That Dirty Black Bag Shows Exactly Why Spaghetti Westerns Died
Witless plots and pointless violence aren’t nearly as enthralling these days.

That Dirty Black Bag. Available now on AMC+.
A lot of stuff from the 1960s—hippie communes, Tab, bubble-gum music—hasn't aged particularly well. To that list, it's time to add Spaghetti Westerns, what was at that time a sardonic new breed of horse operas spearheaded by Italian director Sergio Leone and his favorite leading man, Clint Eastwood.
When they burst on the scene in 1964, the Spaghetti Westerns revivified a dying American film genre with their lone, laconic gunslingers; hair-trigger violence; and whiplash editing that bounced from spectacular location photography (no dreary, weary old backlots) to extreme close-ups of not-necessarily-very-pretty actors.
But watch Spaghetti Westerns today—TCM runs them constantly—and they seem mostly witless (Leone and many of his imitators couldn't write in English), badly dubbed and thinly plotted. The editing style they pioneered has become so ubiquitous that it's no longer very noticeable. The indifferent cynicism of their characters seems more a pose than an attribute.
All this is by way of saying that The Dirty Black Bag, the new Spaghetti Western on the streaming service AMC+, is an anachronistic bore. Yes, Italy, Spain, and Morocco, where the series was shot, have some ruggedly picturesque territory that looks just like the old American West for which it stands in. Yes, Dominic Cooper and Douglas Booth look menacing, especially if they've got a bloody axe in one hand and the body of a naughty 14-year-old at their feet. So what? You need more than that to make up for a garbled story and dullard dialogue. Listlessly moping around the tumbleweeds, even when punctuated by the occasional disembowelment, is not a plot-driver.
Written and directed by Italian TV regular Mauro Aragoni, The Dirty Black Bag exhibits faithful adherence to the Spaghetti Western playbook. (In some case, shot by shot; a scene of a bored gunfighter trapping a fly inside the barrel of his revolver is lifted—excuse me, "homaged"—right out of Leone's 1968 Once Upon a Time in the West.) Aragoni sets a bunch of grim-faced, itchy-trigger-fingered characters wandering in seemingly unrelated directions, then stands back when they converge and the blood splatters.
Most of the action takes place around the once-booming town of Greenvale, where the vein of gold ore that brought prosperity has been exhausted and a five-year drought has laid waste to all the farms that supplied stability. Such authority as exists in the vacant, vagrant Greenvale is vested in the prickly sheriff, Arthur McCoy (played by Cooper, late of Preacher), who seems curiously indifferent to crimes committed against his constituents: When a farmer complains that his plowhorses have been stolen by the town bad boys, the sheriff advises him to sell the place and move on.
Sheriff McCoy, however, is concerned about a bounty hunter passing through his jurisdiction, the grizzled and grisly Red Bill (Booth, of The Pillars of the Earth), a quick man with both a gun and a hatchet. The latter is to decapitate his targets and bring in their heads to collect his rewards. "A head weighs less than a body," the practical-minded Red Bill notes as he deposits the heads in that titular dirty black bag. The sheriff's pique at Red Bill is unexplained; could it have something to do with those three broad, shiny scars running down his back?
The farmer whose missing plowhorses matter so little to Sheriff McCoy is Steve (Christian Cooke, Magic City), who is dead-solid certain God wants him to keep farming near Greenvale despite that five-year drought. His none-too-scrupulous opponents in this undertaking are the extortionate land baron Mr. Thompson (British TV star Paterson Joseph), who is convinced gold still lies beneath the town, and the whore-with-a-heart-of-wooden-nickels Eve (Niv Sultan, Tehran), who is certain that her burnt-out old romance with Steve would rekindle if he'd just leave his wife and the farm.
The wild card in all this is Butler (Aidan Gillen, Game of Thrones), an innocent-looking goat farmer whose mild exterior conceals his maniacal religious zealotry. Butler follows the Gospel as it might have been preached by Hannibal Lecter. "This is Hell, and we are the demons," he advises a potential parishioner he's evangelizing with a meat hook.
This all sounds rather more interesting than it is. The motives and agendas of the characters take far too long to emerge, and often, when the characters are seen in underlit or distant camera angles (as they often are, just to remind you that they're up to dark doings, as if the pyramid of empty-eyed skulls in the background aren't enough of a clue), it's impossible to tell who they even are, since everybody is submerged in frontier facial hair and pretty much all conversation concerns the finer points of murder and rape. I'd guess that the show's scripts contain a lot of descriptive notes that read only, "GUY bloodily kills OTHER GUY."
With the storyline frequently repetitious and almost entirely incomprehensible, it seems that only headhunters and professional sadists will likely manage to maintain long-term interest in That Dirty Black Bag. (Though, to be fair, those are important Nielsen demographics.) I spent more time pondering Farmer Steve's theology than who was killing who. Asked what makes him think that God is really watching over sun-baked, corpse-strewn Greenvale, he replies: "God is wherever suffering is." Is that cause, Steve, or effect?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It sounds like something I should check out and probably would enjoy not getting preached some higher social justice message. I have no idea what Garvin might actually like in a movie or TV but given his above rant, I'll guess it must include some sort of social justice victim or artsy crap that is trying too hard for a Hollywood statue.
[JOIN NOW] I really make A LOT OF MONEY ($200-$300/hour) online from my laptop. Last month I received almost $50,000. this line work is simple and straightforward. ghj You don’t need to go to the office, it’s online work from home. You become independent after joining this position. I really appreciate my friend.
....
Who pointed it out to me SITE….., http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
Perfect. Thanks. I read this review and thought this person must be super negative.. lol. I am looking forward to watching
On the other hand, the Man With No Name trilogy are among the best in the western genre there is. Period. Even with all the imitators, nothing tops The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly as one of the best movies ever made.
Even the spoofs of it like "My Name is Nobody" were good.
love that film! looked it up on youtube within the last year for a nostalgia viewing
Damn straight.
Is Glenn seriously arguing that Leone's filmography hasn't aged well? If so, dude's out to lunch.
From a technical standpoint, you have to kind of take those movies for what they are--I still enjoy watching them, even though I'm not a fan of that "Tower of Babel" dialogue style where the foreign actors' voices are dubbed. And Brandy's right on with The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly--one of the best movies ever and a genre-defining film the same way The Searchers and The Big Trail were.
"Is Glenn seriously arguing that Leone's filmography hasn't aged well? If so, dude's out to lunch."
I don't think he's arguing that -- I think he is just damning the latest "crop."
The first paragraph pretty much says they haven't aged well and the second goes on to specifically detail why he said what he said in the first paragraph.
I would agree that many modern takes have taken the tropes and ideas and run absurdly too far with them (and continue to do so) but the first three paragraphs pretty clearly lay out that the Italians were wrong to start running in that direction in the first place.
No, he's arguing both that the originals haven't aged well *and* that the current crop is mostly copying the style without understanding or originality.
The latter is true, the former is him being out to lunch.
Not to say that most of them weren't shit - but 95 percent of everything is shit.
Could just as well say that genre scifi from the 70-80's was shit if you ignore the masterpieces that were made.
It's no "Power of the Dog", that's for sure.
Ha! 😉
Yeah, it may be bloody, but it's no "Turning Red".
"Witless plots and pointless violence aren’t nearly as enthralling these days."
Have you met American cinema? Seriously wtf is this, laughing so hard.
I would say modern cinema rather than American cinema too. Half of Netflix is just utter garbage where non-Western tropes and social norms are poorly shoe-horned and dubbed into English (or other language) and Western (or other) sensibilities (to rave reviews). You wind up with Squid Game where characters actually say "We should team up.", "It reminds me of the moon where I'm from", and things like "We need more girls on our team in case we play a game like hopscotch." to each other and adults lapping it up. I get that farting slugs and cowardly vegetarian lions play to large numbers of international audiences but poorly dubbing them into English (if there are even any speaking parts) is just dumb.
Particularly what passes for "horror" films? The only thing horror about them is that they even get produced.
Right?
And yet, throw a thin varnish of sci-fi onto the genre and a big-name like 'Star Wars' and people line up for miles to see it.
Guessing it must be the CGI?
The Mandalorian is basically Have Gun, Will Travel, with Storm Troopers as the bullet catchers.
That was my favorite part of the series--"Space Spaghetti Western" is a genre that had never occurred to me before.
But, you know, utter shit instead.
Not that I'm praising The Dirty Black Bag (the pile of skulls in the commercial has largely put me off), but I have to wonder if, reading this, Garvin has even the slightest cinematic awareness of what he's saying. Because it comes across as "I reject your globalism and substitute my own."
The plot and tropes of many Spaghetti Westerns was not original to the writers and at a time when Westerns were largely black hats or head dresses chasing white hats before they could rescue the damsel off the tracks to entertain children, these Italian directors would take Eastern plots, reformulate them in a Western framework, and sell them to a Western audience. Eastern plots that played, and still play today (and fail to be emulated [insert disallowed second link to Netflix's Cowboy Bebop reviews]). They certainly didn't invent the trope but they effectively revolutionized character development and plot formulation, specifically via the anti-heroes, for over 50 yrs. The funny thing about it too is, they revolutionized it in such a way as to make broader political and, at the time, social justice issues more palatable aimlessly or accidentally. When your protagonist stands for things like "That all men are created equal and that everyone has within himself the power to make this a better world... That men should live by the rule of what is best for the greatest number." his story and position are largely unassailable, but when his ethos is "There are two kinds of people in the world those with guns and those that dig. You dig." he becomes much more human.
This review reads as someone who's generally unaware of Western films and themes starring Gary Cooper, John Wayne, and Clint Eastwood.
Reading this it sounds like the movie must be as bad as GBU, Unforgotten, High Noon, The Searchers and How the West Was Won. If it's even half as terrible as he thinks those are I'm going to watch it as soon as possible because those are my kind of terrible movie.
Somehow you have missed the whole point of the genre. Style is the most important thing. By a long road, they were the spiritual descendants of the old pulp crime stories - Hammett in particular, his Red Harvest inspired Kurosawa, which in turn inspired Leone. And Chandler was famous for plots that didn't make sense, because he made his early novels by patching together completely unrelated short stories.
As to why they died, mostly it's because people are now idiots and would rather watch comic book movies.
Spaghetti Westerns had great music.
The best Spaghetti Westerns, like the best Bubblegum records, are timeless.
Okay Millennial.
This is in no way a defense of this new movie, which I haven't seen, and am unlikely to, since I can't afford another premium streaming service, but your bagging on Sergio Leone's movies is evidence that you don't know what you're talking about, unless you also complain that black and white movies all suck because they aren't in color, and that the outdated special effects in the original Star Wars make it lame.
The Leone/Eastwood trilogy completely remade the western movie (and I loved the old western movie style as well), and while it might trend towards nihilism (obligatory Big Lebowski reference here), those movies still are among my very favorites.
Is this guy arguing that films recognized for years as classics can be declassicked that easily? As if 20 years after they were made, no one noticed the dubbing or dialogue? As if only today it's apparent?
By all means tell us about why other classics suck. Start with Buster Keaton. Talk about that bad dialogue! Then do La Dolce Vita. The whole damn thing is probably dubbed. What losers they were!
LOL Right?
I want to know how stupid shit like this gets printed here? Who thought this was worth reading?
Here we have the kind of negative review that is inadvertently a recommendation. Perhaps the reviewer expected Westerns to be more like documentaries.
I deffo want to see this.
"Witless plots and pointless violence aren’t nearly as enthralling these days."
Speak for yourself.