Biden's Desperate Wealth Tax Flip-Flop
On the campaign trail, Biden rejected wealth taxes as punitive, divisive, and unworkable. Now, as president, he’s embraced the idea.

In December 2019, when Joe Biden, still campaigning for the Democratic presidential nomination, released his tax plan, much of the coverage focused on the contrast between his comparatively plan and the plans issued by his more progressive rivals. A CNBC report on his plan was labeled "wealth tax wars." A Washington Post headline noted that Biden's $3.2 trillion tax plan highlighted "divisions" with Sens. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.). Among the starkest of those divisions was that the former vice president had rejected calls by Warren and Sanders to back a wealth tax on the richest Americans.
On the campaign trail, Biden himself played up that contrast. Among the criticisms lobbed at the Sanders and Warren wealth tax proposals was that they were fundamentally punitive, because they taxed wealth of a small, specific group of individuals. He told a wealthy crowd of supporters in Los Angeles that while they shouldn't expect a tax cut from him, there would be "no punishment either."
Around the same time, a CNBC reporter asked Biden about arguments—some of which came from experts friendly to Democrats—that the wealth taxes proposed by his rivals would be unworkable and punitive. In response, Biden allowed that "parts of the plan, those objections apply." He complained about divisive tax policy, and rejected the idea of a "a single tax, on a single group of people." Earlier in the interview, Biden, without prompting, went out of his way to insist that "tax policy is not about punishment."
Biden was running as the moderate in the race. His goal was to separate himself from the progressives. So he rejected the idea of a tax policy that he saw as divisive, punitive, and potentially unworkable.
Yet now, as president, Biden has embraced a wealth tax of his own. In his latest budget plan, Biden proposed something the White House has dubbed the "Billionaire Minimum Income Tax," which applies to all income, realized and unrealized, for households worth more than $100 million. The Biden administration is framing this as a form of "prepayment" on future capital gains—which is to say it's a form of taxation on money that someone has not actually seen, based on the value of their holdings. It's not exactly the same as the wealth taxes proposed by Warren and Sanders, but it's designed around the same fundamental idea: the taxation of personal wealth, rather than of cash income, which often takes the form of difficult-to-value assets.
Most of the same criticisms that applied to the Warren and Sanders plans still apply: Biden's plan probably wouldn't raise nearly as much money as the administration assumes: Wealth taxes are exceptionally difficult and resource-intensive to administer, which is why most OECD countries that have implemented wealth taxes eventually dropped them. It's also quite likely to be unconstitutional. At minimum, if it passed, it would be tied up in court.
But of course, it's not intended to pass, which makes this exercise even more of a charade. Biden's latest wealth tax proposal is part of the White House's annual budget proposal, which is always a sort of wish list rather than a realistic path forward for the budget.
Biden's wealth tax, then, is a desperate policy gimmick by a White House struggling with low approval numbers on the economy. Even Biden's allies understand this. Late last year, his administration tried to convince congressional Democrats to include a wealth tax in one of the big spending bills. At the time, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D–Calif.) reportedly called it "a publicity stunt." That's exactly what this is.
It's a publicity stunt, however, that tells us something, not only about Biden's leftward drift, but about his comportment as president, given his previously stated opposition to the idea.
Biden is willing to make an obvious phony of himself, embracing a policy he knows is punitive, divisive, unworkable, and virtually certain not to pass—and he's willing to do so simply to get attention. Not only is Biden not a moderate, he is evidently not trustworthy either.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
On the campaign trail, Brandon lied straight to your fucking face.
Today as well.
Consistency.
Shocking behavior from a plagiarist.
Fuck Joe Biden.
To be a lie there has to be intent deceive. I dont think Biden remembers what he even said the day before.
Biden has no policy positions, except that green jello is the best jello.
I am making easily every month $ 22000 to $ 28000 just by doing simple work from home. This job is online and very easy to do part-time or Full-time even no special experience required for this task. (nhb29) Anyone can now participate in this job and start earning just like me by just following link…..
>>>>>>>>>> http://CurrentJobs64.Cf
Cut him a break. He doesn't remember what he said then or understand what he's being told to say now.
Biden staff meeting.
Biden is a senile sock puppet. He will say and do whatever his handlers tell him to.
And sometimes accidentally told the truth. Most widespread and inclusive voter fraud organization in history.
I heard that too.
Lies. No credibly sourced evidence.
Our first zombie president.
Was thrown out of office in 20202.
Holy ****. Tell me you're not one of those c***s that continually blame Trump for everything. Seriously, not the greatest POTUS... but get the f*** over it and actually look at the garbage job the current d***head is doing.
Nah, Biden has always promoted the tax dodging wealthy should always pay the fair share. You are lying to yourself.
Very well said, indeed.
You voted for it.
I think it was a mix of lying, dementia, and also realizing "oh all this shit I promised costs way more than we have!"
It was, and is, a straight telling of the democrat party platform policies.
Unsubstantiated delusional fantasy, no evidence....
"Now, as president, he’s embraced the idea."
No, he hasn't. He's repeating whatever his puppetmasters tell him to say.
Wrong, President Biden's tax proposals have remained consistent.
Oh no! Look out! Biden is totally going to punish his ultra-wealthy base!
LOL
Prediction — this will go one of two ways. Most likely it won't happen at all. However if it does, it will be in a mild enough form that the super-rich are still much better off under Biden when you account for his other pro-billionaire policies like looser borders.
#OBLsFirstLaw
#VoteDemocratToHelpBillionaires
At first glance I read LOSER borders!
I agree, even though I know you are being sarcastic. They have no real expectation that this will pass to law as it is just a PR stunt. They expect the Republicans to filibuster it in the Senate so they can say “look at them, they only care about the rich”. What the Republicans should do is nothing, let them pass it without any of their support or descent and if it is passed I am sure it will be struck down by the courts as it is blatantly unconstitutional. But in the meantime deprive them of the PR.
Asking the tax dodging rich today their fair share is a "punishment"? Logic failure. Oh look! The billionaires who voted for Putin knew he was going to make taxes fair before they voted for him. Your unsubstantiated speculative opinions are pure crap.
Fine. I'll bite. How are the rich 'dodging' their fair share? Assume someone who follows the tax code as written, to the best of a tax attorney's ability to determine.
(I'll gladly assume that people who are lying on their taxes deserve to be punished. But adding more taxes doesn't do that).
The guy can't do the math, obviously. If a person made 1 million dollars, they would pay at the highest tax bracket of 35% and fork over $350,000. Apparently, paying more in taxes than most make in several years just isn't enough. Liberals SUCK at math.
It’s never enough for a commie.
If you have enough assets:
You take out loans at super low interest rates against assets instead of selling and producing taxable gains/income
You live off the loans, use part of the loan to pay payments on loan, instead of ever selling assets or needing income.
Then a few years later, your assets hopefully outgrew the interest rates on the loan, so you take out another bigger loan, paying off the first one.
Rinse and repeat until dead. Zero income tax.
After you die the assets price are reset so no taxes are paid on the vast amount of capital gains that occurred.
That's how it works for billionaires.
The met result is you have tons of money, but fund the government less than the poor and the middle class and hardworking doctors/lawyers/etc.
Please, define "fair share" in concrete observable terms that can be applied to EVERYONE.
So far, the best I can get from most people is "They should pay more and I should pay less."
We're already at a point where the top 1% pay 40% of taxes, where the top 10% pay 70%, where most of the bottom 50% pay nothing more than their Social Security taxes, and where the bottom 25% pay no income taxes, no payroll taxes, and receive refundable credits to put cash in their hands ("Zero or Negative sum of Income and Payroll Taxes")
https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/model-estimates/tax-units-zero-or-negative-income-tax-liability-august-2021/t21-0161-tax-units-zero
Most people pay virtually nothing in federal taxes outside of income and income-based FICA taxes.
In 2020, 60.6% of tax units had Zero or Negative Federal Income Tax Liability. Further, 43.3% of tax units had zero or negative sum of income tax and payroll tax liability. In 2019, those numbers reflected the more normal levels (43.6% and 24.8%, respectively).
"But they pay other taxes!" Sure, but probably barely...
Federal gas excise tax, federal excise taxes on tobacco products, and federal excise taxes on alcohol are probably the primary federal taxes that individuals pay (that aren’t income taxes). Fewer people might pa things like excise tax on airline tickets, or on firearms, etc.
Federal excise tax on cigarettes is $2.11 per pack for large cigarettes ($1.01 for small). A two-pack a day smoker pays $1540, a pack-a-week smoker pays about $110. Among smokers, the mean number of cigarettes smoked per day is about 14.5, or about 265 packs per year, so $558 per year. Of course, only about 14% of people in the US smoke regularly.
Federal gas tax is 18.4 cents per gallon, so someone using 1000 gallons per year (i.e., driving 25K miles in a car getting 25MPG) will pay $184 in federal gas taxes. The average per capita consumption of gasoline is about 1.15 gallons per day in the US, so about $77.25 per year in federal gas excise taxes.
Alcohol taxes are harder to work out because the tax varies depending on the type of alcohol be it beer, still wine, sparkling wine, hard cider, or distilled spirits and the alcohol content (proof).
But it’s something close to about 21 cents per ounce of pure alcoholic content of spirits, 10 cents per ounce of alcohol of beer, and eight cents per ounce of alcohol in wine. Note that this is not per ounce of beer or wine or spirits, but per ounce of alcohol. A 12oz can of 6% ABV beer has about 0.75oz of alcohol, so a tax of about 7.5 cents. A hard-drinking man drinking a case (24 cans) of beer every day would be paying about $657 every year in federal excise taxes, someone enjoying 3 beers each on Friday and Saturday night would pay about $24.
Average beer consumption per capita in US is about 26 gallons This is about 288 cans per year, so about $22.
A person buying a $500 Glock would pay $50 in federal excise taxes, but how many handguns guns will an average person buy in a year?
“… coverage focused on the contrast between his comparatively plan and the plans issued by his more progressive rivals…”
A word got dropped from the first sentence, team.
*shitty*
Then don't make them...
Ha!
History will view Warren as an evil, evil person.
Depending on who wins in the long run. She and RBG and AOC and Hillary and Michelle could be the celebrated "Founding Mothers" in 200 years.
If they do then they will erase the Constitution and everything that made America exceptional. The word means "different." Not necessarily greater or less.
Nothing could be less than that hideous MISOGYNISTIC BS.
NK is exceptional.
So was the fledgling USA.
Staying exceptional is the hard part.
Founding mothers of what? If those people are in charge, the US will simply not exist in 200 years.
The extreme right wing, domestic violent white supremacist, fascist Trump Party ( formerly the GOP), will not exist, if there is a God....
You troll well. Now GFY.
The violent thugs and fascists in the US are where they have always been: in the Democratic party.
I say that as a former Democrat (now independent).
History views Sanders as a kindly, I'd grumpy, grandpa - she's going to get the same treatment.
What history? Your cartoon kiddie history?
As I continue to listen to 'The Conservative Sensibility' by George Will, I'd like to say he's saying something new but most of what he said is how I thing/feel anyway.
Still early in the book. Has anyone else read it?
Let me qualify the question. Does anyone who isn't and anklebiter have an intelligent comment about the book? I'd like to hear it.
Poor sarc, it appears Dee didn’t take him up on his invitation to have a private email conversation about this.
Desperate for attention.
Think he made a new sock JReed since he wasn't getting attention.
We get it. You find comfort on other rabid anti trumpers who sold their moral views over appearances instead of policy.
Cry again about how he was betrayed by the GOP despite George Will deciding to campaign against all GOP nominees in 2018. Real conviction there.
Trump had a viable policy? Logic failure.
Aren't you bitching about tax cuts just above dumbass? Do you know what words mean?
who isn't and anklebiter
Ideas! Only losers waste time with juvenile insults.
The Complete List of Trump’s Twitter adolescent Insults (2015-2021)
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/19/upshot/trump-complete-insult-list.html
How did this affect you? How long did you cry after each one?
It reveals your character that Trump's were so bad you're still referencing lists but when other left wingers make them you defend them.
*Patiently awaiting the inevitable you, you, you crew to tell me I'm wrong because of something I may or may not have said or done in my past*
C'mon girls. You're slacking
I try to be civil with most discourse. I read your stuff. Some of it is an interesting take. This, though, is like a desperate cry for attention. It's akin to the defensive end who celebrates a sack in the midst of a huge loss to the opposing team.
If you're gonna mute people, mute 'em. Hand the ball off to refs and get back in the huddle. Don't give them another moment of thought. If your gonna call them out to see how many grey boxes you can get on your post, and then try to guess what they might have said based on your original comment, well, that seems weird.
But you be you. Enjoy the many boxes your comment brings forth in this round.
I like the cut of your jib.
Or I head it off at the pass and the only comments are from the usual trolls who can't help themselves. Like flies to shit.
You just called yourself shit.
LOL he did.
Lol.
You just called yourself shit.
Blind squirrels.
He's on a tear today. This is gold.
"I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast!"
“You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?”
The comments are not kind. But you lobbed a softball that should be good for a couple of days for your greybox friends.
The best was the other day he posted an email address for Dee, then cried about all the nasty emails he was sure he was going to get.
I approve of this advice.
Is preemptive victimhood your new thing?
Germany does the Green New Deal, it fails so miserably that they have to reverse, and Biden wants to do it here.
Europe does wealth taxes, and they failed so badly that they were repealed, and Biden wants us to have one.
Under Biden’s leadership, Europe is the elephant in the parade and we’re the guy walking behind it with a shovel.
Why does Europe get to have all the fun?
Spain also clapsed their economy on a conversion to green energy.
Walking behind with a shovel, or an open mouth, acting surprised when he catches the treat?
It's an organized collapse. Done on purpose. To destroy your future and half of your fellow "citizens" support it blindly.
Only half?
I count 7 grey boxes of Squirrelsy and the Nazi going back and forth at one another.
Mute is a beautiful thing.
Meh, I don't believe in mute. I just scroll past anything or any fights that I can't be bothered with.
That's a lot of scrolling.
It is, trust me. My scroll wheel is worn out.
You mean Russia, right? How are things going in Russia, Nardz?
Decently well, especially now that Zelensky is talking terms of neutrality and the EU is paying for fuel in rubles.
I had a girlfriend named Gloria who didn't like to pay taxes.
What was she, some kind of delicate flower.
I literally just started five minutes ago on filing my taxes. (For real.) Because *I* am a good American, unlike your Gloria!
Daisy. Total daisy.
You got your own domain name? That's cool.
I'm a total computer nerd.
By the way, nowhere in TurboTax, when it is asking me to describe my dependents does it ask whether the dependent I am listing is a dog or not.
Your dog has an SSN?
My dog is also a good American!
Keep the furry talk in the roundup please.
LOL.
The 1040 EZ is so confusing to him.
Do you refuse to take the deductions? A real American does not take them. Do you send extra money in? A real American does.
In fact, how come you're not sending in most of your money?
You might think you are a good American, but you aren’t very smart.
Was her last name Hole?
Gimme. More.
For the past decade or perhaps longer the Democrats having been trying to change the argument for taxation from “this is what we want government to do and this is how much we need to tax to fund it” to one of “everything belongs to the state and we’ll decide what you get to keep”. This will create a poorer society, but they believe society should be poorer.
Way longer than a decade. I came to this realization as a much younger man, in almost the same words you use here. Any time a tax cut, or even less of an increase than expected, is politicized it is "Giving money to the rich."
The last decade this political party hasn't even bothered to obfuscate the fact, however.
Conceptually there is an idea that our government is funded by having the people with more money pay more than the people with less money.
Currently that's true only for labor/wages and the wealthiest don't pay as much as the poorest, while the biggest burden is imposed onto upper class workers such as doctors/lawyers/engineers/etc.
It doesn't seem like that is a good system or a fair one.
It isn't.
But compounding it by forcing people to tally up their net worth -- that means EVERYTHING they own. Everything. Every painting, every sculpture, every rare photograph, every watch, every signed Barry Bonds baseball... everything -- is not only a horrific way to tax people, it's also frighteningly burdensome. We're not just talking about the problems with assessing what net worth really is, we're talking about fundamental aspects of privacy. "...secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause"
Wealth taxes are make work for accountants. And reveal way more intimately personal information than innocent people should ever have to reveal. And are antithetical to the entire notion of wealth creation, which revolves around the notion that wealth is not the same as money.
tl:dr It may be unfair, but a wealth tax is a way bigger nightmare, and for more reasons than just taxes.
Wow. If only Reason editors had known that Joe wasn't trustworthy before they endorsed him. I mean he only had a forty eight year track record.
You beat me to it.
But he wasn't Trump!
No. Mean. Tweets.
So are incoherent tweets any better?
https://babylonbee.com/news/psaki-reminds-reporters-that-biden-doesnt-speak-for-the-president-of-the-united-states
No, no, Superman - he never said that. That did not happen.
Just like the other times it didn't happen.
Oh, we're just now noticing? His 50 prior years in office provided no hint that he could be so duplicitous?
But hey, 'the adults are back in charge' and if he's wrong 'its within normal parameters' and there are 'no more mean tweets'. And look how Presidential he looks! Not like Trump.
Wrong within normal parameters.
there are 'no more mean tweets'
We do have a President who claims his opponents want to return black Americans to slavery though, although luckily it wasn't a tweet. It is strange so many people who claim not to be leftists only believe meanness is a problem when it targets the left. Sometimes it seems they are not applying their professed principles consistently, but instead use whatever criticism is handy against those they hate while refusing to apply any standard to those they like.
Google, how many days to midterm elections?
Google says, "In 224 days."
Way too many.
Practically to Christmas.
Somewhat confusingly economic illiteracy is the core competency of the left.
And biology literacy. Two core principles of the left, economic and biological illiteracy. Don't forget historical illiteracy.
Three, the core principles of the left number 3...
How dare they target billionaire money? I can't even begin to care.
and yet you should
this is the fundamental mental flaw of all proggies. "get those richies, it cant' possibly negatively affect me whatever is done"
useful idiots
And it's completely lacking an understanding of second-order effects. The second-order effect of wealthy people having assets is that they actually seek to accumulate more assets, making them active in national commerce. They're already trying to dodge accumulating too much all at once to duck capital gains, which means they're doing less to grow the economy than they could.
The second-order effect of taxing unrealized gains is that they stop seeking assets at all-at least in the US. Assets end up stored in Ireland instead of sitting and accruing value in the US. You may get some short-term, immediate funds off of this tax but it's a tiny trickle compared to the waterfall of the budget deficit, and then the trickle dries up very quickly.
Economics may be slightly abstract but it's not brain surgery.
Proggies never move past level 1 thinking. Every time.
Because it's not actual money? Why do prog retards always think "billionaires" have silos of money that they swim in like Scrooge McDuck?
Even if they did have silos of money, the effects of taking money out of vaults and putting it in pursuit of goods and services is functionally no different than if .gov just printed the money.
The progs need to learn there is no reality where there is a broad vibrant "middle class" financed by the wealthy. they simply are not consuming the resources that would be required.
“How dare they
target billionaire moneygo after the jews? I can't even begin to care.”In the end, those billionaires are (generally) not your friends, and they overwhelmingly fund a political party that's ruinous to their future prospects, not to mention the nation. And they increasingly take part in cancelling or firing ordinary Americans for wrongspeak, often at the behest of the mob.
Bad ideas that (that are intended to) target your enemies should be rejected. But I won't reflexively side with billionaires in these issues any longer. If CA tried to pass another gas tax on the ballot, I'd vote against it. If they tried to pass soda tax, I may not vote or even vote yes. I'm not going out of my way to save coke and pepsi. I'll just buy generic brand if I do want soda. Did you know that coke said "don't be white"? Yes, they are a racist company.
the soda tax doesn't hurt coke and pepsi.
We are doomed.
LOL @ “Campaign Trail” . He was hiding in his basement while the entire Infotainment-Tech-Deep State Complex ran cover for him.
Not only is Biden not a moderate, he is evidently not trustworthy either.
Oh, come on, Man! Look, here's the deal. He promised to always level with the American People. For God's sake!
news update: politician said whatever he thought needed to be said to get elected, then does whatever he wants after getting elected. shocking!
Hey TeenReason, did you also notice the absolute string of revelations of corruption coming from the verified Hunter Biden emails?
Like the emails from a Burisma exec thanking him for facilitating a meeting with Joe, right before that naughty Shokin got fired.
Or the numerous DoD encryption keys floating around his harddrive.
Or his investments in the biolabs that Ukraine never had.
Or how about the president and his son are incestuous paedophiles? Hunter had video and Ashley was pretty open to her diary.
That's moot, because it already happened.
I'd say justification for the 25th, but then we get Kamala.
It was said that Biden was Obama's best insurance for the same reason.
Now we are at a whole lower step on that scale.
Biden just now:
"Mexico will pay for it."
He also massively increased funding for local police after bandwagonning with Harris and BLM
He is also going to double the Space Force budget. After everyone mocked its creation.
(assuming the budget passes which , obviously, it will only with MOAR inflation-fighting borrowing added on)
And this is why you pay attention to the primaries. Even if the candidate who gets the nomination isn't the one with the whackiest ideas, if you see what the points of contention are, you know what's likely going to come from the eventual nominee. Whenever you're short on political capital, you mobilize the base instead of appealing to the moderates.
Remember when every single candidate raised their hand yes to "free healthcare to illegal immigrants using your money"? That was a big tell. Nothing good was going to come from a D win in 2020 and ... well look where we are.
Also Biden: Why are all these people showing up to the border?
We already have wealth taxes called property taxes. Ask someone in New Jersey what the breakeven is before NJ owns the house.
As a homeowner in a desirable location, I’ve lived through two housing bubbles. No credit for the significant drop in value after 2008. Now the Colorado Rockies are higher than California. And YES YES YES we have very libertarian zoning laws and single room occupancies, multi family housing. Maybe Covid (not crime- definitely not crime ) has something to do with it. If it is a bubble, we will not receive credit for the property taxes. Oh well no mean tweets.
Biden doesn't "embrace" anything; he has said so. Biden will do what his staff tells him to do. That's what he ran on and that's what he is actually doing.
His staff gave him the right talking points to get elected, and now they have him implement the policies they wanted to implement all along.
I like to point out to the "its all billionaires fault" morons that their position is about as intelligent as their counterparts who blame it all on immigrants. not that it gets through to them, but at least it buys you a few seconds to watch the gears turn when they have to try and process how to attack you as a deplorable right winger.
Interesting,, no doubt especially for most of the posters here who claim loyalty to the constitution.
"“Based on the evidence, the Court finds it more likely than not that President Trump corruptly attempted to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021,” U.S. District Court Judge David Carter wrote.
Carter, who sits in federal court in California, said that the plan Eastman helped develop was obviously illegal and that Trump knew it at the time, but pushed forward with an effort he says would have effectively ended American democracy.
“If Dr. Eastman and President Trump’s plan had worked, it would have permanently ended the peaceful transition of power, undermining American democracy and the Constitution,” Carter wrote. “If the country does not commit to investigating and pursuing accountability for those responsible, the Court fears January 6 will repeat itself.”
The remarkable ruling may be the first in history in which a federal judge determined a president, while in office, appeared to commit a crime. .."
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/28/trump-judge-felony-obstruction-insurrection-00020918
"Internal White House records from the day of the attack on the U.S. Capitol that were turned over to the House select committee show a gap in President Donald Trump’s phone logs of seven hours and 37 minutes, including the period when the building was being violently assaulted, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post and CBS News.
The lack of an official White House notation of any calls placed to or by Trump for 457 minutes on Jan. 6, 2021 – from 11:17 a.m. to 6:54 p.m. – means the committee has no record of his phone conversations as his supporters descended on the Capitol, battled overwhelmed police and forcibly entered the building, prompting lawmakers and Vice President Mike Pence to flee for safety...."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/29/trump-white-house-logs/
You BlueAnon J6 people are more embarrassing than the pizza gaters.
If Trump was serving a sentence for every story like this I’ve heard in the last 5 years, he’d be doing 1,000 years of time.
Leave to a CA Nazi to use the word 'Constitution' in places it has absolutely no purpose of being.
"undermining American democracy and the Constitution"...
As-if those two are synonyms; The USA is NOT a Democracy..
Article IV - Section 4
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government
Also leave it to a leftard like Joe; to pretend protesting in a Capitol building is an insurrection attempt by what 12-unarmed 20-year olds? And that obvious election fraud (evidence + executive fiat) is democracy....
Do you even realize how stupid you sound?
Tjj, republics are a subsets of democracies.
That wasn't a protest at the Capitol, it was a riot in the Capitol orchestrated by Trump to try and overturn the election. By the way, he does know what a burner phone is, and his use of them or friends phones during the riot demonstrates his knowledge that he was committing a crime.
Actually democracy is but a itsy-bitsy tool of this Constitutional Union of Republican States. But don't let the very definition of the USA get in the way of making up wild lies and stories ... ya know like going from an 'insurrection' to a 'riot' hoping no-one will know the difference and just automatically associate the two as the same..... Ya know; kinda like that leftard who went from 'American Democracy' to 'Constitution' in hopes idiotic sheeple will equivocate the two as the same.
And that's how most sheeple get indoctrinated folks.. That's how it's done... Hidden messages of equivocating words that have nothing to do with each other... Ya know; like the 'General Welfare' (whoops, taxing clause) for what? the states? the people? oh nope; for the 'United States' (noun) the federal government... As-if that wasn't frek-en obvious being part of the taxing clause.
Biden has "embraced" that Pelosi, Schumer, and Manchin have assured him a wealth tax has zero chance in Congress, so he can publicly "embrace it" to try to appeal to progressive voters who are being continually told they're not welcome, so won't be showing up to the polls in November.
Well, the really stupid ones will show up.
AKA true believers.
Instead of targeting the wealthy, why not make all Americans pay 20% of the unrealized gain in assets, whether it's stocks, bonds, the primary residence, collectible autos, baseball cards, and the like?
That way, people will need to keep working, in order to pay their income taxes. That way, fewer people will start drawing Social Security.
Or better yet, we just say that any wealth above a certain amount will be fully confiscated by the government.
Sell your Individual souls to the [WE] foundation; because you don't own you, [WE] own you.
why not make all Americans pay 20% of the unrealized gain ... collectible autos, baseball cards, and the like?
"Every resident shall have 60 days to declare possession of collectible autos, baseball cards, and the like...."
It's hard to find sympathy for the ultra rich, when they have so little to spare.
Democrats lie and cheat??? Whats new?
Something about the federal doesn't have the Constitutional authority for masks; yet bop - there it is.... And anyone has to wonder why Republicans don't trust Jackson's answers either.
There is nothing complex about a Democrat. They truly believe you don't own yourself at all. All the labor you provide is theirs, all the choices you make are theirs. They are the most greedy self-centered people one will ever meet. Grow up Nazi-fans...
The left always believes in the redistribution of wealth...as long as it's not THIER money being isn't being reapportioned.
The SALT deduction hysteria is one if the most transparent things that has ever happened in recent political memory.
Oh yeah and CUOMO is running for NY mob boss again.
Comparatively plan?
This is where I stopped reading. I don't WRITE this stuff. I (try to) READ it.
"... Biden not a moderate, he is evidently not trustworthy either."
Never was, never will be - both counts. Don't know why anyone at Reason hasn't known this for at least two decades if not more. They are all old enough to drink, yes?
Was anyone out there dumb enough to not realize he was lying?
Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt won their presidencies promising to keep America out of those European wars.
The rest is history.
And HOW MANY Americans died in and from those wars, which the rest of us (Americans) paid for in sweat and gold.
PEOPLE HAVE ASKED IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.AS RONALD REAGAN SAID,”Americans have a right to dream heroic dreams."
PEOPLE HAVE ASKED IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.AS A GREAT AMERICAN RONALD REAGAN SAID,”Americans have a right to dream heroic dreams."
PEOPLE HAVE ASKED IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.AS A GREAT AMERICAN RONALD REAGAN SAID IN 1980,”Americans have a right to dream heroic dreams."
PEOPLE HAVE ASKED IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.THE WORKER FROM CHECKS FROM BOTH THE CLOTHING STORE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS $30,000 FOR THE YEAR AS A GREAT AMERICAN RONALD REAGAN SAID IN 1980,”Americans have a right to dream heroic dreams."
PEOPLE HAVE ASKED IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.THE WORKER FROM CHECKS FROM BOTH THE CLOTHING STORE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS $30,000 FOR THE YEAR AS A GREAT AMERICAN RONALD REAGAN SAID IN 1980,”Americans have a right to dream heroic dreams.We have a rendezvous with destiny."
PEOPLE HAVE ASKED IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.THE WORKER FROM CHECKS FROM BOTH THE CLOTHING STORE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS $30,000 FOR THE YEAR AS A GREAT AMERICAN RONALD REAGAN SAID IN 1980,”Americans have a right to dream heroic dreams.We have a rendezvous with destiny." We can preserve Democracy
PEOPLE HAVE ASKED IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.THE WORKER FROM CHECKS FROM BOTH THE CLOTHING STORE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS $30,000 FOR THE YEAR AS A GREAT AMERICAN RONALD REAGAN SAID IN 1980,”Americans have a right to dream heroic dreams.We have a rendezvous with destiny." We can preserve Democracy for all people
PEOPLE HAVE ASKED IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.THE WORKER FROM CHECKS FROM BOTH THE CLOTHING STORE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS $30,000 FOR THE YEAR
PEOPLE HAVE ASKED IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.THE WORKER FROM CHECKS FROM BOTH THE CLOTHING STORE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS $30,000 FOR THE YEAR YES
PEOPLE HAVE ASKED IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.THE WORKER FROM CHECKS FROM BOTH THE CLOTHING STORE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS $30,000 FOR THE YEAR YES AS RONALD REAGAN SAID WE HAVE A RIGHT TO DREAM HEROIC DREAMS
IS COVID-19 A CIA PLOT TO TURN AMERICA INTO A DICTATORSHIP?I AM AGAINST COVID-19 CIVILLIBERTIES RESTRICTIONS,MASKMANDATES,AND VACCINE MANDATES,RIGHTNOW IN CHICAGO I CAN GO INTO ANYSTORE I WANT WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE.BUT RIGHTNOW I CAN’T RIDE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE PEOPLE ARE OUTSIDE THE APARTMENT BUILDING I LIVE IN WITH MASKS ON THEIR FACES.AND THE FACT WE HAD FOR OVER A YEAR A SOCIETY WHERE BESIDES NOT BEING ABLE TO ENTER ANY STORE WITHOUT A MASK ON MY FACE THERE WERE SIGNS DEMANDING SOCIALDISTANCING AND A WOMAN WHO YELLED AT ME AND SAID CERTAIN INFORMATION ON WHY WE HAVE COVID-19 CIVILIBERTIES RESTRCTIONS IS ABOVE HER,”Pay grade”,BUT SHE WOULD CALL THE COPS ON ME IF I DIDN’T PUT ON A MASK OR LEAVE THE FACT THIS HAPPENED AND WHILE COVID-19 BEGIN IN 2020 IN 2009 THERE WAS AN EXHIBIT IN CHICAGO INVOLVING A TANK MEANS WE CAME CLOSER TO MARTIAL LAW THEN ANYONE REALIZES.
THE REASON EVENTHOUGH I AM LIBERAL I MAYNO LONGER BE A DEMOCRAT I VOTED FOR RON PAUL IN 2012 RON PAUL IN 2016 AND DONALD TRUMP IN 2020 IS BECAUSE I SUPPORT WORKER RIGHTS WHEN A UNION ASKS FOR A HIGHER WAGE OR AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN WORKERS THAT IS WHAT LABOR UNIONS EXIST FOR BUT WHEN A UNION SAYS THEY WANT MASKMANDATES SO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE STORES THEY WORK AT OR CHILDREN WHO ARE NICE TO THEM IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL WHERE THEY ARE A TEACHER WILL BE TRAUMAIZED AND HAVE THEIR LIBERTIES LIMITED.THEY REALLY BELIEVE THAT INSTEAD OF HIGHERPAY AND AN END TO DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN THAT PUSHING PEOPLE AWAY WHO ACTUALLY SUPPORT A PAYRAISE FOR YOU IS SOMEHOW A WORKER RIGHT.
THE SAMEWAY THAT WHILE EQUALPAY FOR WOMEN IS A RIGHT CALLING THE COPS ON NONVIOLENT MEN WHO ASK FOR DATES IS BELIEVING THAT PUSHING SOMEONE WHO ISN’T DOING ANYTHING TO YOU YOU CAN SAY NO,AWAY IS RIGHT.YOUR HUMANRIGHT IS NOW TO LIMIT SOMEONE ELSE’S RIGHTS AND PUSH THEM AWAY.
AT A MOMENT WHEN CLOTHING STORES AND OTHER BUSINESS’S ARE TRYING TO RECOVER FROM NOT JUST A COVID-19 PANDEMIC.BUT AN AMERICA THAT EVER SINCE 9/11 EVER SINCE 2001 HAS BEEN IN A DEPRESSION,INSTEAD OF RASING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR WHICH WILL MAKE SOME PEOPLE UNEMPLOYABLE BECAUSE NO ONE IS GOING TO PAY THEM THAT.AND WILL LEAD TO CLOTHING STORES GOING OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY CAN’T AFFORD TO PAY $15 AN HOUR.IF BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE SAME AS WELFARE THAT CLOTHING STORE PAID THE WORKER $8 AN HOUR.THE WORKER PUT ON THEIR IRS FORM THAT THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR AND THE IRS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SENT THEM A LETTER WITH A CHECK FOR $15,000 SAYING THAT BECAUSE THEY ONLY MADE $15,000 FOR THE YEAR BESIDES PAYING NO TAXES THEY ARE GETTING A $15,000 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE CHECK FROM THE GOVERNMENT.THE WORKER WOULD MAKE HAVE A TOTAL OF $30,000 BUT BECAUSE $15,000 OF THE MONEY CAME FROM RICH TAXPAYERS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THE MIDDLECLASS CLOTHING STORE OWNER DIDN’T HAVE TO PAY SO MUCH THAT THERE STORE GOES UNDER.THE WORKER FROM CHECKS FROM BOTH THE CLOTHING STORE AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS $30,000 FOR THE YEAR YES AS RONALD REAGAN SAID WE HAVE A RIGHT TO DREAM HEROIC DREAMS
I’m not sure Biden is untrustworthy as much as he is so demented he has no clue what he said two minutes ago, let alone two years ago. But he’s also a lying sack of excrement.
Even if it applies only to those with $100mm of income including unrealized gains, this is how bad ideas get embedded in our tax code. Once installed, ostensibly only to tax “billionaires”, you know damn well that threshold will come down further and further to give the Statists more and more money to misappropriate.
Not to mention it will accelerate capital flight to other countries.
Hey government: cut your effing spending!