A New Green Revolution Is in the Offing
Thanks to some amazing recent crop biotech breakthroughs

A recent spate of crop biotech breakthroughs presage a New Green Revolution that will boost crop production, shrink agriculture's environmental footprint, help us weather future climate change, and provide better nutrition for the world's growing population.
The first Green Revolution was generated through the crop breeding successes pioneered by agronomist Norman Borlaug back in the 1960s. The high-yielding dwarf wheat varieties bred by Borlaug and his team more than doubled grain yields. The Green Revolution averted the global famines confidently predicted for the 1970s by population doomsters like Stanford entomologist Paul Ehrlich. Other crop breeders using Borlaug's insights boosted yields for other staple grains. Since 1961, global cereal production has increased 400 percent while the world population grew by 260 percent. Borlaug was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 for his accomplishments. Of course, the disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's invasion of Ukraine are currently roiling grain and fertilizer supplies.
Borlaug needed 20 years of painstaking crossbreeding to develop his high-yield and disease-resistant wheat varieties. Today, crop breeders are taking advantage of the tools of modern biotechnology that can dramatically increase the rate at which yields increase and drought- and disease-resistance can be imbued in crops.
The Green Revolution's crops required increased fertilizer applications to achieve their higher yields. However, fertilizers have some ecologically deleterious side effects. For example, the surface runoff of nitrogen and other fertilizers not absorbed by crops spurs the growth of harmful alga in rivers, lakes, and coastal areas. In addition, excess nitrogen fertilizer gets broken down by soil bacteria such that there are rising atmospheric concentrations of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide, which, pound for pound, has 300 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide.
The good news is that in the last month, two teams of modern plant breeders have made breakthroughs that will dramatically cut the amount of nitrogen fertilizers crops need for grain production. In July, Chinese researchers reported the development of "supercharged" rice and wheat crops, which they achieved by doubling the expression of a regulatory gene that increases nitrogen uptake by four- to fivefold and enhances photosynthesis. In field trials, the yields of the modified rice were 40 to 70 percent higher than those of the conventional varieties. One upshot is that farmers can grow more food on less land using fewer costly inputs.
Some crops like soybeans and alfalfa get most of the nitrogen fertilizer they need through their symbiotic relationship with nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria. Soybeans supply the bacteria living on their roots with sugars, and the bacteria in turn take nitrogen from the air and turn it into nitrate and ammonia fertilizers for the plants. However, nitrogen-fixing bacteria do not colonize the roots of cereal crops.
A team of researchers associated with the University of California Davis reported in July their success in gene editing rice varieties to make their roots hospitable to nitrogen-fixing bacteria. As a result, when grown under conditions of limited soil nitrogen, the yields of the gene-edited varieties were 20 to 35 percent higher than those of the conventional varieties. The researchers believe their gene-editing techniques can be applied to other cereal crops.
This new biotech-enabled Green Revolution promises a future in which more food from higher yields grown using less fertilizer means more farmland restored to nature, less water pollution, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am confident that this solution to the problem of nitrogen runoff will be rejected by the opponents of nitrogen runoff.
GMO- = we will be growing gills like Costner in Waterworld
And about as successful as the movie.
I am a student and I do work part time on this website to meet my needs. One who is jobless or want to earn more money for himself, (res-08) should must try this because this is really very easy and less time consuming and also advantageous without investing any amount.
.
SEE MORE:>>>> https://googlejobs0945.netlify.app/
Will we all be inexplicably smoking cigarettes as well?
Most certainly. If it doesn't result in poor people dying of starvation.
Biotech is not considered green by those whose religion is gia
Sri Lanka disagrees. So does Canada. And the Netherlands.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/were-not-gonna-take-it
Local stories…
Geeze Ron you can just come out and say you're for killing people to lower nitrogen already.
Bailey has no place in a Libertarianish site. He can GTFO with his pseudoscience Scientism
Carbon is evil
And now nitrogen is too.
When is the left going to admit they hate life itself?
The problem is that man is evil. And so your default position is that if man is doing something to the environment it must be bad. And strangely, everywhere you look, you will find precisely that answer.
Are you taking up land that is used by field mice? You are destroying natural habitat and killing field mice.
Does your land use actually provide a good habitat for field mice? Then you are encouraging the overpopulation of a species and stressing the population of crickets that those field mice eat.
Are you fishing out prawns in Hawaii? That's bad. But if you start farming prawns in ponds on the big island, well now you are introducing runoff into the water.
Look no further than nitrogen runoff. Yes, certain nitrogen-eating algae thrive on the stuff- yay we are helping life! And in the process, the algae crowds out other sealife- generally at the bottom of the ocean- by taking oxygen out of the water.
Here is the thing: Every economic decision you make has tradeoffs. And these enviro-cultists have succeeded in changing the debate such that all we are allowed to discuss is the cost, and never the benefit. Because whenever you point out the grain you grow, or the prawns you farm, they can claim that you don't really NEED corn, it's evil anyway. And who needs shrimp when meal worms will do the job?
I actually think that nitrogen runoff is a problem- it is literally a tragedy of the commons. It is easily- and I mean easily- solved by introducing property rights to waterways and fisheries. Then you render the cost benefit analysis to property owners who are best equipped to judge whether the market benefits of their crops are worth the costs (they now must shoulder) to the environment.
The problem is that the enviro-cultists have made this impossible. They are not interested in private property, and even when they talk about "market solutions" it is essentially a fancy crypto tax pretending to be an exchangeable credit. Instead it is always command and control, command and control. And so the only choice is to resist them at every turn.
all we are allowed to discuss is the cost, and never the benefit.
Environmentalism is a cynical movement.
Was it Oscar Wilde that said "the cynic is a person who knows the cost of everything but the value of nothing"?
Leftists are cancer.
Literally, not figuratively.
It is easily- and I mean easily- solved by introducing property rights to waterways and fisheries.
Uh, because water rights management is so easy even without worrying about nitrogen?
The bigger thing is the nitrogen fixation for cereal crops. This is one that they've been working on and farmers are excited about. Currently, we rotate crops, 1 year pulse crops (nitrogen fixation), three years cereal, but you only get a nitrogen bump from the pulse crop in the first year. Additionally, pulse crops can't be planted less than three years apart because of disease cycles (many insurance companies are now not insuring if you plant them closer than four years apart). Farmers will appreciate not having to apply as much fertilizer. It costs money and time. If we could get away with just a little starter fertilizer drilled in with the seed and the plant provides the rest, it would save us time and money, as well as benefit the soil and downstream run off.
Turning cereals into three or four year perennials would be the next breakthrough. Having to plant only three or four years, perennials often require less herbicides (as they crowd out weeds), perennials have deeper roots, and year round living roots, which decreases erosion, makes them more drought resistant, improves soil microbiology, etc. If paired with nitrogen fixation, this would drastically change agriculture while also reducing inputs and reducing pollution. It also would be a major labor savings.
I learned more from your comment than I did in the article above, so good job.
"In July, Chinese researchers reported the development of . . . "
Whatever follows is a lie.
>RONALD BAILEY | 5.17.2016 3:02 PM
Nature Genetics has published an article with the catchy title, "Signaling from maize organ primordia via FASCIATED EAR3 regulates stem cell proliferation and yield traits," that describes how researchers have bioengineered corn so that yields are boosted by 50 percent. Basically, a team of biologists at Cold Spring Harbor have figured out a way to modulate the molecular brakes that tell ears of corn to stop growing once they reach a certain size. Mutations in the FEA3 receptor eases off the brakes and allows stem cells that grow into kernels of corn to proliferate, but not so much so that they outrun the availability of nutrients, water, and light to sustain their development. This bioengineered change in the FEA3 pathway, according to Cold Spring Harbor, "gave rise to a modest, manageable increase in stem cells, and to ears that were significantly larger than ears in wild-type plants.These ears, the product of maize plants grown from weak alleles of FEA3, had more rows of kernels, and up to 50% higher yield overall than wild-type plants."
With the lockdowns, supply chain tomfuckery, and record inflation it feels like corn yields have been up 50% for the last 6 yrs. doesn't it?
Also worth noting that even if we get 10X more efficient acreage-wise at growing it, that doesn't mean dick if government figure out ways to be 100X less efficient at using it.
"Also worth noting that even if we get 10X more efficient acreage-wise at growing it, that doesn't mean dick if government figure out ways to be 100X less efficient at using it."
If there is one thing government is efficient in its being inefficient.
finally, Tomacco!
It would make for the best pizza ever.
Um, that would use tomashish.
Are they working on that?
I am now.
Don't let the goats get into it
Ronnie, our global betters have already explained the next green revolution. It will focus on luddite communal farms and bug meat. A side benefit: reduced life spans will fix SS and Medicare solvency (though benefits will be paid in stunted vegetables).
Hey baily the evil retarded subhuman cancers you support don't want more food. Take a look at you heros work in Sri lanka and denmark
The anti GMO people will make it unprofitable.
And impossible
many nations have outlawed GMO's.
I have one relative who is a gmo scientist and the other is anti science anti vac and both are religious nuts that think the end is near. thankfully I've never been around for their arguments but have had to tell them i don't care if the rapture is near
I hope the Rapture takes people like them and leaves the rest of us to enjoy life here on Earth.
Apart from nitrogen, another essential nutrient for plants is phosphorus. Plants like venusfly traps, pitcher plants, and sundew have evolved strategies to obtain phosphorus on otherwise nutrient poor soils. We definitely need some gene editing to put those genes into common food crops and scale them up! Just imagine strolling through a field of 8 ft tall venus flytraps or sundews.