abilities, and then waited in the car.
It doesn't surprise me that you are "that guy."
I know, right? Driving a friend to the doctor's office. What. an. asshole.
You need to read more than the first sentence. I know it's hard. But if you push you can do it.
swoosh
How about a nice game of chess?
I didn't see a list of the names of people who died because he didn't wear a mask, and figured it was unimportant.
It doesn't surprise me that you would cave.
Cave? What are you talking about? I'm just not a dick to people who are forced to require everyone to wear masks. They didn't make the rules. It takes a real asshole to berate someone for something that is out of their control.
I knew you would cave. And here you are trying to hide behind social decorum to cover for it.
So much shit is forced on people because they're scared of making a scene instead of telling someone to fuck off.
"Someone" didn't make the rules. "Someone" isn't responsible. So telling "someone" to fuck off isn't manly. It's childish.
Don't be an asshole to the medical offices requiring you to wear masks.
Be an asshole to the people forcing medical offices to require masks.
See the difference?
Is the medical officer not requiring you to wear a mask?
Why does he get a pass?
What if your personal rule is to not wear a mask how does one reconcile the two rules?
Every major authoritarian group has utilized social decorum to assuage the masses. It is why they try to teach it in grade schools. It worked with the Nazis and China under Mao. It is the idea behind Chinas social credit score and ESGs.
It is a means to control people.
Note sarc never brings up differences on social decorum either. It is always to submit to the required decorum of government or the media.
Straight from the JesseAz playbook:
This person didn't say anything about [insert distraction]!
That means they believe [insert strawman]!
I'm genuinely curious here.
How does rudely questioning the medical knowledge of the staff at a clinic over their being forced to require masks have anything to do with sticking it to the government and the media?
You think spouting off at some lady who answers the phone is comparable to resisting Nazis and Maoists?
What the actual fuck. Wow.
Keep in mind that none of that was out of their control - they chose the job, they chose to assist in forcing others.
And you're certainly not willing to give the same leeway to law enforcement.
The lady answering the phone at the medical office can't kill me if I fail to obey.
But she can - she will call the cops and the cops will kill you.
It's how block wardens work.
Similarly you could call the cops on her for not requiring you to wear a mask.
See how force works?
When they are forced to require masks, then tattling goes both ways.
They can tattle on you for not wearing one, and you can tattle on them for not requiring one.
It's not me requiring them to do anything.
If they have an issue with those threatening them then they should fight back against them
Instead they choose to be part of a system of oppression - hoping the tiger eats them last.
You do know the difference between require and force, right? If you do, then re-read what I wrote. Medical offices can't use force. They are forced to require masks, but they can't force you to put one on. Who is the bad guy? The people at the medical office? No. They're being forced. The bad guys are the ones forcing the medical offices to require masks.
There is no require without force.
If there is no force then it's a request, not a requirement.
And if they don't require, force will be used on them.
Just following orders. Right.
Beware of those medical offices with guns!
How do you think covid mandates worked?
Businesses were told that if they didn't do the government's bidding, force would be used on them.
He has no actual principles.
Inside the mind of JesseAz: "Don't look at me! is on my team and sarc just pointed out that what he did was dickish! I must defend my tribe! I know! I'll do what I always do and say things about sarc while ignoring what he said! It always works! Whew! That was a close one!"
Seriously though, do you think it is their choice, or CDC guidelines? I did a google and what I read said that up until last Wednesday, CDC forced all medical facilities require masks. Then individual states and cities have their own rules. I figured that since everywhere else I do business stopped requiring masks the moment they weren’t forced to, medical and dental offices aren't requiring them by choice.
I thought I was muted.
Start chanting "You said you muted me! You said you muted me! You said you muted me!"
You can do it! Get the while clique to join in!
Guidelines are guidelines, not regulations.
Even if they were regulations, you *choose* to follow and enforce them.
Oh, and the CDC isn't Emperor of Doctors.
That's a nice license you've got there. Hate to see anything happen to it.
At what point is "I was just doing my job" no longer an excuse? I hope it's somewhere long before overt violence is being committed against people refusing public health mandates.
At what point is “I was just doing my job” no longer an excuse?
When you are the coercer. The lady making appointments isn’t coercing anyone into wearing a mask. Sure she can call the cops if you refuse, but if she didn’t then someone could call the cops on her. They are the coercers. She’s just doing her job. She probably hates masks and hates telling people to wear them. Violence and animosity directed at her is misplaced. Get mad at the people making her tell you to wear a mask. Not her.
Words are violence
/sarc
So the system of informers is ok - it's only the specialist who do the headbreaking that are wrong?
The CDC isn't a licensing agency.
The mandatory boosters of an experimental drug applied to the healthiest demographic in the population is the real tragedy here.
And those feisty students, always concerned with the rights of the oppressed and underprivileged protested in vast numbers! It was like the 1960s all over again!
I interpret this as the beginning of rewriting of COVID history and new propaganda, which will claim that masking and other restrictions were driven by white supremacists, in order to preserve systemic racism.
I don’t think we’re there yet. Too many of the hyperleftists are still using masks as virtue signals.
Was at a place Saturday where that was the case, and yesterday I saw a 20ish lesbian couple, the “pretty’ one with impossibly purple hair, the rough one wearing her mask wrapped all the way around to the beginning of the shaved sides if her head.
It was way too fun for those sorts of people to feel smug and important. And they lack the self awareness to realize everyone else thinks they’re a terrible stereotype and pretty much finds them repulsive. I think we won’t get the hard core gaslighting until we come closer to the ’24 election season.
Don't understand why anyone would borrow lots of money to attend NYU or any other university that imposed lockdowns for 2 years, mandated mask wearing for 2+ years and mandated/s ineffective covid vaccines.
Even worse, NYU takes children and turns them into freedom hating socialists, racists, transgenders, environmental extremists and Democrats.
. . . and fetus killers?
SCIENCE!!! Progressivism - it really is a cult religion.
That's when you transfer to a different university and/or take a couple semesters off.
Why? It wasn’t the university’s fault, they were just following cdc guidelines.
Thank you for sharing. I guess the world has to move on eventually. Keep it up.
The university is more proud of the student's compliance than anything else.
As my Grandpa always said, don’t let that pesky science stuff get in the way of good old fashion political narratives and virtue signaling!
I miss my pappy.
What people need to realize is - it was always their choice.
What does abortion have to do with masks at universities?
What does abortion have to do with murder?
It was a crude joke making fun of the fact that many on the left see the words "choice" and "abortion" as synonyms.
Fail
Where are your buddies to chime in? It just isn't the same without Big Mac and upChuck repeating the same shit after all of my comments.
You thrive on the attention.
Power corrupts.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
(but it really, really, feels good)
Party of science here people!
A virus that everyone had, and also can get an additional vaccine for, that is not in any way a significant risk to the population attending NYU statistically.
But they still kept their religious talismans as long as possible to ward off spirits.
New intern.
At least they've got her on the right side of the commentariat to start. Ease her in before they give her an assignment that makes her afraid to read the comments ever again.
The commenters here ARE a vicious lot. LOL
She could do the recently neglected food truck beat. I think commenters here are unanimous in their enthusiasm for Food Truck Freedom (or FTF. And yes I'm starting a non profit 301c to support these heroes at a very reasonable salary.)
"NYU Finally Allows Students To Choose Whether They Mask:"
Women, minorities and ugly students hardest hit.
Ugly people with pretty eyes hardest hit.
Washing Square News:
"The end of NYU’s mask mandate on Wednesday doesn’t seem to have changed much for students, most of whom already weren’t wearing masks. As hundreds of students streamed through the front entrance turnstiles of Bobst Library on Sept. 28, the first day on which masks were no longer required in the building, only 32.9% were wearing masks, according to a survey of more than 900 library visitors conducted by WSN. The day before — when masks were still required — 36.3% of students were observed wearing masks."
I have been around the country enough during the past few years to see that NY is now the pussy capital of the nation. No, not that kind of pussy--the kind that combines irrational paranoia and eager Karens.
So Pink Pussy Hat, not Pussy Riot.
NYU could solve Addie Mae's problem by following Judge Ho's lead and no longer admitting wingnuts.
in college you're supposed to over-respond to authority with backlash.
If a conservative speaker shows up, burn the motherfucker down. If you're forced to be injected with experimental drugs, meh.
the dissonance boggles.
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. (ras-02) Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
“Professor Francis Boyle joined The Alex Jones Show on Monday to expose the medical tyranny under Biden being created by a United Nations treaty.
Boyle explained that the World Health Organization (WHO) the medical arm of the UN is drafting a treaty that, if signed by Joe Biden, would surrender U.S. health policy to the global body.
ïs clear that this treaty, if passed, will give the WHO dictatorial powers to determine health policies here in the United States in the event of another pandemic, which of course they know all along they’re going to create, Boyle said.
Boyle went on to point out that the Biden administration issued an executive order earlier this month which violates the biological weapon guardrail legislation that he drafted in 1989 by green-lighting the development of an offensive biological warfare weapon and a vaccine for it.
called for and drafted the United States domestic implementing legislation for the biological weapons convention that is known as the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act (BWATA) of 1989 that was passed unanimously by both houses of the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President George Bush Sr. with the approval of the U.S. Department of Justice, Boyle explained.
In violation of that bill, the EO provision says the U.S. government and international partners will:
(vii) develop, and work to promote and implement, biosafety and biosecurity best practices, tools, and resources bilaterally and multilaterally to facilitate appropriate oversight for life sciences, dual-use research of concern, and research involving potentially pandemic and other high-consequence pathogens, and to enhance sound risk management of biotechnology- and biomanufacturing-related R&D globally; and
(viii) explore how to align international classifications of biomanufactured products, as appropriate, to measure the value of those products to both the United States and global bioeconomies.
So they admit that they will be engaging in the development of offensive biological warfare weapons involving potentially pandemic pathogens like COVID-19 was Boyle said.”
Bleating sheeple being herded for processing.