Minx Is a Witty Treatise on Early Feminism
The new comedy explores women's liberation, the world of publishing, and sex.

Minx. Available now on HBO Max.
There's a scene in the second episode of HBO Max's raunchy, charming, and altogether hilarious new comedy Minx that perfectly sums up what the show is all about. Fiery young women's libber (as they were known in 1971, the year in which Minx is set) Joyce is complaining to her matronly older sister Shelly that the male publisher of her new feminist magazine is selling ads to dildo retailers. "What woman wants a sex toy?" Joyce demands, rhetorically though furiously. "I don't know any woman who uses them." Shelly fixes her with a steady gaze and quietly replies: "Yes you do."
Minx, though it's too breezily funny and sweetly affectionate toward its characters to truly be fiercely ideological, is indeed a witty treatise on liberating early feminism from its frigid Victorian conviction that gender equality and sexual desire are incompatible—that, indeed, freeing women from the frumpy societal compulsion to pretend they aren't interested in sex may be the most fundamental liberation of all.
Minx stars British actress Ophelia Lovibond (best known to American TV audiences for a season playing a Sherlock Holmes protege on the CBS series Elementary) as Joyce Prigger, a prim but passionate young Vassar grad who spends her nights dreaming about creating a glossy feminist journal that she wants to call The Matriarch Awakes. Her days, unfortunately, are spent selling subscriptions by phone for the distinctly unfeminist magazine Teen Queen. Publishers, mostly white men, have no idea what she's talking about at a time when even the milder-tempered magazine Ms. was still a year in the future.
But then, while at a publishing seminar, she has a chance encounter with a semi-sleazeball named Doug Renetti (Jake Johnson, New Girl), whose stable of magazines includes such titles as Chesty Chicanas and Lusty Lesbos and whose interest in branching out in less exuberantly fleshy directions does not impress her. "I'm looking for a different kind of publisher," she informs him.
"What kind is that?" the puzzled Doug inquires.
"The kind who doesn't fetishize lactating mothers," Joyce snaps
Nonetheless, Doug's more redeeming qualities—chiefly, the cash to cover startup costs—gets Joyce onboard, at least until she hears his take-it-or-leave-it demand: Her written content can stand as she imagines it, but each issue must have a full-frontal male centerfold. Her scandalized refusal is met with her own rhetoric, stood on its head. Joyce claims her idea is about "making shit fair and equal for the chicks," Doug notes. "How is it fair and equal that a guy has 12 places to see titties, but a gal has no place to go see a dong?"
"Gals do not want to see dongs," Joyce insists. But when Cosmopolitan's one-shot centerfold of a bare, if strategically obscured, Burt Reynolds sells half a million copies, she reluctantly changes her mind.
What follows is a wonderfully demented editorial tug-of-war between the starchy Joyce and a production staff that doesn't entirely understand her theories on "the ideology of erections" ("Should they be approachable…draped gently on their sides?") but knows from experience that the point of centerfolds is pure prurience. When Joyce wants to screen potential models by reading them selections from Anais Nin and reacts with horror to the idea of them showing their stuff, a curious editor jokingly asks if she's ever seen a penis. "I've seen two…and a half…in very dim lighting," Joyce whispers back.
What makes Minx so delightful is that this mini culture war is accomplished with almost none of the spitefulness and contempt of the real one. Both Joyce and Doug say some clueless things that could give offense but don't because Lovibond and Johnson skillfully portray their characters as people of goodwill groping their way through unfamiliar territory. (In Joyce's case, that includes some unexamined attitudes about race and class, as when she asks Doug's chief adviser to get her some tea. (The chilly response: "I'm not the secretary. I'm just black.") That extends on down to even the minor characters, photographers, and paste-up artists, who aren't at all sure where Joyce is headed but are happy to ride along for the sheer adventure of it.
It should also be noted that Minx is almost certainly the most penis-friendly show in television history, though HBO's teen-boinkfest Euphoria is providing some stiff (heh heh) competition. And yes, there are some anachronistic missteps in writer-creator Ellen Rapoport's (Wannabe: A Hollywood Experiment) otherwise sure-footed screenplays. But Rapoport is so sharply funny that you can't even get mad at her mistakes, as when she has Joyce gloriously singing along to Helen Reddy's feminist anthem I Am Woman on a car radio a full year before the record was actually released. Still singing as she gets out of the car, Joyce belts out the next-to-final lines—"I am strong, I am invincible!"—as she enters the magazine office for the first time, where she sees the newsroom is an anthill of nude models and sexual paraphernalia. And her voice drops to a whisper: "I'm in Gomorrah…"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Less Twitter and television please.
I make 85 dollars each hour for working an online job at home. KLA09 I never thought I could do it but my best friend makes 10000 bucks every month working this job and she recommended me to learn more about it. The potential with this is endless.
For more detail………. http://applyjobs4.tk
“comedy” + women + feminism?
Ya thats gonna be a no for me dawg
I had and still generally hold that attitude, but I’ve got to admit that I LOLed at “I’m not the secretary. I’m just black.”
Pretty good feminist/SJW-hierarchy cunt punt for a show that’s supposed to be spouting feminism.
There will be the occasional joke or bit that catches me off guard and ill give a kudos to, but my general policy of assuming it will be trash almost always holds true.
For a while female comics had to basically go fully lewd into the “im cool and with the guys I can talk about sex too!” to mostly talking about sex,dicks,blowjobs, to the more modern feminist hyper focus on their vaginas. Itd be like if I saw a male comic just do dick and fart jokes for 45 min. And then you add in the likelihood that if a white woman is on stage it is almost a guarantee she is a wokester and their brains have been broken beyond the point that they no longer understand what funny is, and even if they did they dont want to upset the other wokesters.
So add that context in with many of the writers of these shows being Mindy Kaling/Sara Silverman-esque woke female writers, and it ends up being trash.
Finally a proven way of earning money online. Yes! you can earn more than you think only by working just a few hours from home regularly. I have been doing this job for like a few weeks and my last weekly payment was exactly 2537 dollars.
See More Information Here… http://jobscash.tk
Need someone to write about the fact that for all this talk about the penis finally being common place on shows and movies, that the willful absence of vulvas is quite striking. The male genital seems to be on full display, but the female equivalent seems to not exist.
if it’s sooooooo important to see a penis on the screen then, well, have I got some good news for you. The internet is a thing
You need to re-read what I wrote or edit yourself to be more understandable, smh.
I do kinda have to agree with Woodchipper. I don’t think this is a sewer that can be plumbed for any fruit.
I’ve seen plenty of vulvas in mainstream movies (and certainly wouldn’t mind seeing more), but I’ve seen plenty that wound up being “prosthetic” . Do those count? Either way, when I think about mainstream/non-porn movies I’ve seen recently with penises, they’re usually at a 1:1 with vulvas. Moreover, the general dichotomy of reproductive organs generally makes one set more visible in situations that wouldn’t relegate the movie to the status of porn.
Do those count? Either way, when I think about mainstream/non-porn movies I’ve seen recently with penises, they’re usually at a 1:1 with vulvas.
As a decent example, I think pretty much everyone has seen Boogie Nights. Personally, I think the answer to “Did we see Mark Wahlberg’s penis?” is “No.” and “Did we see Heather Graham’s vulva?” is “Yes.” but I could understand how people would disagree with those answers.
brief glimpse of pubic hair is not vulva. if i remember that movie, it’s been awhile, but i doubt she showed her vulva. pubic hair or merkin is not the same thing as female genitals, not to get pedantic.
I do like your expression above. But I’d have to disagree with your main point. When i think of mainstream movies or shows, the amount of vulvas is on 1 hand. 1:1 certainly not.
I admit to sampling bias but, off the top of my head, the only two penises I can recall seeing in relatively mainstream films/TV are Mark Wahlberg and Bob Hoskins. OTOH, I can list Rosario Dawson, Olivia Wilde, Margot Robbie, Alexandria Daddario, Kate Winslet…
Almost forgot, I dunno if Lena Headey using a body double in GOT counts or not.
Apparently, that’s my sampling bias at work there. I didn’t go through all of GOT and tabulate the P/V ratio.
i think you are confusing pubic hair with vulva mostly or interchanging the two. Dawson of course did show hers and is the rare episode of that, but Lena from GOT did not (actually her body double did not). Usually they use a full merkin to cover any presence of labia that may show.
I was gonna reply above. You said “Not to get pedantic.” but I don’t think you can have this discussion without getting pedantic. I’m not confusing anything.
I can clearly see daylight between Lena Headey’s (double’s) unclothed thighs and, from other angles, can see where her vulva *ought* to be. Whether it’s a merkin or other, I can’t say.
Re: sewer with fruit that can’t be plucked, I don’t see how to accomodate your wishes without allowing/putting more dudes’ taints in mainstream movies/TV. And if that happens, I don’t care how many vulvas there are, I will be very aggravated.
If anything your just highlighting the fact that if there is a vulva, it is hard to actually see, where you have to pause and debate if anything was seen (Basic Instinct style). With penises, the view is out and proud.
If anything your just highlighting the fact that if there is a vulva, it is hard to actually see, where you have to pause and debate if anything was seen (Basic Instinct style). With penises, the view is out and proud.
Yeah, this is beginning to sound like a demand for “Not just equal. The same”.
I’m a fan of vulva/vagina, but women (and men) don’t generally lie on their back spread eagle or do cartwheels naked and, if that’s what you want, there’s plenty of footage of that too.
One of the slim silver linings of women getting into porn is that at least some of the writing has gotten much better. Nothing that will win any awards, but plots and acting have progressed from “I’m here to fix your pipes…” to stuff that at least gives the SYFY channel a run for it’s money production-wise.
Can’t talk about it except in the purely metaphorical sense. That would be sexist.
This is pretty common w/ the woke/feminist and resentful. They are convinced this stance is new, refreshing, and brave. Getting someone of that in-group, or willing to be attacked by that in-group, to write about this? Cost-benefit likely shows diminishing rewards versus kowtowing to the mob.
True
Cost-benefit likely shows diminishing rewards versus kowtowing to the mob.
Both all/benefits too. People generally aren’t going to read your call for equal genital representation in movies and think “So brave!” and men aren’t going to stand up and cheer that you got more vulva into the remake of Forrest Gump. They’ll just watch Forrest Hump instead.
Yay! Woke for Boomers!
Thanks. Sounds like a must miss.
“liberating early feminism from its frigid Victorian conviction that gender equality and sexual desire are incompatible”
Look, I’m not saying you’re full of crap, but I would like some evidence that early feminism was like that.
Or is this simply a distorted way of saying early feminists weren’t as raunchy as modern ones?
I’m not even saying I’m a feminist, early or otherwise, though if acknowledging women haven’t always got a fair shake is feminism then I’m such. It’s their *solutions* which I may not necessarily agree with.
Even the shows Garvin praises don’t sound that great.
And the ones he criticizes sound like they set the standard for badness.
Good efforts. All the best for future posts. I have bookmarked you. Well done. I read and like this post. Thanks.
tamildhoolhd
“A witty treatise on early feminism”? You think? Created and written by blinkered high-schoolers methinks. (Check-out the creator’s previous writing effort – “Desperados”. Enough said.
Moreover, it looks like objectification of nude men is not sufficient; what makes for real comedy is an attempt to humiliate. For example, the conscious decision to include the portrayal of a woman demonstrating that one of the auditioning men has a small penis was both profound and so hilarious.
What next? Mimicking a stroke affected limb of a naked man?
Disgraceful, and quite pathetic.
I have noticed some comments calling out a ‘double standard’ about full-frontal nudity these days. It might be relevant to this situation too – we assume that it would be unacceptable to have a man attempt to humiliate an auditioning woman by pointing out her larger than normal labia. Or is this the next horizon we can expect to cross in the attempt to amuse?
By way of comparison what do you think the reaction might be if we simply switch the sexes and redo this ‘comedy’, as follows:
It is the early days of ‘men’s’ magazines and an adventurous young man wants to push the boundaries and show ‘spread leg’ shots in a new magazine. Together with another guy and two women (one overtly gay), prospective girls are ‘interviewed’; perhaps on a chair where they can display their labia minora and vulvas for selection. We see a display of various sized vulva and labia minora, including one aspiring centrefold pulling out her very long labia minora in a ‘comedic’ stretch. The observers make amusing gestures about small and large vulva and labia.
I think that is a fair appraisal of the casting scene in Episode 1, with the sexes switched.
How would that go?