An LGBT-Friendly Charter School in the Heart of Alabama Shows the Power and Flexibility of School Choice
But culture war political fights over race and sex education threaten their educational freedom.

For an excellent example of how charter schools can reach students who struggle in standardized public school environments, head to Homewood, Alabama, a suburb of 25,000 people south of Birmingham.
There you'll find Magic City Acceptance Academy, a public charter school that opened its doors last August after struggling for a year to get official permission to open. The mission of the academy, in its own words, is to facilitate "a community in which all learners are empowered to embrace education, achieve individual success, and take ownership of their future in a safe, LGBTQ-affirming learning environment."
Yes, an LGBT-friendly charter school has launched in Alabama and serves students from sixth through 12th grade. It currently has 232 students drawn from all over the greater Birmingham area. Registration will be opening soon for the next school year and founder and Principal Michael Wilson tells Reason he's hoping for between 325 and 350 students.
The existence of Magic City Acceptance Academy is important to note during National School Choice Week, because many critiques of charter school systems involve accusing charter schools of discrimination and catering to wealthy or privileged communities. The reality is that many charter schools cater to minority students and those with special needs. The list of charter schools focusing on assisting LGBT students is small so far (the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools notes six of them). But charter schools are a potential way of extricating students from oppressive traditional public school environments.
Students do not actually have to be LGBT in order to attend the school. Rather, the goal, Wilson explains, is to create a friendly and welcoming environment for any child who is being bullied in traditional schools and is not getting the help or support he or she needs.
"There are some pretty horrific things that go on in schools," Wilson says. "It may be about the student's place on the LGBTQ spectrum, but may be also because of autism or their skin color or because they're a child of immigrants. They're not comfortable where they are."
And so, on top of the typical education the academy provides that complies with state standards, the school offers wellness programs and mental health counseling, working with parents to help connect to health services as needed.
Schools have, quite obviously, become a political battleground over what teachers are allowed to say to students on issues of race, and new proposed laws in states like Florida and Oklahoma are attempting to censor how schools educate students about sexual orientation. In Alabama, several bills have been introduced that would attempt to ban certain types of race and sex discussions that are associated with critical race theory. Alabama lawmakers want to specifically ban schools from teaching "that this state or the United States is fundamentally racist or sexist."
Social justice is explicitly part of Magic City Acceptance Academy's program, and parents entering their students into the school know that progressive concepts of justice and equity will be part of the child's education. Given, then, that attendance in a charter school is entirely voluntary, one might assume that they would or should have the freedom to maintain programs that the parents support. But because charter schools are public schools, these political fights may end up hitting charter schools anyway.
Even as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott declared his support for National School Choice Week this week, Essence Preparatory, a proposed charter school in San Antonio, Texas, was forced to change components of its anti-racist education model in order to comply with a law passed last year (which Abbott signed) that forbids schools from teaching that "slavery and racism are anything other than deviations from, betrayals of, or failures to live up to the authentic founding principles of the United States." The aforementioned Oklahoma bill would ban school libraries from including books that focus on LGBT subjects and explicitly targets public charter schools as well.
Wilson is obviously not a fan of politicians undermining school choice by pushing their agendas onto charter schools.
"Critical race theory has nothing to do with hate," he says. "You can gloss over [racism] as most history books do or we can teach the truth. And we believe in teaching the truth. And it's not like we're saying it's their fault. Through the learning process, they become better adults with more understanding."
Leaders within the charter movement are watching how this fight is playing out, and it's not yet entirely clear how much it's going to affect what they're allowed to teach.
"The controversies surrounding CRT and its intersection with what can or cannot be taught in public schools is not yet a matter of settled law," Nina Rees, president and CEO of the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, tells Reason in an emailed statement. "It is evolving in real time and we are watching this evolution carefully. In [the Essence Preparatory] case, Texas law may supersede the autonomy of the charter school."
"With that said, we firmly believe in protecting charter schools from new rules and regulations that curtail their freedom to innovate (especially in matters related to curricula and pedagogy)," Rees continues. "These efforts, if taken to scale, greatly harm the school choice movement which is based on trusting families with the right to select a school that fits their needs."
School choice should mean that there's space for schools like Magic City Acceptance Academy and Essence Preparatory, should parents and students agree those environments are what they want. Banning the teaching of certain subjects there does not align with conservatives and Republicans who say they support school choice but then support the censorship of controversial ideas.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So at the Magic City Acceptance Academy do they allow the girls to be dominated, even bullied, by boys on the girls' sports teams or are they not accepting of trans athletes?
Shackford does his best work when he's explaining to ciswomen that they're terrible people if they fail to welcome their transgender sisters into female-only spaces. Including, but not limited to, bathrooms, locker rooms, showering facilities, sports, and prisons.
#BeardedWomenAreWomen
Can we get an example of an lgbt unfriendly school before we praise this?
You want an example of an LGBT unfriendly school? Every other school in Alabama.
Cite?
Everybody can earn $500 Daily... Yes! you can earn more than you think by working online from home. I have been doing this job for like a QJk few weeks and my last week payment was exactly 2537 dollars. See More Info.... > http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
Agree with above. Cite?
Okay. Citation please.
Cite whenever you're ready.
Anybody who beats Notre Dame?
Every nd student I know is a fag
Boiler up
Hammer down.
Uh, yes, my Junior High School from 1979 to 1982. And every damn day I attended was a Hell on Earth. Probably every other Junior High in North Carolina was like this to some degree or another.
If every school were simply a Nobody-Hate-Or-Hurt-Anybody School, without needing a Big-Brother-May-I Charter, that would have made my adolescence so much happier.
You obviously have not been in a school in decades.
JesseAz asked for an example, so I gave one and more.
I hope and trust no one is about to pull out the bagpipes and use them as a sealion whistle.
I presume he meant current, not four decades ago.
"Critical race theory has nothing to do with hate," he says. "You can gloss over [racism] as most history books do or we can teach the truth. And we believe in teaching the truth. And it's not like we're saying it's their fault. Through the learning process, they become better adults with more understanding."
It's amazing how much horseshit you can pack into one short statement. It's almost a skill, I'd have to say.
Imagine a university professor of Philosophy telling his students "I teach the truth".
It very much feels like "Don't be evil." (or maybe There is no mission!)
You named your fucking school "Magic City Acceptance Academy" and you have to keep assuring everyone you teach the truth. It sounds like some 60s-era Manson-esque nonsense.
What do you think those college degrees are for?
All the kids in the picture look like pampered, suburban white kids with the victim mentality already ingrained. 'Look how different we all are that all look the same.' haha
@ Outlaw Josey Wales. lol I do have to agree with you there. 🙂
More amazing is how fully grown adults can know that chattel slavery was at the forefront of American politics for its first hundred years and that antiblack racism was at the forefront of American politics for its next hundred years, and yet believe that teaching children that racism existed is some kind of conspiracy.
When and where has slavery, the KKK, and the civil rights struggle (all existed because of democrat oppression) not been taught in schools?
Please post some quotes from notable people claiming that "teaching children that racism existed is some kind of conspiracy."
I should hasten to add to all that I've said that one can teach acceptance of LGBTQ+ people without teaching Critical Race Theory.
People of all backgrounds have both accepted and hated LGBTQ+ people throughout human history and treating every student as individuals and not as drones in a hive is key for getting past all injustices.
Correction: Every student as an individual. Teach 'em to correct their own grammar and spelling too. 😉
Democrats (especially Tony) can’t imagine a homo/tranny not being entirely defined by their anomalous sexuality/body dysmorphia. It’s part of their intrinsic paternalistic racism.
What's the new 'Libertarian' motto?
Segregation today! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!
"Banning the teaching of certain subjects there does not align with conservatives and Republicans who say they support school choice but then support the censorship of controversial ideas." Why not? If you can choose certain subjects, why can't also NOT choose certain subjects?
For other people’s families, and other people’s kids?
Well that's what you guys do, Mike.
I wasn't aware that Republicans were placing armed guards in every parent's home to make sure they can't teach whatever idiotic racist nonsense they want to their kids. I thought they were just making rules about what can be taught in public schools with taxpayer money.
What else should taxpayers pay for without getting any input into how the money is spent, Mikey?
"Magic City Acceptance Academy"
Lol.
Well at least it's not being pushed in public schools.
I wouldn't have called it "Magic City" either (especially since "Magic" is just "the art of letting people see what you want them to see" as one professional Magician explained to me in Naturalistic terms.)
Rather, I would have called it The Be Decent Human Beings Academy or to borrow from Bill & Ted, The Be Excellent With Each Other Academy.
Birmingham's nickname is "The Magic City".
"'Cause 'round heah we like makin' certain folks dissapear!'
Magic City Acceptance Academy
Go Prancing Unicorns!!!
sheesh.
hope that music class isn't also the field hockey team
They identify as the varsity football team.
guys, not everybody can play on the offensive line.
Didn’t they restructure the positions to include ‘tops’ and ‘bottoms’? Including the power versions of each?
Yep, these guys will never become geldings for the National Wokester Football Leagueand "take a knee" with Kaep. Oh, the pity of it all! /sarc
The most successful most woke charter school will be the r Lee ermy school. Motto is "there is no racial bigotry here, I do not look down on niggers kikes wops or greasers, in my eyes you are all equally worthless, and my orders are to weed out all those who donot pack the gear to graduate from my high school"
Then they can graduate and attend The Judge Roy Bean School of Jurisprudence! 🙂
"Banning the teaching of certain subjects there does not align with conservatives and Republicans who say they support school choice but then support the censorship of controversial ideas."
The problem is that they're not presented as debatable, controversial ideas--they're presented as the unquestionable underpinning of all education.
You're not allowed to ask why we pay no attention to the pre-Columbian slave culture in the Americas--or even the Europeans who brought and made slaves in the Americas for over a century before 1619.
You're not allowed to ask why humans are the only life form on the planet whose sex is 'assigned' after birth and the only one whose sex can be different from all the genetically coded information carried by the organism.
Wait until they hear about the history of slavery in Brazil!
Yes, it is interesting that most of the talk about European dominance centers on the English, French and Dutch. Not much is said, especially in this country, about the Spanish European culture that ravaged South America. I wonder how AOC would feel about tracing her own roots back to the conquistadors.
But that might present a different perspective on the brown side of brown and black people. hmmmm
Spanish must be not white enough. Not like the Asians. haha
The problem is that they're not presented as debatable, controversial ideas--they're presented as the unquestionable underpinning of all education.
I think it's grossly inaccurate to suggest that there's only one problem. They're not debatable, they're internally inconsistent, even if they were, they're unactionable, even if they were actionable it's not at all clear that they produce any desirable outcome for anyone and plenty of evidence that they actually detract from desirable outcomes.
How exciting! Maybe this is the school that will finally put the litter boxes in the restrooms for the use of the furry identifying students. Anything less would be a violation of Human Rights™. We aren't afraid to teach racism here, because we have our brand of it!
Keep Birmingham weird!
As I recall from my school days, the teachers and maintenance men also used cat litter to clean up vomit. Might come in handy after certain comments here too.
The war isn’t over curriculum it’s over lying to our children.
By advocating school choice as the panacea, you’re ignoring the problem.
I mean unless you’re advocating that we should have the choice to choose schools BASED on the lies they indoctrinate our children with. Preparing them to be “good little bigots” like you, taking our civilization further down into the rabbit hole.
Is that the curriculum war you’re advocating?
The truth is that a nuclear family is one in which children are raised by their biological parents and no other sexually than heterosexuality can offer this.
Is it by choice or fluke that every other sexuality has no interest in it? Because if a non heterosexual wants a nuclear family, their sexuality is a disorder.
Will this truth be taught in an “LGBT friendly” school, or will some lie be used to indoctrinate the children?
How about the truth that LGBTQ+ children come from nuclear families and are as much a part of families as any other member?
How about the truth that adapting parents of any sexual orientation can raise children to be good, independent, self-sufficient human beings?
Be careful how you answer and not to delude yourself. That would be lying to yourself and lying would be a crime, right?
Oh, and far be it for anybody to think you would support any kind of educational choice that didn't involve uniformity of dress, habits, and thought, kind of like a certain other Youth movement that was popular in Germany in the Thirties and Fourties (albeit Mussolini would have called them "Yutes.")
You obviously can’t read or understand what a nuclear family is.
CHILDREN RAISED BY BOTH BIOLOGICAL PARENTS
Can you understand that excludes non heterosexuals, or not?
The children don't have to be heterosexual to be in a nuclear family. Do you not understand that?
You still can’t read or understand.
I said “ if a non heterosexual wants a nuclear family, their sexuality is a disorder.”
Nobody can choose the family they’re born into. Wanting a nuclear family only matters to prospective parents.
Granted, people with the misfortune of not being raised by their biological parents, probably wish they were.
So, to come up with this diagnosis of "disorder," are you a Doctor or play on gory newsreels that became public after 1945?
Mosebys medical dictionary of 2009 clearly identifies a disorder as
“Something that inhibits or interferes with a normal function or an established system”
The nuclear family is our normal and established system to best propagate our species in civilization. Only heterosexuals can create a nuclear family.
And if you had your way, we would be exterminating the homosexuals like your friends did back in the 30’s/40’s.
No that’s in your cherished wet dream alone.
I wouldn’t stop looking for a cure for the disorder as you are satisfied doing.
Ok, so you’re focused on only exterminating the Jews and Gypsies. Got it.
Prove your claim fuckwit.
Oh, I forgot, you’re just another dime a dozen bigot who never does.
Some previous cures used in both Westen and Soviet psychiatric prisons involved forcible injections with hormones chemical castrations, and electroshock "therapy." And, of course, none of it worked unless you would consider suicide to constitute "cured." Is that your speed too?
You’re deluding yourself.
Now you see wbat we're up against here?
You know who else shared most of Herr Misek’s misunderstandings?
He sure knows who.
It was bound to SPRING to mind given enough TIME
Yes, it was that nice gentlemen in the Monty Python boarding house who held National Bolsialist rallys:
Monty Python Hitler Sketch
https://videos.sapo.pt/DKLCMSZ0jjr9AaGZjkom
Though nowadays, his stongest supporters would be Labour rather than Conservative.
The so-called nuclear family is a historical aberration. All ways of life are environmentally specific. There is no correct way of life. There's just what you grew up with and your capacity to imagine beyond it, of which you have none.
We're for freedom here. Freedom means other people get to live their lives in ways that make you uncomfortable. My advice is to grow up and chill out.
Life is a continuum.
The entire ancestry of both biological parents is encoded in their living DNA which combines at conception to create a new life which is the continuation of both and only both biological parents.
As children grow, they exhibit the looks and traits of their biological parents who recognize and appreciate it.
There is no other relationship like it and it can ONLY be experienced by heterosexuals who choose to create a nuclear family.
Any other sexuality cannot experience this and neither will any unfortunate children they raise.
All children need is to be loved, provided for, and taught to respect themselves and others without violence and abuse. The family structure is tangential to that and can be nuclear or extended and involve people of any "race," "ethnicity," or sexual orientation.
All people need to live is food, water and shelter.
Children are the living continuation of only their biological parents. The nuclear family is best for everyone involved.
People also need the process of rational thought to identify hunger, thirst, and exposure and to identify what fulfills these biological needs, as well as discover and invent new methods of fulfilling these needs faster, more productively and more efficiently. And to get that, people need to learn to think, something not provided by mere genes and not by physical force of anyone claiming Authority.
And children are not just the continuation of their parent's genes, but of every previous generation of humans, as well as every species from which humans evolved over the 3.8 billion+ years that life has existed on Planet Earth...and the earliest of that life was single-celled and asexually reproduced.
And if you say otherwise, then you are the one who is operating under a delusion and a lie. Be fareful what you wish for in wanting to outlaw lying.
Correction, careful, though it would be fareful to be careful.
“ And children are not just the continuation of their parent's genes, but of every previous generation of humans,”
You are incorrect.
All humans don’t share the same ancestry.
You and I may have a common ancestor or two since the beginning of time but ALL our ancestry isn’t common unless we’re identical twins. The multitude of ancestors we don’t share makes our genes unique.
Children are the continuum of ONLY their immediate biological parents.
Migration patterns, common denominators in technology and artifacts, and above all, the fully-mapped Human Genome do not support your claim about human ancestry. To continue making that claim would be an intentional falsehood. You know what that is, right?
If you can actually prove your claim that ostensibly refutes my understanding of ancestry I’ll wholeheartedly accept it. I won’t hold my breath.
But I forgot, you’re just another dime a dozen bigot who can’t prove what you claim.
Yeah, I said you can’t prove what you claim.
Peoples understanding of this common sense, supported by research, has been intentionally obfuscated by groups with ideological agendas.
The terms “nuclear family” and “traditional family” have been ambiguously defined in various studies to skew conclusions to have plausible deniability.
The unambiguous definition that directly applies to the issue of multiple sexualities is as I described it “children raised by both biological parents”
Searching for studies relating to this conclusively demonstrate it to represent the best relationship for better outcomes for children.
If “LGBT friendly” schools were really interested in better outcomes for children they would recognize and teach it.
Oh, and by the way, chidren do not always look like their parents or exhibit all other traits, since alleles can be recessive and not show up in the phenotype of offspring. Your ignorance of basic genetics is amazing.
Irrelevant.
Go prove your claim bigot.
If there is no "correct way of life", then you cannot call the nuclear family an aberration. That wording suggests that it is incorrect.
Also, there is plenty of evidence that a household with a mother and a father is more optimal for raising well-adjusted children than others.
"unless you’re advocating that we should have the choice to choose schools BASED on the lies they indoctrinate our children with."
Yes, I am.
Thanks for admitting it on record.
Too bad you’re too much of a coward to have your real name associated with your comments.
I mean, even though it’s understandable considering what you say.
Haveyou ever thought he might just be jerking your own "mind-forged manacles," to quote William Blake?
Humans are beings of volitional consciousness. It is only when minds and bodies are free that individuals have the possibility of even finding the truth. To sayx otherwise deliberately is to speak an untruth...a lie. Right?
“Humans are beings of volitional consciousness.”
You are incorrect. Humans are also beings with unconsciousness Which is completely separate from volition.
Fuckwits like you who can’t employ critical thinking parrot actual credible people selectively and out of context in a feeble attempt to “win” arguments.
You’re pathetic, really.
If reality only consisted of what we chose, then there wouldn’t be death, disease and learning would be meaningless.
You demonstrated that you don’t value truth.
Why do you bother to communicate? Do you like to hear yourself?
Because if your plan is to coerce others by misrepresenting truth to make decisions that are in your interest, not theirs, you have just shot yourself in the foot with your admission.
Nobody needs to think you value truth anymore.
Anyone who is crying like a little bitch about children learning about America's racist history is basically admitting that he's a racist fucktard. We're all in the same boat. Some of us can handle the truth, and some of us cry like little bitches. The stupidity is exhausting.
Teaching kids that race essentialism is the proper lens to view the world is acceptable if you are a racist.
You don’t want to teach history. You want to teach racial hatred and indoctrinate children to your unholy democrat bigotry. The existence of slavery, democrat racism, and the civil rights movement are already taught in schools.
You and your fellow travelers are the racist bigots Tony, not us.
Wow I was not expecting this comment section...
In any case what I was going to say is that to compy with the law the school should just do a big unit on racism and sexism in other contries, such as Russia's "anti-LGB propaganda" law. Then just include just include lots of sections titled things like "Comparrison with US laws" or "contemporary US attitudes on the issue" and leave huge blank spaces saying "In complience with Alabama law we are prohibited from teaching 'that this state or the United States is fundamentally racist or sexist.'" And make a big point of announcing the same to the whole class whenever the US is even slightly mentioned. I'm sure this would help all students get an accurate picture of how much racism and sexism exist in the state.
If you don't like the idea of the school, don't send your kids there. I thought libertarian adults read Reason.
"Critical race theory has nothing to do with hate,"
An assertion which goes against the available evidence.
"There are some pretty horrific things that go on in schools,"
As a matter of school policy? Those horrific things happen in schools because children can be pretty damned cruel when left to their own devices. I rather doubt this changes for this charter school, except for what traits are considered outcast.
Again, when I attended school, I didn't desire an LGBTQ+ charter school, only a Nobody-Hate-Or-Hurt-Anybody School without needing a Big-Brother-May-I Charter. When I couldn't get that, I shrank into my own dream world shell where I could be away from the violence and homophobic bullying.
Also, not having foreced busing to a school in the middle of a violent gbetto would have gone a long way to getting people of every background to get along and treat each other with justice, far better than any teaching of Critical Race Theory, which is just a prescription for Balkanization in the U.S.A.
Forced busing came about due to states doing the equivalent of racial.gerrymandering in drawing school attendance zone and school district boundaries.
That could have been undone simply by allowing all students to attend the nearest school. Busing kids to achieve racial quotas wasn't about just eliminating discrimination. It was about attempted social engineering, and it backfired horribly.
Or allowing students the option of attending any school they can reach on time for opening. People who want to escape rough neighborhoods and don't bring it with them deserve choice too.
This comment section pretty much validated the thrust of the article. People dance around it and pretend they’re “just asking a few questions” but no one will come out and affirm that they support the existence of the school as is. It seems evident that many or at least several would shut down or otherwise curtail this school if they could. Therefore proving one of the main points of the article: that by “school choice” they mean “freedom to teach explicitly conservative/religious beliefs but definitely not alternative beliefs.” So Jesus rode a dinosaur stuff is a-ok and should be legally protected but not anything about two mommies or slavery existing.
It seems. Ire evident that you’re a leftist listening to the voices in his head. You also appear to be an anti religious bigot.
"A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest."--Simon & Garfunkel.
I favor the educational choice of private schooling/homeschooling/unschooling precisely so the beleaguered individual student of a hated racial, sexual, or philosophical minority could learn uninhibited by violence either from State compulsory schooling laws or from an irrational majority mob. And I say this as a Pansexual Atheist who would never want Supernatural Woo or bigotry in anything I learn or teach.
I hope they're not letting the Irish in.
Funny you should say that. King Sir William of Orange forbade the Irish to educate their children as they saw fit, among other indignities such as depriving them of the right to own property, ride horses and bear arms.