Stop Trying To Make Ukraine About Your Culture War
Plus: Russia suppresses anti-war protest by citing pandemic restrictions, gun control advocates emulate Texas abortion law, and more...

As the situation in Ukraine continues to worsen, many Americans can't stop trying to make this tragedy all about us. With the horrors of real war raging—buildings bombed, and 137 people killed so far, according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy—some U.S. pundits are pushing their culture war grievances into Ukraine-Russia discourse.
"Russia and China are focused on expanding their spheres of influence via aggressive action. The West is focused on expanding its national debt and exploding the gender binary," tweeted conservative writer Ben Shapiro yesterday. "Whatever advantages we have on an objective level are wildly undermined by our narcissistic idiocy."
"I'm just glad we flew pride flags," tweeted Fox News host Lisa Boothe.
"Big picture what you are seeing in Ukraine — and maybe Taiwan too — is a conflict between people who believe in words, gestures, the blue check left wing journos of the world and people who believe in raw, physical power. The left wing of the Democratic party is anti-masculinity," conservative radio host Clay Travis commented.
Conservative commentator Matt Walsh took the opportunity to mock military diversity and inclusion initiatives.
One of the idiotic implications here is that Russia's actions in Ukraine could somehow be stemmed if Americans didn't care so much about things like gay rights, race, or gender. As if Russian President Vladimir Putin's imperial ambitions could've been checked if "blue check left wing journos" just got more serious. As if Russian warmongers really care about what pronouns you do or don't use. I mean, talk about narcissistic idiocy—to think that the U.S. culture war or domestic policy has any bearing on this at all.
The other frightening implication is that Russian-style shows of aggression and "raw, physical power" are traits the U.S. should want to emulate. But being big bullies who don't respect international law and international sovereignty—or individual rights and tolerance within our own borders—wouldn't make Russia less likely to invade. It would just lose the U.S. any claims to moral high ground or a chance to show that there's a better way.
In any event, the culture war isn't the only out-of-place issue that pundits want to wind into war discussions.
Author Laurie Garrett wondered if Putin's actions weren't inspired by long COVID.
Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry worried about the effect of the Russian invasion on greenhouse gas emissions and public attention to climate change.
At the Conservative Political Action Conference yesterday, Turning Point USA Director Charlie Kirk said that "the southern border is a lot more important than the Ukraine border."
Comments like all of those above seem so transparently self-promotional (look, look, here's how a war across the globe is really about the thing I'm always talking about already!) and beyond gross.
Now is not the time for petty culture war grievances and personal grifts. Yes, life—and news—in America goes on, but maybe the day Russia starts bombing Ukraine isn't the time for your critical race theory rant or your masculinity-crisis paranoia, you know? And it certainly isn't the time for you to try and tie whatever you would be on about anyway into the war news cycle.
I promise, the culture war and all its brave keyboard warriors will still be there next week. So will COVID-19, and climate change, and border battles. Just let it go for a minute. Show some respect, empathy, and perspective.
If you're tempted to post things like: Russia is doing this because Americans use too many pronouns! At least Putin isn't woke! How will the murder of Ukrainian civilians affect gas prices? Stop. Go outside for a walk. Call a loved one. Cuddle a pet. Do anything real and good and tangible while counting your blessings that you will very likely never know the fear and pain of having your country invaded by a warmongering dictator.
This isn't about us. Stop making it about us.
More Reason coverage of Ukraine:
- There Are Few Good Options in Ukraine Crisis
- Biden Is Right To Keep U.S. Troops Out of Ukraine
- If Moldova Can Welcome Ukrainian Refugees, the U.S. Can Too
- NATO Was Never Actually Willing To Defend Ukraine. Pretending Otherwise Was Dangerous.
FREE MINDS
Pretty brazen use of Covid rules as cover for suppression of citizen protest: https://t.co/SIkCxSWZiF
— Alec MacGillis (@AlecMacGillis) February 24, 2022
FREE MARKETS
Gun control advocates take a page from Texas anti-abortion playbook. Last year, Texas passed a controversial law banning abortion after six weeks and allowing citizens to sue over abortions performed later than this. California is now following suit with legislation that would allow people to sue gun manufacturers when people violate gun regulations:
"We're going to start playing by their rules now," Newsom asserted at a news conference last week as he unveiled a package of legislation allowing citizens to sue manufacturers and dealers when gun laws are broken. "The Supreme Court of the United States opened a door wide open.
California state Sen. Bob Hertzberg (D–Van Nuys) and Assemblyman Philip Ting (D–San Francisco) have introduced legislation to this effect:
Hertzberg's bill, SB 1327, would create a bounty scheme to allow vigilantes to sue manufacturers or dealers who peddle firearms that are illegal in California, such as assault weapons or so-called ghost guns. There'd be a $10,000 reward….
Another bill, AB 1594 by Assemblyman Philip Ting (D-San Francisco), would allow the state and individuals to sue manufacturers and sellers of firearms that harmed people.
QUICK HITS
• The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is expected to loosen mask guidelines today.
• Be careful what you re-share on social media around about the situation in Ukraine.
• More than half of abortions in the U.S. are now induced with medication. A new report from the Guttmacher Institute says that 54 percent of U.S. abortions are nonsurgical, up from 39 percent in 2017 and just 6 percent in 2001.
• An Arizona bill to ban abortion-inducing medications has failed, after one Republican House member voted against it. "In my research of some of these medications, they are used for other purposes as well," said Rep. Michelle Udall (R–Mesa) in explaining her vote. "They're used for women who have had a miscarriage. They're also used to treat Cushing's Syndrome and they have other uses. And so to criminalize making these medications and using them will hurt other people."
• Texas National Guard members are not happy about being deployed to guard the border.
• "According to supporters of House Bill 1557—formally titled the Parental Rights in Education bill and labeled the 'Don't Say Gay' bill by critics—its purpose is primarily to support parents' rights to prevent their children from being taught certain concepts about sexuality," explains Emma Camp. But "like other education bills sweeping state legislatures, Florida's H.B. 1557 has a major flaw: The bill's vagueness will likely ensure that the scope of the intended censorship exceeds the intent of the bill authors." In related news:
NEW: University of Mississippi student and faculty leaders are condemning political efforts to control what educators are allowed to teach about race, including the Mississippi Legislature's so-called "critical race theory" bill.https://t.co/i0fyme6CwN
— Ashton Pittman (@ashtonpittman) February 23, 2022
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
As the situation in Ukraine continues to worsen, many Americans can't stop trying to make this tragedy all about us.
We all know it's about January 6th anti-trans mask vaccine mandates.
I think ive already seen 10 J6 comparisons.
They're impressive.
"But everything should be about me!"
--every coddled tween* ever.
*In 21st century America, any person up to age 30 (40?) is entitled to identify as a tween.
It is difficult to take yourself out of an argument because then you'd have nothing to say. I would like to say something.
Everyone seems to ignore the fact that Ukraine threatened to develop nuclear weapons not long before Putin signed the recognition of the two newest nations on Earth. Make no mistake Russia has the strength, the will and reason to turn the Donbass into sovereign nations, in name if not fact. Do they have the right?
What are the rights of great nations fearful for their security? Did the US have the right to invade Afghanistan and Iraq? Weren't there actual attacks? How has Russia been attacked. Weren't they just supposed to be goody goody like us when we let Hussein develop chemical weapons...Oopsie, that turned out to be a lie didn't it? We didn't know that at the time now did we?
What are economic sanctions except a prelude to war? Sanctions are an act of war. Something else everyone seems to forget. Tarriffs and boycotts are internal matters unlike disguised blockades forbidding the flow of money and goods over an avowed enemy's borders. We declared war on Russia with the first sanction levied back in the early days of its reformation when they were anxious to be our friend. Reminds me of the ignorant Kennedy administration when it made an enemy of Cuba. Fidel's assassin was much more successful than Kennedy's who tried to strike first. Assassinations are also acts of war when the target is a citizen of a foreign country.
Are we really ready to push China and Russia together again and then start attacking them again? Are we ready for the Sword of Damocles over our heads again? Are we ready for Nuclear Exchange? Are we MAD? Are we so callous about our own people and their security that having them live in fear is desirable just to compete with everyone in the world or to exercise power over them? Obviously so.
God Bless Us All
Observe how every mystical whacko angles to pal up to potential converts by belching "we", "us" and "our."
It's because the water supply is being poisoned and turning the frogs gay.
Ironically that can actually happen. Amphibian sex determination is based on environmental factors and hormones, rather than by chromosomes like mammals.
I thought it was because amphibian doctors don't assign sex at birth.
Nah, frogs are just more woke.
Hormones are not genetically dependent???
But otherwise yeah, e.g. alligator sex is determined by the incubation temperature of the nest.
Not if you're getting the hormones from an external source. Whether wastewater or injections.
Ah, gotcha. It was the "and" that confused me.
Sex and orientation are two different things, M'Lady.
>Tips SCUBA visor.*
Fair point by ENB, but she mysteriously didn't mention any examples of the left trying to draw parallels to the topics they covet
https://twitter.com/lilycatsmeow/status/1496635057477328899
The actual hashtag, can't make this up:
#UkraineisGeorgeFloyd
Wasn't that what "Author Laurie Garrett wondered if Putin's actions weren't inspired by long COVID" was supposed to be?
Well it's because if you look around twitter it's about 20 to 1 for republicans spewing garbage like this hoping to win a few more votes in the fall. Meanwhile, they espouse things like “why are we protecting civil rights when there is a war to be fought!” They simply don't understand that people have a right to live the way they want to live, look at the homophobic tweets that are busting out all over the place. ENB is dead-fucking-on with her critique. Just a few months ago the right-wingers were basically fellating Putin (and Trump continues on with it), now they're suddenly anti-Putin?
They simply don't understand that people have a right to live the way they want to live
Does that apply to pedophiles, too?
America is perceived to be weak - not because they withdraw from Afghanistan, but because they bungled the operation from day 1. The culture wars are important as well because they make the west look weak, indulgent and narcissistic. Societies that endlessly argue about pronouns and trans athletes competing in sports look silly - that they are not serious about real issues that affect people in a meaningful way. Nations that prattle on endlessly about catastrophic climate change, while neglecting energy self sufficiency look like fools on the world stage.
The only people I see still talking about the withdrawal from Afghanistan are right wingers still trying to use it to score rhetorical points against Biden.
For everyone else, right or wrong, it’s long gone from the news cycle and from their radar.
Yeah, there's no way that Biden's fuckup in Afghanistan could possibly have any influence on Putin's decision to invade Ukraine.
And spending military budget dollars to supply biological males with estrogen certainly sends a message of strength. Too bad War doesn't have a Women's division; we'd dominate.
Lol. You mad, bro?
I thought that the John Kerry whining about climate change sentence was supposed to kinda both sides the article.
Russia and China are focused on expanding their spheres of influence via aggressive action.
Oh, so suddenly Twitter mobs don't count as aggressive action expanding influence.
More like passive-aggressive.
Russia's sphere is already at the Pennsylvania Truck Convoy. How far can it expand?!?
One of the idiotic implications here is that Russia's actions in Ukraine could somehow be stemmed if Americans didn't care so much about things like gay rights, race, or gender.
They wouldn't be daring to do this if our military had more womyn in combat sporting two moms.
In a roundabout way, it might be true. Voters seemed to think Trump was so bad on race and gender issues, that they voted for Biden. It certainty seems like this invasion wouldn't have happened under Trump. Of course, that's just my wild speculation.
Out of all the irrelevant shit people are arguing about and connecting to the invasion, ENB picks this: people concerned about military readiness in the wake of inclusivity training. She's got the whole internet at her fingertips, she could have picked any stupid argument about mean tweets or grown-ups in the white house, and she picked people specifically talking about the military.
What the fuck.
Although the military obsessing over diversity training and not actual readiness is a problem.
Afghanistan laid bare to the world how inept our leadership is.
Right- our performance in Afghanistan was the clearest signal of our posture in 20 years.
1) It showed that with decades of time, and trillions of dollars, our corrupt leadership couldn't create a stable government.
2) It showed that our unwillingness to fight was so high that we would accept political humiliation rather than pick the gun back up.
I don't blame Biden for any of those points. I just blame him for exposing them so clearly to the world. If the US had not fucked up its withdrawal- if he had left Afghanistan in May 2020 like Trump had planned- the direct association with the US would have been lower, and we could at least make a plausible case that the US wasn't incompetent. This was the international, Realpolitik equivalent of proving to people you are a fool, instead of letting them suspect it. And that is what emboldened China and Russia.
Overt, tell me another country in the world that spent $billions and thousands of military lives over 20 years defending a country 1/2 way around the world of limited strategic value and no economic value. How do you get from that to an "unwillingness to fight"?
You are especially delusional today, Joe. Obviously the US was unwilling to fight in Afghanistan, because we left, and declined to stop leaving as our failure there was played out for all to see.
Obviously we are unwilling to fight, as evidenced in Ukraine where we are...er....not fighting.
The country of 20 years ago is not the same as the country of today. If you are unable to comprehend that, then I advise you to return to your doctor to further adjust your dosages.
What we wanted in 2001 after we were attacked is different than what we wanted by 2021. Not that hard to figure out.
Hell, Roosevelt wanted to declare war on Germany too after Pearl Harbor, but knew that the US had no desire to fight, even if most didn't like Hitler and his actions, so instead Roosevelt waited to ask for a declaration of war against Germany and Italy until after they declared war against us first.
People were pissed after the Lusitania but it wasn't until two years later and the Zimmermann telegram that Wilson could get a declaration of war, and even then it was months later, only after Germany resumed unrestricted submarine warfare and the German Foreign Minister verified the authenticity of the Zimmermann Telegram that the Senate approved the articles of war.
The moral of the story is that, short of massive attack against the US, no matter how bad things get in the Ukraine, there is no desire to fight currently.
Perhaps the conservatives are focusing on the US because the Ukraine isn't our problem
Seems plausible to me.
Is the United States military even engaging in combat? Seems like talking about the effects of wokeness on American military is fairly irrelevant.
Only if you’re stupid.
People are concerned that, since Russia has shown their hand, that they might press the US to respond somewhere that they will end up in combat. Like Latvia, or Lithuania. Or, that if the military had credibility, Putin would fear the possibility of them sweeping into the Ukraine and cleaning up, even if we don't intend to use them there.
And we have soldiers already trained and stationed at NATO border, as well as recently experienced soldiers from Iraq. And if it comes to that fight, it’s likely to go nuclear.
So, gender diversity in our armed forces, whatever you might think, just isn’t a relevant thing to bring up, and says more about one’s personal hobby horses than anything.
Voters seemed to think Trump was so bad on race and gender issues
Cite? He was pro LGBT before Biden or Obama publicly.
I'm not attacking Trump.
Are you always so knee-jerk?
Against false narratives easily discovered, yes. I didn't say you were attacking trump. Why so defensive? For saying something easily proven wrong?
Well, you replied to me asking for a cite, as if I needed to provide some information about Trump's positions, but I want talking about his positions. I was talking about the voters.
In case you are new around here, JesseAz is a notorious troll.
Trump -- the guy who withheld military aid to Ukraine, to try to pressure their president to say embarrassing things about Biden? He's the guy whom "it certainly seems like this invasion wouldn't have happened under"?
Well it didn’t, so it’s a pretty safe assumption.
Narratives that were pushed by ignorant leftists for 500 Alex.
My argument is that Biden is viewed as weak. Trump is not. Or he is, at least, viewed as "crazy" enough to do something beyond sanctions. I've been told Trump was on the brink of starting World War 3.
How do you see it?
Viewed as weak by who? Sean Hannity and Mark Levin, the great war heroes?
Trump was an international laughing stock and is a pussy ass Daddy's boy used to gold toilets. Where are you getting this nonsense?
You seem unserious.
His language is unserious BUT everything he said about Trump is accurate.
Viewed as weak by anyone with one eye and functioning frontal lobe.
As a member of the international community, Biden looks far, far worse. Trump looked bad because thats what the Narrative said he was. Biden looks bad because despite our lying eyes he's a drooling idiot no matter how much the Narrative try and cover for him. Keep on telling us how good that shit sandwich tastes.
Biden has a non-confrontational personality, while Trump has a vindictive personality. Make Biden look bad and he will attempt to explain or deflect, make Trump look bad and you get attacked directly regardless of the consequences.
It's more the lefts belief in hashing diplomacy. It is one of the weakest responses state does now.
Biden has a non-confrontational personality
Depends on who he's engaging with and how effective his meds are that day.
That Trump would be engaging in random, childish acts with the aim of serving his own interests above all else.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-admin-approves-sale-anti-tank-weapons-ukraine/story?id=65989898
I guess aid got there eventually.
After it was discovered Trump was withholding it, and trying to keep it quiet that he was doing so.
Keep spinning Dee!
So there was no invasion under Trump, and his administration did provide arms, no matter the reason.
You haven't answered my question on why this invasion is happening now, as opposed to the years under Trump. You seem almost as unserious as Joe Friday.
Sorry, I didn’t see where you asked that specific question.
Answer is I don’t know, but it’s certainly not because Putin was afraid of Trump. Trump is a worthless buffoon. Timing probably had more to do with COVID-19 and the Nord pipeline.
You and I might think Trump is a buffoon, but I doubt Putin did. At least he understood the implications of Europe becoming dependent on Russian oil and gas. Everyone crapped on Trump for his talk about walking away from NATO, but he was pissed at Europe for not funding its own defence, while pumping billions into the Russian economy through oil and gas purchases. That Europe and Biden couldn’t understand the implications of this is flabbergasting.
Really? I get the sense Putin holds just about everyone in the human race in contempt. Seriously doubt he is scared of a feeble-minded man child like Trump.
Is that kind of like the time Biden admitted on TV that he withheld funds until his son got the government contract?
Except that’s not what happened at all. Jesus Christ, could you NOT regurgitate bullshit talking points?
"One of the idiotic implications here is that Russia's actions in Ukraine could somehow be stemmed if Americans didn't care so much about things like gay rights, race, or gender."
First of all, Reason is doing the exact same thing- trying to make Russian expansionism about their pet projects. Harrigan was arguing that we need to loosen immigration for refugees of the war. And Britschgi was saying this war may not have happened if the US hadn't implied that Ukraine could join NATO.
I think all these takes are worth discussing. But it is noteworthy that ENB can't do anything but go looking for Non-libertarians and especially conservatives to bag on when her own colleagues are doing the exact same thing.
Further, there is a difference between saying that the US could have prevented this war by focusing on readiness instead of Wokeness, and saying that the Ukraine situation shows how important it is for us to focus on readiness instead of Wokeness. That is, whether we could have stopped this war or not, the world is becoming more violent and unstable, and our military needs to be ready for near-peer militaries to start shit up. That isn't a culture war issue, it is a fact.
And to add on to that, the comments regarding the US military's rather pathetic recent track record are in response to the assertions by the neocon/neolib factions that a robust military posture and response should have been implemented. The former in particular are absolutely frothing at the mouth to start another war.
These people are under the delusion that the US military is simply a blunt instrument that can be brought in to play at any time, regardless of the state of its morale, manning, equipment, and leadership resources. This is an organization that can't even acquire the funding for billets that are authorized to them under the manning documents of their tactical units, and we're going to start acting belligerent with a country in its own regional backyard? What are these dipshits going to do, bring back the draft to restart Cold War II: Retard Boogaloo?
I mean, shit, it's not like we have the example of our little adventure supporting the White Russians after World War I to inform us, but the class of pundits and politicians who dominated the mid-90s to mid-2010s has always had a shallow understanding of history, at best, and in most cases are downright ignorant when those lessons don't conform to their pre-established conclusions.
There's a growing push for NATO to impose a no fly zone.
Ukraine and Russia need to settle this before these evil psychotics do something as stupid as that idea.
A no fly zone? Are they fucking kidding? Or just fucking clueless? I mean it is one thing to impose a no fly zone against Iraq after we decimated it's air force or against Serbia that's air force was small and antiquated, but was good enough against the Bosnians who had no air force, but against a near peer with a large and effective modern air force backed up by a state of the art air defense system. These people are fucking insane.
Ahh, so they’re taking a page from Hillary’s playbook.
Yeah. Many of the people who seem most jingoistic seem completely unaware of the sorry state of our military and the even worse state of most of our allies militaries. They also seem to think it will be like WWII, where we can out manufacturer our opponents, however, the state of American manufacturing is worse than our military.
But our possible foes have been focusing on all the things we've been neglecting to conduct diversity training, to combat climate change etc. They've been unhindered by the culture war topics, mainly driven by progressives. We've been busy dividing ourselves into camps, while they've been expanding their manufacturing, expanding the energy sectors, especially fossil fuels and nuclear. Recognizing this is important to addressing it.
Yes, in the middle of a crisis is exactly when we should be pointing this out, because people are focused on it. Waiting until the crisis is over, and everyone has moved onto the next crisis is to late. Because there is always a next crisis or story. I'm sorry if some of ENB hobby horses are getting ignored or even bashed, but pointing out that the DoD spent almost 6 million man hours of training time for our troops on diversity training just shows how fucked up our focus is, and how fucked our military readiness is. To be the best military you have to have a mentality that when you aren't fighting, you're training. When I was in the saying was you train to fight, you fight like you train. If we are spending 6 million man hours on diversity training, what are our leaders training our military to fight? These are legitimate questions, rather ENB likes them or not. That is time that an infrantryman could be on the range, or practicing small unit maneuvers or large unit maneuvers, that pilots can be flying, that tankers can be practicing combined arms maneuvering, that transportation Corp and quartermasters can be conducting combat logistics training, that medics can be practicing battlefield needle decrompressions etc. The best way to build a team is to train together, not talk about diversity but train together.
One of the most important moments in the civil rights movements was Truman ordering the end of segregation in the armed forces. Once white soldiers, many who were from the rural south, were training, and fighting besides blacks, it was difficult to maintain their prejudices. Oh some persisted for quite awhile and the going wasn't always smooth but it did happen. It didn't take dedicated training specifically on acceptance, it took training and fighting alongside each other to change attitudes. I don't think there is much extremism in the military, and no veteran I've talked to believes it either, because you train and fight and depend upon people of every background, race, religion and creed. You live together, you eat together, everything in the military, especially the two ground forces, is about teamwork. In that environment prejudices don't survive for very long. I didn't want gays in the military. I thought it was a bad idea, but then I served with homosexuals, this was in the age of don't ask, don't tell so they couldn't announce it, that I respected as soldiers and trusted as teammates and it changed my entire opinion on homosexual rights.
We had some of diversity training in my day, we called it Care of others training back then (COO), it was mainly focused on sexual harassment and sexism. And it didn't work then, in fact it just led to distrust and fear. What was even more effective at changing sexist attitudes that some held, was things like three day field problems, two or three week field exercises, range days, etc. It's there that you learn some of the female soldiers were more high speed than the male soldiers. That some soldiers were dirtbags and buddy fuckers and soup-sandwiches, that you thought were high speed. And you learned that sex had nothing to do with who fit into what category.
One other thought, field time is necessary for our ground forces not just for proficiency but also for moral. To much field time is detrimental, but so is to little, especially in field units. In a field unit, garrison training is boring, repetitive and to often make work. I served in a CSH, a combat support hospital like a modern day MASH unit. Garrison training sucked, especially for the lower enlisted, because it was the same shit, vehicle maintenance, inventorying CONEX and repacking them, etc. Getting into the field was when we really learned our job.
When we got deployed we were backfilled with a garrison unit that was assigned to Madigan Army Medical Center. Most of them hadn't been to the field since AIT, there were E-6 and 7s who couldn't even put together their TA-50 gear, and they didn't know how to clear a jam from an M-16. Most didn't remember how to construct a fighting position, draw a range card, stake concentina wire, wire a field telephone, conduct challenge and password, etc. Basic soldier skills, that they had learned once but since they never used it again, they'd forgotten. It took less time to retrain them than raw recruits, but it still required retraining.
Excellent, excellent post. I’ll push back a bit on the manufacturing thing. Although America’s output had shrunk, Russia is a paper tiger. It doesn’t have the industrial capacity to fight a prolonged war. Russia has something like the 20th largest economy in the world. It had a smaller economy than Canada, with 10x the population.
Exactly right, per capita GDP of Russia is 1/6 the US, and ranked in the mid 80s worldwide. It’s a shitshow by any measure except ‘willingness to brutalize their comrades in an effort to bring them back into the family’.
I'm just wondering if Linnekin will be rating Ukrainian versus Russian food truck policy.
Let’s all keep in mind, ENB thought Charlie Kirk’s reaction to the Super Bowl halftime show was noteworthy, and then go from there.
Charlie.
Kirk.
Maybe Maddow has a bigger audience.
He did bring us Candace Owens, who, would. So there’s that.
Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry worried about the effect of the Russian invasion on greenhouse gas emissions and public attention to climate change.
Impressively keeping on message.
John Kerry or Johnny Knoxville - which one's the real jackass?
Both?
That's not fair. One of them adds value to society.
And only one of them is self-aware of being a jackass.
Jay Leno once asked: "Hey, Kerry? Why the long face? 🙂
Both.
Although it would have been a legitimate question to ask back when the US was deciding to invade Iraq, and Democrats, who supposedly care about climate change, were suddenly unconcerned about the effects of a war on the climate.
Most Democrats in Congress opposed the Iraq War, overwhelmingly in the House and supported by a small margin in the Senate. The Senate vote by Democrats was heavily and cynically weighted by political calculations as it occurred just prior to the 2004 elections, and not by chance. Some Democratic Senators, like Bob Graham of Florida, the chair of the Senate Intel Committee, led the fight against passage. Al Gore was adamantly opposed to it.
The Iraq war vote was right after the 2002 elections. You have the history wrong again. Authorization of force was voted on in January of 2003, and my unit got the call three days later.
That is straight bullshit.
"Stop Trying To Make Ukraine About Your Culture War"
Right on, Liz. We should be like Fiona and analyze Ukraine through the only intellectually honest framework — as an excuse to pursue the open borders agenda our benefactor Charles Koch always wanted to pursue anyway.
#OpenBordersWillFixEverything
#CheapLaborAboveAll
Good catch.
And don't forget Britschgi implying America could have avoided this war by not implying that we might bring Ukraine into NATO.
well that one's actually relevant
Comments like all of those above seem so transparently self-promotional (look, look, here's how a war across the globe is really about the thing I'm always talking about already!) and beyond gross.
Apparently she missed Fiona Harrigan's article on immigration yesterday.
If only Reason had a Senior Editor!!!!
"Stop Trying To Make Ukraine About Your Culture War"
This from a magazine that refracts damn near everything thru a libertarian lense.
But yes Reason I agree with you.
Cite? Oh wait, you agree when they cross over for leftist talking points.
You still here pushing for pedo friendly policies? Get tired of the child porn?
Go fuck yourself you piece of shit!
I guess that's a yes.
Stop stalking kiddos, you hicklib pederast, before some father gives you the Full Rosenbaum.
Huh? It's a libertarian magazine.
Cite?
If you're tempted to post things like: Russia is doing this because Americans use too many pronouns! At least Putin isn't woke! How will the murder of Ukrainian civilians affect gas prices?
The enemy of my enemy - former Stasi officer and current PoS or not - is something I can use to beat my enemy over the head with.
Within a day or two we’ll see a Reason writer using Ukraine to push their open borders agenda.
Already happened days ago.
But did Harrigan tweet about it? Does ENB even follow Harrigan on Twitter? How the hell was ENB even supposed to be aware of Harrigan‘s article if she didn’t see it on Twitter? I think we should cut her a break on this one.
Twice it has happened already.
And yesterday, two days running.
Gun control advocates take a page from Texas anti-abortion playbook.
I haven't checked lately but I think one of those things is still an enumerated right.
They're working on one of those things, though.
In the "morality" of 21st century America, since the Constitution was written by nothing but old white men, it no longer has legal standing. Plus, like, slaves.
Following the Constitution forces colored…I mean People of Color, to engage in cultural appropriation. Not really a fair place to put them.
The professor claims that the two amendments "tend to be interpreted in aggressively individualistic ways that ignore the reality of conflict among competing rights."
Hey! You found someone who was reading Michael Hihn's blog.
Hihnsanity!
What a cunt.
I'm confused, I thought it was the abortion control advocates taking a page from the gun control advocates.
see ouroboros
That's a chicken or the fertilized egg situation.
ENB is a dishonest leftist. Gun control advocates have been pursuing lawfare like this for years prior to the Texas abortion bill, she's just dishonestly ignoring that to try and score a couple of culture war points. Too bad for her she's only capable of own goals against her causes.
What about the part where the California governor specifically said that the Texas law gave him the green light to go after guns?
Cause he never did that before
No, Newsance did do that, but it was a lie to push a narrative they've already worked on for the left many times. Next up sarc will claim gun control advocates also don't sue under product safety suits.
Not in this way.
What about the part where the same governor told all the peasants they had to lock down and stay home?
Relevance to this conversation?
So it’s ENB’s job to repeat his propaganda? Interesting stance.
What about the part you constantly fall for leftist narratives and push them here while claiming you don't support the left?
Yes, the Governor of California is a very honest man who is to be believed without question, especially when it comes to gun control initiatives.
Keen observation sarc, keep it up.
Let's set aside for the moment the "enumerated" rights stufg. Because this strategy could be used against anything -- imagine if it was used in the war on drugs, for instance. Or disposable diapers. Or cotton candy. Whatever a State decides is unacceptable immediately become the target of "reimbursed vigilantes." I think it's a really stupid precedent.
It's a horrible precedent. And it has been predicted for months, even right here at Reason, that gun control advocates would start using it.
+
A right doesn't have to be enumerated go exist, M'Lady.
*Tips Glock hat while standing in pharmacy line for Plan B.*
Indeed it doesn't, but one would assume the playbook would be different if it is.
Garrett wondered if Putin's actions weren't inspired by long COVID.
Good one. "Anyone who has been exposed to COVID should not permitted to own a firearm."
I am more concerned about toxoplasmosis. Anyone who has been exposed, and risks pussy-brain, should not be permitted to vote.
President Putin is using false 'Nazi' narrative to justify Russia's attack on Ukraine, experts say.
Gee Justin, where’d he pick up that one neat trick?
Twitter?
Keith Ellison?
Sqrlsy?
I mean, Nazis are everywhere. Apparently 48% of the voting population of the US are Nazis. So maybe Putin actually is going to the Ukraine to punch a Nazi in the face.
I'm sure Antifa is supporting him, right?
Someone said that they saw a Nazi flag at a pro-Ukraine protest once.
I heard that Putin loves rainbows.
And the person waving it had a MAGA hat on.
You know who else used a Nazi narrative?
Jeff, Shrike, Mike...
Rob Misek?
Anti-vaxxers?
Who was it that said wanting to leave a European alliance was racism yesterday and doubled down on it again this morning? Remind us.
Does it rhyme with Moe Buyday?
It just may.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is expected to loosen mask guidelines today.
The separation of church and state is back in play, much to the chagrin of Our Mother of the Holy Veil cult.
Hey Buttplug!
Russia Is United States’ Top Source Of Imported Gasoline
It was Canada in top spot until recently. Good thing your boy blocked them from sending their dirty oil via pipeline for more of Putin’s dirty oil instead.
Now Putin finally has enough bank for his little wars.
Gee a president who blocks US fracking and Canadian oil imports, but approves Russian pipelines to Europe and eases pressure from Russian ally Iran so they can pipeline through Russia to Europe too.
Almost like Biden was the Russian agent instead of Trump.
We can't drill for more oil because that's dirty! We're just going to ask other nations less concerned about environmental impacts to drill for more oil because that's smart!
And then send it to us. Not by pipeline, because that's dirty too. Ships and trains, maybe?
Leftists do love trains.
Both having them run on them, and putting people on them.
Obviously. If we export the dirtiness to another country, we're not polluting!
Remember, increasing oil prices are not Biden's fault at all. Just bad luck.
I wish I had saved the post, but some dipshit on Twitter was arguing that the UN needed to have Iran open up its spigots to drive down the price of oil.
Besides the utter stupidity of thinking that Iran would hurt its own ally just to help Ukraine, or that OPEC would do anything but laugh at such a directive, the sheer lunacy and solipsism of these people never ceases to annoy. "START PUMPING OIL, SAND SLAVES!" the Twittertards shriek in between their dilation sessions.
" Here is a list of the top ten countries next to their respective barrels per day (BPD) rates:
Russia - 10.58 million BPD
Saudi Arabia - 10.13 million BPD
United States - 9.352 million BPD
Iran - 4.469 million BPD"
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/oil-producing-countries
If you weren't retarded you would've clicked the link I provided and seen a chart detailing the biggest importers to the US.
” Stop Trying To Make Ukraine About Your Culture War.”
What Lipstick Lesbian Lizzie is really saying is “Please, please, please stop pointing out how much my leader I voted for sucks ass. Please stop talking about out how weak, feckless, and totally and utterly incompetent he is. Because I can’t take much more of this.”
And rest assured she speaks here for Park Slope Welchie Boy and most of the other fake libertarian fanooks of Reason.
And if we had Trump as prez it most certainly wouldnt be "hey guys, lets cool it with making it about America" it would be "10 reasons this is Trumps fault"
Dont know how she even got a job at reason, she belongs at vox
If we had Trump as prez, we'd be getting two months straight of how it's World War 6 all over again as neither Russian troops nor American troops end up in Ukraine.
Because Reason is just a version of Vox that tries to gaslight libertarians?
^
Yep.
lol
Voxlighting.
"she belongs at vox"
If only.
"And rest assured she speaks here for Park Slope Welchie Boy and most of the other fake libertarian fanooks of Reason."
But what does Matt Yglesias think?
Nothing like always.
ENB is saying "Stop pointing out that the progressive prioritization of culture war issues is crowding out things that actually matter".
Also, "Stop resisting the Culture War".
In the future, we will all be sex workers.
Well, as I alway ask about MLMers, who would we sell to if everyone did this, each other? Would we just barter after that?
Pretty brazen use of Covid rules as cover for suppression of citizen
America, Canada, Russia...? I've have Twitter blocked so if someone can let me know which authoritarian hellhole we're discussing, I'd appreciate it.
We're talking about Covid rules, so not Russia.
More than half of abortions in the U.S. are now induced with medication.
COVID vaccines? I knew it.
DMED only saw a 60% spike in miscarriages. Although apparently we aren't allowed to use that data and the military took an action to adjust the data.
An Arizona bill to ban abortion-inducing medications has failed...
[insert another biting mRNA joke here]
Are you mandating us to come up with our own jokes? Not cool.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is expected to loosen mask guidelines today.
The blood of the next wave will be on its hands.
"At the Conservative Political Action Conference yesterday, Turning Point USA Director Charlie Kirk said that "the southern border is a lot more important than the Ukraine border.""
Wow. You have got to be shitting me. ENB complains that conservatives are using the war to push their pet issues, and as evidence, points out a conservative saying we SHOULDN'T worry about the war, and should focus on other stuff.
Logic, people.
Yes, but it made her twitter pals super-mad so she fad to figure a way to cram it in.
Plus, if we ever start looking to an ENB column for reason and logic we're in big trouble.
Wait, there's a website called "logic"?
And it's as worthy of its name as the current iteration of Reason.
Damn, you're right. No links to anything either.
And as examples of people arguing over irrelevant shit, she pulled out tons of examples of people talking specifically about their concerns over the priorities of the US military. That's in the context of a situation in which we're deploying more soldiers to Germany and there's a chance the current leadership might end up committing soldiers somewhere, especially if Putin's looking at the Baltic Republics next.
He's also not wrong. Russia being authoritarian dicks is bad...but Canada being the same is more of a concern to me since, you know, they are right next to us. Ukraine's borders being porous is bad, but not as bad as OUR borders being just as bad.
I have been arguing that Ukraine is not important to us for years. The fact that corruption and now war is going there is a real damn shame, and I am honestly sad about it. But it also isn't something our government ought to be worried about right now. We ought to be worried about fixing our own damn problems, which are legion.
But this is a great opportunity for CNN to focus on a major news story with gripping coverage that might make viewers ignore the various issues with CNN lately. Even if this is the most restrained and bloodless war ever, it will be hyped to the gills as the MSM desperately clings to relevance.
Our government, and their leftist footsoldiers, are our problem.
Also hard to argue against the idea that a nation should worry foremost about its own borders.
Texas National Guard members are not happy about being deployed to guard the border.
They don't get to use whips on horseback.
Duh, it's not like the are Canadian...
Well, at least the adults are back in charge.
"Stop Trying To Make Ukraine About Your Culture War"
Jeez, why even have a culture war if I can't use it to define everything?
The bill's vagueness will likely ensure that the scope of the intended censorship exceeds the intent of the bill authors.
To preventing anti-gay lessons hitting curricula?
One observes that the bill's authors intentionally wrote in the vagueness.
An Arizona bill to ban abortion-inducing medications has failed
Need More War on Drugs
"One of the idiotic implications here is that Russia's actions in Ukraine could somehow be stemmed if Americans didn't care so much about things like gay rights, race, or gender. As if Russian President Vladimir Putin's imperial ambitions could've been checked if "blue check left wing journos" just got more serious"
----ENB
1) From cancel culture to progressive censorship, America would be a better, freer place without the extreme importance the news media places on hot button, social justice warrior issues. Twitter mobs are powerful enough without the news media following their lead.
Oh, and the reason Fox News consistently draws three to four times as many viewers as CNN or MSNBC may be because CNN and MSNBC obsess over issues that aren't at the top of the average American's priority list.
2) When conservatives are telling us to stop overemphasizing culture war issues, libertarians should applaud them. If the isolationists that dominate Republican politics, right now, just want to focus on inflation, school choice, and pandemic restrictions, why should libertarians complain?
Are you afraid of some competition?
P.S. The reason CNN's leadership was "decapitated" recently was not because of his secret admirer. It was because their ratings suck so bad. AT&T is selling the whole shebang to a joint venture with Discovery--and Discovery is obviously kicking out the idiots who ran CNN's ratings into the ground with woke bullshit.
Because woke bullshit is all pervasive doesn't mean it's popular.
Wokeness, like all fads, had a short commercial half-life.
One of the idiotic implications here is that Russia's actions in Ukraine could somehow be stemmed if Americans didn't care so much about things like gay rights, race, or gender.
I don't recall hearing such arguments with respect to Russia. IIRC, the opposition to Russia from idiot journos and leftists was "something something TRUUUUUUUUUMMMMPPPP!!!!"
Well now THAT blame is clearly legitimate.
OMG! Major new Republican scandal!
Gov. DeSantis just attacked the press in his speech at CPAC, calling it a "blizzard of lies." Said the press is intent on propping up the "regime" in the United States, which he calls the "Brandon administration." Speech ended at 1:55 p.m. ET. No mention of Russia or Ukraine.
No. Mention. Of. Russia. Or. Ukraine.
How could #DeathSantis fail to note Russia attacking Ukraine proves Putin is terrified of Biden?
#DefendBidenAtAllCosts
Hopefully CBS's 60 minutes, takes him to task again.
Oh yeah, which scandal was that again? #DeathSantis has had so many it's hard to keep track.
Did 60 Minutes uncover the bombshell that #DeathSantis was prioritizing the elderly in the early days of the vaccine — instead of prioritizing Black and Brown bodies as equity demands?
#LibertariansForCriticalRaceTheory
Best hashtag ever.
Found another Jeff sock!
Believe it was his no bid contracts issue to political donors. IIRC, there was some kind of editing done on his part that they exposed. But like you said, to many to count with Gov DeathSantis.
He's clearly running interference for Trump, his puppetmaster.
How could #DeathSantis fail to note Russia attacking Ukraine proves Putin is terrified of Biden?
It's moments like this... 😀
"Stop Trying To Make Ukraine About Your Culture War!!!!"
"Boo-hoo, that mean ol' Ben Shapiro!"
As usual, for ENB the real problem is conservatives reaction. All those awful dank maymays and that Mean & Hurtful gallows humour.
I notice she didn't stick Fiona's putrid open borders for the US take on the war in Ukraine in the list.
University of Mississippi student and faculty leaders are condemning political efforts to control what educators are allowed to teach about race, including the Mississippi Legislature's so-called "critical race theory" bill.
That, of course, should be left up to tenured faculty.
"What the f**k are you doing here?" she can be heard asking him while the visibly embarrassed soldier answers curtly.
"You're occupants, you're fascists! What the f**k are you doing on our land with all these gun? Take these seeds and put them in your pockets, so at least sunflowers will grow when you all lie down here," she further added.
As the Russian armed official tries in vain to diffuse the situation, the woman insists on handing the sunflower seeds over to him. Ironically, the sunflower happens to be the national flower of Ukraine.
"From this moment, you are cursed. I'm telling you," she said, adding, "You f**king came here uninvited."
https://meaww.com/sunflower-seed-lady-brave-ukrainian-woman-confrontation-russian-soldier-viral
Well good for her I guess.
2/10. We need SugarFree back. I could barely jack off to this at all.
Not Crusty?
There are limits.
Still the greatest contribution strudel’s ever made here.
So where's Chumby in the middle of all this?
Great symbolic gesture, but I still love that Ukrainian police departments are giving out AK-47s to the Citizens. That's what makes the fertilizer!
It will be a great measure of how libertarian Ukraine is if they let the Citizens keep the guns. Kuwait confiscated guns from the Palestinians nationals there and threw them out after the Gulf War in 1991.
Stop Trying To Make Ukraine About Your Culture War...unless there is an angle on sex workers or abortion.
Lol, definitely this.
Poor ENB, she's so predictable.
Hmm, I wager that sex work opportunities will increase under Russian occupation.
Libertarian moment!
“This is a Russian military warship,” a voice on the clip said, according to CNN. “I suggest you lay down your weapons and surrender to avoid bloodshed and needless casualties. Otherwise you will be bombed.”
“Russian warship,” the Ukrainian group replied, “go fuck yourself.”
https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2022/2/24/2082253/-13-heroes-of-Ukraine-tell-Russian-warship-what-to-do-with-themselves
They were willing to die for their beliefs, defense of their homeland.
The problem is, people like you aren't, Sullum.
Surrendering would have done more damage to Russia than dieing. If they surrendered, they would tie up resources having to be guarded, sheltered, and housed. Dieing used shells one time and it's done.
No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making some other poor dumb bastard die for his country. - Patton
Love that movie....one of my all-time favorites.
"Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry worried about the effect of the Russian invasion on greenhouse gas emissions and public attention to climate change."
Is the Democratic Party specializing in senile old white men? (Maybe a deliberate campaign to make them look bad?)
How does the consistent use of his private plane rank?
Couldn't environmentalists find a few non hypocrites to pimp their idiotic message?
Too much Dunning-Kruger.
"Couldn't environmentalists find a few non hypocrites to pimp their idiotic message?"
No, because the hypocrisy is the point.
They are totalitarian feudalists, and they want you to know your place.
This. And anyone who doubted it two years ago could be forgiven. But they’ve become blatant with it.
When you believe that climate change will kill us all, sort of like "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry Gaia," then it makes sense that these people view everything through such a myopic lens.
We have Twitter leftists clutching their pearls about Ukraine's vaccination rates, for god's sake. I'd say that catching a slightly more annoying cold bug for a few days is probably the least of Ukrainians' concerns right now.
"If you're tempted to post things like: Russia is doing this because Americans use too many pronouns! At least Putin isn't woke! How will the murder of Ukrainian civilians affect gas prices? Stop. Go outside for a walk. Call a loved one. Cuddle a pet."
Better yet, kill yourself.
https://notthebee.com/article/biden-set-to-announce-supreme-court-pick-ketanji-brown-jackson
A radical Marxist as supreme court nominee?
She's a Democrat, so the nomination process should be a cakewalk.
Well, don't expect any opposition from McConnell.
Never mind that, following that one dude's stroke, the red team has a 50-49 edge.
If McConnel fights it, it becomes an election issue. She's not going to through the court out of whack. Vote to confirm her and remove any way the Dems could use it as an election issue.
Yeah, it's only a lifetime appointment. Why bother with any detailed scrutiny or anything that might cause the lying racist assholes on the left and in the media to shit their pants.
I just remembered she raped me at a highschool party. I didn't bring it up until now because it's a repressed memory
True. I remember that because of something about your garage door
He has to have two so he never feels trapped.
Well, I agreed with the headline. I thought this was going to be a story about the people arguing back and forth blaming Trump and Putin over wider implications that go beyond who's sitting in the Oval Office.
But people complaining that the Pentagon has put way too much focus on inclusivity training are at least speaking to something relevant. They're concerned about the readiness and the reputation of the US military at a point when the military might end up being deployed in the near future. It's not just about the Ukraine, it's about what we're going to do if Putin's next target is Estonia or Latvia. Those figures you listed aren't talking about the Ukraine conflict in terms of trans-bathrooms in Wal-Mart, they're talking about a military that is spending valuable training hours on inclusivity and implicit bias when it's not popular with the troops and isn't relevant to their job.
You can argue the point, but the people you're telling to stay on message are talking about the military. It's relevant. It's entirely relevant. You chose the worst possible examples you could have plucked out of the whole online culture war discussion.
The problem is, all of that obsession with non-combat related bullshit leave troops unprepared and undertrained. When faced with a near-peer adversary, those troops are going to die.
But ENB thinks people are talking about irrelevant shit during a global conflict so I guess we must defer to our betters.
*regional conflict
The US military already has a reputation. It's concidered the military equivalent of the gong show focusing more on culture politics and not at all on war reddiness.
Like I pointed out yesterday, the government's caving to the gay/troon lobby over the last ten years is just a piece of their overall degradation over decades. You have 30 years of manning cuts placing increased pressure on the remaining personnel to perform multiple duties just to keep things functional ("Do more with less! Don't worry, you'll figure out how to make it work!"), and 20 years of wars (really, over 30 years if you count Desert Shield/Storm, Northern/Southern Watch, and Operation Allied Force) that have run the services' resiliency and equipment in to the ground.
Set aside the fact that Clay Travis is right that the US's institutional and cultural leaders hate masculinity--the "toxic" adjective is considered a given with these people--what's particularly concerning is that the nation's elites are completely detached from reality in regards to what is going on in the world right now. They're the modern equivalent of the Babylonians and Belshazzar right before Cyrus waltzed in to the palace and took over the country.
"Last year, Texas passed a controversial law banning abortion after six weeks and allowing citizens to sue over abortions performed later than this. California is now following suit with legislation that would allow people to sue gun manufacturers when people violate gun regulations"
So can we perform abortions with hand guns now?
The only way this would be remotely analogous is if Texas law allowed suits against medical device manufacturers.
Yeah, as much as I hate to fuck dealers over more, they'd be the correct analogous entity there.
Ahem...
https://twitter.com/ComicDaveSmith/status/1496945788810838016?t=bAxdl81niH6Il5GD_PASiA&s=19
These moments are always the most revealing. Take note of who is willing to say the uncomfortable truths and who sounds indistinguishable from CNN.
"Be careful what you re-share on social media around about the situation in Ukraine."
The AP. That had me spit coffee across the room. I seem to remember the AP running with an ABC News report showing video of an attack along the Turkey, Syria border. The video was of a gun range in Kentucky.
There are a shitload of fake videos from whatever agency/NGO is pumping up Ukraine on Twitter.
One was from a Monty Pyrhon movie...
Wonder if it was the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch?
https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch/status/1497225449755263009?t=Fo176_ezKU128CRL1r4ptw&s=19
Putin articulated his ultimatums for Kyiv:
- Recognize Crimea as Russian
- Rejection of NATO accession
- No weapons supplies from the West
- LNR and DNR gain territory that the regions had pre 2014
Last one particularly interesting: suggests he intends to keep DNR/LNR around
It will be interesting to see the EU/US/Taiwan reaction if Ukraine agrees to these conditions. They well might do so.
They should.
Does Ukraine have a choice anymore?
Yes, it's not a great choice.
But, given that Putin is offering this today (as opposed to stiffer demands) also says that Putin knows his plan is not going as well as expected.
No weapon supplies "from the west" is just silly.
I wouldn't say this means his plan isn't going well. This very well could've been the plan; make it clear the Ukraine can't win and force some concessions out of them before the real bloodshed starts.
For all we know he's got more military ambitions and he'd like to keep his troops as intact as possible. Why waste them in the Ukraine unless you have to?
And see how China likes the argument that breakaway republics/separatist regions have the same basic human right of self-determination/secession as everyone else.
We should absolutely start hammering on that point in public, though. 😀
I mean, honestly, without the Russian involvement, if those two regions were just actually trying to break away and become independent on their own, I'd definitely support them in that.
"One of the idiotic implications here is that Russia's actions in Ukraine could somehow be stemmed if Americans didn't care so much about things like gay rights, race, or gender."
No, you dumb tramp. That's not the "implication." The statements are plainly that the American left's OBSESSION with those issues, to the exclusion of all else, has left the US- and the US Armed Forces- unready and incapable of meeting the moment, and unprepared to mount a defense of NATO allies, should the need arise. We're discharging unvaccinated troops. Our equipment is busted, and our remaining troops know more about extremism in the ranks than how to fight a near-peer adversary. The Army hemorrhages enlisted soldiers every year, year after year, because they can't make standards. The recruiting pool is fat, mentally ill, illiterate, on ADHD drugs... You name it. The politics of graduating womyns from ranger school are more important than training a lethal fighting force that strikes terror into the hearts of enemy forces. And all that is entirely because of the culture war that makes all the traits of a good soldier into a cultural dirty word. "Toxic masculinty" is exactly what you need when you have to go kill a bunch of Ruskies.
The plainly and clearly stated point is that progressive politics has infested every US institution and made them all ineffective, including the military.
Progressives are a festering, gangrenous infection that rot everything they touch. Like the man said, "Everything woke turns to shit."
Leftists are cancer
I've been a Republican since age 19 — and a partisan one at that — but the GOP's obsession with abortion is just tiresome. Not that the base doesn't like it.
Conservatives are supposed to be cautious about the bedrock of civilization. Women who resort to abortion tend to be reckless and the fathers deadbeats. For nature or nurture reasons, why would you want these people to give birth to the next generation? They also tend to vote Democrat. You don't want these people to multiply for the same reason you want to limit immigration from Haiti; because the raw material ain't that good, and they won't be able to maintain the good stuff we enjoy.
Sorry, meant to post that as a separate comment.
Because they don't believe in eugenics? Because murdering innocent people simply because their parents are assholes makes you a monster?
Just tossing ideas out there...
Waste of time, "he's been a Republican since age 19...."
Here's the viewpoint. Protect the children and raise them well. Doesn't matter who they are. Everyone deserves a chance at life.
You're arguing against applying values consistently because they might vote for the other team. That's what partisan hacks do.
"Women who resort to abortion tend to be reckless and the fathers deadbeats. For nature or nurture reasons, why would you want these people to give birth to the next generation? They also tend to vote Democrat. You don't want these people to multiply for the same reason you want to limit immigration from Haiti; because the raw material ain't that good"
Eugenics and racism is never a good reason to support killing kids.
Also, you couldn't be more obviously Democrat if you tried, Mr. Concern Troll.
Your little bit about Haiti gave your game away.
Fuck off dude.
That sounds straight out of Margaret Sanger.
And it's the one issue that might keep the Republicans from big wins in the midterms.
Concern troll trolling.
The American military would wipe the floor with the Russian military. It's the nukes that keep that from happening. You guys don't know shit about fighting if you think the American army is weak.
"The American military would wipe the floor with the Russian military."
...like we did with that nuclear powerhouse Afghanistan?
Right. 20 years and trillions of dollars to stand up a government that fell apart within 2 weeks of sustained fighting from cave dwellers in toyota tacomas.
It very well may be that the US can fight off the Russians. But the idea that we would wipe the floor with them is questionable at best.
I think we'd end up winning, but at great cost and not just in trillions of dollars. The American body count would be staggering.
I’m not convinced we would. It appears our military has forgotten how to win a war.
We'd then have to stay there. For damned near ever.
There is no good win. Better to stay out.
I definitely believe that you are well informed about military matters.
Now is actually the right time to bring up all of these things. The out-and-out Russian invasion is a stark reminder that the survival of your nation isn't helped by the woke nonsense, or by your military looking like some hippie joke worrying about white privilege, and that the fiscal health of the country's finances is important if you want to keep some wiggle room for the rainy days.
Debt, woke, and super-environmentalism weaken the nation. Then again, the left wing (cultural or economic) isn't about long-term survival but about spreading the candy around to those deemed disadvantaged.
Debt, woke, and super-environmentalism weaken the nation.
Here's the thing, too--for several decades, the non-left only thought that the first part mattered, and didn't really give a shit about the rest of it. They never understood how these issues are integrated as part of a whole, and they always thought that every victory they did manage to win was the Last Battle, remaining ignorant of the left's will to power and ideology of secular apocalypticism.
Ignoring the culture war goes hand-in-hand with enabling bad fiscal policy to take place. Its the continual exercise of low future-time orientation for vacuous short-term advantages, and fighting back vigorously in the face of perpetual subversion. Keeping debt down isn't going to mean shit if you're going to capitulate to cluster B psychotics who think they were born the wrong gender and demand that everyone celebrate their fetish, for instance.
"Former U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry worried about the effect of the Russian invasion on greenhouse gas emissions and public attention to climate change."
Natural gas--and the Biden administration's opposition to it--is at the center of this conflict. Our NATO allies are still reluctant to inflict the harshest sanctions on Russia for fear of what it will do to their supply of natural gas.
"US President Joe Biden told reporters on Thursday that depriving Russia of access to SWIFT is "always an option." But, he added, "right now, that's not the position that the rest of Europe wishes to take . . . . "
Germany, which relies on Russian gas to power the largest economy in Europe, is the most notable holdout. Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who earlier this week won praise for halting certification of a new Russian natural gas pipeline, has come under withering criticism at home.
"SWIFT is our sharpest sword," Christian Democratic Union lawmaker Norbert Röttgen said Thursday on Twitter. "The SWIFT exclusion of Russia must not fail now because of Germany!''
The German government said such a move would require careful preparation.
''A suspension of SWIFT would ... have a massive impact on payments in Germany and for German companies doing business with Russia but also to settle energy supply payments — that all would have to be well prepared,'' Steffen Hebestreit told reporters."
----CNN, February 25, 2022
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/25/business/swift-russia-putin/index.html
The first Cold War was largely a fight over oil. We should be flooding the world with natural gas right now--and flooding Germany with natural gas specifically.
John Kerry is Biden's "Envoy for Climate" in the Executive Office. He's coordinating both energy policy and climate policy for Biden. What he's talking about is doing his job.
Yes, eliminating natural gas from America's power grid in 15 years was the Biden administration's stated objective, and John Kerry was put in that position to accomplish this. As Americans come to realize that limiting natural gas production may eventually serve to draw us into another European war, yes, more Americans will come to oppose shutting down natural gas.
And you know this is an election year, right? And the election is only *counts on fingers* eight months away?
So, yes, let's talk about Biden decision to limit natural gas exploration on public land. Let's talk about Biden's decision to kill the Keystone pipeline. Let's talk about Biden's woefully incompetent decision to give the go ahead on Nord Stream 2. These are legitimate questions about Biden's policies that have resonance, right now, because the stories we're seeing in the news regarding Ukraine and Germany are a direct result of them. For goodness' sake, why shouldn't we be talking about energy policy?
Do you know why Saudi Arabia was an important ally during the Cold War?
Do you know why Iran switching sides when the Shah was deposed was important?
Team R needs to run on an explicit plank of energy independence, and increasing power generation with an 'all of the above' approach (esp. Nuclear).
Natural gas isn't bad either. Natural gas releases 40% less C02 than coal to create the same amount of energy. Natural gas is part of the solution to climate change--as a transition stage until renewables can compete on cost. This is why the Germans felt good about moving to natural gas as a substitute for nuclear energy.
The issue also exposes Biden's incompetence for dropping his opposition to Nord Stream 2. A president's first midterm is almost always a referendum on the new president, and Biden's decision to drop his opposition to Nord Stream 2 was a dismal failure--by his own admission. If it wasn't a stupid decision, he wouldn't have reversed it.
Where I live greens have stifled a good short term solution in pursuit of their utopian perfect. Two major electrical generating plans that ran for decades on locally-sourced coal will be shut down ahead of earlier agreements. These two plants sit in the most natural gas-rich basin in the US, which has also been largely shut in. The area has become (more) economically depressed. A delicious twist is that much of the area is Indian reservation, and a major tribe is part owner in various components of the power system--and not happy about the loss of income and jobs. Meanwhile, the local county and state got a few million dollars to explore how building a new railroad line to the area would spur economic investment and activity.
I agree. Trump did this implicitly. It would be good to make it explicit. Doing everything we can to decrease the demand and price of oil will do more damage to Russia than anything else.
Developing viable alternative energy is the real game changer but I think as we work for that we should drilling the shit out of oil and gas.
Makes sense to me!
Thank goodness we killed Build Back Better. That thing was rife with anti-natural gas, Green New Deal horseshit.
I don't know the specifics of that legislation but yeah we need to drill baby drill and develop alternatives to oil to put even more downward pressure on the price.
"Hertzberg's bill, SB 1327, would create a bounty scheme to allow vigilantes to sue manufacturers or dealers who peddle firearms that are illegal in California, such as assault weapons or so-called ghost guns. There'd be a $10,000 reward"
Given that assault rifles is a term with no definition and no dealer/manufacturer peddles "ghost guns", this is sure to be laughable.
Gun companies can always choose to not supply CA with guns. Period. Police and Natl Guard included.
"Not Legal for Sale or Distribution in California"
Russia bans anti-government protests? Who do they think they are? Canada?
They banned the protests under the pretense of Covid restrictions, too.
Putin learns from Trudeau...
There's no principled high ground the west can hold over Russia at this point. It's a great way to kill any enthusiasm for anyone to enlist when the evil threat is doing the exact same things our own government and neighbors are doing.
Shit is bad and is going to continue to get worse. I'm terrified of what might happen with election fraud in 2024, also.
Out governments act the same way, but our institutions and our expectations are different.
Trudeau had to back down because the Canadians institutions and expectations are different.
Putin doesn't have to back down on these kinds of restrictions because he has little to fear from the Russian people or their institutions.
Trudeau had to back down because of a bank run, not corrupt institutions that didn't do shit.
This.
The institutions were already corrupt Ken. Out of the five major Canadian banks CEO's, three are WEF Global Leadership grads. As were both judges who let Trudeau have his way.
Every political leader in Canada who supported the Emergency Act were WEF Global Leadership grads. Those who opposed it weren't.
The next round of elections should tell us whether Canuck voters are able to connect those dots.
Those dots are Russian disinformation, so few Canadians will even hear about them.
No, they banned protesting way before Covid. You're just seizing on one this statement and trying to make some sort of equivocation
And what would that be?
https://twitter.com/RobertPLewis/status/1497209162291310602?t=E4XihjFzgs9PN61AGekqfg&s=19
Did anyone see the news a few days ago that the FBI & DOJ have chosen to drop all investigations of CCP espionage against the US?
Quite telling, isn't it?
Good. China has been portrayed unfairly just because the pandemic — which is actually Drumpf's and #DeathSantis' fault — might technically have originated in one of its "wet markets."
#StopAsianHate
Ordinarily, I'd say, "Fuck off, shithead", but for you, I'll add a word.
Fuck off, shithead troll.
Incidentally, China and Japan are neck and neck in the race to be the most chauvinist, racist countries, so good luck in getting them to stop hating.
The Japanese are more polite about it, though.
I guess the Clintons, Kerry's, and Bidens were turning up too frequently?
Yeah I saw that the dems deserve to be killed
Russia is sinking ever deeper into weakness because they're led by a self absorbed madman who places his own interests ahead of the nation's. Putin is a cancer on Russia.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russias-economic-defences-likely-crumble-over-time-under-sanctions-onslaught-2022-02-25/
Yes, and so are Boris, Justin, Brandon, Xi, Macron, Scott Morrison, and Jacinda Ardern.
There's a hell of a lot of cancer out there right now.
"The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?"
It's a nice hope, but oil prices are high and Putin has gone from US bonds to gold as a major part of Russia's economic portfolio.
I suggest you reassess Putin. NATO has expanded east consistently. NATO is Russia's biggest threat. Ukraine was trying to join and that would put NATO on Russia's doorstep with a potential cause for war over Crimea. Potentially with US Nuclear weapons half the distance to Moscow compared to during the Cuban Missile Crisis (when Nukes in Turkey).
If NATO explicitly said Ukraine wouldn't join NATO, Putin wouldn't have cause. Another option, have Russia JOIN NATO. Turn Russia into a friend and ally. This would also move them away from China.
Ukraine is a sovereign nation a d Russia is the biggest threat to it. You can be against war over Ukraine without sucking up to Putin.
And you can try to understand Putin’s pov without sucking up to him.
^ Da uzh! Eto tochno!
So Russia's problem is a shortage of real altruism?
"WHO recognizes stealth variant"https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2022/feb/25/who-recognizes-stealth-variant/
Fauci and Newsom get wet pants.
“Russia cannot allow Ukraine to become a dagger raised above us in the hands of Washington,” the head of Russia’s foreign intelligence agency, Sergei Naryshkin, said in a brief address aired on Russian state television. “The special military operation will restore peace in Ukraine within a short amount of time and prevent a potential larger conflict in Europe.”
"Russian propaganda falsely claims that “neo-Nazis” controlling Ukraine’s government are perpetrating a genocide against Russian speakers in the country. President Vladimir V. Putin said Thursday that the purpose of Russia’s attack on Ukraine was to demilitarize and “denazify” Ukraine, and Mr. Lavrov repeated those terms on Friday, making it clear that Russia was seeking to install a new government in Kyiv."
----The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/25/world/europe/sergey-lavrov-ukraine-talks.html
It's hard to keep up the pretense that the Ukrainian people are being subjugated by the U.S. through CIA puppets in the Ukrainian government when you're invading them so you can put your boot on their necks. If it were at all possible for Putin to claim that this was a war of liberation, and he was freeing the Ukrainian people from the yoke of their government, he would. But that doesn't explain why millions of Ukrainians depopulated the two breakaway regions, or why so many Ukrainians are fleeing his forces of liberation today. Don't they want to stick around and enjoy some Putin style liberty? So, Putin had to find another propaganda message.
Now Putin is anti-fa.
We don't want to act like this, but the Nazis made us do it!
And if we didn't do this, there might be a war in Europe!
That wasn't supposed to be a reply.
“We don't want to act like this, but the Nazis made us do it!”
MISEK OUT OF UKRAINE NOW! (And don’t do that again!)
There…Problem solved.
"It's invisible Covid and it's coming to get you!"
Time for more mandates and lockdowns.
I don't think they could shut us down again. Even the progressives of San Francisco have had enough of lockdowns. Even the Canadians aren't taking it anymore.
Not so fast, Ken.
Shopped at several stores without mask requirements since the end of the mandate; me and one or two others were bare-faced.
That doesn't mean they want to be forced.
True, but there's a strong whiff of 'chicken little - save me!' emanating from those masks.
"US gas prices could hit $5 a gallon or more after Russia’s Ukraine invasion"
[...]
"Prices could surge even higher if Russia responds to severe sanctions from the US and its allies by curbing oil exports — a move that could push the global cost per barrel to record highs..."
https://nypost.com/2022/02/24/us-gas-prices-could-hit-5-per-gallon-after-russias-ukraine-invasion/
And not a word about:
"Biden Administration Halts New Drilling in Legal Fight Over Climate Costs"
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/climate/carbon-biden-drilling-climate.html
There are times when you wonder if turd is not legion...
And Americans' approval of the president still tracks oil prices last I checked.
https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/itw2011042801/
As recently as the Obama administration, his popularity was never so challenged as it was after he shut down drilling in the Gulf during the big spill.
Maybe a better way to put this; while the US has lacked an external common enemy for two generations we’ve become narcissistically obsessed with a panoply of grievances and internal conflict, largely inflamed by media and agenda driven politicians. Meanwhile there are big players in the world for whom raw power and ruthless actions remain very much a means to an end. Our country’s standing in the world is much diminished and will only get more so as long as our feckless myopic obsession remains. The global direction is steadily increasing authoritarian control, even amongst traditionally democratic countries. Get a fucking clue; this isn’t just our future, it is now.
We didn't lack an external common enemy. China has been growing. Half the country thinks the CCP is a role model instead of a threat.
After the Midterms, One Party Controls All the Wealthiest Congressional Districts
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/midterms-one-party-controls-wealthiest-184200649.html
Andrew DePietro
November 8, 2018
...After the midterms, the top 10 wealthiest districts are represented by a single party.
The Ottawa truck convoy has revealed the ugly side of freedom
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-ottawa-truck-convoy-has-revealed-the-ugly-side-of-freedom/
...Scholar Elisabeth Anker in her book Ugly Freedoms examines the historic use of freedom in America to justify discrimination, domination and avoidance of the law and regulation essential to a peaceful and prosperous society. The same, we now know, can happen in Canada.
As we move forward from the pandemic into the future, we need to understand the true nature of freedom under our Constitution.
Freedom is not absolute but subject to reasonable limits.
Freedom, misconstrued as license to do and say whatever one wants, is dangerous.
Nothing uglier than calling a multiracial, peaceful convoy headed by Metis and Indigenous elders and a Sikh, a violent, bigoted protest in a national newspaper, Ms. Anker.
The incitement that Elisabeth Anker and the Globe & Mail are perpetrating is no different than what Julius Streicher and Der Stürmer did in the 20's.
This isn't hyperbole. They are doing the same actions with the same goal.
I hope that they too end up in front of some sort of Nuremburg trial someday as well.
The ugly side of freedom is that people might do or say something I don't like.
War has returned to Europe. As Americans, we need to awaken from our slumber, and understand that the communists are dedicated to the destruction of our way of life. They must be opposed on the battlefield, and in our own homeland.
ENB made the choice to don on her journalistic kneepads for her blue check friends. She picked her side. Shame on her. She ought to tattoo the hammer and sickle on her forehead. I am sure we will see sex worker articles shortly on how Russian soldiers are properly treating whores plying their trade, but should pay more.
As for Ukraine, they must choose for themselves their path forward. If they want to fight a protracted guerilla war with Russia, then NATO can certainly help them...discreetly. That Polish border looks pretty porous to me. Lots of 'trade' can happen at the border. We can sell Ukraine weaponry on a 'cash and carry' basis. I would not object to sending home Russians in body bags. Eventually, Russia will tire of the effort and cut their losses. Ukraine may voluntarily choose 'subjugation lite'. That is a real possibility. They are not a NATO member and there is no vital US national interest in Ukraine. In the end, this is a European problem and they must decide their course of action.
Frankly, I am a lot more concerned about Taiwan. Communist China is going to invade Taiwan. When we get involved in that conflict, we face the real possibility of utter defeat. Americans today do not truly understand what that means, and what defeat entails.
We must awaken from our slumber. Totalitarianism is ascendant in the world today. Soon, America will be called upon to defend our liberty and our way of life. Reading ENB's screed, I wonder if we have what it takes, and whether people like her are even worth fighting and dying for.
The US needs to tell Japan and Taiwan that they are on their own, and (discreetly) give Japan whatever assistance they need in building The Bomb.
I would love to say that our Carrier Fleet has the ability to resist Chinese advances, but China has been building its navy to this one purpose- defeating the US carriers and invading Taiwan. Meanwhile we have been building our military to fight cave dwellers in the mountains beneath unrestricted air cover. Add to that the corrupt and woke nonsense, and I have serious doubts as to our ability to legitimately defend Taiwan.
Indeed in the next 5 to 10 years, China will have orbital platforms capable of defeating any fleet on the surface. If the US is going to remain a player in future conflicts, we need to understand that orbital platforms are the new carrier fleet. Our heavy lift capabilities are one of the few advantages we have left over the rest of the world, and if we don't solidify our gains here, we may find ourselves leapfrogged.
In the meanwhile, regional allies like S Korea, Japan and Taiwan need to understand that the defense of their interests is going to be primarily dependent on what they, not the US, are capable of. In 2-3 years, Japan could probably have nuclear weapons. Taiwan could potentially do the same. This might be the only deterrent they have against China.
Sorry Overt, but we don't agree at all about Japan (or Taiwan). Japan is an ally by treaty, ratified by the US Senate. We don't abandon allies. What you propose vis a vis Japan is simply not realistic (or tenable).
Taiwan produces 40% of the world's semiconductors, and America runs on semiconductors (and energy). That is about as close to a vital US national interest as it gets. It is enough to go to war, unless we replace that capacity domestically and we are nowhere close to that. Like yourself, I have reservations on our ability to go toe-to-toe with China, in their backyard, and prevail.
Points well-taken regarding space, and the strategy behind China's naval strategy against the US. We can play the asymmetric game also; we are actually quite good at it.
It is not that I don't want to defend Japan. It is that it is time for us to stop pretending we can, because it harms us, and most of all harms Japan, Taiwan and Korea (among others).
First, I am not clear at all that our fleet has the ability to stop China if it tried. The performance in Afghanistan and COVID response have convinced me that the US government's incompetence has reached deeply concerning levels. If China agrees, then our posturing will only mean that our fleets are destroyed and the US is *also* at the mercy of two bit actors.
Second, even if the US is able to limp through an engagement with China, it is clear that the US public will not support a protracted defense of these countries- allied or not.
I love Japan and everything it represents. I have friends and work colleagues in Taiwan. I am not calling to abandon them. I am calling on them to not trust us. Because if they trust in the US, we are going to let them down- potentially with great impact to ourselves.
Something something Ukraine something nukes something something trust us we got your back.
CDC Right to Withhold COVID Data to Prevent Misinformation, Scientists Say
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/cdc-right-to-withhold-covid-data-to-prevent-misinformation-scientists-say/ar-AAUgma8
Multiple outside experts have told Newsweek that it is important for the CDC to ensure that the data it collects is complete, interpreted, and properly representative of reality before it's published—otherwise it risks breeding misinformation.
-----
Of course I already demolished this excuse last week.
Yes, the priority of the agency that ‘suggested’ we all wear masks and that the vaccine would end the pandemic — even while knowing it would do nothing of the sort — is CLEARLY ensuring data is accurate and actionable.
Remember when the CDC pointed at the Kansas mask study as proof that masks worked?
Many of us immediately noticed what’s wrong with this chart: there are two different axes. In fact, when the data was shown with both lines on the same axis, the study actually showed masked counties ALWAYS had more covid than non-masked counties.
And CDC published this ‘recommendation’ in late November. Guess what had already happened between the end of study and the time the CDC published the recommendation? (Study duration in red boxes)
In other words, the original data was completely cherry-picked and the newest data had ALREADY blown the study out of the water. Both masked and unmasked counties saw huge increases at the start of the winter surge. Yet the CDC still pointed to this study as proof of mask efficacy, KNOWING IT WAS BULLSHIT.
Accurate and actionable my ass.
In the long run, wars make us safer and richer
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-the-long-run-wars-make-us-safer-and-richer/2014/04/25/a4207660-c965-11e3-a75e-463587891b57_story.html
The real reason the WaPo hated Trump.
Chavez for Life?
There are at least three reasons why the world should congratulate Venezuela's Hugo Chávez on his recent success abolishing term limits.
https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/chavez-life/
...Now that Chávez can stop worrying about whether he will be able to run for re-election again, he can hopefully focus on making sure his people want to re-elect him. Venezuela’s social problems and political tension require urgent, expert attention; and with falling oil prices, Chávez has an immense challenge ahead of him. But on February 15, looking back on his ten years in office, 54 percent of Venezuelans felt that Chávez and his Bolivarian Revolution were change they can believe in.
Putin beat him to it. Communist Party vote share was dropping on a log curve, so Putin became Czar for life. Cowards now quake as they did when Hitler "protected" the Sudeten Germans in Czechoslovakia. Czechs rounded up and executed the German 5th column wholesale after Hitler sacrificed his life for Christian National Socialism. Surprise!
Parents' fury after biologically male counselors who identify as non-binary and use they/them pronouns slept in rooms with fifth-grade girls for three nights during school-organized science camp
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10534269/Parents-furious-biological-male-non-binary-counselors-slept-rooms-little-girls.html
Stupid bigot parents. This is exactly why the FBI was right to dub them terrorists.
He shouldn't be anywhere near a science camp if he doesn't understand basic chromosomes
LITERALLY BIN LADEN!
But these mentally ill perverts couldn’t have stopped Russia invading Ukraine so shut up.
Mask Mandates Are Illogical. So What?
They only need to align with communities’ goals.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2022/02/covid-mask-mandate-washington-dc/622860/
Bank of England to Ministers: Digital cash could be programmed to ensure it is only spent on essentials
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/bank-of-england-to-ministers-digital-cash-could-be-programmed-to-ensure-it-is-only-spent-on-essentials-2/
China also proves you can program it WITH AN EXPIRATION DATE. Literally spend it or lose it.
NBC Columnist: Parents ‘Aren’t Qualified,’ ‘Should Keep Their Noses Out’ Of Education
https://www.dailywire.com/news/nbc-columnist-parents-arent-qualified-should-keep-their-noses-out-of-education
Concerned parents and political leaders “should keep their noses out of school curricula,” according to a columnist at NBC News.
“Parents and politicians across the country are interfering with the curricula that public schools use to teach students,” author and professor of teacher education Christina Wyman wrote in NBC News’ THINK newsletter. She concerned herself chiefly with the banning of Critical Race Theory in public schools, the removal of “literary classics” from libraries for explicit sexual content, and parents “trying to shield students” from the topics of mental health and suicide.
“Part of the problem is that parents think they have the right to control teaching and learning because their children are the ones being educated,” Wyman wrote. “But it actually (gasp!) doesn’t work that way.” She then likened parents taking issue with course materials to interfering with surgery because the patient is their child.
This was the most infuriating assertion: "Which is why the ceaseless effort of parents and politicians to shape curricula by targeting book selection, the type of history taught in classrooms and even specific terms used in classrooms should be ignored."
1) These efforts aren't "ceaseless." They just started up in the last year or so because parents happened to get a good look at the curricula and pedagogies being practiced for the first time in ages when COVID kicked off.
2) Telling parents that their concerns about what their kids are being taught should be "ignored" because they aren't "experts" is the epitome of sheltered elitism. This bitch and the people she's influencing don't deserve respect; they deserve every bit of scorn, hatred, and loathing they receive, to the point that they get driven out of the communities they're subverting.
Make these people understand that their smug condescension won't be tolerated, and they'll back down or take off in due time. But you have to get involved in your communities and keep the pressure on them. Political apathy is the greatest weapon they have against you.
The problem with the "parents aren't qualified" argument is that the points in dispute are not points of fact, not really. They're largely issues of values. What "qualifies" teachers or school boards what values a child is raised with?
^
99% of teachers aren't experts on their subject. Full stop. They have one of the lowest college entrance exam scores of all majors. Their learning requires teaching them how to teach, but has been transformed into really teaching them how to teach narratives. Look at your local universities course curriculum for teachers and be shocked. Most teaching degrees, as an example, only require basic algebra and one or two history courses. Most of the classes are tied to tenants of how to teach wrapped in narrative discussions.
Teachers on average are not high performing or high intelligence individuals.
The vast majority of teachers these days know just enough to be dangerous. The worst of the lot are ideologues who became teachers to "make a difference" and be a "transformational influence."
Look at your local universities course curriculum for teachers and be shocked.
Oh, it's not a surprise anymore. The rot of critical theory and neomarxism in the field runs deep and long.
Nothing new about that. The ED school had the lowest SATs and the highest GPAs a half century ago,when I was in school.
What changed is the deliberate plan by the left to co-op the education establishment to indoctrinate youth. See: Bill Ayres. It's always easier to "gut n stuff" something with no guts, which describes the content of most ED courses.
Incidentally, the only reason you can say "one of the lowest" entrance exam scores is the creation of the "Studies" degrees.
Is Professor Wyman an alt right plant trying to subvert confidence in public education?
Why Canada Will Become a Dictatorship Under Trudeau
https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/trudeau-dictator_b_6314494
The leader of that party does what he wants, when he wants, and no one dares question him. Would a Prime Minister Trudeau arbitrarily whip the vote and outlaw certain moral questions? Could Prime Minister Trudeau be trusted to make decisions for the good of the country, not just for his personal self-worth? Would Trudeau call in the police to enforce his vision? Let's hope we never have the opportunity to ask those questions.
It's becoming clearer as the days of Trudeau's Liberals wear on: if elected Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau would turn Canada into a dictatorship.
This is the man who admitted he "admires China's basic dictatorship." It wasn't just a sarcastic comment - he seriously said that he admires the dictatorship because they can get things done quickly.
That article is from 2014.
It's weird for Huffpo to be so prescient, but we're through the looking glass now folks, so why not.
https://www.theblaze.com/news/washington-post-trucker-freedom-convoy-white-supremacy
The Washington Post was skewered for an opinion piece painting members of the Freedom Convoy as "explicitly racist," and arguing that expecting individual freedom is a "key component of white supremacy."
https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/02/prof-worries-about-politicized-freedom-after-purdue-u-makes-masks-optional/
In response to Purdue University moving to an optional face mask policy, an English professor complained the move would give people “more freedom.”
...“Regardless of how students will interpret ‘except for instructional settings,’ I’m worried that this can only translate to more freedom for a culture of health laziness and give more fodder to the combative, politicized conception of individual freedom now rampant.”
Lamp post.
give more fodder to the combative, politicized conception of individual freedom now rampant.”
"Why won't these fucking conservatives stop resisting so hard and go back to sleep so we can continue our march through the institutions?"
Good thing that English Faculty has kept POLITICIZATION at bay!
Emails Shine New Light on CDC-Facebook COVID Collusion
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/spencerbrown/2022/02/18/emails-shine-new-light-on-cdc-facebook-covid-collusion-n2603485
Emails between federal agencies and Facebook employees from November 2020 obtained and released by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) show how the social media giant was guided in its messaging surrounding COVID-19, who it was told should be targeted, how users should be targeted, and what was being done to use social media to "drive uptake of vaccines."
In a chain of emails initially planning a meeting between Dr. Deborah Birx and Facebook's Vice President of Health, the CDC provided updates and suggestions for how Facebook could package government data to make it "resonate" with users more and to whom information needed to be directed.
The Exploitation of ‘Freedom’ in America
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/04/opinion/ugly-freedom-discrimination-racism-sexism.html
Hoes mad.
Deadspin:
Joe Biden Is A Doddering Old Mummy With A Skull Full Of Dumpster Juice
ByAlbert Burneko
9/13/19 10:49AM
https://deadspin.com/joe-biden-is-a-doddering-old-mummy-with-a-skull-full-of-1838094396
But also! Joe Biden is 76 years old and plainly in steep cognitive decline, which is a nice way of saying that he is a doddering, senile old oaf who cannot keep his teeth in straight and whose brain appears to be some torn-up sponge chunks floating in dishwater. During last night’s Democratic presidential debate in Houston, Biden appeared confused about his own position on health care, both about the details of the health-care proposal on his own website and about what he himself had just said about his health-care proposal, a few minutes earlier.
...What you are seeing is a sundowning and increasingly panicked geriatric who cannot follow the cognitive thread from the beginning of a sentence to the end of one, much less from one sentence to another. To the extent you can pull any actual semantic content out of this demented babble, Joe Biden, frontrunner for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, answered the question of whether and how America’s educational system should redress the legacy of slavery and systemic racism in this country by saying that social workers should be sent into black parents’ homes to teach them how to put the record player on at night so their kids will hear as many words as white kids. As a charitable donation, you can perhaps grant that he had no fucking idea what was coming out of his mouth.
Mask Mandates Didn’t Make Much of a Difference Anyway
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-02-11/did-mask-mandates-work-the-data-is-in-and-the-answer-is-no
They just didn't mandate enough masks. MOAR HARDER!!11!!!11!!1
They did try to get us to triple mask but some combination of Russian disinformation and bigoted racism caused us to not listen.
???!!! Only just ALL THE TIME the headline writers and bloggers here complain that government is distracted by this instead of doing that. Just yesterday it was about how the AMA was complaining about the pronouns people use instead of taking care of sick people. So now, what, priorities don't matter any more?
You guys are now as disingenuous as the NY Times, and you have to go a looonnng way to be THAT disingenuous.
Now?
“One of the idiotic implications here is that Russia's actions in Ukraine could somehow be stemmed if Americans didn't care so much about things like gay rights, race, or gender.”
“Implications” is doing a lot of the heavy lifting for the “implied” strawman.
No, I don't know. You saying everyone who's on any other beat should take the day off?
I don't know what you even want to say now, ENB. That America should focus on the Ukrainian war? Or that America should not focus on it? That you should compare its importance to other things? That you should not compare its importance to other things? That you should connect, or not connect, it to other things in world affairs?
I think we may be entering a twilight of the gods period, where the people and issues that dominated the culture in the past are receding, and the people who thrived in that period can see the writing on the wall. They know their time is fading. Eight months from now, the issues of progressive wokism may not be driving the national conversation anymore.
"I promise, the culture war and all its brave keyboard warriors will still be there next week. So will COVID-19, and climate change, and border battles.
----ENB
These issues have risen and fallen in relative importance over the decades, and the relative importance some of them have been given over the past five years may not be the relative importance they enjoy going forward. A lot of people cared about climate change more than energy prices--right up until energy price spikes became a reality. A lot of people cared more about progressive wokism right up until inflation became a serious issue for them.
The most embarrassing vote of my life was when I voted for George W. Bush. He had some great ideas about transitioning away from the socialist welfare state and moving towards a system of private charity. He was talking about reforming social security by letting me keep more of my money for private investment. Terrorism completely changed our priorities, and his priorities changed with it. Don't bet your bottom dollar on culture war issues being as important next week as they were last week.
Progressive wokism was already burning itself out.
The big story at the moment is that Putin agreed to talks with the Ukrainian leadership.
I'm trying to imagine why the Ukrainian leadership would want to meet with the Russians--except to surrender unconditionally.
It looks to me like Lee at Appomattox Court House.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Appomattox_Court_House#Surrender
Lose the eastern bits and stay out of NATO and we declare victory and go home.
Under the circumstances, not the worst deal. Evil that it happened, but unless we send millions of feminists in knitted pink vagina hats to #resist the Russians, maybe the best deal available.
We should probably still send them, just to be sure.
No one needs an actual puppet government if the current government agrees to do what you want them to anyway.
It's not my place to say that he should continue to let his people die for their independence.
Lee was urged to retreat and run a guerrilla campaign to resist the North, but he saw surrender as a merciful alternative to more suffering and no change in the final outcome for that suffering.
If I were Ukrainian, I'd want to keep fighting for my freedom and Ukraine's independence--but I'm not Ukrainian.
Yet you won't even fight here.
Faith alone!
It would be interesting to see just how effective the Ukrainian military has been at inflicting casualties on the Russians.
I've seen claims by the Ukrainians, but you can't trust them to report their own numbers accurately at this point.
Yeah, Im intensely curious about that too. Did the bear get a bloody nose?
I'm hearing that U.S. assessments had the Russians taking Kiev already, but they've been held back.
Don't know what that's worth.
I'm also seeing photos of burned out Russian troop transports and the dead body of a Russian soldier taken in the presence of some Ukrainian soldiers who were being interviewed.
The resistance hasn't disappeared. I guess we know that.
If Kiev turns into urban warfare this could go on for a while.
Didn't you get the memo? As of a week or two ago, you have to say and write "Kive" because that is how Ukrainians do it.
It would just lose the U.S. any claims to moral high ground or a chance to show that there's a better way.
Wow. She spends the first half of the commentary attacking people who unrealistically claim anything the American left does could have convinced Putin he didn't face serious opposition, then immediately pretends this nonsense could have impacted Putin's decision. This shows the in-group / out-group disparity showing she perceives herself part of the left. This is why her perceptions of the right are stupidly wrong.
The better way would be for the USA or some other country with legal due process protections (think Amendments 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) to issue a letter of marque and reprisal against Putin, with a substantial cash reward for capturing him and bringing him to trial, and holding him personally and criminally liable for the murders and bombings done by forces reporting to him.
But that would set a precedent that drone warriors from certain other nations might not appreciate.
That her conceptions of the right are stupidly (and stereotypically) wrong marks her as a person of the left, no matter what her own professed identity may be.
The headline is correct, but the article could use a little more "both sides" for once, or a link to the original culture-war take from the far left to which the right-wing commentators are responding today.
Like this?
https://twitter.com/thelaurenchen/status/1496864932884799498?s=21
Biden's polling firm suggests how the democrats can claim victory over covid. Bonus points for saying fatality numbers are similar to the flu.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/who-could-have-seen-this-coming
>>The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is expected to loosen mask guidelines today.
extreme pity if still in mask because CDC.
At least California doesn't invest in culturally objectionable stocks and bonds:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-pension-fund-calstrs-investments-231337362.html
If their invested in Russia does that mean it is going to be more solvent?
also has anyone checked on Pussy Riot?
+
Days since enbs last yglasis refrence:7
No room in her “conservatives pounce” screed.
*It would just lose the U.S. any claims to moral high ground or a chance to show that there's a better way.*
OK, so what is the "better way"? Do we just continue to be patient and morally superior while an autocratic madman has his way with other sovereign countries?
Didn't work very well in 1938.
Go over and join a militia, pussy.
The problem is there weren’t nuclear missiles in 1938. If it weren’t for that, the US military could polish off Russia’s in short order.
This is how you can tell White Mike doesn't know shit about the US military, its adversaries, or their respective capabilities. The question of whether we'd wipe the floor with the Russians in a conventional fight is highly debatable. We do well against their mercs in the Middle East, but that's because it's hard-ass spec ops guys doing the killing.
Russia is not the pushover that neocons or liberaltarians think they are.
Actually it did. The countries that had borrowed billions to throttle the Accursed Hun in 1916 then claimed repaying the U.S. was a sick joke had plenty of time to reflect on welching. Finland had good credit, in the wrong place. After Los Alamos scientists unchained the nuclear Golem, all wars ended. Only the most idiotic cretins, like the Johnson and Nixon parties, and Russia, still felt the fatal attraction. Ukraine should have added a Bill of Rights and Second Amendment when it had the chance. It's their turn to reflect.
also I'm a little interested in the consequences I've never faced in history.
That ENB screed about making Ukraine about your culture wars is one of the dumbest things she has written here.
Making a tangential point is now verboten? Is that only where war is involved?
Does that include bringing Hunan trafficking into the discussion?
What about immigration policy?
Or is it only opinions and arguments we disagree with that are to be avoided when discussing "important topics"?
Let's look:
"Russia and China are focused on expanding their spheres of influence via aggressive action. The West is focused on expanding its national debt and exploding the gender binary," tweeted conservative writer Ben Shapiro yesterday. "Whatever advantages we have on an objective level are wildly undermined by our narcissistic idiocy."
So Shapiro notes that Russia and China are using various forms of aggression to expand their sphere of influence. Is that OK? That seems to be directly on point. I mean, invading a neighboring country is definitely aggression. And it definitely expands your influence over that country.
He contrasts this with the west exploding their national debt. Is that the objection? Not exactly a culture war, at least not directly. But it does make a good contrast... Gains versus losses. Squandered treasure versus accumulating resources.
So no. That is not the objection.
"And exploding the gender binary"
So that is it? That is the objection. Mocking our national obsession over such obscene violations as not including Xe/Xer under gender along with he, she and they on the forms down at the DMV? That is the bridge too far?
Really?
In your world, an opinion writer cannot belittle the priorities held by the national conscience by directly listing things they think were less important than the war that you think is to important to discuss in context of anything else?
Is that the disconnect? Is it just that you are stupid and easily lead by Twitter posts of out of context sentences?
Shapiro is saying "we should be focusing on important things like the moves China and Russia are making, not on forcing people to obsess over fringe lifestyle choices". And your response is "how dare you minimize important things like war in Ukraine by mentioning these important alternate lifestyle choices!"
In a world of cumb hot takes, this may be the dumbest of all.
We have a Veep who beclowned herself on her diplomatic mission to avert this war... But that doesn't deserve analysis, or even a hot take. We have a president who apparently is not up to the task of talking to Putin on the phone to try to avert the war. ... But that doesn't deserve analysis or even a hot take.
We have a president who unilaterally ended sanctions that were put in place specifically to protect Ukraine from this exact eventuality..... And that is not worthy of analysis or even a hot take
We have a president who... How to put this in a way that is inarguable?... A president who's family has highly questionable financial ties to oil interests in Ukraine... And that is not worthy of analysis or even a hot take.
But a conservative podcaster says "hey, maybe we should be spending our time on things like Russian aggression instead of spending like drunken sailors and pushing the boundaries of gender identity into every aspect of society".... That one is the thing we *really* need to be focusing on.
Good lord.
“Is that the disconnect? Is it just that you are stupid and easily lead by Twitter posts of out of context sentences?”
Yes.
also didn't Clancy write The Bear and The Dragon like 25 years ago?
I really worry about our Reason writer's echo chamber. If you guys are passing around every dumb quote from conservative voices in the slack channel all day as it seems, you need to wake up.
You should be passing around stuff that isn't already covered on CNN and MSNBC and HuffPo.
Where is the puppycide? Where are the illegal searches? Where are the violations of free expression? Where are the deep dives into official acts of corruption?
Heck, we just had one of the three largest countries in North America declare martial law over a 6 square block "sit in" by a bunch of truck drivers. Are you guys so divorced from issues of personal libery and government overreach that the comments of right wing talk show hosts is really worthy of tenfold more attention from your staff?
Where is the libertarian focus?
Yes, Republicans are idiots. They are also not even in power.
Democrats are also idiots. And they are running things at the moment.
If your derision is focused on Democrats less than 60% at this moment, you are not paying attention and your underlying team affinity is showingwenare libertarians. The NAP should come first, not (R) or (D).
YEAH BUT DID YOU HEAR WHAT CHARLIE KIRK SAID ABOUT THE SUPER BOWL HALFTIME SHOW?!?
Reason is 100% team totalitarian left, and will do whatever they can to destroy our lives
I dunno about that, but they sure have bought in hard to at least the team blue negative advertizing
If they ignore all of that stuff, maybe it will go away. Just like Cancel Culture.
"Russia and China are focused on expanding their spheres of influence via aggressive action. The West is focused on expanding its national debt and exploding the gender binary. Whatever advantages we have on an objective level are wildly undermined by our narcissistic idiocy."
Well, I don't know what effect the gender stuff has on military readiness (at best it's a minor annoyance), the national debt is, among *many* other things, an obstacle to preparedness - we're supposed to have limited debt in peacetime so we have room to borrow for wartime emergencies (and make sure it's a *real* emergency because these things take time to pay back). If we can't discipline ourselves in the piping times of peace, we'll be a lot less ready for emergencies when they come.
Yeah, culture war stuff. Like the poster on Daily Kos who posted about "fighting" by driving around putting up pictures on bridges, overpasses, etc. with the letters "GOP" but with the "O" replaced with a hammer and sickle.
And when I open the door and climb in it’s like I’m getting into a Supermarine Spitfire, and when I turn the key, that’s just what it sounds like too… the engine’s old and has just the perfect kind of rattle to keep up that end of the fantasy.
Jesus Christ, these people need a real, actual war on their doorstep to cure them of any delusions that getting in their fucking car to put up some dumb posters is some kind of victory for the March of History.
Maybe the last thing that goes through their head, other than the soft-nosed bullet, will be the thought that perhaps LARPing as a Billy Badass is quite a bit different than the real thing.
Wait, so a commie is going around accusing the GOP of being communist?
That’s levels of insanity I don’t think any of our erstwhile trolls here could manage.
Hello!! RED states?? Not to mention all those connections to the KGB?? C’mon, get with the New McCarthyism!
Oh, jeez, just thought about what is going on on the International Space Station. We should discreetly offer to let the Russian cosmonauts defect.
The head of the Russian space agency reportedly threatened to crash it into the US.
ENB was making some decent points about the Ukraine debate, until she used Affect instead of Effect.
Putin’s “Favorite Nazi” —Volodymyr Zelensky—who is Jewish and had relatives who died in the Holocaust as well as others who served in the Red Army in WWII
https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-698674
NOTE TO THE UKRAINIAN PEOPLE: If THIS is who you elect as your President you really need to work on this whole “Nefarious Nazi” thing. Frankly, you SUCK at it!
So his relatives were victims of both Hitler and Stalin*? Wow! Now here's a man who really can say: "Both sides!"
*(Never forget, Stalin exiled, imprisoned, or murdered 80 % of his best and brightest Officers, leaving the rest in an impossible bind. Also, Soviet soldiers actually had casualties from starvation, doubtless due to Stalin's agriculural policies combined with Nazi seiges.)
Reason readers already know about Petr Beckmann. Now find out about Michael Shellenberger.
Counterpoint: Ukraine demonstrates that the Constitutional right to bear arms is superior to the right to make Molotov cocktails when you are seriously fucked.
newest nations on Earth. Make no mistake Russia has the strength, the will and reason to turn the Donbass into sovereign nations, in name if not fact. Do they have the right?
What are the rights of great nations fearful for their security? Did the US have the right to invade Afghanistan and Iraq? Weren't there actual attacks? How has Russia been attacked. Weren't they just supposed to be goody goody like us when we let Hussein develop chemical weapons...Oopsie, that turned out to be a lie didn't it? We didn't know that at the time now did we?
What are economic sanctions except a prelude to war? Sanctions are an act of war. Something else everyone seems to forget. Tarriffs and boycotts are internal matters unlike disguised blockades forbidding the flow of money and goods over an avowed enemy's borders. We declared war on Russia with the first sanction levied back in the early days of its reformation when they were anxious to be our friend. Reminds me of the ignorant Kennedy administration when it made an enemy of Cuba. Fidel's assassin was much more successful than Kennedy's who tried to strike first. Assassinations are also acts of war when the target is a citizen of a foreign country. https://wix9ja.com.ng/