LAPD's Militarized Response to Peaceful Abortion Protests Makes the Case for Police Reform—Again
Reforms promised after Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 are not being followed by Los Angeles police.

Despite promises of reform after the city's poor response to Black Lives Matter protests in the summer of 2020, video of police violence at recent pro-abortion protests in Los Angeles shows that Los Angeles police have not yet changed their practices.
After pro-abortion activists took to streets around the U.S. to protest the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in late June, videos have circulated on social media showing police in Los Angeles treating protesters like enemy combatants.
Armed with riot gear and brandishing rubber-bullet guns, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) mobilized rapidly in response to pro-abortion protests near the city's federal courthouse from June 24–27. Activists and journalists claim excessive use of physical force was rampant, with officers using batons against peaceful protesters.
The LAPD has maintained that it did not use force against peaceful protesters. "The vast majority of those involved [in pro-abortion protests] were peaceful and law abiding, however, a much smaller group of individuals took to the streets with the intention of creating chaos and destruction," the LAPD said in a June 27 statement. "The Los Angeles Police Department has the distinction of facilitating First Amendment Rights for all Angelinos. Equally the Department will enforce the law when individuals engage in violence," the statement continued.
While there were violent actors present at the protests, including one man who attacked police with a torch, videos shared online appear to show police using force against nonviolent protesters, including those trying to deescalate the situation. In one clip that received particular attention on social media, LAPD officers seemingly shoved Full House actress Jodie Sweetin to the pavement as she tried to defuse a confrontation between police and protesters on a Los Angeles freeway.
this is actress Jodie Sweetin (Stephanie Tanner from Full House) being thrown to the ground by members of the LAPD as she was trying to lead a group of peaceful protestors away from the freeway during the protest pic.twitter.com/nr3Yx6TgZU
— Dana Abercrombie #AmplifyBlackVoices (@sagesurge) June 26, 2022
In another video, LAPD officers appeared to keep bystanders from providing water to a protester who had his head and arm repeatedly slammed into the ground by police.
https://twitter.com/VPS_Reports/status/1540577435556511745
Police also reportedly targeted journalists, even when they presented their press credentials and explicitly identified themselves. One clip seems to show police officers hitting reporter Tina Desiree Berg and shoving her to the ground, even after she showed her press badge:
https://twitter.com/AJD_90/status/1541218633107394560
Back in May, when Politico released a leaked draft Supreme Court opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, protesters were also met with violence from LAPD officers.
The LAPD's response to Black Lives Matter protests in June 2020 was also subject to criticism over poor planning, disorganization, and several instances of excessive force. An investigative report commissioned by the Los Angeles City Council found that "those arrested for curfew were detained and handcuffed for hours, without water or bathroom breaks, before being transported to the jail facility for booking."
City officials promised reform following protests in summer 2020. In response to public outcry, the LAPD updated many of its policies on managing crowds and respecting protesters and journalists. Police reform has also remained an important issue in Los Angeles elections, with both major candidates for Los Angeles mayor, businessman and former president of the Los Angeles Police Commission Rick Caruso and U.S. Representative Karen Bass (D–Calif.), promising to implement further changes to the LAPD's practices without "defunding" the department. The Bass campaign includes police reform as a key tenet of her public safety policy.
For activists and local observers, the police department's approach to these recent protests shows the failure of reform efforts. "It's a little less than two years since [the LAPD] changed its policy on how it treats non-city credentialed press after they roughed up [reporter Lexis Olivier-Rey] in 2020," tweeted James Queally, a crime reporter for the Los Angeles Times. "Pretty clear from this video they're not following it."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
One man's peaceful abortion protest is another man's violent attack on democracy.
A dicey but mostly peaceful abortion?
I don't doubt that most protesters were peaceful, even in the last two summers. But I have as much sympathy for "peaceful" protesters who don't try to rein in the violent ones as I do for "good" cops who don't try to rein in bad cops.
As long as your peaceful protest provides backing for the violent protesters, you are part of the problem.
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job (eny-05) achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money on-line visiting this site.
>>> http://usjobs85.tk
I think this sounds good and all, but I don't see how it is practicable to hold people collectively responsible for the conduct of strangers.
Antifa is very clear in their aims. The last thing they want is for peaceful protest to work. Their entire goal is to show up at a peaceful protest and turn it violent exactly for this sort of response- so that onlookers decline to support the cause, and the protestors feel their peaceful acts don't work. Because they want a violent revolution. They want everyone so convinced that dialogue is impossible that violence is the only alternative.
Let's say you show up to a protest for something you are passionate about, and Antifa shows up. What are you going to do about it? Are you going to shout them down? They are louder and they are there to sow chaos, not protest- if your protest turns into a giant scream fest, they've won. Are you going to engage in violence to get them to leave? Now it is exactly the riot that you accuse others of failing to prevent.
I think any culpability belongs with the media who will do tone deaf things like standing in front of a burning building and declaring it mostly peaceful. If more "journalists" had acted like Rommelmann and told things straight, organizers would have (justifiably) felt the pressure to distance themselves from the violence, and onlookers at home may have been more willing to distinguish between the peaceful protestors and the rioters.
Reason had an excellent article during the several-times-weekly courthouse arson incidents in Portland. Written by a trans who embedded herself and explained first hand how the Antifa core works.
They're very calculated. They control media, only "reporters" who are antifa approved are allowed to film or photograph anything. They have tactics from weaponizing frozen water bottles (several pounds of hard ice to hit someone, but no evidence later since it melts) to cans of soup in their pockets "To feed my family". They will constantly antagonize, doing things like throwing bottles full of piss into a crowd, and threatening with the largest men in the group, but the instant someone confronts them they run the women up front and get the cameras going so it looks like the opposition is picking on the poor, innocent weaklings.
The fact that a Reason writer is so taken in by this shit that he will repeat the line, simply because it conforms to the pre-determined reason line of "We need police reform", should be remarkably embarrassing. I mean, like hide your face in shame if you have even the slightest conscience level of cringworthy embarrassment.
This dude is getting played, and he's too ignorant or complicit to even care. He should read his own magazine.
I read the same articles, and that is my point.
These people are dedicated agitators. Their purpose is to confuse the issue of what is happening. They want people sympathetic to the protest to think the government is being unreasonable. And they want people sympathetic to the government to believe the protestors are being unreasonable.
Again, what are you or Alphabet supposed to do if your peaceful protest gets attended by these dedicated agitators? Are you supposed to go to blows with them in order to prove that you are the peaceful one? How, exactly, does that work?
Leftists don't protest for anything legitimate, so they can go fuck themselves.
Leftists are collectivist assholes, so judge them by their own standards.
They can believe whatever they want. Someone doesn't lose the right to protest because they believe wrong things, or because other assholes are violent.
Sometimes I wonder who the real 50-center is here.
Speaking of the media, the idiot who wrote this piece has come up with some pretty strange conclusions from these mostly unenlightening videos.
30% of the country imposing it's superstitions on the other 70% of the country... quite a Democracy we've got here!!
her name was Ashli Babbitt
In one clip that received particular attention on social media, LAPD officers seemingly shoved Full House actress Jodie Sweetin to the pavement
Show me the 15 seconds before the start of that clip.
Completely agree. Almost all of these clips start the moment something happened, which tells you nothing about what lead up to the conflict. We saw this with Jacob Blake (among others).
Bingo! What was she doing in the police line? That's NOT leading the rest of the protesters away. As for blocking highways - an illegal act - those should be cleared with water cannons and mass arrests. Resistance should earn the use of force.
Dogs, General; don't forget the dogs.
Perhaps LAPD could track down the last surviving member of the sixties Selma Police Department and learn how to handle crowds.
The full video seems unavailable anywhere. The guy posted that clip on his Instagram page but didn't show what was happening immediately before, even though it's clearly a clip from a longer video.
Fuck off.
'protest or insurrection? how to tell the difference'
a reason article coming soon
Protest - Burning cars, looting, violence and mayhem
Insurrection - Strolling around Congress with police holding the doors open for you.
Easy. An Insurrection is a protest that can be blamed on Orange Man.
Well, maybe you need to think twice about violently insurrecting to support abortion.
Because it threatens Our Democracy.
"I tried to give him water and LAPD smacked the water out of my hand."
Ya, you dont put stuff into people's mouths when they are having a seizure. This is retarded logic. From retards. That's how you make a person aspirate. LAPD might have saved his life by doing so.
But also, this is all in the play stupid games...category.
Why are these people always trying to hand people water, anyway? Is it some sort of proggie sacrament? The handing of the water?
Is it some sort of proggie sacrament?
It's an attempt to interfere with the arrest in a way that can be later justified as innocuous to and by allied media. The cop doesn't know what you're doing and can't allow you to stop their arrest (because teaching activists that violence will get people free encourages more violence). So they have to stop the interference, which the activist portrays as police violence.
This is all orchestrated theater, with the Reason "reporter" playing their role.
"This is all orchestrated theater, with the Reason "reporter" playing their role."
This is the part that grates on me so much. There is no analysis or any sort of originality in this article OTHER than to promote the carefully curated and edited videos of activists- Activists that Mr Reason Intern doesn't know from Adam. They could be liberty lovers, or marxists or Russian bots.
Even the "This requires police reform" angle is absurd. He can't know that, because short clips of videos can't tell us one way or the other. It is just another example of the swirling toilet water of "You tweet a video, I tweet an article reaction" social-media driven reporting that has the entire journalism discipline circling the drain.
I do not get why these activists are given the benefit of the doubt when, say, the Proud Boys -- with less of a history of violence, let's be honest --- are not.
Be consistent. Don't give anybody much benefit of the doubt.
"this is actress Jodie Sweetin (Stephanie Tanner from Full House) being thrown to the ground by members of the LAPD as she was trying to lead a group of peaceful protestors away from the freeway during the protest"
When asked for comment, Sweetin responded "How rude!"
+1
In fairness to the LAPD, she is a known associate of criminal mastermind Lori Loughlin.
lol, good one
I demand a re-opening of Bob Saget’s death investigation. For all we know his skull fracture was caused by being slammed to the ground by a cop.
LOL!
#fillinginforFist
Let Los Angeles burn. They got exactly what they voted for, all LAPD should simply stand down and wait until it's time to pick up bodies.
I can't even figure out what it is they're protecting from the protesters. A homeless encampment? A pile of trash?
The protestors had pretty much shut down the 110 highway, which is how you get from downtown LA to the foothill communities. The wife and I had planned to go to caltech that night for a dinner, and waved off when we realized we'd be at a drive-in of performance theatre.
In downtown, they were evidently trying to peacefully protest a federal courthouse to the foundation.
and when they came for the Hallmark actresses I said nothing, because Christmas in July is stupid.
Just don't mess with the Good Witch series.
if any human on earth looks like a living Who, it is that chick.
That upper lip of hers is too big for her face.
exactly.
no sympathy for protesters who block roads that makes it impassible for emergency vehicles to get poeple to hospitals. more people need to start running over street protesters.
Also don't know why they are protesting in California, go to a state that is limiting abortion. maybe they are afraid to protest in those locations
Yeah, no shit. It's Los Angeles, you can get your uterus vacuumed out fortnightly if you want to.
Mostly, it's fun. It's an excuse to go out and go wild and cause trouble and mostly get away with it.
A ticket to France is more expensive than going to the 405.
Especially since they live in a state that is not going to ban or limit access to abortion. Exactly what are they protesting, again?
Half of them probably genuinely think SCOTUS banned abortion.
Then again, the LAPD and LASD are full of actual criminal gangs. These morons deserve each other.
Whatever their masters tell them to.
IIRC, the video of Tina Desitee Berg getting hit by a cop came as she was trying to film the arrest of a guy who blasted a cop in the face with a hairspray flame thrower. Doesn't make what LAPD did to Berg ok, but it does put an asterisk next to Reason's characterization of the protest as "peaceful." Reason could at least pull a CNN and put a "mostly" in front of that peaceful.
" videos shared online appear to show police using force against nonviolent protesters, including those trying to deescalate the situation."
For the record, as near as I can tell, Reason Intern and Author ERIC BAZAIL-EIMIL lives in Washington DC. And here he is "reporting" on what happened 2500 miles away in Los Angeles.
What does that video *actually* show us? Does it show little Steph Tanner trying to de-escalate? No. The Twitter post ASSERTS she was doing this, but it is conveniently edited to show nothing but the moment Swedin is sent tumbling to the ground.
"One clip seems to show police officers hitting reporter Tina Desiree Berg and shoving her to the ground, even after she showed her press badge"
No, the one clip shows Tina Desiree Berg, an employee of an activist opinion site, trying to cross a police line and being pushed back. Brutally.
I am not trying to excuse the cops here, but none of what Mr Bazail-Eimil reports is something that he actually saw. It is not the result of actual interviews he did, or footage that he claimed from some person he interviewed. And as a result, he is regurgitating the carefully edited and crafted messages from activists on Twitter. He is being the mouth piece of convenience for people he doesn't even know.
Shame on Reason for teaching its interns that this is the way to report.
"appear to show police using force"
He applied the cover words.
It's almost like Reason is an enthusiastic cog, playing their role, in the totalitarian leftist regime.
"none of what Mr Bazail-Eimil reports is something that he actually saw."
Hyphenated name appears to cause brain rot
Note that the only reason reporter to actually go to any of these events was Nancy rommelman, and her stories are compleatly different than the rest of the reason articles
and her stories are usually revealing of the rot and disfunction within the protestors. Which leftie outlets prefer not to show.
This was a point I forgot to make, and you are exactly right.
Rommelmann isn't some deep south conservative. She clearly is left leaning, but she reports what she sees, even if it departs from a narrative. Reason should be teaching its interns to write like Nancy, rather than regurgitating and summarizing his twitter feed.
In fact, where is Ms. Rommelman? I trust her more than the rest of the authors combined. That was actual reporting, not just opinion pieces based off Twitter posts.
Wasn't she just in Ukraine or something?
also, very convenient many of the videos shown are clipped to the point where police have a response.
Why was Sweetin deep within police ranks when the clip starts? Seems like they have a line formed and she was pushing into them. But we cant tell from the clip, because it starts when she is already being pushed over. Purposefully.
Also fun to see the results of the Tanner daughters. "DJ" is a religious conservative, "Stephanie" is an antifa retard, and "Michelle" is (they) fucked up for life, most likely. No commentary here, just fun to watch.
>>"Michelle" is (they) fucked up for life
tough knowing your younger sister entirely more talented.
"Stephanie" is an antifa retard
And meth addict at one point.
Bingo! What was she doing in the police line? That's NOT leading the rest of the protesters away. As for blocking highways - an illegal act - those should be cleared with water cannons and mass arrests. Resistance should earn the use of force.
You can tell who the Reasoners are trying to appeal to. In this case the protester narrative is repeated as fact even though none of their characterizations are proven by the video and several are inconsistent with it. For example a better way to describe their claimed "de-escalation" is "interfering". When someone is being arrested you don't get to decide whether they should or not, and trying to stop it is an escalation, not a de-escalation. All these people are doing is forcing themselves into the conflict to make themselves the story. The idea it is appropriate for them to mediate is absurd.
By comparison the Reason CRT articles criticize the right for not adopting the left's terminology, even claiming this proves them wrong, even though the terminology is political double speak.
Even when Reasoners disagree with the left they take the minimalist method while taking the exact opposite approach to the right. In that case they are so eager to maximize the difference they lie that claiming urgency is white supremacy is not CRT. In all cases Reasoners adopt the left's framing and language and claim any deviation is wrong rather than a competing understanding.
Lemme see if I can sum this up.
Bunch of entitled doofus's either can't afford to go to an anti-abortion state, or don't want to interrupt their schedule, so they protest in a pro-abortion state by illegally blocking a freeway.
Every video in support of the "peaceful" narrative begins the moment the police respond to some unknown provocation, conveniently leaving out all that prior context.
I am burned out on "mostly peaceful protests" from a couple of summers of blatant lies. Get back to me when you've got a new slogan.
Just as good cops who don't rein in bad cops are not really good cops, so with peaceful protesters who don't rein in the violent protesters who piggyback off your peaceful protest. You want to be called responsible? Act responsibly.
And if you actually cared about whatever you are protesting, you would do it in a state where it has some meaning. Read MLK's Letter From a Birmingham Jail for an introduction to "responsibility". There was a reason he protested in segregationist areas.
"I am burned out on "mostly peaceful protests" from a couple of summers of blatant lies. "
ya the press and the left have overplayed this card.
Unfortunately for them, now when "peaceful protest" is stated, it is almost assumed that rioting/arson took place. The benefit of the doubt on "peaceful" was burnt a long time ago...when all those buildings were also burnt
Am I the only person to not a big yellow glow in the background of several photographs? What is on fire? The answer to that question changes the context of these incidents considerably.
" . . . even when they presented their press credentials and explicitly identified themselves."
Bad news snowflake; you ain't nothing special just because you got a plastic card. Equal treatment under the law REQUIRES that you get the same beatdown as everyone else.
Besides, CA - no one cares anymore.
“LAPDs Militarized Response”?
This is a militarized response only when compared to a paintball gunfight.
Exactly.
"reporters" should be require to serve a hitch in combat arms, just so they have an idea what the hell is going on.
A militarized response calls for enough shit that they run out of ambulances.
Police also reportedly targeted journalists, even when they presented their press credentials and explicitly identified themselves.
Journalists are not a protected class. Literally anyone can be a journalist, all you need is internet access. You can write a blog, you can post videos on Youtube or Rumble. There's no special protections that should be in place because someone flashes a magical press badge. We shouldn't be alarmed that somehow journalists were not given special privilege's, we should be alarmed at the general behavior, assuming it's worth of condemning.
Journalism doesn't belong to mass media, it belongs to the people. It's an individual practice.
in fact, it would be appropriate (and I would be just as happy) if a similar response happened with Wapo or Fox journalists. You are in the middle of what is essentially a riot, confronting police in riot gear. You might catch some hands. Thats the fucking game, deal with it
Some press credentials have a recognized legal status. If the cops were ignoring them that's like cops ignoring a concealed carry permit and arresting someone for having a gun on them. Doesn't matter if the credential or permit should exist. If it does then the law enforcement is supposed to respect it because it's the law and that's what they enforce.
Some press credentials have a recognized legal status.
Which I think is bullshit, if you didn't pick that up. There's nothing about journalism that requires treating them like super special VIPs.
Doesn't matter if you think it's bullshit or not. If it's the law then the cops are supposed to do what the law says.
Cops aren’t supposed to throw protestors down, either. That’s far more offensive to my sensibilities than not respecting the magical press talisman.
I’m unmoved by journalism being upset that they’re not being given more rights than other citizens. I really am. It’s quite upsetting to me that so many people have come to accept the idea that there’s some special privilege that comes from being a press person.
I'll say it one more time and then give up.
Regardless of whether or not the press should be granted special treatment so they can document what is going on, the cops are not supposed to interfere with them if they do.
When cops ignore press passes, and it doesn't matter if you like them or not, they are not upholding the law.
Unless you think cops should be able to pick and choose what laws they enforce and what legal statuses they respect.
Even if it is the law, in the middle of chaos, you don't have the time to check everything. You check it after the fact when you have time to actually do so.
In the middle of a mob...sorry. You gotta move or be arrested and we can release you later.
Hey sarc, can you provide an example of this "legal status"? The only ones I am aware of are wrt international war law, which is a very different beast.
Specifically, in Los Angeles, the LAPD does issue Press Passes, which *under specific circumstances* may allow press to get past police and fire lines. Again, right wrong or whatever, this isn't just some "Diplomatic Immunity" card that makes police stand down. It states that you are ELIGIBLE to cross a police line, *if* the police feel it is safe.
Hey sarc, can you provide an example of this "legal status"?
Not without doing some research. I just looked up press credentials and it said they can come with special legal privileges. It's like proof that you're documenting, not participating. At least that's my assumption.
And for what it is worth, I went looking for the credentials of this person. She is a Journalist like Paul Krugnuts is a journalist. She is an activist who is a proud supporter of Bernie Sanders and writes for Bernie-boosting, socialist web properties. Ostensibly these are "news articles" but only in as much as they have a bit of current events to serve as a hook for her socialist screeds.
Your point stands- if she is a journalist, everyone is a journalist or no one is. Either you can cross a police line as they are in the process of arresting someone or not. That she is a journalist, "journalist", journalist(*) or random passerby should not matter.
Quick! Quick! Which team were they on? That determines whether or not the police were heavy handed! What was the color of their skin? Did they have religion? Can't make decisions based upon principles, must base it on the people involved!
That Reason is not justifying indefinite detention for them shows what "team" they were on.
Reason regurgitating antifa talking points again. How stunning and brave.
Looking at the videos I'm supposed to get outraged about, I see people blocking freeways and "working the refs" by screaming at the cops who are responding to the bad behavior.
I think the cops know that in dealing with protests by progs in a prog city, they have to be cautious because politicians will seek to gain points by punishing any cop missteps. Maybe if it was Proud Boys protesting the local politicos would allow some good old police brutality, but this is the politicos' base demonstrating, they need to be handled with kid gloves.
by punishing any cop missteps.
I heard defunding worked well. Maybe they could do more of that.
Maybe if it was Proud Boys protesting the local politicos would allow some good old police brutality, but this is the politicos' base demonstrating, they need to be handled with kid gloves.
They arrest proud boys before they get to the freeway. And it's reported here with deadpan neutrality of a media saying that the Illinois shooter was "wearing women's clothes to obscure his identity."
I actually have made $18k within a calendar month via working easy jobs from a laptop. As I had lost my last business, I was so upset and thank God I searched this simple job achieving this I'm ready to achieve thousand of dollars just from my home. All of you can certainly join this best job and could collect extra money
online visiting this site.> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
The LAPD and LASD are full of criminal gangs and plenty of examples of their brutality and corruption therein abound... so far this ain't it. We KNOW that these clips are curated by the people who post them, they all start with no context, and we know antifa wants to stir things up. So we have to be skeptical. We can probably say that last guy took more licks than he needed to, but I can show you a dozen videos of worse police assaults with almost no effort.
Now, if you want to do a deep dive into how they implemented their tactics, and FOIA a bunch of bodycams to see if officers in context were instigating violence, I'll bet you'll find plenty. But until that happens, let's focus on police crimes that we can actually show. For example, in the same city right now the LASD Sheriff and undersheriff are both dodging subpoenas with lame excuses because they were probably covering for literal criminal cops who beat up other cops for not being criminals. I'm not even joking. The sheriff's chief of staff just admitted to being in such a gang and retired chief said he was told not to look into the gang connections from the fight.
These cops are not heroes. Many aren't even law-abiding. But this article doesn't show that.
"Militarized Response"?
Uh-huh. You see a lot of riot shields and rubber-bullet guns on the battlefield when you served, Mr. Bazail-Eimil?
"showing police in Los Angeles treating protesters like enemy combatants."
Oh, they show the protesters being shot with real bullets?
Several of these photos show what appears to be a fire in the background. Is this just a lot of streetlights, a standard bonfire, or was there actual arson? The answer to this question puts everything in a very different light. If the crowd has started burning cars and buildings, the violent reaction becomes much more understandable.
"as she was trying to lead a group of peaceful protestors away from the freeway."
Utter Bullshit. They were facing off with the cops ON the freeway. There is no peaceful protesting on the freeway.
If you're trespassing or deliberately and unlawfully blocking the road, the entrance to a building or public access to a public space then you're not "peacefully" doing anything much less protest that is protected by the First Amendment.
This is irresponsible journalism, part of which is explained because it was written by an intern but also because it apparently escpaped the eyes of a responsible editor. Sweetin wasn't trying to lead protesters "peacefully" away, she was defying a lawful police order to move back by trying to lead the protestors around a police line. And there is the repeated implied if not spoken assertion that just because a journalist flashes an ID to a cop they are relieved of any duty to obey the police during a riot. REASON is a strange magazine. On the one hand they bring to light many important issues often avoided by mainstream corporate media, yet at the same time they employ the same blinkered, agenda-driven mainstream media disregard of basic, easily-verified facts in order to support a pre-determined narrative. C'mon, Reason, up your game.
Your comment needs more punch.
"Hey, Reason, I upped my game, now up yours."