Brickbat: You Have to Move

With a new rent control law taking effect on May 1, many landlords in St. Paul, Minnesota, particularly small landlords and those who rent to low-income people, are raising rents, converting their buildings to condominiums, or selling them. The Pioneer Press reports this is exactly what critics of the measure said would happen. Voters approved the rent control referendum in November. It limits rent increases to no more than 3 percent a year and does not allow them to be raised to market rates when an apartment is vacated.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
People working against central planning to negative consequences? Who could have foreseen this?
This wasn't the intent! Blame the kulaks and wreckers!
Blame the other party. Blame the people not in power. Blame the politicians and the preachers. Blame the person who doesn't care enough. But don't blame me because I had good intentions.
Dee hardest hit.
Weirdly, all these idiotic measures seem to come from one party. Funny that.
Obviously an impact of systemic racism in the Democratic Party.
A progressive policy that kills small time business in favor of large corporate renters?
H mmmm where is obl?
Laughing too hard to type?
This is the lease of OBLl’s concerns.
Unintended consequences are not unforeseen.
The real problem are those who think one can change reality by a simple vote. The tyranny of good intentions.
p.s. Some years ago I offhandedly remarked the old proverb, "The road to hell is paved with good intentions". The person I was talking to, who was a political activist, had never heard that phrase before, and had no idea what it meant. The idea that good intentions don't automatically lead to good results was foreign to him. He as not a progressive though, but a conservative, and had been going through life thinking all bad policies came from politicians and voters who wanted the bad outcomes. So this thinking isn't limited to just one side of the fence.
We're going to file that in another brady story of things that never happened
Dream time is real time!
Yup. Conservative political activist walking around going "What is this 'hell' of which you speak? I know not, for I've not heard of it. I've been too busy lynching Jussie Smollett."
Even if it actually happened, in earnest, it still sounds an awful lot like "I got duped by a retard."
Spend a dozen years in the Republican Party apparatus, and you run across people like this. Definitely more in the Democrats, but idea that the GOP is free of good intention politics is a bit naive.
"This is the right thing, therefore it can only lead to right outcomes".
I meet plenty of people on these very forums who are persistent in the notion that they aren't retarded.
I haven't met anyone who hasn't heard of the phrase, but I have met more than a few that I genuinely think don't understand it.
Yeahbut...The idea that all the negative outcomes we see in the economy recently are *actually* unintended seems to indicate an irrational fear of rational conclusions; if said conclusions might be called "conspiracy theories"*. If current conditions lead to more centralized ownership/control of physical property...well, I don't think it's far-fetched to think some ominous, shadowy, probably-not-really-reptilian folks find that a desirable outcome, even while denying any hand in its' coming to pass.
*-please note: the people doing the "dismissal by claim of conspiracy theory" are the villains in the story. The Demwits doing their bidding are truly innocent of any understanding of economics.
Do not blame conspiracy theories, when good old fashioned human stupidity and incompetence can explain it. Paraphrased, I know.
The difference between conspiracy theory and true is about 3 months in today's world
Conspiracy Theories need a spoiler alert.
I know two landlords who are selling their properties. They are giving the existing tenants the first chance to buy. With the market prices of houses exploding, and government's ability to take away the profits from renting, they'd be foolish not to sell.
Law seems to be working exactly as designed and planned then. It's not every day you see a law accomplish exactly what the people who proposed it knew it would do. Good on you, St. Paul City Council! You achieved your objective of reducing low-priced housing! Well done. Once all those filthy poors are forced to move somewhere else, your city's median income will go up and you're on your way to being a posh place to live! All it took was "encouraging" them to move along!
Just wait until they set a $30/hour minimum wage.
A couple more years at 7.5% inflation and the 30 dollar an hour minimum wage will arrive on its own.
Sooo...what you're saying is "The filthy white supremacist Republicans' resistance to limitless government largesse, ???????????? the boundless greed of the corporations, will make prices go up." Or did you mean the shorter "Because Trump"?
~source, "The DNC's Big Book of Economic Hand Waves, Rationalizations and Excuses, 2022-2026"
They'll all be above average income, and their kids will all get above average grades.
Lol. THEN they can engage in their performative progressivism while minimizing the cost in rapes, murders, open-air drug markets and sidewalk scatatoria*. It will also drive out some of those low-end clingers who are still striving for social mobility. Can't. Have. That. Unless it occurs at the pleasure of politicians.
*-c'mon, English! How can "scatatoria" not be a real word?
Lots of made up words with no real meaning are used every day by fascist propagandists.
I'm curious how rental markets will develop over the next two decades. Condominiums suck from my perspective. You have all the downsides of both living in an apartment and owning a home. They are massively expensive and not easy to offload if you have to move again, but if you can't turn a decent profit off a rental property, then the supply is going to dry up.
I dunno. If I had a family I would rather have a house. But impossible to afford a house in some cities. But as a single guy it's perfect. It's cheaper than renting (really, it is), and the condo fees cover all the lawn, gardening, and outside maintenance. Heck, not even a special assessment for a complex wide re-roofing.
I just don't need a place like in the picture above. What the heck would I do with a full acre of front lawn? I get that it's traditional, and I have no problem with people imagining they're a country lord in a manor, but it's just not me. I've too much redneck in me, so I would end up just parking my beaters on the lawn and use the garage as a mancave.
"I would end up just parking my beaters on the lawn and use the garage as a mancave."
What part of the above is not preferable to "a cell equal to the other cells, and they take care of the stuff I that makes it look nice to the people driving by"?
Might you be over-estimating the amount of "redneck" in you? No offense meant, but I've lectured people on the physical, spiritual and financial benefits of rural living in the past, and then on reflection realized it had been 40+ years since I'd lived in a metro area smaller than a half million. Kinda sneaks up on ya...
"
I'm with you on this one, Trollificus. The beaters on the lawn and me in the garage sounds a lot better than "included" landscaping.
Of course, the place I'm living is officially a "Village" and not even a "City", so...
You can take the boy out of the redneck, but you can't take the redneck out of the boy.
Plus a house means maintenance. Why would I want to maintain a full fucking manor like in the picture, when it's just me? It's a complete waste.
Heck, not even a special assessment for a complex wide re-roofing.
What condo complex you living in? I had continuous special assessments for anything that was 'property-wide'.
The re-roofing was planned for, not an unexpected expense.
Yeah, I may have I lucked out by not living in a complex that chose to finance everything with special assessments. I have friends where it seems like their places impose new special assessments just to repair broken sprinkler heads.
Condos are like the end of the chain. The last to go up and the first to go down.
Socialists are the dumbest animals.
Yet the most dangerous.
If they are so stupid, how did they get in charge of media, Hollywood, counting votes, New York, California, Illinois, the senate and the congress and the White House?
Riddle me that one.
They vote.
Vicious, animal cunning?
Like a rattlesnake, but less cuddly.
Promising to steal from everyone and give the proceeds to you.
Voters approved the rent control referendum in November. It limits rent increases to no more than 3 percent a year and does not allow them to be raised to market rates when an apartment is vacated.
And we wondered why that city burned in 2020. Or was it 2021? Meh.
Because inflation will never be more than 3%, unless it's transitory....
It's transitioning from inflation to New Normal. Respect pronouns.
Again, a progressive "sounds good" measure does exactly as predicted, hurting the people on the very bottom rung of the "owner" class and doing its tiny part in funneling every single dollar up to the top.
This is so unsurprising that even my complete lack of surprise, isn't surprising.
Comments closed.
Comments closed.
Comments closed.
Comments closed.
Seems Reason is getting butt hurt by their readers!
It's not even like there's anything new in there either... Same callouts for yellow sellout journalisming noodlewrists with the Libertarian values of Marx.
Vox Populi, vox Dei.
Another place to move from.
Another clue to the political leanings of Google auto-correct.
It insists I capitalize the second "vox", presumably because it doesn't know Latin, just left wing magazines. And it capitalized populi on its own.
If only people would refrain from responding to incentives!
Just think what a boon this will be for the county homeless problem-solving think tanks. Since there will be more homeless people, they will be able to ask for an increased budget, more meetings per month (thus a larger coffee and bagel budget), larger computer screens to use for their power points, and increased pay per meeting per member.
Win Win!