Revenge of the Abortion Voters?
Republicans are losing ground in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.

Republicans seemed so close to a massive midterm victory in 2022. Then the reality of their anti-abortion ideology started to drop. Now, Democrats are gaining ground again, and the outcome of this November's election seems much less clear.
With gas prices high, inflation still rising, and Democrats still tainted by bad COVID policy, polls in late 2021 and the first half of 2022 showed American swing voters leaning heavily Republican. For instance, Gallup polling on independent voters found Democrats' nine-point advantage over Republicans at the start of 2021 shifted to a five-point Republican advantage by the end of the year. In March, independents surveyed by The Wall Street Journal favored Republicans by 12 percentage points, and 46 percent of respondents overall said they would back a Republican candidate for Congress, while only 41 percent would back a Democrat. And in a PBS NewsHour/NPR/Marist poll conducted in April, 47 percent of respondents said they would vote for a Republican candidate if the election were held then, compared to just 44 percent who favored Democrats. "Republicans have strong support among independents who break toward the GOP by 7 points, and only one in 10 say they're still undecided on which party to support," PBS reported.
Things look different now. And abortion may explain this shift.
In June, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overturning Roe v. Wade (1973) and upending the basis for legal abortion across America. Some Republican-controlled state legislatures rushed to pass new anti-abortion laws, while previously passed bans triggered by Roe's overturning also started taking effect.
Dobbs and its aftermath may have heartened hard-core pro-life factions. But early signs suggest it's not playing so well with the U.S. populace at large—a populace that remains moderately but significantly pro-choice.
Before Dobbs, "Republicans were cruising, and Democrats were having a hard time," Republican pollster and strategist Tony Fabrizio (who conducted the Wall Street Journal's poll in conjunction with Democratic pollster John Anzalone) said. "It's almost like the abortion issue came along and was kind of like a defibrillator to Democrats."
In the most recent Wall Street Journal poll, Democrats—down five points against Republicans back in March—hold a slight advantage. Respondents favored a Democratic congressional candidate over a GOP candidate 47 percent to 44 percent. This is "a lead that is within the poll's margin of error of plus or minus 2.7 percentage points," the Journal points out. But it represents a six-point rise for Democrats since the March poll.
And the difference is more stark when considering only independent voters. Where Republicans led by 12 points among independents back in March, Democrats now lead by three points (38 percent to 35 percent). White, suburban women—a notoriously swing-voting group—now prefer a Democratic congressional candidate 52 percent to 40 percent.
Since the Dobbs decision came out, Democrats have been massively outpacing Republicans in new voter registrations in many states with restrictive abortion laws, with new voter registrations among women far outpacing those among men. The latest Wall Street Journal poll provides yet another sign that the issue of abortion will be motivating voters—and benefiting Democrats.
Asked about the most important issue in deciding their vote for Congress this November, 13 percent said abortion. It ranked only under the economy (16 percent) in issues of importance, outranking 35 other issues from inflation (11 percent) to immigration (7 percent), preserving democracy (5 percent), crime (2 percent), race issues (1 percent), and jobs (1 percent).
Asked how various issues would impact their likelihood to vote, 48 percent said the Supreme Court overturning Roe made them "much more likely" to vote, and 9 percent said it made them "somewhat more likely" to vote.
And when asked whether Democrats or Republicans would be better at handling "abortion policy," nearly half (48 percent) of respondents said Democrats, while just 27 percent said Republicans. (Sixteen percent said neither, and 6 percent said both equally.)
The Journal poll—conducted August 17–22 among 1,313 registered voters (more of whom were likely to describe themselves as conservative than liberal)—suggests that this fall's battle for control of Congress may be more competitive than anticipated and provides yet another sign that voters aren't totally enamored with Republican extremism on abortion.
Earlier signs include voters in the notoriously conservative state of Kansas rejecting in large numbers an anti-abortion ballot measure at the start of August.
The situation has gotten so iffy that some Republican candidates—including Blake Masters, a Republican candidate for Senate in Arizona, and Michigan congressional candidate Tom Barrett—have scrubbed their websites of more extreme anti-abortion language.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
IT'S HAPPENING!
ENB's magnum opus. This is the column she's been waiting years to publish.
Close. I think it's missing sex workers to be full magnum opus.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but (dbt-10) my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
---------->>> https://cashprofit99.netlify.app/
Ya, umm, been there done that - It's called "counterfeiting."
What? No one here ever tried slipping a blank into a vending machine in their wayward youth.
It was a great decision ENB. Americans (esp white suburban woman) need to grow up and understand how our "democracy" works. You want it in the Bill of Right..pass an amendment. Sans that it goes to the States. Honestly these are the same "I stand with Ukraine" and "BLM" types who "feel" this way or that and have no critical thinking skills. For the left libos..when do you draw the line on abortion? When is the baby crowning? Ok to put an ice pick in its head if you don't "mentally" feel like raising a kid? this shows how Reason is not really libertarian. open borders (something that is very dangerous to nation states being able to defend individual liberty), abortion, gender affirmation (sexual mutilation) of children is Reason's reason to be, and never a word about war, the Fed or the creeping authoritarian cultural Marxists infecting our institutions...sick Reason..very very sick
Phew!
Yeah, Republicans can squander political capital almost as fast as Democrats can squander actual capital.
++
The debate sure does get interesting ~18 yrs. on down the line.
And yet, Democratic presidents are the ones who have to clean up the mess and reduce the deficit after those alleged-fiscal Conservatives have bought all those "free aircraft carriers" and "free F-35s" after pissing away the nation's collective wealth on the tax cuts for the Conservative Parasite/Donor Class.
Conservative love Big Gubment, as long as it's security state spending, or benefits their masters in the Conservative Parasite/Donor Class, and "Those People" don't get access to the government subsides that built and maintained the greatest middle class in recorded history - That is until Canada left us in the middle class rearview after the economic terrorists who hate us for the freedoms that strong unions, proper taxes on the Conservative Parasite/Donor Class, and proper financial regulations gave us, used the economic turmoil created by the oil crisis to launch their jihad against shared prosperity and the middle class.
Kuni bravely recites the keep-the-Kleptocracy fallacy that communism is the correct system, and that the slightly-different fascist looters are the only obstruction. The LP is perfectly able to represent individual rights and minimize the initiation of force till it converges as close as possible to zero. We had 4000 voters 50 years ago. That increased 12% a year until platform cowardice removed individual rights for women. Pro-choice Gary tripled our formerly flatlined performance. Unburdened by fascist "friends" the LP can compete with the looter Dems on a level playing field.
You do realize this is a libertarian not a conservative site right?
The single-issue anti-abortion voters now have no reason to vote. They got their way.
Meanwhile the single-issue pro-abortion people who didn't vote in the past are going to show up in droves.
A definite one-two punch against Republicans.
Well the single issue anti-abortion voters are now going to inhabit their local committee meetings and do their damnedest to make sure no RINOs (ei, multi-issue Republicans) ever gets nominated again.
That's not what RINO means. It stands for Republican In Name Only, and it means any Republican who fails to do exactly what the party leadership (Trump) tells them to do. These fuckers actually listen to their constituents and stuff. If they were real Republicans they'd obey the Party. Kind of like true libertarians are Republicans.
Yeah we all know how well liz cheney listened to here constituents
That is the Austrian Anschluss Caucus interpretation of real. The previous LNC considered only anarchists, communists and child-mutilators "real" libertarians. Someone tell me this is coincidence, and had nothing to do with Gary's 4 million votes scaring the doodoo out of the Looter Kleptocracy. This Kleptocracy has for over a century sent troops abroad till somebody they like can be elected.
Their Christian National Socialist exemplars voted to deprive Jews of individual rights where the victims added up to at most 3% of the population. The deprivers later shot themselves to meet Jesus and laggards were tried, hanged or shot out of hand. Today's Christian National Socialists seek to declare by law that women--half the population--who have sex be declared rightless slaves or Siamese twins. Can anyone see where this is headed?
Jewish Internationalists Bolsheviks..there it is easy to do that right? sorry for taking the lords name in vain but JC...another made up term "Christian Nationalist" to smear anyone who is against the DIE, Cultural Marxist, Authoritarian attack on anyone who disagrees with the left. Just stop it..it is embarassing..
So "The Stupid Party" again grasp defeat from the jaws of certain victory. If they had been vocally pushing for moderation for the past 50 years, rather than for full-on outright prohibition, they would now be in a good place to have a real debate. But like the gun-grabbers on the left, the hard-core pro-lifers on the right don't seem to get how to deal with a diverse (gawdsabove I hate the political overtones that word has accrued) population who can just barely agree on what day of the week it is.
Sometimes getting 2/3 of what you want is better than getting 1/3 of what you want, especially if you realize that you're not going to get 3/3 of what you want.
"rather than for full-on outright prohibition"
While some conservatives and Republican politicians hold this position, applying this to all conservatives/Republicans is a stretch. In fact, the Dobbs case was about a 15 week ban; which is nowhere close to full-on prohibition. Actually, it's pretty consistent with every country in the EU.
This entire article is a bit of cart before the horse. Perhaps you and ENB shouldn't count your chickens before they hatch. Polls are consistently wrong and most voters are NOT single issue voters.
I think a lot of the post-Dobbs new voter registrations will be single-issue voters. The question, I think, is will they actually vote.
How long is their attention span?
"In fact, the Dobbs case was about a 15 week ban"
Most people oppose a 15 week. "Most" includes a sizable number of moderate Republicans.
That's the issue. The news media has complete control of the narrative and the Democrats have complete control of the news media. They are pushing the idea that Republicans are pushing for complete bans, even on emergency abortions, and there just enough useful idiots spouting off to give them quotations.
I have genuinely had people argue with me that they are in fear of ectopic pregnancies, despite these both being much earlier than any ban and every ban including emergency exceptions.
A party that sends thugs with guns to kick in doors, shoot women kids and dogs on some superstitious theory of demonic possession by plant leaves is perfectly capable of AGAIN banning condoms, motherly advice and all other forms of birth control until the capacity to initiate deadly force has been prized from their reckless grasp. Federalists and Whigs, Populists and communists have likewise proven themselves liabilities and been voted out of power in America.
The fact of the matter is that media, including Reason, as well as politicians like to pretend any restriction on abortion is tantamount to an outright ban which is so disingenuous is makes my head spin.
Huh? There are red states that have virtual outright bans or are trying to pass outright bans. Nobody is exaggerating here.
Yes many states have outright bans on murder its a good thing.
I guess if you are opposed to abortion from conception because you are a religious fundamentalist. Happy for you you got to impose your religious beliefs on everyone else.
That is not a religious belief. Life is continuous. A fetus is alive from conception by every rational scientific definition of the word.
The question is when it becomes a separate life worthy of protection, which is a matter of philosophy, and none of five points (conception, heartbeat, quickening, viability, and birth) are overwhelmingly more valid than the others.
It seems that everyone wants to shortcut around the actual argument in order to insult people, since that's so much easier.
Readers will observe that Republican girl-bulliers pointedly ignore the "All persons born" at the beginning of the 14th Amendment. This is the one ratified after the Amendment prohibiting "involuntary servitude" which, to female slaves, included being forced to reproduce. All this was prior to Abolition.
Note to foreign readers: Republican platform committees routinely regard the use of condoms as mass-murder. In 1873-4 they legislated against the rhythm method with chain-gang sentences and fines equal to hundreds of thousands of current dollars. The economy crashed in 1875, by their lights due to "normal business cycles" not totalitarian enactments.
My local Republican Party, as well as my mother's local party, seem to think that everyone is opposed to abortion. The general public being extreme pro-lifers is a given to them. But it's just not true. The Republican base is not there because of abortion. They're there because of taxes and some semblance of fiscal sanity and because the Democrats are just awful. NOT because they are committed pro-lifers who want to criminalize all abortions everywhere.
In short, the Republican base are not single issue pro-lifers, no matter how much the single issue pro-lifers assert it is.
but none of them are going to move to Democrats over abortion.
They may not be solely focused on extreme abortion restrictions but they aren't losing sleep over it either. And the Dems offer them nothing with regard to any of the other issues they care about.
I don't think that's accurate. There are plenty of Republocans who have abortion as their fourth or fifth (or tenth) most important issue. And there are a good number who are pro-choice.
The biggest issue is the independents. Many of them swing between the two parties based on issues of personal importance.
Abortion also galvanizes the Democratic base, which are otherwise becoming disenchanted with a party that cannot seem to move past their Trump obsession and is passing bills that are overhyped and have serious negative consequences. This gives them something to argue for and a slippery slope to fear.
Ben's Grabbers of Pussy still publish planks demanding cops cage, rob and shoot youth over plant leaves, and force women to reproduce at gunpoint. Their past prohibitions by violence and confiscations caused Crashes and recessions in 1921, 1929-33, 1971, 1987 (with Dems), and 2008. These dangers to the economy plus their feral determination to violate the rights of actual individuals on behalf of hypothetical potential persons not recognized by the Constitution erode voter support.
Yes, that seems the case with some groups, in that they think everyone thinks like them, and those who don't are a minority outlier.
Media can be like that. Bloomberg News isn't overtly political, and when Trump was president they analyzed his actions without regard to his mean tweets. But now they are overtly for abortion as if nobody is against it.
Perhaps it goes along with some large corporations that will offer to cover travel pay for employee's abortions. That is cheaper for the company than an employee having a baby.
It's definitely a way to make your employees think you are there for them without costing very much. The number of people that would utilize it would be limited to women who are pregnant, don't want a baby, and are outside of the period of legal abortions (granted, a higher likelihood in extreme states). How many of those would there be in a workforce?
One of the best things for employee morale and retention, from a company's perspective, is a benefit that makes your employees feel like they have the support and the full weight of the company's resources behind them, but is almost never utilized and costs almost nothing. This is such a benefit.
And while showing solidarity with their employees, they get to avoid maternity leave and child benefits and other icky kid stuff.
It's more than "icky"; it can be ruinous for a small business.
Anteater is welcome to want to rape and otherwise coerce women. But the function of laws is to stop cretins from actually doing that. Even so, look at Tennessee today, where that message has STILL not sunk in!
Once again a left leaner is here to tell us exactly what the conservatives and republicans think. For the record, Brandy lives in california like myself. The republican party in this state is not competitive. If you are part of the "party", you are either a crony codependent of the california political machine, or you are a die hard ideologue.
I disagree with most of the Republicans in my state on abortion.
Doesn't mean I'm voting Democrat anytime soon.
The Republican party retasked the communist income tax into an enforcement weapon for the ban on beer, wine and whatnot. This directly resulted in crashing the entire economy to shore up a Volstead act only the most brainwashed simpletons still supported. Time and again fanatical enforcement and confiscation orgies are followed by crashes and recessions. Production and trade, like control over one's own reproduction, are individual rights the Republican Party is sworn to do away with piecemeal, punctuated by screeches of "Assassins of Youth" and similar hogwash. Voters now perceive the pattern.
OK, here's a proposition. Is a voter who is fine with allowing abortion in the first 14/15 weeks of pregnancy, but having some level of restriction in the remaining 40+/- weeks, a pro-choice or pro-life voter?
Yes.
Who has a 54-55 week pregnancy?
And the answer is pro-life.
Pro-choice.
The proposition is equivalent to goyim going along with Kristallnacht laws to declare Jews unpersons according to some national socialist schedule. All lifeboat ethics propositions seek to obfuscate rights by pretending reality is not what it is until you agree to let them coerce someone.
Nothing rallies democrats like killing babies.
Nothing rallies national socialists like invisible water-strider buddies urging them to imagine potential Hitler Youths ready to be squeezed out for indoctrination and conscription. Whatever happened to Hitler medals for outstandingly prolific dams?
Here a simple solution, have the Republican lead state legislatures give the choice to the voters in a referendum like Kanas. Let Wisconsin, Michigan and other states vote on abortion rules. Or do the Republican masters know better than the people?
Democrat and Republican masters both know better than the people. You think NY would ever put a late-term abortion ban on the ballot? They are too scared it will pass.
"Or do the Republican masters know better than the people?"
Both WI and MI are blue states. Your anti-Republican bias is showing.
Really? The state legislatures in both WI and MI are controlled by Republicans. I would say both are purple.
Hey, why don't we have direct democracy for everything, right? What could possibly go wrong!
Interesting question, why don't we have more direct democracy?
See California.
Every time we have tried it and the voters opposed a progressive agenda, progressives just overrode them anyway. Viz gay marriage, bilingual education, and benefits for illegals in California.
Because asking people to vote on whether or not they want something without requiring it to be paid for is begging for an endless stream of unfunded mandates that the state is required to accept, but there is no budget for.
Look at California. Sure, they have high taxes, but they have to fund a vast number of programs that people voted for because it was the "right" thing to do, but without including "this is the tax that will pay for it", there is no reasonable pro/con assessment available for voters. Whether it is a government or a company, those who don't have to make a budget work every quarter usually assume "this company has plenty of money to spend on us, they're just too cheap/corrupt/heartless/greedy to spend it. Now they have to."
Ballot initiatives are cost way too much, raise taxes, and stifle entrepreneurs. Look at California. I haven't checked it out in decades, but back when I was in college unfunded ballot initiatives comprised something like 40% of the state's budget. And a lot of the programs were duplicative, ineffective, or both. Just a collasal waste of money.
You have a valid point. However, this is a special case because it's a highly contentious point, and we cannot trust polls on it. Everyone has an extremely strong opinion, and polls differ starkly based on the questions asked.
Additionally, since this is about the definition of life for purposes of abortion, it doesn't bear any responsibility of funding. This simply changes the regulation.
It is fairly simple. Give an array of options for the voters.
1: Emergency abortions only
2: For-Cause abortion only
3: Heartbeat - No-cause abortion until a heartbeat is detected
4: Dobbs - Fifteen week no-cause abortion
5: Roe - Twenty week no-cause
6: Unlimited - No-cause abortion at any time.
The hard part would be that is should not be a strict plurality (like if 1 has 31% but 4&5 have 30% each, then one of the latter should be implemented). It would probably have to go to a runoff.
Because our Founding Fathers understood why direct democracy would be a nightmare.
The relevant question is: should a bunch of superstitious male bigots be empowered to vote away individual rights of women the way whites voted away the individual rights of blacks before the 13th Amendment?
"Revenge" implies that Republican politicians did something. They didn't.
SCOTUS corrected a bad legal decision and made the nation more democratic by handing control back to voters.
"Revenge" has nothing to do with this, except in the minds of ignorant left wing partisans. Is that you?
"SCOTUS corrected a bad legal decision and made the nation more democratic by handing control back to voters."
Yes, this is the interpretation of people who support severely restricting or banning abortion, understand the nuances of the Dobbs decision, or who believe in a more extreme version of federalism.
Those that don't share those traits, which I would argue is most moderate voters, see that an individual choice (or right) has been taken away from people and put in the control of politicians, many of whom are beholden to special interests (in this case, anti-abortion lobbyists). It's a bad look and will influence people.
""Revenge" implies that Republican politicians did something. They didn't."
The "revenge" is against the party that is pushing extreme prohibitions across the country. If they had been more measured and moderate, this wouldn't be an issue.
A ban after 20 weeks would make it impossible to paint Republicans as extremists. A six week ban with no exceptions for rape, incest, or health of the mother is way beyond the pale for most people.
They are doing something wrong, in the eyes of the average Republican-leaning moderate. And it won't be contained to the states in which it is a political advantage. It tarnishes the whole party, so it will influence voters in swing states where the political winds are against abortion bans (or significant restrictions).
Guilty as charged: I believe in the "extreme version of federalism" that is f*cking written down in the US Constitution.
Well, most moderate voters are greedy, entitled, and ignorant. Like you!
Maybe. Or maybe that's just wishful thinking on your part.
Actually, personally, at this point, I have come to like strict abortion limits, for the simple reason that it keeps people like you out of red states.
You cannot murder your baby nationwide with SCOTUS sanction anymore.
Tough shit.
Murdering babies is illegal in all 50 states and always has been. But you know that.
Note to foreign readers: The above Theodore Roosevelt quote (1907) was supplemented in 1934 by Germany's pro-life expert on Womanhood, Hitler: "The catchword “Women's Liberation” is merely a phrase invented by the Jewish intellect, and its contents are marked by the same spirit. The German woman will never need to emancipate herself in an age supportive of German life." German denazification has progressed to within a couple of weeks of the LP's 100 days, and further liberalization is in progress, now that Germany, too, has a Libertarian party.
This is really fun to watch. On the one hand we have abortion maximalists dancing with joy that some republicans are too ideological on this issue and it is costing them. On the other hand, we have abortion maximalists dancing for joy (see Lancaster's column the other day) that some republicans are realizing they will need to make compromises.
This is a great tactic that even Chemjeff has tried in the past. If you are ideological, well you are just too extreme and America isn't with you and you deserve to be voted out. But if you try to compromise, well you must never have really cared about abortion in the first place, so no one should vote for you. It's great coin flip- tails they lose, heads you win.
It is overly simplistic to claim that Republicans (or conservatives) are opposed to abortion. I would guess that most Republicans are only opposed to the ridiculously radical abortions with no limitations folks. Look at the abortion law in Mississippi, for example, it prohibits abortions after 15 weeks of gestation, only a partisan hack would say that is extreme.
Another example is the recent vote in Kansas, a red state, that struck down a state constitutional amendment that would have allowed Kansas legislators to prohibit abortions. That amendment lost by more than 20%. To summarize, Republican voters voted in very large numbers to keep abortion legal.
Abortion has not been banned in America. Now that the feds have backed away from the terrible Roe decision some states have banned abortion because, you know, Democracy. Other states have left abortion as a legal option because, you know, Democracy.
Humorously... The narrative is so well planted..
They can't just pass a law that doctors cannot *intentionally* kill a fetus (i.e. Allow Fetal Ejection). And the only logical conclusion that they can't just pass that law is that they want to FORCE reproduction.
Course; you won't hear anyone even entertain that plausible outcome because without auto-equating 'abortion' to killing a fetus the political-party wedge issue fades away into the fantasy-land it was born from.
"some states have banned abortion because, you know, Democracy. Other states have left abortion as a legal option because, you know, Democracy."
Where do you fall on additional laws by restictionists states to prevent people from getting abortions in legal states (like criminalizing travel for abortions)? Or banning speech that informs people about legal ways that the bans can be circumvented or avoided? Or outlawing medications that can be used for medical abortions?
The 1972 LP platform and the ROE decision incorporating its plank did not completely embrace the individual rights of women while individuals. Like the 13th and 14th Amendments, it merely stopped mystical collectivist lynch mobs from corrupting local governments into declaring pregnant women rightless, enslaved Siamese twins and chasing them with guns drawn until roughly a hundred days had gone by. Population has since doubled. If Comstockism hadn't been struck down like slavery in 1973, the population today would be 10.4 billion wretches. LP democracy prevented this.
Only a gutless male wannabee rapist would presume to violate the individual rights of women. (These arguments from intimidation do cut both ways.)
Shake off the Power-Mad (it's really leftard ideology) of Pro-Life Republicans. At this point; UR our only hope on USA survival but not with traces of leftard ideology applied....
STICK to LIMITED GOVERNMENT!!!
Time and time again I watch a party gain traction, get greedy, start passing laws to force the other side do things that they don't want to do, only to suffer a backlash and lose not only the ground they once had ... but watch as public opinion swing the other way; only for the other side to do the same thing , in time, and it repeats.
Our two party system is made up of busybodies.
True that. If you aren’t a busybody you tend to stick to minding your own business, and the idea of attending political meetings and sitting in committees is painful.
Both halves of the Nixon-subsidies altruist-looter Kleptocracy are committed to the initiation of force. All deviations from that (dropping the draft, cutting federal drones, legalizing some plant leaves, ROE...) were copied from the LP platform under the whip of libertarian spoiler votes determining close elections. You watched violent looter parties fighting over control of battered victims while libertarian spoiler votes jammed a stick in their spokes.
I know this is the popular thing for Democrats and left-leaning moderates to believe, since history, the electoral map, and public opinion are strongly against them in the midterms. It is a fantasy.
The Democrats are going to get shellacked in the midterms. The House will go dark red and the senate, even with some of the hapless clowns that are running in states like PA, will be red as well. Is it a possibility that Dems can avoid shooting themselves in the foot (or, since that's already happened, avoid bleeding out from the wound? Sure. Is it realistic? No. Is it likely? No way on hell.
The Democrats are going to get crushed. And it's their own fault.
Voters whose sole concern is abortion, or 'racism,' or climate change, will find that those issues do not decrease food and fuel costs or make it cheaper to heat during the winter. Resentment and revenge are what one would expect from a population of petulant and immature people focused only on themselves.
"Democrats still tainted by bad COVID policy, polls in late 2021 and the first half of 2022"
Says who? White ISIS and the American Taliban, or Conservatives a societal malignancy who will always perform as a body of enemy operatives.
Girl-bullying fascists have reverted anti-vaxxer superstitions of 1913, when children died of diptheria because Jesus clearly wanted them dead and women didn't vote. No way can they brag about THEIR successful policies (shooting teenagers of assorted color overplant leaves, ruining Latin American economies by exporting shoot-first prohibitionism, bullying girls, whining about getting beaten). So they have to try to attack their fellow looters. Yessss!
"Revenge of the Abortion Voters?"
Let's hope so.
Poor Elizabeth.
You don't have Joe Biden make the Independence Hall speech he made when you're confident of winning.
And you fortify the polls --of course you fortify the polls. How else will you get your army of useless idiots riled up if you don't make them think they're going to win?
Fourscore and 8 years ago Hitler got something right in an address to Nazi Womanhood: "We have seen that the clever mind can be misled only all too easily, that ostensibly intellectual arguments can cause men of weak intellect to falter, and that it is particularly in these times that the most profound inner instinct of preservation of the self and of the Volk awakens in a woman. Woman has proven to us that she knows what is right!" Today's coathanger Republicans bet American women would surrender individual rights like so many Trilbys.