Tchaikovsky Is Canceled
The Cardiff Philharmonic Orchestra scrubbed the famed composer from an upcoming program, calling his music "inappropriate at this time."

In light of Russia's invasion into Ukraine, many westerners are understandably doing their level best to distance themselves from President Vladimir Putin and those loyal to him. But some of those gestures look increasingly like performance art.
The latest utterly pointless sanction is the Cardiff Philharmonic Orchestra's announcement that it would remove music by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, the Russian composer, from its all-Tchaikovsky concert, calling it "inappropriate at this time." In the last week, conductor Valery Gergiev and superstar soprano Anna Netrebko have also lost engagements and artistic affiliations due to their cozy ties to the Russian president.
Nationality and prodigious talent aside, Tchaikovsky shares little else with Gergiev and Netrebko. The latter two are alive and beneficiaries of an autocrat's favoritism; Tchaikovsky died over a century ago.
The composer is an inappropriate scapegoat for another reason: He was one of the first and only Russian composers to eschew Russian nationalism and endear his music to the West, becoming what many historians would consider one of the few bridges between Russian and European artistry.
He also loved Ukraine.
There was plenty of political and public pressure to take the opposite route. Tchaikovsky's primary contemporaries were a group of Russian composers nicknamed "The Five"—Mily Balakirev, César Cui, Modest Mussorgsky, Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov, and Alexander Borodin—who dedicated their musical lives to constructing a distinctly Russian-nationalist style. Tchaikovsky was the odd composer out. Having been educated at the Saint Petersburg Conservatory, where Western European influences were heavy, he inserted themes from Russian folk tunes but imbued his music with the operatic and balletic lyricism more characteristic to the works of his neighbors.
Perhaps more importantly, his disposition for an international musical style informed the ways in which he shared it with the world. In an era when many Russian composers siloed themselves off from the globe, Tchaikovsky sought to be a part of it; during a three-month tour in 1888, he became the first Russian composer to personally unveil his music to Western Europe. It was on that trip that he met Brahms, the German composer, whose music he disliked and whose popularity he chalked up to a nationalistic sort of fan-girling. Their exchange is an instructive window into how Tchaikovsky wanted his music to be received. It couldn't stand on identity. It just needed to be good.
That left him on the outskirts—an allegory for his life, in some sense, which was marred with depressive episodes as well as inner torment over his homosexuality (the latter of which, I'll add, would not make him very popular in Putin's Russia). At odds with some of the nationalist cultural elite, he gave the premiere of his opera Eugene Onegin to a group of students as opposed to a grand Russian theater. And when Rimsky-Korsakov of "the Five" had an about-face and took a job at the Western-influenced Saint Petersburg Conservatory—seen in some corners as a betrayal of sorts—it was Tchaikovsky who supported him.
Those who agree with the Cardiff Philharmonic's decision to deprogram Tchaikovsky may note that one of the selections on the program was his 1812 Overture, a 15-minute piece celebrating the defeat of Napolean Bonaparte's attempted Russian invasion. The piece is inappropriate given the circumstances, the thinking goes. Such comparisons fall a bit flat when looking at the historical context: The piece does not commemorate Russia as the aggressor but rather as a country successfully fending off a foreign invader; as such, it has been embraced by the West and is familiar to many American audiences during 4th of July celebrations. There are lessons to be learned there.
Even still, the objection hardly necessitates scrubbing Tchaikovsky in his entirety solely because of where he was born. That's especially true in light of what was supposed to be the program's main course: his Symphony No. 2, which, in a sort of cosmic irony, is built around…three Ukrainian folk songs.
For those familiar with Tchaikovsky, that likely won't come as a shock. The composer spent several months a year in Ukraine and had close family ties to the region; his paternal grandfather was born there. "I found the peace of mind here that I had unsuccessfully sought in Moscow and Petersburg," he once wrote, ever the outsider.
Even in death, it appears Tchaikovsky will continue to play that part, the anti-nationalist again ostracized—this time by the people who purport to agree with the core of what he stood for. In a time where some are unable to differentiate between supporting Putin and being Russian, when theaters and embassies are vandalized and defaced solely because of their flag, it's not necessarily a surprise. But that doesn't make it less of a shame.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
LOL. Just LOL.
So utterly fucking stupid. Even the jingoism after 9/11 wasn't as retarded as this.
How old are you? Do you not remember freedom fries?
Yeah, but that was more trolling by individuals than cancelling a centuries dead person's music because he happened to be born in the same country we currently have decided are our foes. Yeah, it was possibly as stupid, considering french referred to the cutting method as opposed to the French people, though not quite as bad, as French Fries were popularized America by Thomas Jefferson, who are them for the first time when he was serving in France as ambassador.
So BLM/CRT/Wokesters will be calling out and cancelling French Fries as racist? 🙂
Probably, because they were popularized by Jefferson serving them at the Whitehouse when he was president, and we all know he was only a rich white slave holder, who may have slept with one of his slaves (which was co-owner by his paternal uncle who actually had a reputation for that, and the DNA results only show a common paternal ancestor between Jefferson and the offspring of one of his slaves).
Could point out that Jefferson spent most of his time when the child was conceived in DC and Richmond, while the female slave appears to have spent most of her time on the Jefferson family plantation, which he didn't become sole owner of until after the children in question were born.
So you’re one of them types. Monticello now openly admits TJ and Hemings had love children.
Still a boring schtick.
Fuck off Macintosh
They only ran a Y test? I could be wrong but I was under the impression that they did autosomal.
They did and it ruled out TJ’s sisters son. TJ’s nephew had the reputation and had been rumored to be the father of Hemings kids. SM76 has TJ’s nephew confused with an uncle. Must be the Mormon in SM76…
I hope they build a bunch of Mormon churches around your residence. That would be funny.
The short version: We can prove the Hemming children are Jeffersons. Of which Jefferson, it's exceptionally difficult if not impossible to prove at this point.
If they dug him up...
"Do you not remember freedom fries?"
Idiots asking for "freedom fries" at McDonald's, isn't the same level as Orchestra's cancelling composers because of their ethnicity.
Could you imagine after 9/11 an orchestra refusing to play anything Arabic?
What about Fronch fries?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhW7rpFhr2k
Cancel all screenings of Rocky 4, red dawn, the thin red line, and Dr shivago
I haven't seen The Thin Red Line, but damnit, the other three are are among the best anti-Communist movies evah!
Reds has been making the rounds in Shotime this month.
The Cardiff Philharmonic Orchestra ought to roll over to Beethoven.
"Roll over, Beethoven! Get Tchaikovsky back!..."
....and tell Tchaikovsky the news.
When your COVID narrative loses Dr. Campbell...
Pfizer data has finally been forcibly released and... well, it's not good.
Quick hits: Pfizer's own internal post-marketing data shows 1223 associated deaths from the Pfizer vaccine in the first three months of delivery in late 2020 and early 2021.
Did those people die *from* the vaccine or *with* the vaccine?
*** ducks ***
[Johnny Tightlips voice]
What's a vaccine?
[/Johnny Tightlips voice]
Campbell is perplexed why the media hasn't taken this story up. I think Campbell is in for some rude awakenings coming up.
All hail science. In Pfizer we trust. Praise be to Fauci.
Finished watching. Looked like it broke his heart making the video and realizing what had been done for lack of transparancy early on.
Also looked like he had taken the jab himself.
Campbell is perplexed why the media hasn't taken this story up.
Campbell isn't actually perplexed. He constantly says he's perplexed to ward off the YouTube ban hammer. He's always been good at sneaking out the actual story under the censor's noses.
"sneaking out the actual story".
That is certainly my take.
Just think if they'd managed to keep it under wraps for those 75 years...
Also, this was data that was known by CDC and FDA prior. Just because WE now get to know as well doesn't mean this is a revelation to anyone else.
Fauci et al are responsible for crimes against humanity. Willingly and knowingly.
OK, so now banning, shunning people for their ethnicity is OK because Russia Bad.
Sounds legit.
HATE CRIME!!
This isn't a surprise. The music community, and especially the classical music community, have gone more and more to progressive, left virtue signaling the last few years.
This phil is particularly ridiculous, but the chamber recital I went to last weekend they opened with the Ukrainian national anthem. Before that they had no problem calling the massive bulk of their donors and patrons racists -- trust me, that community is rich and lilly white. They won't hire any help at one venue that isn't female, transgender, of an ethnicity other than white, or preferably a combination of the above. It has gotten bad enough I don't donate to the local symphony any more.
It used to be just annoying when they did something like this. I remember they broke their own arms patting themselves on the back for hiring a mexican-looking singer rather than a white looking singer for a piece in Spanish (both were Americans) because that was the thing at the time. But it is past annoying now.
The problem with dogmatic virtue signalling is ALWAYS that it eventually misses the point. Tchaikovsky was brilliant, his work is still brilliant a century later, and current events don't change any of that. This is a classical music version of "Freedom Fries".
Follow the money. Where do they get their funding?
Generally rich older white folk. The small time donors are a lot more diverse, but one or two that have an outsized impact at the moment. Around here that's tech Democrats, but there's more to it than that. The scene has been moving left along with everything else in entertainment and media, and since they tend to be charities operated by the types who go into non profits in the first place, typical theater companies, philharmonics, and music societies generally operate in an echo chamber that's more one-note even than hollywood.
This is the way with music in Pop and Rock and Roll, too. They've gotten conformist progressive, and if you aren't on board you're not getting work with a major artist tour so people outside the progressive virtue circle just stay silent. So the money making acts are also echo chambers.
Agreed.
The classical music community is insufferable in their zeal for identity politics, as if that will make them relevant again.
Soros is a rich older white folk…….
The dogmatic signaling also never stops, much like activism itself whose sole interest is in the perpetuation of whatever grift is involved. God forbid that what problem/issue there is be solved. That would mean the activists' livelihood was cut off.
hiring a mexican-looking singer rather than a white looking singer for a piece in Spanish...
At the risk of being accused of racism, why is this celebrated, but at the same time Netflix is being applauded for having a black woman playing a Danish Viking Jarl on their new series Vikings: Valhalla? Yes, Scandinavian culture was more equal in it's treatment of women, but inheritance laws have always forbidden women from hereditary titles, and until the end of the 20th century, it still remained the law of the land (Norway and Denmark were the last two to allow the crown to be passed to the oldest offspring of either sex, not the oldest male offspring). Also, not a whole hell of a lot of people of African descent living in 11th century Denmark (hell there isn't very many living there in 21st century Denmark either).
The white savior complex bugs the shit out of me.
But classical music is all benefactors. It's not a money maker, it never has been. It has relied on generous donors going back to Bach. Only a scant few artists are actually a draw in and of themselves, otherwise they're a draw as a large group. So a lot of the ones who make solo careers are beholden to whoever has the purse strings. Know the right people, get the right donors to ask for you, and you can get a lucrative gig rather than having to play second fiddle in the orchestra or make peanuts teaching while sidelining in a string quartet for weddings.
So these folks don't see it any differently than getting a job for being a mezzo soprano and not an alto. They "fit" what the orchestra was looking for. They've seen nepotism, favoritism, name recognition, and all kinds of other things not specifically related to their skills get people good gigs when someone else might be technically better.
The difference here, obviously, is that race is a particularly charged issue and using it to exclude anyone -- even whitey -- is a substantial backslide in civil rights to eyes like ours. But it is just far too tempting for entertainment, which is the industry of who you know far more than what you know. It's only a tiny step, and easy for those types to justify with specious arguments based around how things were 50 or 60 years ago.
It wouldn't bother me so much, except historical inaccuracies always take me out of a historical drama, making it less enjoyable, if they weren't shitting all over my culture. And when I and other people of Scandinavian descent point it out, we get called racist. It's the whole making a big deal out of Idris Elba playing Heimdall, Marvel making a big deal out of the new Thor being a woman (there were so many powerful female deities in Norse mythology, why not pick one of those?) not because of his acting but because he is black, and Disney patting itself on the back for being brave for recasting the Little Mermaid with a non-white female, despite it being a Danish children's book that specifically described her as fair skinned and redheaded (the actress also replaced another classical red headed character in the MCU, but they retconned that by changing her name from Mary Jane and the multiverse).
During that whole Thor being a female debate I was blasted for being sexist for suggesting that they change the character completely to one of the female goddesses. The comics already had made Sif and Frigga canon, so I suggested making the character Freya. Oh boy, that pissed the feminist off! "Oh so you think women are only good for breeding? Because it's obvious you suggested the goddess of fertility!". It didn't matter that wasn't all Freya was. It didn't matter that Freya was also described as a bad ass shield maiden and commander of her own army of fallen warriors. She got half of all fallen warriors, they didn't all go to Valhalla. In fact, she got first choice of fallen warriors before Odin, who got whoever she didn't choose. And she wasn't the only deity of fertility, she shared those duties with her twin brother Frey. None of that mattered to them because she was the goddess of fertility and mothers. And God forbid we have a strong female character associated with fertility and motherhood at all.
By Norse standards, Freya was kind of a slut. That always gets women up in a tizzy, because it's the women who do the slut shaming. Doesn't matter that she was capable of all kinds of whoopass. Make that argument and watch the internet femenists' heads explode.
But none of that matters. They don't want a female to play a female because it's not about finding a role for a female lead to make her own. The idea is that everything is zero sum. You can't elevate a woman without putting down whoever it was that was playing Thor.
Also, they want "their share" of ... I dunno. People who argue for equity think they're owed something, as though these things that make money and fame are and have always been the same and so they want that existing position. The notion of creating Freya and popularizing the character with a well done film is antithetical to all of this. No, they want the already in place Thor position and not only that, in their minds this new Thor will be required viewing because everyone goes to see Thor.
I don't go to see Thor. I especially won't go to see a female Thor just because it has a female lead. That's ridiculous. If you want me to go see a movie, make a movie I want to go see.
Nor do I want to watch a black scandanavian somebody or other, largely for the same reason. But also because in the back of my mind I will always be thinking that they are a diversity hire and, frankly, the fake multi-cultural-mix cast and hamfisted, woke writing of just about every modern movie or television program I've seen recently is repugnant. It's stilted, it's obvious, and it is not good art or entertainment, so now when I see it I'm just turned off enough I won't bother at all. Hard to watch a movie when I'm rolling my eyes all the time, you know?
Actually, Norse standards of female sexuality were much looser than other Europeans, and not entirely strictly enforced. If you look at birth records from the sagas and the few from runic inscriptions that have survived (runes for every day stuff was done on wood not stone, so fewer have survived), you see a lot of children born 18 months after their husbands left for a 3 or 4 year raid. Technically, the husband could declare adultery (female adultery was less accepted than male adultery in the law, but females could seek divorce for male adultery with a free woman that resulted in children, of course slaves were open game) but the few records we have don't appear to show that very often the husband's did seek this route. It was more common if it was an eldest son, for inheritance reasons. Also, the husband's often returned themselves with children they fathered on raids, it was not uncommon to claim bastards like in the Christian kingdoms, even those from slaves. They expected their wives to accept these children, so, they often accepted the children their wives birthed while they were gone for years on end, to keep the peace. Getting a divorce was fairly easy in Viking Age Scandinavia, it wasn't until the end of the age, as Christianity took over, that things changed much.
Another thing, while virginity was desired, it doesn't appear it was expected. And some of the sagas are quite erotic, so it also appears the Vikings at least recognized female sexual enjoyment and passion (unlike some of their Christian counterparts of the same time period, but even there, the writing shows this was much more widely acknowledged than later, and seems to have mainly fallen out of favor during the reformation), and at least tolerated it. It's more likely they accepted it and celebrated it based on the sagas. Male heroes were often described as talented lovers who pleased their partners. Female heroines were often also described as passionate and desirable due to their passion, and in some cases, their sexual talents. But the sagas also often would describe them as chaste, too, in different verses.
The Anglo-Saxon chroniclers, Irish chroniclers and the Frankish chroniclers also made a big deal about the sexual promiscuity and licenses of Norse and Danes, both men and women. We don't how much this was propaganda and demonization and how much this was accurate, or possibly even misunderstanding due to the freedoms Scandinavian women enjoyed compared to women from their own lands. It's widely debated, and you can find support for all three hypothesis in Viking runes and sagas. The sagas mostly weren't written down until the 14th century, three centuries after Scandinavia was mostly Christianized, so it's possible the authors may have added portions regarding the importance of chastity and virginity, while editing out some portions that celebrated sexuality, especially female sexuality. Based on Roman encounters with other Germanic tribes men, and Gaelo-Roman historians in England and France at the time of the migration period, which described the Anglo-Saxons, both southern Scandinavian Germanic tribesman (and archeological data also has shown there were also large numbers of Jutes and Gotlanders in the Anglo-Saxon invasion armies, both of which were forefathers of the Viking culture) and Franks, and the similarities of their descriptions of their practices to what the tribesman descendants used to describe Viking culture, I tend to lean more towards the Vikings having a much opener attitude towards sexuality. I would also note that Latin Christian Kingdoms felt that the Germanic Christian kingdoms were too sexually loose, as well.
We also don't know how accurate the accusations of wide spread rape was either, as these records come from the same Christian chroniclers, but Viking religion frowned on rape, and it wasn't considered murder if you killed a fellow Norseman or Dane for raping one of your female relatives or dependents. In fact it was generally expected for you to. You also rarely had to pay the death fees, and quite often the family of the slain man would have to pay you damages. I'm sure rape happened, what war hadn't it happened, but we don't know how widespread it was. Rape appears to have been more taboo than murder, but that taboo may only have applied to Scandinavian women and those under Scandinavian males protection (it was taboo to have sex with the female slave of another person, without their permission, but that was treated more like theft). We also know that the Anglo-Saxon and French chroniclers especially complained about the grooming habits of Scandinavian raiders and settlers, because they were cleaner and wore clean clothes that they changed often, and thus they seduced native women away from their masters and families. Why rape someone when the fact that you bathed regularly and changed your clothes regularly and took care of your teeth, meant you could easily seduce them? Besides, women, even more than today, were attracted to wealthy powerful men, and Vikings were generally wealthier and more successful than most of the males they raided and conquered (wealth was much more concentrated in the Christian kingdoms than in Viking culture, and Viking culture was also much less static in class, you could conceivably be born to a slave and rise to the rank of Jarl, albeit it this was probably the rare exception, much like being born poor and rising to become President today).
Go on... 😉
Oops, editing mistake, I meant to insert the example of Marvel and Thor after the part about Idris Elba's acting ability. Mean culpa.
One thing I'll say: Idris Elba would be awesome as James Bond. Might be getting too old though. The important features of Bond aren't physical, they're nationality and charisma. Bond has to be British, and he has to be suave, clever, and cold. If he fits those requirements, he can be Bond. Neither an American nor woman would fit. They could be a different character, but not Bond.
Black (or anybody else) actors can work in roles their skin color doesn't line up with depending on setting and approach. I largely didn't mind the black lady viking chieftain, but she should've been a newly invented character instead of a historical one. If given the right backstory, and as long as the superficial identity class isn't the whole point of the character, it can work. But the performance and writing better go a long, long way to overcome the ridiculousness of the anachronism.
As for black Scandinavians at the time, this would have been noted by someone because of the rarity of blacks anywhere in Europe and free blacks in the near east at the time. The Africans they would have come into contact with would have been mostly been Berbers and Moors. Despite the Kevin Costner Robin Hood movie and subsequent remakes, Moors were not black, they were descendants of the Berbers, which were a Mediterranean culture, and more similar to southern Spanish and north Africans in skin color, as these two groups have strong ancestry from those two earlier cultures. Also, by the time of latter Viking Age, the word Moor came to be used by Christian Europeans to describe both the Berber tribesmen and their Moorish cousins, as well as these people who had mixed with their Arab conqueror's, that lived in Western North Africa, and those that had conquered much of the Iberian peninsula.
The history channel also portrayed Hannibal in the series Barbarians Rising as a black man, but Carthaginians were Semitic people (Phoenicians) who mixed with the North African Tribesman and their descendants would become the Berbers and Moors of later ages, and the Arabic Berbers of modern North Africa. They may have been darker skinned than Romans, but not black. They would have looked most similar to native Egyptians and Palestinian Jews (this probably needs to be specified for some people as the modern Palestinians, while Semitic people, are of Arabic descent not Jewish descent and didn't enter this region until the Islamic conquests of the 7th through 12th centuries) and Lebanese of the time period.
The other Islamic cultures the Vikings had contact with, would be the Persians via their settlements and river trade routes through Russia and Ukraine, although this was mainly dominated by Swedish Vikings, with only minor Norse and Danes involved in it. There may have been some contact with Turks and Mongols from Central Asia due to these trade routes as well.
To summarize, any Africans they most likely encountered would have been North Africans. There is an outside chance that Ethiopians and other Horn of Africa cultures may have been present via the Islamic world, Ethiopians Christians, and Islamic converts from the Horn of Africa probably did occasionally undertake pilgrimages to the Holy sites in the Middle East of both Religions, which were split at the time between Muslims Kingdoms and the Byzantine Kingdom (although Byzantine had by the 11th century lost control of most of Palestine and were fighting a rearguard defensive campaign in Syria and Lebanon). So, it's possible they may have come into contact with them via trading and raiding the Byzantine Empire on the Southern Black Sea from their Kievan base, but it's unlikely. Ethiopian Orthodox and Eastern Orthodox don't get along any better than Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox do and did, Roman Catholic and Ethiopian Orthodox didn't exactly get along very well either, and Byzantine and Arabic Muslims main interaction was warfare, and there aren't many Islamic Holy sites in modern Turkey that date to that period. Possibly as traders or more likely as slaves taken from the Arabs in warfare (where they would have been slaves as well). They may have been some East Africans held as slaves on the Iberian Peninsula (although the majority of slaves would have been Caucasians, Moorish Spain was a major depot of the Frankish slave routes, which in turn got most of it's slaves from Vikings, who took them in raids on Western Europe. Slaves taken on raids in the Eastern Baltic and Eastern Europe would have been traded to Persia via the Volga River trade route and the Caspian Sea, or the Byzantines via the Dnieper River and the Black Sea.
There was some trading of slaves and other goods from these two areas at the Viking settlements and merchant cities in southern Jutland, Zealand, Burnholm, Gotland, northern Frisia, and Danish and Swedish settlements in what is modern Poland and Baltic states. These regions served as major trading regions were good taken from Western Europe by Danes and Norse would have been traded for goods acquired by trade and raiding in the Eastern Europe, Asia and the near east by Swedish Vikings.
The Vikings really had extensive trade routes that stretched from Greenland (and some from Canada) to Persia and the Black Sea, who in turn were linked to the far east via the silk road. And via the Franks and Bretons, and also via direct trade and raids, they also were linked to the western Mediterranean, especially North Africa and the Iberian Peninsula. Through the Byzantine Empire their trade routes were also linked to the Eastern Mediterranean.
Man that post got much longer than it needed to. I could have said it was unlikely to have a black person in Denmark at the time, but the best possibility would have been one taken as a slave by Arabs on the Horn of Africa and then traded to Persia or the Byzantines or captured as a prize of war by the Byzantines.
Bond is specifically Scottish. Sorry, but Bind is a hetero white male. Maybe they could just adapt Luther into films.
[T]here were so many powerful female deities in Norse mythology, why not pick one of those?
But... how would that have let them literally emasculate one of their most beloved characters and earned them Wokredit?
Vikings: Valhalla is pretty good though, even if Leif Erikson is a bit of a Mary Sue -- he's the best fighter! (even though he's from Greenland and didn't have many people to fight against there). and the best strategist! (even though he's never been in combat before). And the best ship's captain! (okay, that one might have been real.)
And of course his sister is the best shield maiden, after a few days of training. Do you have to beat the captain in single combat to make the squad? If so, wouldn't that kind of limit the membership count unnecessarily?
They even Godwinned their own show, with a historical Godwin of Wessex. King Canute is pretty good too, juggling multiple traitors, 2 wives, and 3 kingdoms. And King Olaf is clearly the villain, since he's spreading Christianity (by any means necessary....)
It depends. Are they red or White Russians?
After all, he is an outspoken Putin supporter!
I want everyone to know that I have stopped playing Tetris, which is inappropriate at this time.
Tetris was a Russian plot to undermine Western productivity.
And the pieces were falling into place, if the Internet hadn't come along around then.
Well, perhaps people will stop playing Russian Roulette.
Yep! Go back to the good ol' Ah-Merikun Alcatraz Necktie!
They could play Polish roulette. It’s different. You use a semi automatic.
https://twitter.com/tjmcintyre/status/1501594050478153739?t=e28b1mDqj8P737Wp_ts-NQ&s=19
Remarkable news for tech law nerds. EU sanctions against Russia Today and Sputnik require:
* search engines to delist all their content, and
* social media firms to delete posts by individuals which reproduce any of their content.
Commission’s explanatory text in images. 1/
[Link]
Wow.
"If we don't forcibly shut down news sources by government action, the
terroristsRussians win." makes "freedom fries" look quaint.Not just that, it sounds like they'll be tasked with taking down any posts that link to or cite those sources as well.
Russia has asked the UN Security council today to discuss the biological laboratories in Ukraine. Will coverage of that be banned?
The Cathedral seems to have passed the event horizon of a black hole of hypocrisy.
On second thought let's not go to Cardiff Philharmonic. It is a silly place.
+Nice
In actuality, of course, Cardiff has been wanting to cancel Tchaikovsky for quite some time. But not because he was Russian, but because he was gay. This is just an excuse
/sarc
It would be hilarious to get this going. VICTIM FIGHT!
I see that someone went to shit in their brains on just that topic at the linked tweet.
You have something there. Monty Python's Flying Circus'Eric Idle did call Tchaikovsky: "An old poof what wrote tunes."
Really, though. Banning Tchaikovsky just plays right into Putin and Patriarch Kirill's hands. Here's what Kirill has to say about The Russo-Ukrainian War:
Russian Orthodox Church Blames LGBTQ Pride Parades For Ukraine Invasion
https://www.ibtimes.com/russian-orthodox-church-blames-lgbtq-pride-parades-ukraine-invasion-3429590
https://twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1501667941284257798?t=OdP5RKlS8qYo4MUlVGAfUA&s=19
As I said yesterday: ..."Don’t get so caught up with the nervous admission by Under Secretary Nuland, that you miss the purposeful intent of Rubio in getting out in front of a story that could be more troublesome for the Fourth Branch (intelligence apparatus)."...
[Link]
Rubio threw her quite the lifeline. Still, a fast move from "labs? There are no labs; that's crazy conspiracy talk" to "OMG, the Russians might take over these all-important, super critical labs."
Look, if we don't expend American lives and treasure to protect the Ukraine's wet markets, who will?
Fuck Joe Biden.
Fuck Joe Biden. Because it needs to be said, regardless of the headline.
Fuck Joe Biden
Fuck Joe Biden.
so don't hire Pussy Riot to play my birthday party?
Infidel!!!!!
When stupid people are taken seriously and given positions of authority, stupid games with stupid prizes soon follow.
^^^
THIS.
https://twitter.com/Chardwa13/status/1501325641014255619?t=d3lN3bk5IdsPMxM8J0-fkA&s=19
In 2014, a firm called Metabiota, which specializes in detecting, tracking, and analyzing potential disease outbreaks, signed an $18.4 million federal contract as a subcontractor for Black & Veatch in Georgia and Ukraine.
Metabiota was started with help from U.S. President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and his investment firm Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners (RSTP), which he founded alongside John Kerry’s stepson in 2009.
[Links in thread]
It was on that trip that he met Brahms, the German composer, whose music he disliked and whose popularity he chalked up to a nationalistic sort of fan-girling. Their exchange is an instructive window into how Tchaikovsky wanted his music to be received.
As a Brahms fan, I can't let this one go. This article is a bit overdoing the "Tchaikovsky as embattled anti-nationalist" angle, and Brahms, classical liberal that he was, was arguably even less of a nationalist than Tchaikovsky. This was one of the things that Wagner hated about Brahms and that partly drove his attacks on him.
Plus, Brahms is quite simply head-and-shoulders above Tchaikovsky as a composer. Even Tchaikovsky himself thought a lot of his work was trash (including the 1812 Overture, which he openly admitted was unimaginative crowd-pandering).
He shouldn't be cancelled, obviously, but let's not retcon him into some of principled political activist.
He shouldn't be cancelled, obviously, but let's not retcon him into some of principled political activist.
Can we blame him for inflation?
Tchaikovsky did that stickers on every pump.
Can we blame him for inflation?
I don't see why not.
Climate change and at least three or four extinct former endangered species, at least. He's dead, white, apparently male.
Why not Disney is desperately trying to retconned the disasters that were their Star Wars Sequels Trilogy, and giving fans what they wanted, the Timothy Zahn sequel trilogy that he wrote in the early 1990s. Why not retcon a few dead composers biographies?
Disney also got activist-ed into "condemning" Florida's anti child grooming bill
I heard that today. You'd think they would have learned their lessons about the dangers of going woke... But, guess not.
Brahms is definitely not better than Tchaikovsky. He wrote good stuff, but he’s B+ level.
Pistols at dawn.
I prefer Borodin to both. Brahms plays to my tinnitus.
OK, so, after Sochi 2014, we're back to the reality where John Logie Baird invented television, right?
Stupid Fucking Progs.
When can we start shooting them?
My son and I were talking today, on the drive back from the ranch, about the origins of the National Anthem. It's based, as most people know, on the events of the siege of Ft McHenry, which ended the British invasion of the Chesapeake Bay in 1814, making the entire campaign a British strategic loss, despite the British having won most the battles. So it's a poem about beating the British. And we decided that the Americans of the time were trolling even harder by putting it to the music of a British drinking song, which was very popular with the British military at the time. It's sad to see how far we've fallen.
a British drinking song
To Anachrion In Heaven.
The song of the Anecreon society in England, a popular gentleman's society in the late 18th century, that often barred women from coming to their concerts because of the humorous and risks nature of many of their songs. Sounds like a drinking song to me.
taking chicks to shows is fine. letting them vote otoh ...
Risque shows with no women sounds pretty gay, and British.
Well, that's why half of them were in a frock.
Haven't the copyrights expired?
I wonder if there's any overlap between those decrying Asian hate crimes due to the ChiComvirus and those now promoting Russian hate because a Russian tyrant invaded another country?
Definitely a lot of crossover with the "Islamophobia everywhere" crowd
Venn diagram, one circle.
Who’s cancelling the US for funding Nazis?
“These people Mr. Biden is cutting checks to in Ukraine aren’t being labeled fascists the way the term is thrown around on Twitter. They are full-on, jackbooted, stiff-armed, “Heil Hitler,” cheering-at-Nuremberg Rallies Nazis — and they’re proud of it.”
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/8/biden-plays-into-putins-lies-by-arming-neo-nazis-i/
“Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Sir Winston Churchill
History is "inappropriate at this time."
At least for those in power at the moment and repeating histories biggest mistakes.
Ackshuyally, that quote was from George Santayana.
Pop-Up Video Factoid: It wàs also on a plaque in Jonestown.
French Guyana type Jonestown?
Yes. In fact the plaque was right above Jim Jones" throne where he sat and his henchmen forced his followers to drink Cyanide-laced Flavor-Aid, and where Jones then got off easy by killing himself.
“Let’s Void Poutine”
*OUCH!* That would cause serious urinary tract problems!
Stop giving public funds to the arts.
Stop giving public funds to all assholes.
Stop giving public funds to the arts.Stop giving public funds to all assholes.Stop giving funds, public or private, to all assholes! Tchaikovsky MP3s, invest in what you love, and chill.
FTFY
These clowns seem to be acting as if Ukraine is a joke to them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzLtF_PxbYw
Kramer does kind of look like Putin meets Hair Club For Men! LOL! 🙂
"But some of those gestures look increasingly like performance art."
Is there anything that our pampered elitist political-academic-media class do in the 21st century that is NOT performance art?
Violate our rights comes to mind.
They make violating our rights an art, and it is a performance, but it's not as entertaining as actual perforkance art.
This is a really big deal. It's unsettling, to say the least.
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1501732193172926470?t=_01m8VLR7J-SE_qPi1-nFg&s=19
The accusation in this tweet illustrates how quickly this war and the threat of escalation have spiraled to a very dangerous point. The US/Ukraine and Russia (supported by China) are all but accusing one another of preparing an imminent chemical and biological weapons attack.
"@PressSec
Now that Russia has made these false claims, and China has seemingly endorsed this propaganda, we should all be on the lookout for Russia to possibly use chemical or biological weapons in Ukraine, or to create a false flag operation using them. It’s a clear pattern."
And it continues to be mystifying how the US Government can issue such emphatic denials about the existence of dangerous biological labs in Ukraine given what Victoria Nuland said yesterday while testifying. Ignoring this makes it disappear domestically, but not in reality.
[Video]
Rubio asks if we have biological or chemical weapons. Noland responds "uhh... we have biological research facilities".
She doesn't say no, and it looks very much like she's trying to avoid saying yes by politalking it with a euphemism. This exchange implies that yes, the US was developing bioweapons in Ukraine.
Rubio then immediately jumps to blaming Russia "if a bio attack should occur".
W.T.F!
It wasn't said outright, so go ahead and call it Russian propaganda, but it indicates to me that the US was not only developing bioweapons, or potential bioweapons, in Ukraine but that there was also a plan to release one and blame it on Russia as an excuse for more direct involvement.
I saw it more as a recovery moment; they were not planning on Russia targeting the labs, but eager to spin away any bad implications by pre-empting the next potential issue.
I half expect Putin to send a squad of conscripts into a hot lab just to get pictures.
Rubio, and others, have been talking about the Russians using chemical/bio weapons too much for it to be mere recovery.
It's the same thing they pulled in Syria to get US more directly involved, only Trump resisted. But they're still citing the Syria chemical weapons attacks as if they set precedent for Russian use, when what they really set precedent for is US/British false flags.
Like Russia now, Syria had no incentive to use weapons like that at the time they supposedly did. They were winning and gaining momentum, definitely conscious of US/NATO wanting an excuse to intervene.
Our media does a lot to hide and steer people away from consideration of logical motives, but it's the first thing that needs to be considered when hotly disputed allegations are made.
For example, media has been playing up this "maternity ward" attack for 36+ straight hours. So Russia all of a sudden just decided to target a bunch of pregnant women for no apparent reason? That doesn't make sense, other than Russia for some reason wanting to create tailor made propaganda opportunities against themselves.
What is likely, as with pretty much all "civilian" area targets, is the defenders moved most/all the pregnant women out and turned it into a paramilitary base.
But we're all expected/conditioned to respond emotionally and obediently, while the logic and motives they ask us to swallow don't line up with their story.
CHOOSING SIDES Is China helping Russia in Ukraine war?
Jacob Bentley-York
7:23 ET, Mar 8 2022Updated: 11:21 ET, Mar 8 2022
https://www.the-sun.com/news/4846712/china-russia-alliance-ukraine-war-explained/
China is not actively supporting Russia’s invasion, but have refused to denounce their actions - having “fiercely” opposed sanctions.
After Russian forces moved across the border, China went on to blame the US and its allies for provoking Moscow.
It came as Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi warned US Secretary of State Antony Blinken against US action that may “add fuel to the flames” in Ukraine.
China then faced an angry backlash after they, alongside India, abstained on a UN vote to condemn the invasion of Ukraine...
On Monday, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi reaffirmed their strong relationship, calling Russia China’s “most important strategic partner.”
He added: “No matter how perilous the international landscape, we will maintain our strategic focus and promote the development of comprehensive China-Russia partnership in the new era.
“The friendship between the two peoples is ironclad.”
Russia also supported China over Taiwanese independence, calling Taiwan an “inalienable part of China”, while China has supported Russia over NATO expansion into Eastern Europe.
Soooo...How do you and Goldie and Misek like being on the same side with the modern-day Genghis Khans who brought us:
*The Great Leap Forward that brutalized, starved, and murdered tens of millions,
*Education Through Labor (Laogai,)
*The Hundred Flowers Campaign that set-up dissenters for...
*The Cultural Revolution,
*The Tiananmen Square Massacre,
*The repression of freedom in Hong Kong,
*The possible future invasion and repression of Taiwan,
*Concentration camps in Xinjaing,
and
*The unleashing of COVID-19 and the accompanying lockdowns and emergency police-state powers worldwide that came with it?
Things that make you go: "Hmmm..."
One of my favorite composers, along with Rachmaninov and Shostakovich.
Pyotr Ilyich is the composer of my favorite piece of music which I am happy to share with those of you symphonically inclined
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Frnnhv1TVzU&feature=share
NO CANCELING RUSSIAN CULTURE!!!
AND FUCK THAT CHEKIST PUTIN!
ПУТИН УХОДИ!!!!!
I love that trio. I last got to see it performed summer of 2019 at a local chamber festival I attend.
Can you imagine cancelling Shostakovitch? The dude spent half his life on Stalin's shit list and, if Stalin actually understood ANYTHING about his music, probably would have ended it in the gulag after his 5th.
I got to see Shostakovich’s 7th Symphony played on the first night of the Leningrad Symphony calendar, roughly the same week it had been played fifty years before under Nazi siege—IN THE SAME HALL!!! Imagine that….I’ll never forget…
And yes, StuckIbCalidornia (AS…AM…I!!!) I commend you for your perception. Even if Stalin couldn’t shoot Shostakovich for the 7th (although strains of Communism gone bad are VERY obvious in that one) he should (by his own perverse lights) have done it with the 8th!!
You combine the best of both worlds in your sentiments!
I am a mere novice at Classical Music. I only know the most basic Classical titles like Beethoven's Fifth and Ninth, Mozart's "The Magic Flute," Wagner's "Ride of the Valkyries" and "Gotterdammerung," Holtz "The Planets," Strauss' "Also Sprach Zarathustra," Rossini's "The Barber of Seville," and others, mostly from the Looney Tunes soundtracks. 🙂
However, I do love listening and love learning more whenever I get a chance. My locality has a Classical station I enjoy:
WDAV from Davidson College, Davidson, NC
http://www.wdav.org
I also like watching the Classica channel on Pluto.tv
It is a fantastic world well worth exploring! And if nothing else, it makes for beautiful rest in a too-often violent, and disturbing world!
Oh, and I also know and love Tchaikovsky's "The Nutcracker Suite." I saw the Ballet at Queen's College in Charlotte, NC at Christmastime when I was in Elementary school and I loved it...And as Jeff Foxwothy would say: I know that "The Nutcracker" is not a move on the diving board. 😉
Russia has a fine tradition of dissident composers, and Tchaikovsky was a flaming homosexual as well.
This is not only a warped version of cancel culture, it is contrary to the principles we are supposed to be getting behind. Tchaikovsky doesn't belong to Putin, he belongs to the Russian people, and actually he belongs to the world.
The Romantic period in music began with Beethoven envisioning a liberal global brotherhood. That is what this music is for.
Well, at the risk of being typically Libertarian pedantic, Tchaikovsky belonged to himself and under U.S. Copyright Law, his musical works are Public Domain. 🙂
This isn't surprising in the least, coming from prog philistines who want schools to stop teaching Mozart and Shakespeare is some effort to "decolonzie" education.
If I (a person of color, basically an exalted being) belonged to that cult, I would idolize nobodies like Cardi B or Awkwafina because I'm also not white, while forcibly depriving myself of works of timeless beauty from white creators like Tchaikovsky, Mozart, Schubert, Shakespeare, etc.
Yes it IS a cult. This is cultish behavior. It's a cult where members flagellate random people who've done nothing wrong as well as themselves over self imposed rules about equity and social injustice. Once in while they say "this really hurts, I want to stop" but they can't, because cult members run government and big companies and they will banish you to the wastelands for deviating from their orthodoxy.
It's not a cult, you say? OK, you tell me why "classical musicians" aren't resigning in en masse to protest blacklisting one of the greatest composers of their field, simply because he happens to be a countryman of a nation engaging in war. Would it have been racist for us to cancel haikus during WW2?
Teaching Shakespeare is now colonization (facepalm). Do they not understand the contribution of Shakespeare to the development of late middle English into modern English?
As an aside, one of my favorite sections in 10th grade English was a documentary from BBC that traced the evolution of English from Anglo-Saxon conquest to modern English that our English teacher showed us. Long story short, English history and the language, was for the most part, just a series of getting conquered. The celts conquered the early British isle cultures, which we don't know much about, then the Romans conquered the Celts. Then the Romans withdrew leaving a hybrid Gaelo-Roman culture, which was then conquered by the Anglo-Saxons. These were then invaded and conquered at various times by Scandinavians, who shared much of the same culture and even a similar language, to the dominant Anglo-Saxons. Then at the end of the Viking Age, the descendants of Vikings who settled in West Frankie and had adopted Frankish culture and Frankish language (a hybrid of late Vulgate Latin and Frankish Germanic). This ended the period of conquest, but started the period of intermarriage with Europe, especially for the nobles. Which would play a large part in the language development, especially the noble class until the age of discovery and the subsequent age of British Imperialism. Basically English is a northern Germanic language most closely related to Dutch, (Frisian and Saxon were almost identical at the end of the migration/start of the Viking Age), with strong influences from Latin, Western German languages, Celtic and a whole shitload of borrowed words from colonized people. Basically English is one of the most schizophrenic languages in existence (and one of the most frustrating to learn) because we adopted grammer rules and pronunciations from several different and unrelated or only distantly languages and cultures. And there are innumerable dialects. Even in England, there are several dialects that are difficult for other English speakers to understand. Then add in America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, not to mention the wide variety of pidgin Englishes spoken in former British colonies and American Pacific colonies, and who sometimes contribute back to the mother language, and it's no wonder ESL learners, especially if they don't speak a Germanic language as their primary language, get so frustrated. Hell, it's not amazing that native English speakers struggle with English. Also, unlike most other European languages there isn't necessarily a high English and a Low English, or a literate English and a spoken English. Mainly because we can't even fucking agree on spelling, pronunciation and what grammer rules to use. For example is it color or colour, gray or grey and how do you pronounce aluminum? And is it a biscuit or a cookie, a fry or a chip, a soda or a pop? How do you pronounce creek? Is ain't a word, and is it acceptable or vulgar? Is it gas or petrol or fuel, is it a truck, a pickup, a lorry, a rig and several other possible words? And how do you explain when a c is hard and when it's soft? And I before e except after C and a shit ton of other exceptions that most people who aren't linguists could explain why they are exceptions. Than there is the letter X, which changes sound all the time, and the letter y that doesn't only change sound, but also can be either a vowel or a consonant, depending on no rule I am aware of (and most people aren't either, unless they're linguists). And let's not forget Z or is it Zed? For fuck sake we can't even agree on how to say our fucking alphabet. And our alphabet, fuck we use the Latin Alphabet, but we've decided to change several of how the letters are pronounced and in the case of U and V, just decided fuck it, were going to swap V in Latin to U. Also, at one time we had a shit ton of other letters, runes and funny accented vowels, and somewhere we decided just to throw them the fuck out of the language and substitute consonant and diphthongs in their place. But we can't fucking agree on how dipthongs should be pronounced from one word to the next, unlike the Germans, Scandinavian and Dutch languages, which all pretty much follow the same pronunciation rules for dipthongs. Nah one dipthongs will follow Germanic rules (emphasis on the second vowel) well another one flips it to the emphasis on the first vowel, and in other cases, such as boot and goose, they change it to a whole other vowel sound not even in the word(soft u most often).
Does it surprise anyone that most English speakers have mental issues? Our fucking language is a mental issue.
God, I must be in the mood to go off on only tangentially related rants tonight. It's from watching to much old school Dennis Miller and Eddie Izzard when I was younger and reading Douglas Adams and Terry Pratchett, while watching Monty Python.
There is also the influence of Tolkien and CS Lewis that we can't ignore either and can't forget Anne McCaffrey, an American who moved to Ireland and decided to start writing like she was a native of the English Isles. Plus a lot of Louis L'Amour, who might have wrote pulp western fiction but loved languages and the written word and added it into his works often (most notably and prominently his classic The Walking Drum).
Wonderful thoughts! You may also enjoy the equally wonderful thoughts of Ex-Muslim Skeptic Ibn Warraq:
The Superiority of Western Values
https://youtu.be/spulRXEMvxw
Yeah, because the day Russia bombed a maternity hospital is really a great day to celebrate Russian music.
There's being cancelled and then there is being tasteful. Maybe don't play music from a culture/national that is currently committing war crimes?
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1501821770323664897?t=ObLF2E4bPK5SWuEAakgnyA&s=19
Wait, there are no reported deaths in the incident that people were saying was the final straw to launch WWIII?
Also bear in mind that these casualty figures are sourced to the Ukraine government, not any independent corroboration. So not even the “official” sources are claiming any deaths
International awareness of this incident was sparked by, of course, Zelensky tweeting about it within minutes. Few if any details have been independently corroborated. And we all know what Zelensky is lobbying for
It also seems odd that if there were "children under the wreckage," none of the photographers or video-takers on scene would've documented that, given how emotionally potent those images would surely be
The details are pretty important considering Zelensky is citing this incident as evidence of a "genocide," which would be the ultimate justification for a "humanitarian intervention"
Music is music and Tchaikovsky has nothing to do with the current Russian government. You really think an entire culture should be shunned because the government currently associated with it is doing something bad? The entirety of Russian culture and history hasn't invaded Ukraine, Putin has.
It does. I will guess progressive, or far rightist, they are fairly similar.
Simple Justice requires that we both condemn horror and praise excellence. It is possible to walk and chew gum at the same time.
Putin's crimes against humanity do not negate Tchaicovsky's works of greatness and edification To say otherwise is truly to let the Putins of the world win.
I'm sorry, but this is nonsense. Should all middle eastern restaurants be closed on 9/11? How many people in that region are killed for the offense of being gay or not wearing a piece of cloth on their heads?
There is no evidence that there have been any war crimes committed, but people who would rather believe whatever the outrage machine serves them will repeat the same bs. If the Russian govt did intentionally target the hospital, what do the compositions of long-dead composers have to do with that decision? Or the transactions of the average Russian citizen using many banking firms, credit cards, or other means of paying for goods and services? I have it on good authority from folks who voice opinions similar to yours that non-targeted sanctions do more damage than good, and specifically to disadvantaged communities. They also seem to think it is their place to determine who can discuss what, and when, who can play or listen to what music and for what reason. Authoritarians always out themselves, often using terms like 'tasteful' or 'etiquette,' it comes down to your desire for control.
They know he's dead, right?
Perhaps it takes longer for news to reach Wales.
Oh, and I also know and love Tchaikovsky's "The Nutcracker Suite." I saw the Ballet at Queen's College in Charlotte, NC at Christmastime when I was in Elementary school and I loved it...And as Jeff Foxwothy would say: I know that "The Nutcracker" is not a move on the diving board. 😉
I meant to direct this to Utkanos.
"The Cardiff Philharmonic Orchestra scrubbed the famed composer from an upcoming program, calling his music "inappropriate at this time.""
Updated headline, 'When retards run the world based on Feels"
You notice that people who cancel others never refer to themselves as "inappropriate at this time".
Thanks for your sharing! The information your share is very useful to me and many people are looking for them just like me! dog walking Wythall
What about Maliszewski, Rubinstein, Arensky, Sapellnikoff, Dmitriev, Tcherepnin, Kryzhanovsky, Godowsky, Artsybushev, Moniuszko, Akimenko, Soloviev, Prokofiev, Tiomkin, Koreshchenko, Glinka, Winkler, Bortniansky, Rebikov, Ilyinsky, Medtner, Balakirev, Zolotarev, Khvoshchinsky, Sokolov, Kopylov, Dukelsky, Klenovsky, Shostakovich, Borodin, Glière, Nowakowsky, Lyadov, Karganoff, Markevitch, Panchenko, Dargomyzhsky, Shcherbachov, Scriabin, Vasilenko, Stravinsky, Rimsky-Korsakov, Mussorgsky, Gretchaninov, Glazunov, César Cui, Kalinnikov, Rachmaninoff, Stravinsky, Gretchaninov, Rumshinsky, and Rachmaninoff?
No, I switched to War Thunder.
B-b-but he's just a Russian propagandist!
"Nuland's bizarre admission that “Ukraine has biological research facilities” that are dangerous enough to warrant concern that they could fall into Russian hands ironically constituted more decisive evidence of the existence of such programs in Ukraine than what was offered in that same Senate in 2002 and 2003 to corroborate U.S. allegations about Saddam's chemical and biological programs in Iraq. An actual against-interest confession from a top U.S. official under oath is clearly more significant than Colin Powell's holding up some test tube with an unknown substance inside while he points to grainy satellite images that nobody can decipher."
"This joint US/Ukraine biological research is, of course, described by the State Department in the most unthreatening way possible. But that again prompts the question of why the U.S. would be so gravely concerned about benign and common research falling into Russian hands. It also seems very odd, to put it mildly, that Nuland chose to acknowledge and describe the "facilities" in response to a clear, simple question from Sen. Rubio about whether Ukraine possesses chemical and biological weapons. If these labs are merely designed to find a cure for cancer or create safety measures against pathogens, why, in Nuland's mind, would it have anything to do with a biological and chemical weapons program in Ukraine?"
only from Anthony Fauci speaking with the DNC's media arm.
Did you see the relief on her face? What a hero with that lifeline.
Everything they are doing to the Russians
pay particular attention to the ease in which they cut off the ability of a Nuclear Power to buy and sell. Doing the same to you is easier.
I'm anti-Putin and I'm not cancelling Tchaikovsky.
*Strawman tumbled.*
*sets blender to frappe*
Heh;
Only a commie would subject himself to large-scale clinical trial of an experimental vaccine. Better dead than red.
Whether people die by radiation, microbes, gas, bombs, guns, or an old-fashioned club is irrelevant. Each of us have only one Life. And Liberty and Property and Pursuit of Happiness make that Life human and give that Life meaning. Some of us are willing to risk all for the whole package.
The willingness to take that risk makes "cancel culture" into an annoying fly at a picnic.
That risk-taking also makes tyrants like Putin "tremble in their fear, and hear their death knell ringing" far more than "cancelling" a composer whose baton Putin isn't fit to carry.