Who's In Charge of Black Lives Matter's Millions of Dollars?
"A giant ghost ship full of treasure drifting in the night with no captain, no discernible crew, and no clear direction."
Black Lives Matter (BLM) was more than just a hashtag—it was an entire movement for racial equality, criminal justice reform, and police accountability. It was also a cultural moment and serious moneymaker: The organization raised some $90 million in 2020 alone.
That year was a banner one for racial justice protests. The summer of 2020 saw the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police: In response, millions of people all over the world participated in Black Lives Matter activism. (The cause wasn't—and still isn't—necessarily partisan. Even Republican Sen. Mitt Romney marched.)
That $90 million is an impressive total. But according to multiple media reports, two-thirds of it—$60 million—remain unspent. What was spent, and how it was spent, also raises serious questions. And then there's the biggest mystery of all: Who is currently in charge of BLM? No one, it seems, has any idea. The Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation is, as far as anyone can tell, leaderless. The founders are no longer involved, and the people they supposedly installed to succeed them never actually took the job.
That's all according to a series of bombshell reports in both left and right media. At the very least, they should give anyone who is considering donating to BLM serious pause.
Listeners with good memories will recall that last year, BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors came under fire for purchasing several million-dollar homes at the exact time the George Floyd protests were underway.
In a statement, BLM said that all of this was on the up and up: "Patrisse Cullors is the Executive Director of Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation (BLMGNF). She serves in this role in a volunteer capacity and does not receive a salary or benefits. Patrisse has received a total of $120,000 since the organization's inception in 2013, for duties such as serving as spokesperson and engaging in political education work. Patrisse did not receive any compensation after 2019."
And that very well might be the case. Cullors has many sources of income: book deals, speaking gigs, a media production arrangement. She's a celebrity activist, and that lifestyle can pay. Nevertheless, after the fallout from that story, Cullors resigned as president of BLMGNF.
In May 2021, she announced that her successors would be Makani Themba, chief strategist at Higher Ground Change Strategies, and Monifa Bandele, chief operating officer at Time's Up Foundation.
But just a few months ago, in September, Themba and Bandele released a curious statement: Neither of them had ever assumed the role. They had not been able to "come to an agreement with the acting leadership council" and had ultimately declined the position.
Thanks to everyone for your support. pic.twitter.com/E268EUpVo4
— Makani Themba (@Makani_Themba) September 3, 2021
In a subsequent tweet, Themba clarified that she was never onboarded, did not access BLM's funds, and was generally clueless about how the money was spent.
According to The Washington Examiner, the remaining board members of BLMGNF are Shalomyah Bowers and Raymond Howard. Bowers, "served as the treasurer for multiple activist organizations run by Cullors, including BLM PAC and a Los Angeles-based jail reform group that paid Cullors $20,000 a month and dropped nearly $26,000 for 'meetings' at a luxury Malibu beach resort in 2019."
According to additional reporting done by New York magazine:
In 2019, while working on an ultimately successful ballot initiative, Reform LA Jails collected more than $1.4 million in contributions. More than half was paid out to just four recipients. The group sent more than $270,000 to Bowers's consulting company, as well as some $211,000 to Asha Bandele, a friend of Cullors's who co-wrote her memoir. About $205,000 went to a company Cullors operates with her spouse, Janaya & Patrisse Consulting. And about $86,000 was paid to Trap Heals LLC, an entertainment, clothing, and consulting company started by Damon Turner, the father of Patrisse Cullors's child."
Fundraising ethicists consulted by both the Examiner and New York magazine found the arrangements extremely shady.
"This is grossly irregular and improper for a nonprofit with $60 million in its coffers," Paul Kamenar of the National Legal and Policy Center told The Examiner.
CharityWatch Executive Director Laurie Styron described BLM to New York magazine as a "giant ghost ship full of treasure drifting in the night with no captain, no discernible crew, and no clear direction."
These are damning descriptions of an organization that lead such an important—and well-funded—social movement. BLMGNF has some explaining to do.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Evil Marxist terrorists.
Indeed:
https://notthebee.com/article/so-blm-gave-6-million-to-its-co-founders-wifes-charity-to-buy-the-old-communist-hq-building-in-canada
Black Lives Matter (BLM) was more than just a hashtag—it was an entire movement for racial equality, criminal justice reform, and police accountability.
If you start off with a faulty premise you really hurt the rest of the article
I kind of agree. The media wanted you to believe it was a hashtag and a slogan, because that drew attention away from a living, breathing organization with specific missions and visions for the country, not least of which was "the destruction of the nuclear family."
So eventually the media dithered and called it... "both".
I’m not sure the media premeditated that confusion. In the post-Twitter world, every entity is a real thing and a hashtag, and the distinction between the two is blurred.
Shut up. They knew what they were doing.
The donations weren't going to a hashtag, there had to be something on the other end
Yes, "some antiracist activists". I wonder how many people do send their money for what they believe to be some charitable or good political purpose, without even knowing the name of the organization /entity to which they are sending the money (let alone knowing anything more about them), but I wouldn´t be surprised if the answer is many, many people.
This is my shocked face
BLM is like George Costanza's Human Fund. They'll take your check but they really don't do anything.
turd is a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
Not actually all that bad of a scandal. Just not spending the money is one of the least bad things an activist organization could do.
I don't think anyone believes the money hasn't been diverted somewhere. We can't find evidence it's been spent, which is not the same as saying it hasn't been spent. This Bowers person probably managed to misappropriate large amounts into another established scams to line some pockets.
There's not $60 million still floating around anywhere. I'd be surprised if it's over $10 million.
I mean, we already know that BLMGNF transferred millions to BLM Canada, run by Cullors' husband, who promptly spent over $6 million to buy a mansion in Canada. There's got to be literally dozens of transactions like that involving the same 5-10 families.
#RacialJusticeInAction
Okay, that's the part of the scandal I was missing. Makes a lot more sense now.
That's Khan-Cullors...
pronounced Con-Cullors...
and screamed "KH-A-A-A-A-A-N-Cullors!!!
That was my thought. Presumed to be in the coffers on account of no record of it being spent, and actually still in the coffers? Different things, until the organization has been audited.
My bet is that the people actually calling the shots thought it was time to cash in, and rolled up the operation after looting it.
The real question? Those riots were accompanied by highly organized, systematic looting. Caravans of people being dropped off, emptying stores, and scooting.
Wanna bet the organizers of THAT weren't the same people?
I’d argue that the IRS has been “encouraged” to keep their prestigious nose out of BLM’s financials, especially given the political climate and the Democrat’s critical dependence on the “black vote”.
And being that legacy journalists get their marching orders from the same place the IRS does, BLM leadership can rest assured that they’re in the clear to do whatever they want with the money.
Despicable, but accurate and expected.
They are saving the money for the upcoming elections
They'll need fortifying.
5hey'll need a fortress to deal with the seige they deserve from law enforcefent.
Correction: Not "enforcefent." I mean "enforcement." Geez, all this talk has put the word "Fentanyl" on my brain. Good thing the mere word doesn't give a contact high.
If you're asking this question now, you're so far behind the "news" cycle, you might as well be CNN.
Guessing that when all this shakes out, people are going to jail.
what if BLM gets the police defunded before all this shakes out?
That's a good one. I laughed.
I will take that wager.
The whole thing is a scam.
Oh, and no, it was not the fever-dream rantings of Alex Jones that Seattle was considering handing over the east precinct to BLM, it was seriously being considered.
So, here's their last filed 990:
link from IRS 990 search
It shows: no contributions or grants, no assets, no liabilities, no expenses, and no program gifts. The executives spend no time either. The 2020 return is late or not filed.
Nice.
Oh, and you can always inquire with their tax preparers.
Doesn't meqn you'll get an answer without a subpoena.
I guess href doesn't work anymore, or I fucked it up.
https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/824862489_201912_990EZ_2021102019107621.pdf
Did you read the last page? They say they only care about black queer and trans. Hetero blacks need not apply
Well, the followed up at the end with "all black lives along the gender spectrum" so...
BLM is a psyop created to prevent a left/right coalition against police abuse by racializing the whole thing,
That's sure what it looks like.
If BLM really cared about legitimate instances of police brutality or false imprisonment or "The War On (Some) Drugs" or "The War On Sex Workers," wouldn't they have used their millions of Dollars to free the real victims of these injustices? And wouldn't Colin Kaepernick have done the same with his millions if he was serious?
True friends of Liberty are few and far between.
>>it was an entire movement
no.
"Who's In Charge of Black Lives Matter's Millions of Dollars?"
I and many other commenters repeatedly pointed out that BLM was a group of racists, socialists and marxists who falsely accused white American, Republicans and police of being racists and rioted in dozens of cities and got lots of wealthy corporate exec apologiest to give them tons of publicity and money.
BLM made Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton appear as amateurs when it came to playing and exploiting the race card for their own selfish financial benefit.
Seems like it take Soave a year or two to figure out what many of us have been saying (in comments) ever since long time criminal George Floyd died from an fentanyl overdose 19 months ago while resisting arrest.
I don't want to accuse Robbie of this, but there's a lot of people who are afraid to come out with a controversial take when an issue is hot. There's a lot of moral cowardice of people who are afraid to confront liars and grifters on loud and emotional issues; that's why those are exactly the tools they use the most.
Perhaps those afflicted with moral cowardice should work somewhere other than the media.
This is what Christopher Hitchens referred to as people "showing up right at the end with their tin cups, and emptying them upon the embers."
There is a tendency to come out when it's "safe". We're starting to see this now with the covid pandemic.
Sorry, Peter Hitchens said that. Although I have no doubt Christopher would have a similar sentiment.
Chris would've said something more along the lines of "poor, inner city Christians showed up to empty their tin cups on the embers" and then be bewildered about how he could've possibly offended anyone.
Oh, The Hitch wouldn't have been bewildered at all. Recall, The Hitch said if Rev. Jerry Falwell had an enema, they could have buried him in a matchbox. 🙂
No, he would've been. Note that I said 'poor, inner city Christians' and not just 'Christians'. He had no trouble taking swipes at Christians for Christianity (or Jews for Judaism, etc.). It was when he gave every indication of either being bare-assedly ignorant of history and society or knowingly using other social dogwhistles as intended alongside religion that he suddenly got befuddled about how the human mind or humanity as a whole operates and disappeared from Twitter. Carlos Danger's cries of "I was hacked!" showed more consistency and integrity.
"[Antiochus] weaned many people away from the sacrifices, the circumcisions, the belief in a special relationship with God, and the other reactionary manifestations of an ancient and cruel faith.” Yeah, the guy that commissioned a temple to Zeus with an alter literally made from the ashes of human sacrifices was a tipping point for society's Great Atheist Leap Forward that would've freed us from the barbarism and stupidity of ancient religions. Sure, Hitch, go on wondering why people have such a negative view of anti-Semitism, I mean Atheism, with you at the helm.
I get what he's trying to say and don't disagree with the notion that it would be cool if The Enlightenment had come around circa 100 B.C. but it's troubling to think of a more abjectly wrong way, along several dimensions, to say it. In a very real sense, he's just shy of saying, "If Hitler had risen to power 2000 yrs. ago, we'd all be better off."
BLM is a Super-PAC. The DNC is the one in charge of their money, ultimately.
Thank you--I was hoping someone here remembered that BLM is basically just a slush fund for the DNC, and so their financials are really beside the point.
The DNC was flat fucking broke up to early 2020, then suddenly became flush with cash after the Floyd riots started.
BLM made Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton appear as amateurs when it came to playing and exploiting the race card for their own selfish financial benefit.
Jesse Jackson never got SHIT painted down Fifth Avenue in Manhattan.
Not that Jesse wouldn't want it for himself.
And that very well might be the case. Cullors has many sources of income: book deals, speaking gigs, a media production arrangement. She's a celebrity activist, and that lifestyle can pay. Nevertheless, after the fallout from that story, Cullors resigned as president of BLMGNF.
I notice you didn't represent any of the grift from previous organizations she's been involved in running. Like, the fact that she has a history of being extremely shady with her supposed charitable funds and then ends up running BLM is a big problem, even if she wasn't directly stealing from BLM. It means she's got no experience in actually running a reputable organization which is how we end up with a situation like this.
It means she's got no experience in actually running a reputable organization which is how we end up with a situation like this.
But she does have lots of experience running left-wing grifts, which made her the perfect choice to run BLM.
"A giant ghost ship full of treasure drifting in the night with no captain, no discernible crew, and no clear direction."
If they don't elect a board and all carry membership cards, how can we be sure they even exist at all?
Let's play the are you racist game
Your favorite movie is:
A: American history x
B: Django unchained
C: it's a wonderful life
D: birth of a nation
Answers
A: your racist for promoting nazis
B: your racist for want to see white people use the word nigger
C: your racist because it depicts a utopian town with no blacks
D: actually... Your good, nothing wrong with this movie.
What about The Spirit?
Which Birth of a Nation? The one where the KKK saves a town from black union soliders?
To be fair, BLM never had a captain or a direction, just a grift.
Well, they didn't get a Penny from me, so at least I don't have to sail the Seven Seas looking to get my money back from the "ghost ship."
My stock response I haven't used yet with a BLM activist is: "Whether a life matters or not is entirely up to the individual. I am in nobody's way so don't don't get in mine!"
Matters to whom? In what way?
Most lives don't matter to most people.
Ah, but each life ideally should matter to the one who possesses the life. And if the BLM crowd think their lives matter, they should be more self-respecting than to grift, loot, and destroy.
Robby's coiff looks more like Boris Johnson's. He also didn't say the full hyphenated name of the Co-Founder Patrice Khan-Cuillors. And didn't he at least partially answer his own question when mentioning her real estate deals?
Did someone "grab the hair" with Rico Suave and make him forget to read the promptor and make him "forget" the content?
Well, we’ve already been told that math and accuracy are racist, I bet these hucksters would readily qualify accounting as being racist as well.
Race grifters gonna grift.
Maybe someone on the media could stop trying to censor Rogan, and interview these clowns to show just how easily they duped all the progressive idiots in this world.
That $90 million is an impressive total. But according to multiple media reports, two-thirds of it—$60 million—remain unspent. What was spent, and how it was spent, also raises serious questions. And then there's the biggest mystery of all: Who is currently in charge of BLM? No one, it seems, has any idea. The Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation is, as far as anyone can tell, leaderless. The founders are no longer involved, and the people they supposedly installed to succeed them never actually took the job.
Dibs!
Suckers...
You're a moron if you think there's $60 million floating around some where. The media knows damn well that money's gone, they're just pretending that, since there's no record of it being spent, it must not have been spent because to suggest otherwise is to suggest BLM might be just a straight-up criminal organization and that would be racist. BLM is a scam, it has always been a scam, these people are crooks, the money is gone, it went to hookers and blow.
I just read up on Cullors' wikipedia page. She grew up poor, in section 8 housing, and then got a dual Bachlor's in Religion and Philosophy, and then an MFA. She teaches something at Otis College of Art and Design.
Beyond that, she's done nothing in her life that isn't activism. So one might wonder how she's buying MULTIPLE million dollar properties. She's published one book, though a second one is pending, and I can't tell how well that first book sold. There's no indication that her husband/spouse/partner (whatever they are) is particularly wealthy.
I understand that people should be compensated even when devoting their lives to charitable works, but getting ridiculously wealthy doing it is extremely shifty.
Psst! Don't tell anyone but if you agree that the $60M, which doesn't exist, is mine because I called dibs, I'll cut you in. Consider the deal carefully, otherwise, the public and/or media might just find out that you don't honor the pre-Western tradition of dibs/finders-keepers and are employing systemic racism and racially-privileged accounting math to deny me my $60M.
P.S. - Would it assuage your conscience any if I generated an NFT that proved I'm the owner of the $60M?
Sorry, I meant that for Jerryskids.
How can it go to blow? Blow is white. Black Tar Heroin wold be more like it.
What isn’t “shady”, using a reasonably polite term, about this BLM outfit? I await clarification/answers, though not with my breath held.
What isn’t “shady”, using a reasonably polite term, about this BLM outfit?
I'm pretty sure that question is racist.
Poetic justice. Useful idiots donate millions to a terrorist group and some of its leaders steal the money for themselves. The only thing that would make it all more perfect is if BLM burns the houses down.
It would be super poetic justice if a Nigerian/prince/president/general/minister scammed them out of the dough.
"BLMGNF has some explaining to do."
I'm not holding my breath for it.
Fundraising ethicists consulted by both the Examiner and New York magazine found the arrangements extremely shady.
This may be the most unintentionally funny part of this article.
"We're too afraid to call this what it is, which is obvious to anyone over the age of nine who can think, so we consulted with some ethicists within the field, and they inform US that this may be outside of nominal boundaries."
We're now "following the science" to discover if BLM is shady or not.
This may be the most unintentionally funny part of this article.
Remember when the OK sign was a white supremacist dogwhistle? Reading these comments in that lens is also entertaining.
The ethicists aren't saying these deals are shady, they're just being niggardly with their criticisms.
Anyone check here? She ain't in noways tarred.
https://www.fitsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/clinton-blackface.jpg
"At the very least, they should give anyone who is considering donating to BLM serious pause."
What's the big deal? What's good for the Trump Organization is good for the gander!
Shush, simp.
Or the Clinton foundation. People seek power to make themselves rich. Nothing new.
Careful Robby, you are close to calling the BLM grifters of being N...... rich.
Black Lives Matter (BLM) was more than just a hashtag—it was an entire movement for racial equality, criminal justice reform, and police accountability.
We knew BLM were racial grifters from the first moment when it lied about events in Ferguson to escalate conflict. Every time they've taken action publicly it's been the same. When Floyd was killed the Police Chief immediately fired all 4 officers, which never happens. They were moving to file charges and there was every reason to expect success on reform.
Then BLM got involved, and quickly before any reasonable possibility of reform agreement. Their insane and extreme demands brought the possibility of reform to a grinding halt - but the riots and donations sure picked up.
I can't really be the only one here who knows that BLM was founded by a Jewish guy. Stop blaming black women.
The height of race-grifters. Money flows directly from every AWFL right into the coffers of BLM marxists so they can buy mansions while complaining about how bad they have it.
Robby needs to do his homework. BLM was never a non-profit. The group that handled it's finances was. Google "Thousand Currents" and forget the whitewash on their website. They handled the money.
and the people they supposedly installed to succeed them never actually took the job.
That was probably smart.
“Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and turns into a racket.”
― Eric Hoffer
This would be the first justifiable civil forfeiture in history to my knowledge!
Who cares? It's not my cake.
Why? Because that's what you get when Gov-Guns have a full monopoly over EVERYTHING... [WE] mobs go to war with each over on who gets the almighty POWER of legal GUNS!
Wake-up; Nazism (National Socialism) has been tried and tried and tried again. There is a reason the USA was so successful BEFORE people started poking guns at people for Nazism.