U.S. Spent Over $21 Billion on Afghan Police, Got 'Barely Qualified Mall Guards'
New SIGAR findings shine a light on America’s dysfunctional efforts to train the Afghan National Police, which “actually contributed to increasing criminality” in Afghanistan.

After spending over $21 billion trying to train a national police force in Afghanistan, the United States splurged on equipment rather than focusing on institutional reform and churned out police trainees who were effectively "barely qualified mall guards," per an international observer. That's according to a sprawling new report published by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) that examines what went wrong in America's costly and ineffective management of the Afghan National Police (ANP).
The SIGAR report notes that "two decades of conflict had left little to reform in Afghanistan" by the early 2000s. "The entire criminal justice system—from police to courts to prisons—had to be rebuilt, and with the help of a largely illiterate Afghan population." The U.S. has no national police force and lacked any centralized standards or precedent to apply to the ANP. Training and advising fell to a piecemeal collection of departments and agencies, creating inefficient bureaucratic processes that butted up against deeply corrupt institutions in Afghanistan.
No effective, rights-protecting national police force has ever existed in Afghanistan. Both before and after U.S. involvement in the country began, the police had a reputation for arbitrary detentions, torture, and human rights abuses, which affected the Afghan population's receptiveness to newly trained officers. But the Afghans trained in American facilities were ill-equipped to perform tasks necessary to their jobs. It was so bad that in 2007, one international observer remarked, many graduates of U.S. training facilities were like "barely qualified mall guards."
Recruitment standards were lax and often colored by the corrupt Ministry of Interior, which prioritized personal and factional allegiance over legitimate qualifications. Further, "between 70 and 90 percent of the graduates of U.S. police training centers were illiterate." They were incapable of taking complex notes, reading warrants, or jotting down license plate numbers. Militia fighters also filled the ranks of the new police force, with one U.S.-contracted trainer noting, "we train who we can get." All the while, the yearly attrition rate for trainees floated around 15 percent (but may have been up to 30 percent).
The SIGAR report criticizes an approach to police assistance that "resembled failed efforts by the Soviet Union, other international donors, and former Afghan government administrations." The U.S. and its partners came to focus on "the hardware of police-building—equipment, infrastructure, organizational restructuring—over less tangible goals." That ultimately led to heavy investments in increased strength and a relative lack of attention to corruption and institutional abuse. But simple needs were still overlooked: In 2005, it was estimated that the ANP required 3.4 million basic items like communication equipment and cold-weather clothing.
This ultimately helped create a militarized police force, which was only exacerbated by the nature of instruction for trainees. "Police training courses put almost 90 percent of their emphasis on military skills such as weapons handling, roadblock establishment, and improvised explosive device identification. Only about 10 percent of the curriculum" focused on things like human rights or Afghanistan's constitution, while no time was spent on domestic violence or women's rights.
Eventually the Department of Defense took over the police-training initiative from the Department of State, though it lacked expertise in managing a civilian police force. That was largely done at the behest of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who lobbied for special funding from Congress as no such money existed in the Pentagon budget. "Since fiscal year 2005," the SIGAR report notes, "Congress has appropriated over $21 billion…specifically to support the ANP."
Despite all the money and time the U.S. devoted to building the ANP, the SIGAR report finds that the police force "actually contributed to increasing criminality." It was at least partially because of this dysfunction that the Taliban began to regain support among some Afghans, who were simply looking for someone to enforce law and order. State police had been "extorting and beating locals" and "regularly abducting and raping young boys." By the time President Joe Biden announced the U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, it was clear that the ANP was incapable of staving off disorder. When the Taliban took Kabul in August, they did so with effectively no resistance from Afghanistan's military or police.
Misconceptions and misplaced optimism plagued U.S. efforts to build a police force in Afghanistan. But sheer ignorance doomed the program too. "No one even knew how many police were actually on duty in Afghanistan" by 2006, years after the American training initiative began. As with so many other SIGAR reports, these findings drive home how futile nation-building efforts are when carried out by government bureaucrats who refuse to take stock of prohibitive realities in the country they hope to transform.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's all Trump's fault!
Trump didn't do anything to change things. So yes, he bears partial responsibility as do Bush and Obama.
For fuck's sake, Shrike.
Afghan conflict: US and Taliban sign deal to end 18-year war
so obviously...
House Democrats, Working With Liz Cheney, Restrict Trump’s Planned Withdrawal of Troops From Afghanistan and Germany
Afghan conflict: US and Taliban sign deal to end 18-year war
so obviously...
House Democrats, Working With Liz Cheney, Restrict Trump’s Planned Withdrawal of Troops From Afghanistan and Germany
I’ve made so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. (res-22) It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do.
.
For more details visit:>>> https://brilliantfuture01.blogspot.com/
Online Police remedial reading instructor is about the best job the Stans can offer.
Trump did not include the Afghni government in the negotiations or the "deal".
$20,000,000,100.00 in graft. the rest went to the training.
Exactly.
Sounds like Ukraine.
How much went through to the Biden's?
10%
That's just the Big Guy's cut.
Yeah. Plus 10% to Jim and 20% to Hunter, so 40% for the Bidens.
How are they with piloting Blackhawks?
I'm sure the billions we're spending on Ukraine will be put to better use.
#LibertariansForGettingToughWithRussia
Perfect.
FBI
Immigration
Secret Service
National parks
Marshalls
I would not be surprised if the US has hundreds of national police forces.
If she means police which can do anything from write parking tickets on up, why yes, you can get parking tickets from some of these.
Is there any other basis for distinguishing national police?
You're off by a little. Here's the list.
Good old Wikipedia:
Always up to date -
In 2004, federal agencies employed approximately 105,000 full-time personnel authorized to make arrests and carry firearms in the 50 states and the District of Columbia
Never politically correct -
Women accounted for 16% of federal officers in 2004, an increase from 14.8% in 2002
Never racist -
A third (33.2%) of federal officers were members of a racial or ethnic minority in 2004. This included 17.7% who were Hispanic or Latino, and 11.4% who were black or African American. In 2002, racial or ethnic minorities officers comprised 32.4% of federal officers.
May I suggest that we only need one; the US Marshals.
The secret service needs to be armed, but do not really need arrest powers. They can call a cop for the survivors.
The secret service is also responsible for going after counterfeiters, iirc.
What's the problem? Effective law enforcement was one of the founding principles of our nation, right there in the Declaration of Independence:
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
And President Biden has hired 87,000 more, in the IRS alone. Who says he hasn't created any good jobs with great benefits?
I love that reason hasn't commented on this. Must be too local
The nationalized Capitol Police would likely be far down that slippery slope.
They could call them the Praetorian Guard.
Is that her definition of police, that they protect rights? Somehow I've always been under the impression that one of the reasons for the Bill of Rights is to protect us from the police.
Has any rights-protecting national police force ever existed _anywhere_? If so, I'm not aware of it.
What is the point of this article? Is she surprised to find corruption in Afghanistan, or in nation building, or the Defense Department or State Department? And out of all the trillions wasted in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Global War on Terror, why pick on such a puny corner? Trying to make us think the rest was well-spent?
Hey, give Fiona credit for broadening her scope. Not once did she tell us about how whatever she covered in paragraphs 1-3 means we have to open our borders to some needy group.
It is just soooooo hard to find good help these days. I can't even.
Afghanistan has no national identity. It’s just an arbitrarily large collection of tiny villages with no loyalty to each other and no capacity to defend themselves.
Russia might want to discuss that "no capacity to defend themselves" with you.
As well as Great Britain, and oh, yes, the USA.
Kipling: (published 1890)
"When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
An' go to your Gawd like a soldier."
Well yes and no. They get rolled pretty easy by the big boys, but unless you're willing to be Genghis Khan they're going to make life miserable.
That's a gross over-simplification. It would be more accurate to say that the ethnic groups and regions often seem to have little holding them together except a sense of pride in their history of repelling invaders. And, as LTBF states, they sure as fuck can defend themselves.
But $21 billion in contracts to US and international suppliers. Gotta look on the bright side.
Did the SIGAR report cost more or less than $21 billion? How many thousands of military contractors did they have to hire to complete the report? Because I can give you a pretty good idea what led to the problems in Afghanistan and why they ain't getting fixed, or even addressed.
Shoehorning 'modern' US style democracy onto a culture that is, for want of a better word, tribal at its roots was likely doomed to failure. Doing so by groups who were not invested in the mission, only stayed in-country for a year at longest, did not build lasting connections with the Afghan people and organizations, nor develop organizational memory.
Hey,
I really appreciate your efforts in that crucial time when https://halloweensquishmallows.shop/products/jack-the-black-cat-squishmallow everybody hurries for their own problems and their solutions. You produce a gem of content.
Cheers
If 70-90% of graduates were illiterate doesn't that put the real failure on whatever educational program that was instituted? It shouldn't take that long to instill basic literacy a d we were there long enough to educate a generation from K through PhD.
Yeah, I'm thinking the first thing a training program does is conduct a skills assessment and establish a training plan. A reading/writing course should have been done before starting police training.
Does Afghanistan even have any malls? If so, there can't be that many. Seems like we could ship some qualified leftists/ antifa to handle all of the mall duty there.
You joke but I honestly think Antifa could do a better job as cops. They're at least blindly loyal to the State.
Our bad for spending the money on a bad plan. It's on the Afghani's that they couldn't get it together and keep it together for even a month after we left, given the dollars and lives we left there. Not everything is our fault.
Friday's right on this.
Now I feel all cheap and dirty.
Look, it gives me no pleasure to be the one saying, "I told you so," because the results of successive administrations since "the big one" ie 9/11 have been a tragedy in terms of wasted lives and treasure.
Instead of responding to 9/11 with punitive bombing raids to let the Taliban know that the USA was not willing to accept their harboring Al Qaeda terrorists and that if they did not stop there would be more of the same along with selective military operations to attempt to find OBL and his supporters, the Bush administration (in the true Wilsonian spirit of Dubya) embarked along with Tony Blair, the Canadians, French and Germans as well as pretty much all of the "Progressives" (the renamed wing of the democratic party) in the USA in an attempt to "build the Afghan Nation."
"Building the Afghan Nation" is reminiscent of liberal/"progressive" threats to drag various "reactionary factions" in their own countries "kicking and screaming" into whatever century they thought was the zenith of "progress". The Taliban did a lot more than "kick and scream", they fought back and killed and bombed. And to the dismay of the American, Canadian, French and German leftists who thought they could bring "liberal democracy" to a third world country the afgahn people showed that the Taliban was what they wanted.
We might not like it, but if we had left a chastened and weakened Taliban in power in 2002, we would not be facing a reinvigorated one now. And a whole lot of American and allied soldiers would still be alive.
We also wouldn't have wasted a lot of money which plainly ended up on the balance sheets of many countries (particularly our own) as debt.
Isaac, much of what you write - including bombing the Taliban - I'm in agreement with, but assigning blame to progressives is silly when polling at the time showed 85% of Americans supported invading Afghanistan. I'll guarantee much to most of the opposition would have been on the left with people like Chomsky in lead.
I served in Afghanistan. If you limited enrollment to only the literate, you wouldn't have any police officers. Much of the country is illiterate. Generally the officers were literate, the lower ranking police/military were not.
Let's face it: Washington's interventionist foreign policies of the last 120 years have been filled with one failure after another. The worst were in the latter half of the twentieth century with Korea, Viet Nam,
Cuba, throughout Latin America( Monroe Doctrine) Libya, Syria, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, then there the invasion of a tiny little island in the Caribbean, then Panama, and what have we to show for it except endless numbers of coffins, wasted taxpayer's money, the results of nebulous claims and lies.
All this because of the progressive mantra of bringing democracy to the world....or something like that. or was it nation building? Or regime change.
Seems the only regime that needs changing is the one in Washington, D.C.
John, you left out WWI and WWII. By the way, at least half of those you list were only opposed by "progressives".
Oh yes, I forgot. It was propagandists like Edward Bernays(small hat tribe) who used his advertising prowess to convince Americans to get involved in a war that was, for the most part over. Hence half a million Americans slaughtered in France 1917-1918.
As for WWII we fought on the wrong side.
We should have allied with actual Nazis?
Real ones, with death camps, reprisals, and a Gestapo?
Should we have provided them with Higgins boats to invade England?
It was bad enough that we gave communists Tommy guns and trucks.
I'm really getting tired of this bullshit semantics game about the federal law enforcement agencies not being a national police force.
I understand why the courts play that game, because they want to sidestep the constitutional problem with it, why is Reason?
Another $20 billion put to good use. Right? I'm sure most of it made its way into this program. Just like the $40 billion in aid to Ukraine. Yup, nothing to worry about it will all go to fighting those pesky Ruskies.
What we're dealing with is a stone age, tribal population, that hasn't changed much in thousands of years.They may have some modern conveniences such as cell phones and some sort on internet services but underneath the facade of all that, they're still tribal.
The damage done to that country and the people will last a long time but that was the goal in the first place. After all it was israel who ordered the attack on Afghanistan and America dutifully does its bidding.
So it isn't any wonder why things turn out the way they do. It's just normal American foreign policy.
Compare the experience in Afghanistan with current situation in Ukraine. The support the US and western allies in Ukraine is helping fight the Russians. The US support of the Afghan people in their war against the Russians was successful. A motivated populous defending their country works. Nation building does not work. Simple as that.
a. they are muslims
b they are the products of first cousin marriage, over umpteen generations
c. they are on drugs
circle the corresponding letter to the correct answer.
correct. all of the above.
It seems to me that pretty much every shithole country on the planet has at least one of 3 defining characteristics:
* Fundamentalist Islam
* Rampant corruption
* Autocratic
Combining 2 or more is pretty much guaranteed to result in shithole status.
Add, stone age tribalism and massive illiteracy.