Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Television

Tech-Noir Thriller The Girl Before Glitches With Muddled Storytelling

Novel adaptation struggles to separate two parallel tales.

Glenn Garvin | 2.16.2022 2:10 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
girlbefore_1161x653 | HBO Max
"The Girl Before" (HBO Max)

The Girl Before. Available now on HBO Max.

Oh masochism, thy name is woman. At least, that's the case in The Girl Before, HBO Max's new suspense drama, in which the pretty and well-educated female characters indulge themselves with a steady romantic diet of liars, manipulators, sadists, control freaks and murderers, then put themselves in thrall to totalitarian houses. That's right, houses. Would you knowingly rent a computerized house that prohibited pictures, ornaments, carpets, rugs, books, magazines and about 200 other perfectly ordinary items?

Perhaps more importantly—well, perhaps; sorting out the various levels of preposterous tomfoolery in The Girl Before is a complex business—would you date the architect-owner of such a house? The women of The Girl Before clamor for the attentions of their landlord, who they consider not only charming but philosophically well-grounded. "You can see his point," observes one with admiration. "He's a minimalist architect. If you design something for a certain way of living, why let people just do what they want with it?"

The Girl Before is based on the 2016 novel of the same name by British suspense writer JP Delaney (who, with British screenwriter Marissa Lestrade, wrote the adaptation). A joint production with BBC One, it aired in Great Britain last year, where critics mostly liked it. Which is why we threw all their TV critics overboard along with that tea.

The show follows the parallel stories of two young women (Emma, played by Jessica Plummer, and Jane, played by Gugu Mbatha-Raw) who live in a highly wired but otherwise austerely designed house at One Folgate Street in London—but three years apart. Each of them is smitten not only by the house but by its cryptic owner Edward (David Oyelowo, Star Wars: Rebels), who denies there's anything unusual about his buildings. "I don't actually think of myself as a minimalist," he says. "When you relentlessly eradicate everything unnecessary or imperfect, it's surprising how little is left."

Except computer glitches, that is. Showers, stove burners and lights turn themselves on and off at random times, sometimes inconveniently, sometimes a wee bit more ominously than that. The house's data monitors—which Edward assures the women will only capture "almost nothing Google or Facebook wouldn't know about you" (really, not exactly a comforting thought)—turn out to be a leviathan bank of blinking, beeping computers carefully concealed in a massive underground storage area. Though there are occasional hints of a supernatural presence in One Folgate, they're all red herrings; though The Girl Before offers a goodly number of allusions to The Haunting, particularly when it comes to past deaths in the house, it really owes more to the libidinous AI running amok through Julie Christie's house in Demon Seed.

Red herrings, however, are axiomatic in suspense films. What drives The Girl Before off the rails, distressingly early in its interminable four-hour running time, is a simple incomprehension of movie/TV storytelling grammar by the filmmakers. The suspense is driven by the similarity in the stories of Emma and Jane. They're both rising young and pretty business executives, seemingly with bright futures but both concealing fractures in their souls (Emma had a terrifying encounter with a knife-wielding burglar; Jane, a late-term miscarriage) that leave them vulnerable to manipulation.

Each of them winds up dating the gruff, stony-hearted Edward after identically artless propositions ("I'd like to have a relationship with you") followed by identically boorish promises that their hookups will be devoid of "all the clutter of conventional relationships" like flowers, candlelight dinners, or other romantic gestures, and will end as soon as anybody (especially Edward) decides they're bored. Through split scene effects, we even see that he's giving the women the same gifts.

I haven't read Delany's book, but I'm told by friends who have that the women's stories are mostly kept separate, chapter by chapter, so it's not difficult to keep track of what's being done to whom. That's not the case in the TV show, where the stories are cross-cut so frequently, even within scenes, that it becomes difficult to tell which woman's story you're watching—especially when the two of them have such similar appearances. As the shows progress and they begin mucking around with their hairstyles, difficult morphs into near-impossible and all the doppelganger gimmickry makes it feel like you're sitting through every scene twice. Which, as any good minimalist can tell you, is about 1.5 times too many.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: How Drug Cartels and Federal Import Restrictions May Cancel Your Guacamole Plans

Glenn Garvin is a former contributing editor at Reason. 

TelevisionGlenn Garvin TV Reviews
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (7)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. sarcasmic   3 years ago

    Just finished Raised By Wolves on HBO Max. Still haven't decided if I liked it or not.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      I watched... I think the first season? It left me with a bit of a 'huh' feeling.

      1. EmeldaCort   3 years ago

        I make 85 dollars each hour for working an online job at home. KLA02 I never thought I could do it but my best friend makes 10000 bucks every month working this job and she recommended me to learn more about it. The potential with this is endless.
        For more detail …. http://guest.link/TCu

  2. mad.casual   3 years ago

    well-educated female characters

    They may be well-educated, but what really matters is, "Are they clean and articulate?"

    1. mad.casual   3 years ago

      ROFLMAO!

      Psycho would've been a great movie except Marion Crane was just a stupid secretary.

      LOL.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      They speak so well.

  3. Hilde S. Saldana   3 years ago

    [JOIN NOW] I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($200 to $300 / hr.) online from my laptop. Last month I got cheek of nearly 30,000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don’t have to go office, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this job. I really thanks to my friend who refer me this:-
    ..
    SITE….., http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'Banal Horror': Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process

Billy Binion | 5.29.2025 5:27 PM

Supreme Court Unanimously Agrees To Curb Environmental Red Tape That Slows Down Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 5.29.2025 3:31 PM

What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations

Jack Nicastro | 5.29.2025 3:16 PM

Original Sin, the Biden Cover-Up Book, Is Better Late Than Never

Robby Soave | 5.29.2025 2:23 PM

Did 'Activist Judges' Derail Trump's Tariffs?

Eric Boehm | 5.29.2025 2:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!