Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Black Lives Matter

Who's In Charge of Black Lives Matter's Millions of Dollars?

"A giant ghost ship full of treasure drifting in the night with no captain, no discernible crew, and no clear direction."

Robby Soave | 2.1.2022 2:56 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
spnphotosseven787468 | Splash News/Newscom
(Splash News/Newscom)

Black Lives Matter (BLM) was more than just a hashtag—it was an entire movement for racial equality, criminal justice reform, and police accountability. It was also a cultural moment and serious moneymaker: The organization raised some $90 million in 2020 alone.

That year was a banner one for racial justice protests. The summer of 2020 saw the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police: In response, millions of people all over the world participated in Black Lives Matter activism. (The cause wasn't—and still isn't—necessarily partisan. Even Republican Sen. Mitt Romney marched.)

That $90 million is an impressive total. But according to multiple media reports, two-thirds of it—$60 million—remain unspent. What was spent, and how it was spent, also raises serious questions. And then there's the biggest mystery of all: Who is currently in charge of BLM? No one, it seems, has any idea. The Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation is, as far as anyone can tell, leaderless. The founders are no longer involved, and the people they supposedly installed to succeed them never actually took the job.

That's all according to a series of bombshell reports in both left and right media. At the very least, they should give anyone who is considering donating to BLM serious pause.

Listeners with good memories will recall that last year, BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors came under fire for purchasing several million-dollar homes at the exact time the George Floyd protests were underway.

In a statement, BLM said that all of this was on the up and up: "Patrisse Cullors is the Executive Director of Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation (BLMGNF). She serves in this role in a volunteer capacity and does not receive a salary or benefits. Patrisse has received a total of $120,000 since the organization's inception in 2013, for duties such as serving as spokesperson and engaging in political education work. Patrisse did not receive any compensation after 2019."

And that very well might be the case. Cullors has many sources of income: book deals, speaking gigs, a media production arrangement. She's a celebrity activist, and that lifestyle can pay. Nevertheless, after the fallout from that story, Cullors resigned as president of BLMGNF.

In May 2021, she announced that her successors would be Makani Themba, chief strategist at Higher Ground Change Strategies, and Monifa Bandele, chief operating officer at Time's Up Foundation.

But just a few months ago, in September, Themba and Bandele released a curious statement: Neither of them had ever assumed the role. They had not been able to "come to an agreement with the acting leadership council" and had ultimately declined the position.

Thanks to everyone for your support. pic.twitter.com/E268EUpVo4

— Makani Themba (@Makani_Themba) September 3, 2021

In a subsequent tweet, Themba clarified that she was never onboarded, did not access BLM's funds, and was generally clueless about how the money was spent.

According to The Washington Examiner, the remaining board members of BLMGNF are Shalomyah Bowers and Raymond Howard. Bowers, "served as the treasurer for multiple activist organizations run by Cullors, including BLM PAC and a Los Angeles-based jail reform group that paid Cullors $20,000 a month and dropped nearly $26,000 for 'meetings' at a luxury Malibu beach resort in 2019."

According to additional reporting done by New York magazine:

In 2019, while working on an ultimately successful ballot initiative, Reform LA Jails collected more than $1.4 million in contributions. More than half was paid out to just four recipients. The group sent more than $270,000 to Bowers's consulting company, as well as some $211,000 to Asha Bandele, a friend of Cullors's who co-wrote her memoir. About $205,000 went to a company Cullors operates with her spouse, Janaya & Patrisse Consulting. And about $86,000 was paid to Trap Heals LLC, an entertainment, clothing, and consulting company started by Damon Turner, the father of Patrisse Cullors's child."

Fundraising ethicists consulted by both the Examiner and New York magazine found the arrangements extremely shady.

"This is grossly irregular and improper for a nonprofit with $60 million in its coffers," Paul Kamenar of the National Legal and Policy Center told The Examiner.

CharityWatch Executive Director Laurie Styron described BLM to New York magazine as a "giant ghost ship full of treasure drifting in the night with no captain, no discernible crew, and no clear direction."

These are damning descriptions of an organization that lead such an important—and well-funded—social movement. BLMGNF has some explaining to do.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Germany's Failed Bid To Be the Global Climate Leader

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Black Lives MatterActivism
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (90)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    Evil Marxist terrorists.

    1. Minadin   3 years ago

      Indeed:

      https://notthebee.com/article/so-blm-gave-6-million-to-its-co-founders-wifes-charity-to-buy-the-old-communist-hq-building-in-canada

  2. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    Black Lives Matter (BLM) was more than just a hashtag—it was an entire movement for racial equality, criminal justice reform, and police accountability.

    If you start off with a faulty premise you really hurt the rest of the article

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      I kind of agree. The media wanted you to believe it was a hashtag and a slogan, because that drew attention away from a living, breathing organization with specific missions and visions for the country, not least of which was "the destruction of the nuclear family."

      So eventually the media dithered and called it... "both".

      1. Mike Laursen   3 years ago

        I’m not sure the media premeditated that confusion. In the post-Twitter world, every entity is a real thing and a hashtag, and the distinction between the two is blurred.

        1. VULGAR MADMAN   3 years ago

          Shut up. They knew what they were doing.

        2. RabbitHead   3 years ago

          The donations weren't going to a hashtag, there had to be something on the other end

          1. Ayuleen   3 years ago

            Yes, "some antiracist activists". I wonder how many people do send their money for what they believe to be some charitable or good political purpose, without even knowing the name of the organization /entity to which they are sending the money (let alone knowing anything more about them), but I wouldn´t be surprised if the answer is many, many people.

        3. DesigNate   3 years ago

          This is my shocked face

  3. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   3 years ago

    BLM is like George Costanza's Human Fund. They'll take your check but they really don't do anything.

    1. Sevo   3 years ago

      turd is a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.

  4. Illocust   3 years ago

    Not actually all that bad of a scandal. Just not spending the money is one of the least bad things an activist organization could do.

    1. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

      I don't think anyone believes the money hasn't been diverted somewhere. We can't find evidence it's been spent, which is not the same as saying it hasn't been spent. This Bowers person probably managed to misappropriate large amounts into another established scams to line some pockets.

      There's not $60 million still floating around anywhere. I'd be surprised if it's over $10 million.

      I mean, we already know that BLMGNF transferred millions to BLM Canada, run by Cullors' husband, who promptly spent over $6 million to buy a mansion in Canada. There's got to be literally dozens of transactions like that involving the same 5-10 families.

      #RacialJusticeInAction

      1. Illocust   3 years ago

        Okay, that's the part of the scandal I was missing. Makes a lot more sense now.

      2. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        That's Khan-Cullors...

        pronounced Con-Cullors...

        and screamed "KH-A-A-A-A-A-N-Cullors!!!

      3. Brett Bellmore   3 years ago

        That was my thought. Presumed to be in the coffers on account of no record of it being spent, and actually still in the coffers? Different things, until the organization has been audited.

        My bet is that the people actually calling the shots thought it was time to cash in, and rolled up the operation after looting it.

        The real question? Those riots were accompanied by highly organized, systematic looting. Caravans of people being dropped off, emptying stores, and scooting.

        Wanna bet the organizers of THAT weren't the same people?

  5. Kungpowderfinger   3 years ago

    I’d argue that the IRS has been “encouraged” to keep their prestigious nose out of BLM’s financials, especially given the political climate and the Democrat’s critical dependence on the “black vote”.

    And being that legacy journalists get their marching orders from the same place the IRS does, BLM leadership can rest assured that they’re in the clear to do whatever they want with the money.

    1. MK Ultra   3 years ago

      Despicable, but accurate and expected.

  6. Rockstevo   3 years ago

    They are saving the money for the upcoming elections

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      They'll need fortifying.

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        5hey'll need a fortress to deal with the seige they deserve from law enforcefent.

        1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

          Correction: Not "enforcefent." I mean "enforcement." Geez, all this talk has put the word "Fentanyl" on my brain. Good thing the mere word doesn't give a contact high.

  7. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    If you're asking this question now, you're so far behind the "news" cycle, you might as well be CNN.

  8. Unicorn Abattoir   3 years ago

    Guessing that when all this shakes out, people are going to jail.

    1. Dillinger   3 years ago

      what if BLM gets the police defunded before all this shakes out?

    2. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

      That's a good one. I laughed.

    3. MK Ultra   3 years ago

      I will take that wager.

  9. Adans smith   3 years ago

    The whole thing is a scam.

  10. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    Oh, and no, it was not the fever-dream rantings of Alex Jones that Seattle was considering handing over the east precinct to BLM, it was seriously being considered.

  11. Ska   3 years ago

    So, here's their last filed 990:

    link from IRS 990 search

    It shows: no contributions or grants, no assets, no liabilities, no expenses, and no program gifts. The executives spend no time either. The 2020 return is late or not filed.

    Nice.

    1. Ska   3 years ago

      Oh, and you can always inquire with their tax preparers.

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        Doesn't meqn you'll get an answer without a subpoena.

    2. Ska   3 years ago

      I guess href doesn't work anymore, or I fucked it up.

      https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/824862489_201912_990EZ_2021102019107621.pdf

    3. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

      Did you read the last page? They say they only care about black queer and trans. Hetero blacks need not apply

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

        Well, the followed up at the end with "all black lives along the gender spectrum" so...

  12. Carl Cameron   3 years ago

    BLM is a psyop created to prevent a left/right coalition against police abuse by racializing the whole thing,

    1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

      That's sure what it looks like.

      If BLM really cared about legitimate instances of police brutality or false imprisonment or "The War On (Some) Drugs" or "The War On Sex Workers," wouldn't they have used their millions of Dollars to free the real victims of these injustices? And wouldn't Colin Kaepernick have done the same with his millions if he was serious?

      True friends of Liberty are few and far between.

  13. Dillinger   3 years ago

    >>it was an entire movement

    no.

  14. Bill Godshall   3 years ago

    "Who's In Charge of Black Lives Matter's Millions of Dollars?"

    I and many other commenters repeatedly pointed out that BLM was a group of racists, socialists and marxists who falsely accused white American, Republicans and police of being racists and rioted in dozens of cities and got lots of wealthy corporate exec apologiest to give them tons of publicity and money.

    BLM made Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton appear as amateurs when it came to playing and exploiting the race card for their own selfish financial benefit.

    1. Bill Godshall   3 years ago

      Seems like it take Soave a year or two to figure out what many of us have been saying (in comments) ever since long time criminal George Floyd died from an fentanyl overdose 19 months ago while resisting arrest.

      1. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

        I don't want to accuse Robbie of this, but there's a lot of people who are afraid to come out with a controversial take when an issue is hot. There's a lot of moral cowardice of people who are afraid to confront liars and grifters on loud and emotional issues; that's why those are exactly the tools they use the most.

        1. wareagle   3 years ago

          Perhaps those afflicted with moral cowardice should work somewhere other than the media.

        2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

          This is what Christopher Hitchens referred to as people "showing up right at the end with their tin cups, and emptying them upon the embers."

          There is a tendency to come out when it's "safe". We're starting to see this now with the covid pandemic.

          1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

            Sorry, Peter Hitchens said that. Although I have no doubt Christopher would have a similar sentiment.

            1. mad.casual   3 years ago

              Chris would've said something more along the lines of "poor, inner city Christians showed up to empty their tin cups on the embers" and then be bewildered about how he could've possibly offended anyone.

              1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

                Oh, The Hitch wouldn't have been bewildered at all. Recall, The Hitch said if Rev. Jerry Falwell had an enema, they could have buried him in a matchbox. 🙂

                1. mad.casual   3 years ago

                  No, he would've been. Note that I said 'poor, inner city Christians' and not just 'Christians'. He had no trouble taking swipes at Christians for Christianity (or Jews for Judaism, etc.). It was when he gave every indication of either being bare-assedly ignorant of history and society or knowingly using other social dogwhistles as intended alongside religion that he suddenly got befuddled about how the human mind or humanity as a whole operates and disappeared from Twitter. Carlos Danger's cries of "I was hacked!" showed more consistency and integrity.

                  "[Antiochus] weaned many people away from the sacrifices, the circumcisions, the belief in a special relationship with God, and the other reactionary manifestations of an ancient and cruel faith.” Yeah, the guy that commissioned a temple to Zeus with an alter literally made from the ashes of human sacrifices was a tipping point for society's Great Atheist Leap Forward that would've freed us from the barbarism and stupidity of ancient religions. Sure, Hitch, go on wondering why people have such a negative view of anti-Semitism, I mean Atheism, with you at the helm.

                  I get what he's trying to say and don't disagree with the notion that it would be cool if The Enlightenment had come around circa 100 B.C. but it's troubling to think of a more abjectly wrong way, along several dimensions, to say it. In a very real sense, he's just shy of saying, "If Hitler had risen to power 2000 yrs. ago, we'd all be better off."

    2. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

      BLM is a Super-PAC. The DNC is the one in charge of their money, ultimately.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

        Thank you--I was hoping someone here remembered that BLM is basically just a slush fund for the DNC, and so their financials are really beside the point.

        The DNC was flat fucking broke up to early 2020, then suddenly became flush with cash after the Floyd riots started.

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

      BLM made Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton appear as amateurs when it came to playing and exploiting the race card for their own selfish financial benefit.

      Jesse Jackson never got SHIT painted down Fifth Avenue in Manhattan.

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        Not that Jesse wouldn't want it for himself.

  15. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

    And that very well might be the case. Cullors has many sources of income: book deals, speaking gigs, a media production arrangement. She's a celebrity activist, and that lifestyle can pay. Nevertheless, after the fallout from that story, Cullors resigned as president of BLMGNF.

    I notice you didn't represent any of the grift from previous organizations she's been involved in running. Like, the fact that she has a history of being extremely shady with her supposed charitable funds and then ends up running BLM is a big problem, even if she wasn't directly stealing from BLM. It means she's got no experience in actually running a reputable organization which is how we end up with a situation like this.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

      It means she's got no experience in actually running a reputable organization which is how we end up with a situation like this.

      But she does have lots of experience running left-wing grifts, which made her the perfect choice to run BLM.

  16. mad.casual   3 years ago

    "A giant ghost ship full of treasure drifting in the night with no captain, no discernible crew, and no clear direction."

    If they don't elect a board and all carry membership cards, how can we be sure they even exist at all?

  17. Rev. Arthur L. Kuckland   3 years ago

    Let's play the are you racist game
    Your favorite movie is:
    A: American history x
    B: Django unchained
    C: it's a wonderful life
    D: birth of a nation

    Answers
    A: your racist for promoting nazis
    B: your racist for want to see white people use the word nigger
    C: your racist because it depicts a utopian town with no blacks
    D: actually... Your good, nothing wrong with this movie.

    1. mad.casual   3 years ago

      What about The Spirit?

    2. Spiritus Mundi   3 years ago

      Which Birth of a Nation? The one where the KKK saves a town from black union soliders?

  18. wareagle   3 years ago

    To be fair, BLM never had a captain or a direction, just a grift.

  19. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

    Well, they didn't get a Penny from me, so at least I don't have to sail the Seven Seas looking to get my money back from the "ghost ship."

    My stock response I haven't used yet with a BLM activist is: "Whether a life matters or not is entirely up to the individual. I am in nobody's way so don't don't get in mine!"

    1. Zeb   3 years ago

      Matters to whom? In what way?

      Most lives don't matter to most people.

      1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        Ah, but each life ideally should matter to the one who possesses the life. And if the BLM crowd think their lives matter, they should be more self-respecting than to grift, loot, and destroy.

  20. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

    Robby's coiff looks more like Boris Johnson's. He also didn't say the full hyphenated name of the Co-Founder Patrice Khan-Cuillors. And didn't he at least partially answer his own question when mentioning her real estate deals?

    Did someone "grab the hair" with Rico Suave and make him forget to read the promptor and make him "forget" the content?

  21. Ranter   3 years ago

    Well, we’ve already been told that math and accuracy are racist, I bet these hucksters would readily qualify accounting as being racist as well.

    Race grifters gonna grift.
    Maybe someone on the media could stop trying to censor Rogan, and interview these clowns to show just how easily they duped all the progressive idiots in this world.

  22. mad.casual   3 years ago

    That $90 million is an impressive total. But according to multiple media reports, two-thirds of it—$60 million—remain unspent. What was spent, and how it was spent, also raises serious questions. And then there's the biggest mystery of all: Who is currently in charge of BLM? No one, it seems, has any idea. The Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation is, as far as anyone can tell, leaderless. The founders are no longer involved, and the people they supposedly installed to succeed them never actually took the job.

    Dibs!

    Suckers...

    1. Jerryskids   3 years ago

      You're a moron if you think there's $60 million floating around some where. The media knows damn well that money's gone, they're just pretending that, since there's no record of it being spent, it must not have been spent because to suggest otherwise is to suggest BLM might be just a straight-up criminal organization and that would be racist. BLM is a scam, it has always been a scam, these people are crooks, the money is gone, it went to hookers and blow.

      1. A Thinking Mind   3 years ago

        I just read up on Cullors' wikipedia page. She grew up poor, in section 8 housing, and then got a dual Bachlor's in Religion and Philosophy, and then an MFA. She teaches something at Otis College of Art and Design.

        Beyond that, she's done nothing in her life that isn't activism. So one might wonder how she's buying MULTIPLE million dollar properties. She's published one book, though a second one is pending, and I can't tell how well that first book sold. There's no indication that her husband/spouse/partner (whatever they are) is particularly wealthy.

        I understand that people should be compensated even when devoting their lives to charitable works, but getting ridiculously wealthy doing it is extremely shifty.

      2. mad.casual   3 years ago

        Psst! Don't tell anyone but if you agree that the $60M, which doesn't exist, is mine because I called dibs, I'll cut you in. Consider the deal carefully, otherwise, the public and/or media might just find out that you don't honor the pre-Western tradition of dibs/finders-keepers and are employing systemic racism and racially-privileged accounting math to deny me my $60M.

        P.S. - Would it assuage your conscience any if I generated an NFT that proved I'm the owner of the $60M?

        1. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

          Sorry, I meant that for Jerryskids.

      3. The Encogitationer   3 years ago

        How can it go to blow? Blow is white. Black Tar Heroin wold be more like it.

  23. Alan@.4   3 years ago

    What isn’t “shady”, using a reasonably polite term, about this BLM outfit? I await clarification/answers, though not with my breath held.

    1. mad.casual   3 years ago

      What isn’t “shady”, using a reasonably polite term, about this BLM outfit?

      I'm pretty sure that question is racist.

  24. jdgalt1   3 years ago

    Poetic justice. Useful idiots donate millions to a terrorist group and some of its leaders steal the money for themselves. The only thing that would make it all more perfect is if BLM burns the houses down.

    1. Fats of Fury   3 years ago

      It would be super poetic justice if a Nigerian/prince/president/general/minister scammed them out of the dough.

  25. LarryA   3 years ago

    "BLMGNF has some explaining to do."

    I'm not holding my breath for it.

  26. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   3 years ago

    Fundraising ethicists consulted by both the Examiner and New York magazine found the arrangements extremely shady.

    This may be the most unintentionally funny part of this article.

    "We're too afraid to call this what it is, which is obvious to anyone over the age of nine who can think, so we consulted with some ethicists within the field, and they inform US that this may be outside of nominal boundaries."

    We're now "following the science" to discover if BLM is shady or not.

    1. mad.casual   3 years ago

      This may be the most unintentionally funny part of this article.

      Remember when the OK sign was a white supremacist dogwhistle? Reading these comments in that lens is also entertaining.

      The ethicists aren't saying these deals are shady, they're just being niggardly with their criticisms.

  27. Fats of Fury   3 years ago

    Anyone check here? She ain't in noways tarred.

    https://www.fitsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/clinton-blackface.jpg

  28. Wearenotperfect   3 years ago

    "At the very least, they should give anyone who is considering donating to BLM serious pause."

    What's the big deal? What's good for the Trump Organization is good for the gander!

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   3 years ago

      Shush, simp.

    2. Spiritus Mundi   3 years ago

      Or the Clinton foundation. People seek power to make themselves rich. Nothing new.

  29. Spiritus Mundi   3 years ago

    Careful Robby, you are close to calling the BLM grifters of being N...... rich.

  30. Marshal   3 years ago

    Black Lives Matter (BLM) was more than just a hashtag—it was an entire movement for racial equality, criminal justice reform, and police accountability.

    We knew BLM were racial grifters from the first moment when it lied about events in Ferguson to escalate conflict. Every time they've taken action publicly it's been the same. When Floyd was killed the Police Chief immediately fired all 4 officers, which never happens. They were moving to file charges and there was every reason to expect success on reform.

    Then BLM got involved, and quickly before any reasonable possibility of reform agreement. Their insane and extreme demands brought the possibility of reform to a grinding halt - but the riots and donations sure picked up.

  31. JoogerNation   3 years ago

    I can't really be the only one here who knows that BLM was founded by a Jewish guy. Stop blaming black women.

  32. JimboJr   3 years ago

    The height of race-grifters. Money flows directly from every AWFL right into the coffers of BLM marxists so they can buy mansions while complaining about how bad they have it.

  33. jimc5499   3 years ago

    Robby needs to do his homework. BLM was never a non-profit. The group that handled it's finances was. Google "Thousand Currents" and forget the whitewash on their website. They handled the money.

  34. Fist of Etiquette   3 years ago

    and the people they supposedly installed to succeed them never actually took the job.

    That was probably smart.

  35. Robert_Klug   3 years ago

    “Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and turns into a racket.”
    ― Eric Hoffer

  36. Dudley Doesright   3 years ago

    This would be the first justifiable civil forfeiture in history to my knowledge!

  37. JonFrum   3 years ago

    Who cares? It's not my cake.

  38. TJJ2000   3 years ago

    Why? Because that's what you get when Gov-Guns have a full monopoly over EVERYTHING... [WE] mobs go to war with each over on who gets the almighty POWER of legal GUNS!

    Wake-up; Nazism (National Socialism) has been tried and tried and tried again. There is a reason the USA was so successful BEFORE people started poking guns at people for Nazism.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!