The Government Hoarded 750 Million N95 Masks While Telling You To Wear One
And now that the omicron variant is in retreat, everyone gets them for free. Great timing, guys.

Later today, the White House is expected to officially announce plans to send roughly 400 million high-quality, N95 masks to pharmacies and health centers around the country. From there, the masks will be distributed for free to anyone who wants one.
The Associated Press reports that the move is meant to encourage Americans to replace cloth masks with alternatives that better defend against the Omicron variant of COVID-19. In places where mask-wearing is mandated by government policy, at least some people will surely be happy to swap out their current masks for the free N95s.
If the "free masks" plan tracks earlier plans for distributing "free" vaccines and "free" testing, then we know how this will go. Some pharmacies will run out immediately while others will still have some in stock when the next pandemic arrives.
But the timing feels all wrong. As The New York Times' David Leonhardt reported today, omicron is in retreat. Wouldn't it have made more sense for the White House to order the distribution of these masks months ago, when omicron first arrived on U.S. soil and federal officials started pushing Americans to wear N95 masks instead of basic cloth face coverings?
That, in turn, raises some serious questions about the national mask stockpile itself, which media reports say currently contains 750 million masks. If this is how they're going to be distributed, essentially to whoever wants one, rather than on the basis of need, what is the point of having a stockpile for emergencies? Markets are perfectly capable of handling the distribution of N95 masks.
For that matter, why is the government sitting on a stash of 750 million masks after two years where mask shortages have been a recurring problem? Keep in mind, every mask that went into the federal stockpile—that is, every mask that will now be made available "for free" via the White House's new program—is a mask that could have already been in use weeks or even months ago.
In fairness, it doesn't seem like the stockpile was that large in March 2020—Politico reports that federal officials have "have worked to replenish" the stockpile "since the earliest days of the Covid-19 outbreak." But it's worth asking whether replenishing that stockpile was really the best use of federal resources in the middle of an ongoing pandemic. For months, Biden and his top public health officials have been urging Americans to wear N95 (or the similar KN95) masks as a defense against the omicron variant, while apparently also removing millions of masks from the marketplace in order to replenish a federal stockpile—as if having a few hundred million masks in storage for a future pandemic is more important than using them to fight the current one.
America produced an estimated 1 billion high-quality masks last year, so we're no longer experiencing the dire shortages that marked the first year of the pandemic. Even so, masks haven't been as readily available as they could be. It was widely reported last year that some Americans were turning to counterfeit N95s because of the difficulties in purchasing the genuine article.
Just last week, Politico notes, Biden talked about how obtaining high-quality masks is still "not always affordable or convenient" for some individuals. Shouldn't his administration have to answer for contributing to that problem? Why was the federal government stockpiling masks at a time when those same masks were very much in demand?
All this accomplished was time-shifting the availability of masks. Because that's what a stockpile is meant to do: shift the availability of resources from a time when demand is low and supply is high to a time when there is a crunch in supplies.
It's certainly questionable whether this time shift was a productive one. The White House is making hundreds of millions of masks available now, after the omicron wave seems to have crested and started to recede in many parts of the country. If the distribution of masks from the federal stockpile takes as long as the White House's planned distribution of free COVID tests, they likely won't arrive in pharmacies and health clinics until early February.
So the operative question is: Are Americans better served by getting free masks in February than they would have been to have a higher number of N95 masks available for purchase in October, November, and December of this year? That equation does not seem to break in the Biden administration's favor.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The headline's a lie. They may have hoarded N95's, but they told US to wear cotton cloth diapers.
Since they are sending the masks to pharmacies to distribute, there are limited opportunities to protest this action. I suppose one could "harvest" the largest number of masks they will let you out the door with from every pharmacy around and hoard them for later resale (for profit) to the Karens who panic over the next variant or virus.
But they are going to mail the COVID home test kits directly to the public (unless they change their minds). What protest could more effectively communicate the population's disdain for pResident Brandon than to mark the packages "Delivery Refused - Return to Sender" and drop the intact, unopened package off at the nearest Post Office. Hopefully this idea would go viral (but I'm not on Faceplant to advocate for it there) and literally millions of packages would be refused and returned? Any bets on reporting of the protest if this develops?
Just send them a cat turd.
They are not free. The American taxpayer (and holder of US currency) paid for them.
They know the masks are useless, that is why they are giving them away.
nothing the government has done has slowed or stopped this virus.
Never question The State. It always knows best. Whatever it was - it had good reason and whatever it is - it has good reason. The State works in mysterious ways.
Boehm - isn't this your candidate? Back to normalcy right?
Yes this is Reason's boy, not one person has admitted they were wrong. But hey, no more mean tweets.
You people with your Trump fetish.
Someone was poking around in that same warehouse where they put the crate with the Ark in it. Found a bunch of boxes of N95 masks in the corner.
You are as unfunny as sarcasmic is.
No, that one was humorous.
A sea lion walks into a bar and orders a drink with a burger. The bartender informs her that the burger comes with either fries or onion rings. He asks which one she would like. Dee responds, “Both sides.”
Cite?
White Knight states, correctly, that this occurred.
If he wasn't drinking HO2, I don't believe you.
That’s just mean.
Both overseen by Top Men.
If you ever run across the Ark, look inside. There’s presents for you.
I believe the mask stockpile is there to be used when necessary to score political points. Nothing else. Besides, we've been told masks don't really make a difference, so at this point, what difference does it make?
Very little difference in practical terms.
A properly fitted and worn N95 probably would be effective. It would also be annoying to breathe through, so will be worn incorrectly by the vast majority. But at least they would no longer be trying to fight an airborne virus with a mask incapable of making an airtight seal.
They REALLY should have moved onto recommending reusable industrial respirators by now for high risk people, as they are easier to breathe in, easier to get the right fit on, easier to verify the fit on and reusable. However, since they don't filter exhale and public health officials are still acting like reducing community exposure is more important than focusing protection on the 5-10% of the population that is at high risk, here we are.
I suppose I'll pick up my share: I've got to replace the ones that I already had for woodworking at the beginning of this mess.
I might not feel any need to wear one to protect myself from Covid, doesn't mean I want to inhale sanding dust.
Actually, that's a really good idea. I could definitely use them for legitimate reasons rather than virtue signaling a disease.
Yep, I was off work remodeling my bathroom in March of 2020 when this whole mess started (that, and to watch the NCAA tournament - that worked out well).
I wanted to strip several layers of paint (including lead, most likely) off the old historic cast iron ventilation grill, and I could have really used a mask for that, but all the hoarders on both coasts had stripped us bare, even here in Missouri.
It's honestly like they are trying to be as incompetent as possible.
Mask hoarders may be attempting to cover something up.
keep puttin' those strategic votes down for (D).
Doesn't work anyway
"The Government Hoarded 750 Million N95 Masks While Telling You To Wear One" ...you just can't make this shit up. The Babylon Bee seems like realness these days.
I am required to put on a mask when I enter a restaurant, then walk 9 feet to a table and take it off. How silly is this?
Stand up. No. Sit down. Now kneel. Stand up again. Sing a chant in unison. Now put money in the offering plate. Rinse. Repeat.
You forgot to wiggle your hands in the proper pattern.
Enjoy hell, sinner.
Has no one here heard of Kubuki theater?
It makes a lot of sense for stopping an illness that primarily spreads via droplets. Which we thought COVID was originally. We have known that it isn't for at least 18 months now, but government regulation isn't known for its rapid updates.
Probably the reason they were stockpiling the masks during the pandemic was to replenish the stockpile that didn't get re-stocked after the 2008 H1N1 pandemic; the agency overseeing that emergency supply chose to hoard doses of Tamiflu and H1N1 vaccine instead, on the assumption that the next pandemic would be exactly the same virus as the last one.
Spending a decade plus not replenishing the more generally useful stores of PPE that had been depleted in 2008-2009, and instead building up huge stores of more specific treatments, was the bigger error on the part of the Feds. Dumping the emergency stockpiles now that they've actually been decently replenished, especially when the timing is likely to coincide with the natural fade in the Omicron wave is nearly as big an error in policy judgement, although it's one that they'll undoubtedly point and claim credit for having caused Omicron to follow the same pattern in the U.S. that it has seemingly everywhere else (and which many epidemiologists were already predicting it would likely do on its own).
Lucky for Joe, Dem partisans have never been at all particular about matching up what they choose to see as cause/effect relationships with the chronological order of the events in question; many likely still believe that the tax cuts enacted by W in Jan 2001 caused the bursting of the stock bubbles which began in April 2000 (before the nominees were even selected for that year's election).
Maybe a stupid question: for healthy, vaccinated folks <50, should we have considered Omicron parties? I know it sounds stupid, but the risk of Omicron to that population is nil, they would know to isolate a week after the party and therefore not inadvertently expose higher risk populations and can schedule their mandatory isolation week to a time convenient to them and their employer (presumably staggered with other employees). Whether or not they actually contract Omicron, they would come out of it being much more confident that they are less likely to accidentally contract this variant of the illness in the future.
They're supposed to be thrown out after a few hours of use. Can't wait to see people using the same dirty mask for weeks straight.
They can take those masks and stick them up their asses. I'll stick with my cloth "Let's Go Brandon" mask. As useful as the shit they are giving away...
The N95s they're giving people are handy for "bug out" bags and emergency kits, especially if you live in a city where the emergency might include something exploding and putting a lot of random particulates into the air.
By the time the distribution starts happening, it seems like most of the Omicron waves around the country will have already crested and be into decline anyway, so there's not nearly as much use for wearing those masks at the time they show up in the mail.
The whole concept seems to still be that there's a path through to the point where this virus is endemic which also includes huge numbers of people never being infected at all. That's never been a realistic expectation (like planning a whitewater rafting trip in which nobody expects to get wet), and with a strain as mild as this one, it's probably not worth working to make happen for anyone under 65 years of age anyway.
This policy is quite good. I think it can effectively contain COVID-19. If we insist on wearing masks and orologi lusso , we will definitely be able to defeat the virus.
Speaker Pelosi bought for and is forcing the House Reps. to wear KN95 masks. These masks are made in China, are listed on the package as being effective "against cold air only" and were previously labeled as dangerous to use by the US government. (exposed on Newsmax by a House Rep.).
Your government at work.
Not that masks are any good against virus transmission anyway.
Wonder why Boehm didn't mention that?
They were saving the N95 masks for an actually dangerous epidemic, not COVID. But they are probably expiring, so they have to dump them now. /sarc
I got a box from Amazon during peak Omicron, obviously they are not in short supply anymore.
Who cares at this point, though? If it helps even just a few people, great. If not, it's just a tiny bit more gov't waste. It ain't gonna break the bank.
But is it really "great" if only a few people benefit? Do you have any governing principles?