America's Harsh Immigration Restrictions Mean Haitians Drown Trying To Get Here
Their deaths are the tragic, predictable consequence of shutting down safer migration paths.

More than 600 Haitians have reached the U.S. mainland in the last eight months after sailing across the treacherous Caribbean pass; many others have died trying to make the journey. This is, the Miami Herald reports, "the largest exodus of boat refugees since 2004." It is also what happens when a group of people wants to flee dire circumstances but lacks a safe and predictable immigration path.
Political and economic conditions in Haiti have long been terrible, but they worsened last year after a devastating earthquake and the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse. Violence in Haiti, poor conditions in Latin American countries where other Haitians had settled, and additional factors compelled thousands of Haitians to journey to the United States. That mass migration came to a head in September, when around 15,000 Haitians gathered at the U.S.–Mexico border, some of them clashing with U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) agents as they tried to reach American soil.
In 2020, President Donald Trump invoked Title 42 of the Public Health Service Act to enact a policy of allowing immediate expulsions of migrants at the border, a policy that remains in place today. Many migrants, thus barred from beginning the formal asylum-seeking process, were simply sent back to Haiti. The Biden administration has expelled more than 25,000 Haitians since September. Around 4,000 were sent back to Haiti last month.
With land-based migration proving difficult, some desperate Haitians are attempting to reach American soil aboard overcrowded ships. The Miami Herald reports that five boats of undocumented Haitian migrants have reached the Florida Keys since November. While others reach Puerto Rico, most are intercepted in the water—and many drown, undetected. A boat trying to reach the U.S. in May capsized, resulting in the deaths of 11 Haitian women. Another vessel carrying two dozen Haitians bound for the U.S. has been missing since March.
Border hardliners often claim that chaos will erupt if Title 42 expulsions are halted and the standard asylum process resumes. But as the Cato Institute's David J. Bier points out, illegal immigration from Haiti (and other Caribbean nations) is a policy choice. "In October 2016, nearly 7,500 asylum seekers from Haiti and Cuba crossed the U.S.-Mexico border into the United States," Bier writes. "Just 6 did so illegally….99.9 percent of all crossings from these two countries happened legally through lawful ports of entry." That number had essentially reversed by October 2021, when 99.7 percent of the 7,000 Haitians and Cubans who crossed the border did so illegally.
In the early 2010s, border guards "at southwest ports of entry adopted a policy of generally granting parole to Haitian asylum seekers," Bier points out, after the Obama administration suspended removals of Haitians without criminal records. They were legally permitted to enter the country, claim asylum, and receive work authorization. But starting in 2016, the Department of Homeland Security required the CBP to detain all incoming Haitians and turn them over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement to be deported (unless they could demonstrate a credible fear of persecution in their home country). A significant proportion of Haitians began to enter the U.S. illegally after this policy change and other Trump-era restrictions on asylum.
Immigration officials warn that sea arrivals could come to resemble migration patterns in the 1980s and 1990s, when groups of 70 to 100 Haitians would heap into one makeshift boat bound for the United States. "Our general worry is this could replicate over the summer and this could become a trend," CBP spokesperson Jeffrey Quiñones told The Washington Post.
Restoring asylum is an important step in preventing more tragedies, and so is employment-based immigration. Thankfully, the Biden administration has said it will provide 11,500 H-2B nonagricultural seasonal worker visas for people from northern Central America and Haiti. Shutting down safe and legal migration options won't prevent truly desperate Haitians from attempting to escape danger, but reopening them can help prevent deadly journeys.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Haitians cramming 100 people on a raft is the fault of the United States.
Yeah man. It's our fault someone tries to paddle 600 miles of open ocean on a floating door.
Haiti sucks. They've had a series of natural disasters in the last decade and political instability which compound great poverty. But, somehow, I don't think US Immigration laws caused hurricanes and nasty earthquakes the last dozen years.
The Dominican Republic also had those same things, yet its not a shit storm. All of the problems Haiti is facing are man made
All of the problems Haiti is facing are man made
By 'man made' you mean Trump Made?
Betting he means Clinton Made.
if we have to blame anyone, blame Napoleon.
Blame Canada!
Understanding of internet and basic typing skill… It’s been an amazing experience working with them and i wanted to share this with you, because they are looking for cdc09 new people to join their team now and i highly recommend to everyone to apply… Visit following page for more information….......Visit Here
IF DJT doesn't win the White House in 2024, can he go on living rent free in your head?
The Dominican Republic doesn't have the same level of political instability.
It's a huge difference when responding to this kind of shit.
But that doesn't matter. The political instability is decidedly NOT a byproduct of US immigration policy, regardless of how many times Fiona rings that bell.
Ok. So why don't Haitians just cross the border into the Dominican Republic? You don't think that it's because the Democrats keep telling them about all of the bennies that they can get in the US?
The Democrats don't want to lift immigration restrictions. That might get Immigration lawyers to stop giving them "campaign contributions". It also wouldn't let them to blame the poor immigrants plight on the evil Republicans.
One would say Clinton made with how many failed Haiti products they are tied to.
k
The United States harsh rape laws are why men get convicted of rape.
Just an apt an inference as Fiona.
I thought the Clinton initiative fixed Haiti.
US immigration policy broke it again.
Nah, they ran out of money before they could get to that bullet point.
Slow Joe’s open border policies are causing coyotes to get rich and hundreds to die in the desert.
Trump’s mean tweets saved many lives and impoverished the coyotes.
Neither "[p]olitical and economic conditions in Haiti", nor "poor conditions in Latin American countries where other Haitians had settled" are valid reasons to be granted asylum.
Thus, these people need to apply and be admitted through normal immigration channels, which don't require such measures as perilous journeys in unsafe boats.
They can come in through any means available.
This is an argument for illegal immigration to be allowed, contrary to federal laws and the wishes of the American people, who overwhelmingly want illegal immigration stopped.
Just what our Country needs is more negros.
"Bier points out, illegal immigration from Haiti (and other Caribbean nations) is a policy choice."
ALL laws are policy choices , if that is the reasoning.
At the basis is the policy to follow the constitution or not.
Under a coercive monopoly government such as Reason supports , that is the only option.
Blackmailing someone into doing what you want by threatening to play Russian roulette is a unique tactic, certainly.
Good.
The Biden administration has expelled more than 25,000 Haitians since September. Around 4,000 were sent back to Haiti last month.
Skin color is the most important thing
When Reason.com benefactor Charles Koch experiences a disruption in his quest to import cost-effective labor, we must treat it as a genuine emergency. We desperately need to fix this problem so his net worth — currently $71.5 billion — can climb even higher.
#InDefenseOfBillionaires
#CheapLaborAboveAll
"Many migrants, thus barred from beginning the formal asylum-seeking process, "
Say what?!
You begin the formal asylum seeking process by filing an application, not by showing up at the border.
I know, right? They don't even try anymore. It's like diarrhea of the keyboard.
Serious question: if some Haitians are desperate enough to try escaping under such dangerous conditions, what makes anyone think none would continue doing so when less perilous options were legal?
It's one thing to think truly open borders (which I approve of) would reduce deaths from desperate illegal immigrants; but by definition, if you are going to make legal immigration easier, it still won't allow entrance to all who want to immigrate, meaning there will still be a lot, probably a vast majority, who can't get in legally and will still try to get in illegally.
Suppose 10,000 want to come to the US, but only 1000 are allowed. That's 9000 remaining, and I would bet that as word gets round that more legal immigration is allowed, even more will try illegally.
Yes, if there are any immigration restrictions that prevent someone from coming through regular channels which causes them to try more risky options, then there is no limiting factor to this argument. The only way to avoid is having no restrictions at all.
This is how you argue for open borders without saying "open borders".
The cynic in me doesn't think that most people really want legal immigration. Open legal immigration that is.
If you bring a lettuce picker in, pay him under the table, and he doesn't like it he's screwed when you call La Migra. Whenever someone mentions that it's bad for unskilled labor here in the US they get called a racist, while the same people have for years been saying "White people won't do that job." I get a serious OBL vibe when someone says that rather than raising the wage to a level where Americans will accept the work. It's disingenuous.
For skilled work, If you bring someone in on a student visa, they'll never ask for a raise, because if they lose that tech visa after they get their degree, they will have to go back to someplace with lower wages and worse quality of life.
I'm not going to mention the politics of it, because I think political advocates really do want open borders because they expect fresh immigrants to vote for their party when they can vote. Kind of undermines my "they want them illegally" argument.
The system is set up to provide employers with laborers who motivated by desperation. Both parties are complicit.
Many could say Bidens lax immigration enforcement is what is causing the surge in deaths from migrants coming over.
He needs to learn some mean tweets to scare them away….to live.
Serious question: Tomorrow Biden's handlers pick up the pen and phone and air lift all 11M Haitians out of Haiti and (strand several thousand American aid workers in the ensuing power vacuum). Where do we put them? Chicago? Detroit? Gary? Cleveland? Los Angeles?
Delaware
DC. The wealthiest city in the US. Chevy Chase, Arlington, Georgetown.
Serious question: if some Haitians are desperate enough to try escaping under such dangerous conditions, what makes anyone think none would continue doing so when less perilous options were legal?
In states where weed is legal, some people still buy it off the black market and risk getting pinched.
You know, I'm looking at a map. There's another, much closer country to Haiti. From it's Northeastern-most shore, it's only 20-30 miles to the next country. Why are they trying to sail to the US which is much further away? Is it worth discussing the immigration policies of that country next door?
*Northwestern-most shore.
I think there might be a country 0 sea miles from Haiti.
WHAT DO I LOOK LIKE, MAGELLAN? I'M FOCUSING ON PEOPLE WHO WANT TO MAKE A BOAT TRIP! WHY COMPLICATE THINGS WITH IMMIGRATION POLICY WHEN YOU CAN JUST JUMP ON A BUS!
"Why are they trying to sail to the US which is much further away? "
As a related question, why would they even want to come here? Don't they know the US is the most racist country in the world and we invented slavery?
They are coming for Pride Month.
https://twitter.com/JustinTrudeau/status/1536365897358745600?t=2VOih6hQA4yJasbG782TUA&s=19
I’ve tested positive for COVID-19. I’ll be following public health guidelines and isolating. I feel okay, but that’s because I got my shots. So, if you haven’t, get vaccinated - and if you can, get boosted. Let’s protect our healthcare system, each other, and ourselves.
Nobody has the constitutional right to protect themselves from viruses.
My virus protects you, your virus protects me.
That's funny. When I caught Covid-19, it was from someone who'd had three doses of Pfizer. We got equally sick, and 40 days later, he is still coughing, but I'm not. I guess the difference is that he got the jabs, and I didn't.
Wait, what?
Political and economic conditions in Haiti have long been terrible
And they want to come here???
Reason, this is how you write about immigration policy in a free, democratic country.
There's a good quip about immigration I heard from someone (maybe Jonah Goldberg): "My preferred immigration policy is to have one."
I sympathize with that, for sure. That's step one.
Exactly. I'm all for reasonable, controlled immigration. And yes, I think a nation has a right to pick and choose from where.
According to a recent op ed in the NYT, all of Haiti's problems [or why they are such a shithole] is not due to corruption, decades of internecine violence, natural disasters, or a total lack of any degree of civic organization, but because France imposed some reparations on them after they rebelled and claimed independence in 1804.
So extending the 1619 project to the Caribbean, poor old Haiti just never had a chance.
1804 huh? They've only had a couple hundred years to get their shit together. Racist.
They are African...they will never get their shit together.
Haiti is one of the worst places I have ever visited. In most places, when there is a disaster, people from the surrounding area converge on the disaster site to try to help. In Haiti, they converge on the disaster site to rob the dead and the people trapped in the rubble.
Good to see Fiona-bot back on her designated topic, with her designated party-at-fault and her designated solution.
It was hard to a bigger purveyor of sophistry than Shikha, but by gum, Reason never shirks from a challenge.
Sounds like we dodged a bullet.
Probably one of those lung-blasting 9mm bullets, too.
It'd be interesting to go visit Fiona's house - a veritable United Nations of refugees that she's taken in from poor countries all over the world.
How did they get past the gate?
No, their deaths are the tragic, predictable consequence of open borders rhetoric, unrealistic expectations about life in the United States, and political groups offering them incentives to come here!
Look at a map of the Caribbean. If these were really people fleeing for their lives they could flee to the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Cuba, or Puerto Rico. All these locations are closer than the mainland United States. Instead of seeking safety, they wanted to risk their lives to travel to the wealthiest location.
If someone dies trying to get here for any reason or by any means they deem necessary, it is our fault for not making it easier for them....fucking hell, that is some inverted excuse for reasoning. By this the only option to to throw open the doors and let's provide safe transportation while we are at it.
And the irony of that argument is that making it easier for them will not actually reduce deaths appreciably.
Don't know if there's a sponsor around here or something, but every summer a bunch of guys from Haiti would work all over the place cooking, harvesting crops, cleaning rooms, and doing other seasonal jobs. Hard working guys. Definitely more productive than traditional summer help. Then 2020 happened. Who knows if they're still doing it.
My brother and his wife went for 2 weeks several years with their evangelical church.
After the kidnappings, no more.
So, just to be extra annoying I will start this by saying I'm pretty much an open-borders person.
That said, Reason articles often have a rhetorical trick of saying that we could cut down on illegal immigration by just allowing them to be legal immigrants. Which is true, but doesn't really speak to the actual concerns of people who are for lower immigration in general, or for more documentation of entry across the border. I think that rhetorical trick is annoying, and it's done to make your stance sound easy so you can avoid the hard issue of actually arguing the point.
She's singing for the donors, dude. Readers were forgotten long ago.
I don't know. I'm in the comments section, which is a small, very biased selection of people. I really wonder what people think about their articles, particularly because Reason is more left-libertarian and I don't know what those types of folks think.
The comments are not representative of real life, and I have no further insight into Reason's readership. They're opinion journalism, and have some audience they aim at.
They're opinion journalism, and have some audience they aim at.
Pot, hookers, Mexicans and ass. It's funny because it's true.
And I love 50% of those things. Still, they could improve their rhetoric.
It's mostly interns. Cut 'em some slack.
Left-libertarian is an oxymoron.
This trick generalizes to a lot of conversations about criminal acts. "If we want to reduce crime X, we can make it not a crime."
It's not a good argument, it's a dodge. It also leads to a bad situation where folks ignore laws they don't like, and obey laws they like. This has led to a proliferation of laws that are enforced inconsistently which is a worse state to be in than few laws enforced strictly. It might be a worse state to be in than a state where many laws are enforced strictly.
Proceduralism is important, and is often more important than outcome in any single incident.
The government policy of tracking what things cost is the cause of inflation.
Just like subatomic particles.
Something's missing here. Where are the quotes from the economists explaining How to Wreck Your Nation for Fun and Profit?
If libertarianism teaches us nothing else, it teaches us the country that dies with the greatest GDP wins.
Most libertarians will say GDP is a meaningless number.
Only b/c it includes government spending.
ven if you give "safer migration paths" to 1 million Haitians, that still leaves 10 million desperate Haitians in Haiti. And 1-2 billion other desperate people around the world. Less restrictive immigration policies are not going to have any appreciable impact on the number of desperate people taking extreme risks to the US.
You know what does have an impact? Enforcing immigration law. Because if Haitians (or anybody else) know that their illegal presence in the US will not be tolerated, that they will be expelled immediately and precluded from ever entering the country again, they will not bother to come here in the first place. That's not just theory, that's what data from the US and around the world show: strict enforcement of immigration law reduces dangerous illegal migration.
It is heartless, evil pricks like you, Fiona, who are responsible for the massive suffering of migrants.
You know what does have an impact?
Mean tweets.
What's next Reason? Building a bridge for Open Borders???
Why don't y'all just tear the front doors off your houses, open your garage door and leave it all 'un-attended'...???
Wait has no one told these people that the US is an irredeemably racist shithole?! Do they not know of slavery?!?!
The self-hating leftists in our country aren't doing a good enough job shitting on America it seems...black and brown people are literally risking their lives for the privilege to live here.
I for one say we welcome each raft of Haitians in, and just go through the neighborhoods in DC, Portland, LA, san fran, and just replace white leftists 1:1 with Haitian migrants. They would be a lot more thankful for being here, and the white leftists could finally provide some of that racial equity they are always screaming about
Yeah, a one-for-one trade with almost anybody in blue urban areas would probably be a net economic and political benefit. And like you said, beaucoup equity.
My harsh restriction on who I sleep with mean thousands of women are down bad thirsting for me.
How do you feel about men?
Somebody check my privilege here:
Presumably, the reason they're coming to this country in dinghies is because Haiti isn't exactly a resource-rich industrial center where not a lot of more seaworthy shipping takes place. So, to prevent them from drowning on the way here, we'd essentially be sending more seaworthy cargo ships to collect a bunch of Haitians and bring them to our shores. Now, I'm no economist, but somebody, somewhere along that supply chain is going to expect payment for services rendered. At which point, my white privilege poses serious consternation in arguing that Fiona's wish fulfillment won't have effectively restarted the slave trade in the Western Hemisphere.
Actually, being resource-rich is generally bad for the population. Haiti's problems are cultural, political and social. Based on its geography, it could do just as well as many other Caribbean nations.
Haiti just might have it a bit harder, with their magical mix of African tribalism, French bureaucracy, and Latin American corruption.
Haiti just might have it a bit harder, with their magical mix of African tribalism, French bureaucracy, and Latin American corruption.
The other side of the island is the Dominican Republic. Same native population, same colonial influx, weathered the same storms and natural disasters.
And not a shithole.
I meant from our perspective. We drop cash on them and get a mix of people and resources and it's just trade. A few entrepreneurial Ukrainian deck hands flee a war zone and they're legit refugees fortuitously employed in international trade. Haiti wouldn't even have those fig leaves. It would be straight up send a boat, pay for people with relatively no skills or education to get on the boat, and come back here to work menial labor to pay into the machinery that brought them here.
Their deaths are the tragic, predictable consequence
Gasp! Of their own actions!
Did they misspell your name, Fiona Harridan?
No, you see, even a complete open-door policy won't stop people from trying risky means to come to the US. The truly desperately poor (much of the world still lives on less than a dollar a day) simply can't afford safe means of travel. Given the belief that they can stay here and prosper if they get here, they'll take all sorts of risks to get here, and the "tragic, predictable consequence" is that many will die doing so.
On the other hand, if the US adopted a uniform policy of systematically hunting down and severely punishing people who dare immigrate, nobody would take the risk of coming to America, which would utterly end the scourge of people dying to get in.
In short, Ms. Harrigan, if you really wanted policy to be driven by preventing the deaths of people trying to get into the United States, you'd utterly reverse your position on immigration.
As was pointed out to you back when you spewed this same propaganda line over the idiots who froze to death trying to sneak into the US.
I disagree in part.
Change to:
"...if the US adopted a uniform policy of systematically hunting down and severely punishing people who dare hire illegal immigrants, nobody would come to America illegally to look for work."
There, fixed it. The problem isn't the immigrants. It's the people who scoff at our labor laws by hiring them.
No. The people who are willing to work are the most welcome. They will add more to the economy than consume.
But we must regulate the rate of immigration if we want assimilation.
A large number of the haitians in the US right now are criminals. They take advantage of our lax immigration laws and live it up on our dime. We need someone with a backbone to just deport all the moochers.
It's like squirrels. One year I decided to feed them and as the summer went on, I had more and more squirrels show up to be feed. But then it wasn't enough to feed them outside, they started coming inside
Finally I had to start shooting them. My initial well meant idea of feeding them ended up with me killing quite a few
And to think, you could have just bought them bus tickets to a liberal enclave.
Yeah, a one-for-one trade with almost anybody in blue urban areas would probably be a net economic and political benefit. And like you said, beaucoup equity.
Thankfully, the Biden administration has said it will provide 11,500 H-2B nonagricultural seasonal worker visas for people from northern Central America and Haiti
ROTFL! ROTFL! ROTFL! ROTFL! ROTFL! ROTFL! ROTFL! ROTFL!
More complete pro-Biden BS from Reason. The Biden Administration also said they would fix the border crisis, there was no inflation and then that inflation was transitory and they would solve the gas price situation. Yet everyone of those have gotten worse.
Oh puhleeze! The US welcomes over a million legal immigrants per year from all across the globe. We have been forced to accept as many as two million illegal immigrants flooding into the country in just the past year. That level of total immigration is NOT sustainable economically culturally or environmentally.
Does the author suggest that we should prioritize accepting immigrants from places like Haiti, Honduras or Dominica with minimal marketable skills and poor health over physicians, scientists, teachers, craftsmen and computer engineers from India, Germany, Russia or Korea? Should we not be encouraging the immigrants with skills and talents that we most need to improve life for all Americans?
What? Having people *earn* their living??? No, no.... You're violating the Nazi-Law around these parts... It's not about *earning* or Justice anything here anymore; it's about Gov-Guns and their Power to STEAL whatever other people want from 'those' people.....
Democrats --- Still the party of slavery.....
America's authoritarian, collectivism destroys humanity. People worship it. Dissenters abhor it, get punished for "domestic terrorism". The lesson: Freedom is obedience to authority, tyranny is independent thought.
How is this American? (What's your name, address?)