Senate Committee Approves Climate Treaty
The pact will phase down the use of HFC coolants.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted with no objections yesterday to send the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol to the full Senate for ratification. This addition to the Montreal Protocol would phase down the production and use of hydrofluorocarbon (HFCs) coolants that are contributing to man-made climate change. ClimateWire accurately described the Kigali Amendment as the "most important climate treaty in years."
First, a little bit of history: Back in 1988, the U.S. Senate gave its advice and consent to ratify the Montreal Protocol on an 83–0 vote.
That international treaty was an agreement to phase out the global production and use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), widely used as coolants in refrigerators and air conditioning. Long-lasting CFCs were wafting into the stratosphere where their chlorine atoms eroded the ozone layer that blocks damaging ultraviolet sunlight from reaching the surface. Since no one owns the atmosphere, pollution problems that occur in this global open-access commons are handled through international negotiations and commitments.
"If CFCs were allowed to build up in the atmosphere during the next century, ozone depletion might eventually entail significant costs," I concluded in my book Eco-Scam: The False Prophets of Ecological Apocalypse (1993). "In light of these costs, it makes sense to phase out the use of CFCs."
When the Montreal Protocol was ratified, it was not generally appreciated that CFCs are also potent greenhouse gases. The global warming potentials (GWPs) of CFCs are thousands of times higher than carbon dioxide.
CFCs were largely replaced with hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) coolants that do not damage the ozone layer. The good news is that as a result of replacing banned CFCs with HFCs, the ozone layer has been slowly recovering. The bad news is that it turns out that HFCs also have high GWPs.

Overall, the presence of these coolants in the atmosphere accounts for about 11 percent of the rise in global average temperatures attributed to man-made increases in greenhouse gases.
Negotiations for the Kigali Amendment phasing down the usage of these gases by 85 percent over the next 15 years were completed in 2016 in Rwanda, and it has, so far, been ratified by nearly 130 other countries.
Bipartisan comity over what is essentially a treaty addressing climate change has been largely achieved because American manufacturers are the leading developers and suppliers of replacement coolants with significantly lower GWPs.
"The business community applauds the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for its bipartisan vote approving the Kigali Amendment for consideration by the full Senate," reads the joint industry press release. "This is an important step in ensuring the U.S. joins this global effort while accessing international markets that will grow American jobs. It is a win for the economy, the environment, and U.S. leadership."
Ingesting the proverbial grain of salt, a 2018 industry analysis found that implementing the Kigali Amendment would slightly reduce U.S. consumer cooling costs. Since it is estimated that unabated HFCs would add 0.4 degrees C to projected man-made warming by 2100, ratification would be a relatively cheap way to address the problem of climate change.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
First
Is it 2002 up in here?
"Since it is estimated that unabated HFCs would add 0.4 degrees C to projected man-made warming by 2100, ratification would be a relatively cheap way to address the problem of climate change."
Just for the record, those projections are wrong.
They have been wrong for over half a century.
I want to know how much of this warmth is from assumptions on perfect absorption of solar rays (it is never perfect, but often a logarithmic type capture) and how much of the warmth is based on feedbacks.
Is there any evil that High Fructose Cornsyrup isn't responsible for?
Trump?
Trump is 100% the result of cornsyrup.
The other 150% of him is the result of burger grease.
Like Bill Clinton?
So what are we replacing HFCs with? Propane? Ammonia? Sound waves?
(that's actually a thing BTW)
Whatever it is, it will be discovered by the state of California to be carcinogenic.
More likely it whatever they'll switch to already is designated as a carcinogen by CA.
Even if it's not a carcinogen, it'll come with a "Prop 65" label attached anyway since it there isn't one some law firm will sue the manufacturer because the exhaust from the gas engine of whatever vehicle it's delivered in or the manufacturing of some part of the container it's in has been.
I like the soundwave & sand experiments
"Propane? Ammonia?"
So we should replace relatively safe refrigerants with ones that are more toxic and flammable?
I just point them out because they have been used in refrigeration systems in the past.
Matthew obviously doesn't own a travel trailer with all creature comforts of home.
It's called R290 and its used for most commercial refrigerators.
Too late. R1234yf produces hydrofluoric acid when it catches on fire.
Good thing car engines never have fires.
It's going to turn out that Strickland was behind this the entire time.
Nope - on the residential refrigeration and vehicular air conditioning side we're using R600A and R1234yf, respectively. Do you know what it is? It's Butane. No joke. The pro's are it's efficient and takes much less to do the same job as R134a. The con's - it's highly flammable.
For commercial refrigeration they use R290 which is (wait for it) propane.
Unicorn farts. (You should know this)
And in other Reason news...
Climate Change Nazi-Propaganda is all B.S.
Just because it's all B.S. Propaganda doesn't mean [WE] Nazi's can't keep building a Nazi-Regime though... Right?, Right? /s
Welcome to the Montreal Hindenburg Paradox:
Having phased out the world's best fire-extinguishing gases, the Halons, UNEP's minions are phasing in flammable and explosive air conditioners & domestic refrigerators.
The Precautionary Principle was not available for comment.
First , a little bit of history Ron:
The Freons were invented in the 1930's to cut the fire and explosion death toll , and incidence of people being blinded in their sleep, by such flammable and toxic refrigerants as ammonia, methylene chloride and sulfur dioxide.
The roaring twenties were punctuated by exploding cold storage warehouses and hospital wards filled with corpses by leaky air conditioners.
All these gases are sealed inside refrigerant systems. Service technicians pump it out and capture when service is required.
The small fraction that is lost due to leaks or irresponsible release probably isn’t worth getting into a twist about.
^
Hey! Don't you care about DuPont's bottom line here?! If the EPA didn't mandate a new refrigerant every so often, DuPont wouldn't be able to get them to mandate something they have a patent on!
What, you think Pfizer and Moderna just invented that scam for Covid?
https://twitter.com/RNCResearch/status/1522297220283965440?s=20&t=5Tz5L-S_FKb-y7fG83vl8Q
"NEW: Attorney General Merrick Garland unveils a new 'Office of Environmental Justice' as part of Biden's 'environmental justice enforcement strategy.'"
While we were distracted by Roe, DOJ launches Office of Environmental Justice.
Fan-fucking-tastic.
Expect a slight mention in the roundup abd an article maybe late on Friday after 4.
I'm waiting for Jeff to come let us know it's totes NBD.
Wait until Republicans pounce!
CONSERVATIVE BACKLASH!
Also, if you want to know how to do a libertarian critique of the Ministry of Truth, this is how you do it.
Planning on listening to him on Rogan in the next few days.
Again, Trump wasn't bombastic enough and we need to elect someone who will throw bombs and light fires... literally. Just undoing what the previous guy did is insufficient. Set fire to the buildings with people inside. I don't want anyone to die. I want it to take at least 4 years to rebuild the building and everybody who walks through the door to remember the last time somebody opened and worked for an Office of Environmental Justice.
Nobody needs 23 kinds of coolant. In fact, as our environmental justice superiors have told us, nobody needs any coolant (or AC).
None of YOU need any coolant or AC.
In other news, Texas Trumpican Greg Abbott continues his attack on Supreme Court precedent by possibility attempting to revive Plyler v. Doe, solidifying the fact that Trumpicans/Republicans/Conservatives, or whatever the fuck you want to call them, care about life only when it's in the womb. After you're out, you're on you're own!
After you're out, you're on you're own!
Well... you kind of ARE on your own. We have murder laws to cover regular murder.
Without tax payer funded education, people will die!
How many of those who object o murdering homeless people actually adopt homeless people into their homes?
Thanks for sharing this blog. Please keep it up Cheers!
Articles like this are why I stopped checking Reason on the daily. So the libertarian perspective is that unelected multi-national treaties based on unproven and highly fraud-riddled "studies", all of which are in turn tied to grant money to tell those same multi-national governments and NGO's what they want to hear..... should decide what private companies and citizen's have access to, to provide safe and effective cooling options. You forgot to mention most replacements for CFC's are HIGHLY more lethal to humans, and most replacements to HFC's are likely even more so... but who cares... Oh and the real polluters of the world have zero interest in following these treaties, it just cripples the 1st world. If this is what it means to be libertarian... I am out. Next you will tell me Rachel Carson's Silent Spring was accurate and saved the Bald Eagle.