China's Quest To Take Taiwan
If Taiwan became embroiled in a protracted military engagement with China, global supply-chain turmoil would ensue.

Chinese officials have started directing citizens to stock up on food amid rising vegetable, egg, and pork prices. Encouraging people to become preppers could just be how the Chinese government expresses concern about cold snaps and potential future COVID-19 lockdowns. But some fear it's a more sinister sign, indicating that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) wants people to prepare for the growing threat of war.
For years, tensions between China and Taiwan remained at a simmer. But in October, China sent a record number of warplanes, 149, into the Taiwanese air defense identification zone while conducting military exercises in a province directly across the water from Taiwan.
"The current situation is the most challenging since I joined the army four decades ago," wrote Taiwan's defense minister, Chiu Kuo-Cheng, in The Wall Street Journal, gravely noting that "Taiwan is no match for China in resources, manpower and military technologies." The island, which is less than 0.5 percent the mainland's size, is dwarfed by China in both area and population.
China's complicated relationship with Taiwan began in 1684, when the Qing dynasty seized the island after Admiral Shi Lang wrote of its abundance: "Fish and salt spout forth from the sea; the mountains are filled with dense forests of tall trees and thick bamboo; there are sulfur, rattan, sugarcane, deerskins, and all that is needed for daily living. Nothing is lacking." At the end of the 19th century, Chinese rulers, facing a humiliating war defeat, gave Taiwan to Japan; following Japan's loss in World War II, it was returned to the mainland. But just a few years later, civil war split the country apart. The Chinese Nationalist Party (or "Kuomintang") was exiled to Taiwan and would go on to exercise martial law there for nearly 40 years.
Despite this messy backstory, democracy and pluralism have flourished in Taiwan since the end of the Kuomintang's dictatorial reign in 1987. As in Singapore, Hong Kong, and South Korea, the rapid industrialization of the 1960s has produced lasting economic strength for Taiwan. Toward the end of the 20th century, robust political freedoms and civil society institutions also took root on the island.
Fourteen U.N. members recognize Taiwan's independence, and much of the world views its autonomy as legitimate or worth defending. But today's CCP regards Taiwan as a territory gone rogue. Many Taiwanese people, led by democratically elected President Tsai Ing-wen, believe the mainland has no claim over the island. Many also think any attempt by China to annex it ought to be met with military might. Although some wish they weren't cut off from mainland economic activity, most are acutely aware of how much they stand to lose if they are brought under totalitarian CCP rule.
From America's perspective, Taiwan remains in limbo. The U.S. maintains an embassy-by-another-name there and has soldiers on the ground to assist the Taiwanese military. But the U.S. government officially recognizes the government in Beijing, not Taipei. That tenuous balance is predicated on the assumption that China will continue to behave peacefully in the Taiwan Strait.
During a CNN town hall in October, President Joe Biden vowed to protect Taiwan, saying somewhat controversially that "we have a commitment" to come to Taiwan's defense if China attacks—the same position that then-President George W. Bush took two decades before. But it's not true that the U.S. is obligated to defend the island; the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979 just says that an attempt to take Taiwan by military means would be of "grave concern" to the United States. The concern is made more grave by Taiwan's role in the global electronics market.
Taiwan does indeed provide "all that is needed for daily living," but not due to the fishes and salt spouting forth from the sea. The chips produced by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. are essential parts of your smartphone, laptop, and car. Without them, factories around the globe would face difficulties in producing the world's electronics.
"China's intention," Chiu worries, "is to take Taiwan quickly and deny third parties the chance to intervene." If Taiwan became embroiled in a protracted military engagement with China, global supply-chain turmoil would ensue. What we don't know is how the U.S. would respond to the CCP's totalitarian flexing or what the collateral damage might be. While China may stand to gain, pretty much everyone else stands to lose.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Thank Henry Kissinger and his Big Ideas, with an assist from Richard Nixon. Open relations with Red China, they'll greet us as liberators!
Yeah, the problem is not Beijing's mature communist dictatorship which has developed into an nationalist authoritarian regime.
Start working at home with G00gle! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this–4 weeks past.I began this 8-months ago and immediately was brindfswdging home at least $77 per hour.
I work thr0ugh this link, G0 to tech tab for work detail.………>>> Visit Here
Taiwan isn't going to be a protracted military campaign. Taiwan has no maneuver space, limited magazine depth, and no reliable allies. Once China starts lobbing missiles at the important targets in Taiwan, they will fall all over themselves finding reasons to re-unite with China.
China is reportedly many years from having a viable amphibious assault fleet. A few boats and paratroopers won’t take Formosa. The inside baseball said China believes it would be a ten year campaign, once they are ready, to prevail.
There won't be any beach assaults. That's old school thinking. The only Chinese troops coming off boats will be getting off in Taipei Harbor as they arrive to occupy the island.
The campaign will be short and heavily rely on missiles and air strikes. Taiwan's ability to counter missile attacks is limited by launchers and magazine depth, and its ability to defend against air attacks is similarly limited.
That is video game thinking.
You need to read what the Chinese themselves are writing vis a vis doctrine and warfighting.
Did just a few months ago. They believed it would be a ten year engagement and require a large naval assault, which their military does not currently have. Their commercial fleet might be able to be used as a surrogate. Maybe. Their goal is reunification by 2049, the 100th anniversary of the proclamation of the PRC.
That timeline has changed. Xi isn't gonna be around in 2049. And the ten year engagement isn't all military; there is diplomatic and economic activities that go with it, which have been ongoing for several years. In other words, it will not be a protracted military campaign that gives Taiwan's unreliable allies time to react.
The ten years came from China and that was their expectation for the military phase of the campaign.
I’m sure Xi would love to plant the flag. But it is about China and not him.
Missile and air strikes followed by cruise ships is optimistic.
Everything is about Xi.
Well, I do believe that the Chinese might actually be deluded enough to think that's true.
Sounds like the chips may be down.
Well Taiwan definitely is not a chip off the old block.
Nah, you just fabricated that view.
Regular commenters will know I have been talking about Taiwan for some time. Know for certain that war is coming to Taiwan. The Red Chinese will invade Taiwan, and they will win. The Quad, led by the US, will be defeated and humiliated. The correlation of forces is so extremely in the favor of Red China it is silly.
We should understand the implications. Our allies (Japan, India, Australia) will distance from us and acquiesce to China's demands - whatever they are. We will lose 40% of the world semiconductor supply overnight. NATO will be sorely tested. US forces will cede the western pacific to China, and then try to establish a demarcation line extending from Hawaii to Aleutian Islands. With current civilian and military leadership, that will be a futile effort.
I sure hope that Taiwan takes the advice that Robert O'Brien told them three years ago: become a porcupine - immediately.
+1
Remember the people of Tibet
Remember the people of Hong Kong
Remember the people of Taiwan
Remember the people of the western Pacific region.
Remember the Pueblo?
+1000 Hawaiian salutes
On our Christmas road trip, the wife and I listened to a book about Gengis Khan. And it is amazing how so much of China's policy is about settling thousands of year old grudges.
For those who don't know, from the 1200s to the 1300s, the Chinese were increasingly conquered by the Mongols. Wanna know who one of the first vassals of Ghengis were? The Uighurs. They formed much of the administrative body of the Mongol empire in the east.
Eventually, much of what we see as "China" today was taken over by the Mongols, who ruled from Beijing's "Forbidden City"- forbidden because (while Kublai Khan put on the pretenses of being more Chinese than the Song dynasty) behind its walls, the Mongols lived in their yurts under the open sky.
Wanna know what priestly caste would eventually dictate policy at the right hand of the Mongol Emporer? The Buddhist Monks from Tibet. They weren't no ultra peaceful detached worldly people like Brad Pitt would portray. They were every bit the devious, conniving political monsters that the Catholic Church was in Europe.
The nationalists of China have spent the past 60 years "righting" the wrongs of their history- taking care of Tibet, Mongolia, and the Uighurs. Thousand-year old humiliations are now being avenged, as they catch up with history. Taiwan is just one more score to settle on their list.
And before you say, "Oh well for asia, do not forget that perhaps China's greatest humiliation was at the hands of the west, who forced them to cede territory to be used as Free Trade ports. They won't be satisfied with just Hong Kong. Oh no, China has a looooong way to go before things are even in their book.
#OpiumWars
"The nationalists of China have spent the past 60 years "righting" the wrongs of their history-"
I remember seeing maps of China published by the KMT of Taiwan. They included both inner and outer Mongolia as provinces of China. The mainland Chinese, of course, recognize 'outer Mongolia' as the same independent republic that the rest of the world does.
I remember also chats with a colonel from the RoC Airforce who stressed the importance of China maintaining her hold over Tibet as the high ground and location made it an ideal platform for launching missiles.
This was all a few years back when the KMT, vicious thugs really, controlled the island. These days more moderate voices have taken the lead.
I have been saying for about a year that the best path for the US is to unambiguously tell Taiwan- privately and publicly- that it is on its own. To give any implication that we will defend them is to force China to plan on defeating our carrier fleets- and given our performance in Afghanistan, I have zero faith in our military to put up even a token defense against China. It would be far, far better for the world to continue to wonder if our carrier fleets are all that tough than for China to sweep them away over night.
The age of the Carrier is fast succumbing to the age of the Orbital Platform.
Did the military perform badly in Afghanistan or was the problem there a political one that the military could not solve? Fighting the standing military of a major power to defend a smaller nation is quite different than trying to change the political culture of a society.
"Did the military perform badly in Afghanistan or was the problem there a political one that the military could not solve?"
Our military was in charge of designing the national defense of Afghanistan. By all accounts, our military failed and failed hard. We installed operating procedures and equipment that could not be supplied or maintained by the Afghani's and by many accounts, knew this to be the case.
I think there is a lot of blame to go around, but the military leadership cannot be excused. Many, many military leaders promised success that never came. These are the same people who are captaining our fleet.
Our navy can't even pilot thru a bay with out hitting other ships and our military is too reliant on electronics one small failure and the whole thing is down.
Xing has ordered its coal companies to work 24/7 war will be soon. they maybe planing long term which is smart but the battle will be short
From what I've read, the Chinese will be ready to invade by 2025. But the biggest issue is not the military stuff.
It is the wobbliness of the CCP's pseudo-'Mandate of Heaven'. They have been relying on a big housing bubble in their transition from a 5-yr plan based economy to a price-based economy (which is not the same as market-based). That became very obvious - but ignored - with the massive cities with no people, Those are still housing 'investments' - but they are more like Ponzi schemes. Now that Evergrande is toppling, it's only a matter of time before the whole housing bubble topples and reverses. Bubbles pop. And with that bubble pop, all the retirement/savings of the Chinese will disappear since they are even more dependent on perpetually higher house prices than Americans are.
Historically in China, that sort of economic shock has led to civil war and no reason to believe that's different this time. In fact, it may be why Xi and his cadre are diverting attention to old-fashioned nationalism stuff (Taiwan, nineline stuff, etc) in order to pretend away the possible housing pop.
JFree, the CCP are ready to go now. Their second aircraft carrier comes on line this year.
Am I the only reader here who thinks this piece says more about Reason than about China?
Still looking for a coherent explanation of how the Communist Chinese will use military force successfully.
They have the capability to destroy Taiwan, but they don't want to rule over a smoking ruin. They want the massive economic benefits of a Taiwan that is still a productive economic engine. So forget the missiles and bombs. Forget a 'conventional' invasion, they don't have the sealift to mount, let alone sustain, an amphibious assault (yet).
So they will be patient, and bully Biden into submission, and eventually just land the new administration.
That's the problem -- they want takeover, not destruction. This is not Hitler trying to empty the steppes for German population expansion.
They especially want TSMC intact and continuing production, but they know it would be easy to destroy with artillery and missiles. Last I read, China's fab plants are stuck five generations behind the west, including TSMC; 14 nm vs 3-5. Those plants cost billions and take years to build, and each depends on the previous generation. Good luck getting South Korea and Singapore to help rebuild the TSMC fab, let alone the US, and in the meantime, their global trade would fall to pieces.
I don't put it beyond Xi to be stupid enough to start war against Taiwan, even if just a blockade; dictators by definition put glory and power over thinking straight. But the odds are against it.
isn't that what nutron bombs are for, kills the people but leaves everything else in tact.
Parachuting 100k men over night would probably be all it takes anyway.
"If Taiwan became embroiled in a protracted military engagement with China, global supply-chain turmoil would ensue."
We'd have a lot more to worry about than 'global supply-chain turmoil."
Hmm, instead of spending money on military prep, how about we exchange the people of Taiwan for those in the coastal counties of California, Oregon, and Washington?
As long as those Taiwanese would understand that their high test scores and GPAs would not get them into American colleges.
Is that a problem when their high-schoolers already perform at a level above 80% of our college grads?
A friend in mainland China sent a video of her daughter’s end of school year event. It looked like the freaking Super Bowl halftime show.
Last year tutored another friend’s son on a math problem. They are in eastern Europe. Believe he is 12. Half the engineers I have worked with would have struggled on that problem. He is a smart kid but not a savant in some advanced program.
But neither of them spend hours a day on social media.
"But neither of them spend hours a day on social media."
Likely they have parents who respect scholarship and teachers, too. I noticed in the comments here that any scholarship outside science and engineering is viewed as a waste of time and teachers are held in contempt.
"I respect scholarship and hard work. That's what makes me pretty sure it was the kid's calligraphy teacher or the local barista with a Ph.D. in gender studies and not his math teacher that helped get him into the advanced math program." - mtrueman
Study of anything outside of science or engineering is a waste of time. Teachers are contemptible. It can't be stressed enough.
Jesus Christ what a dumbass you are.
Blasphemer!
Lots of people here saying a Chinese invasion and occupation of Taiwan makes little sense. I agree. It may happen in time, but before that I expect to see a PLA base on the moon. Then we can really start with the hand wringing.
The US shouldn’t do anything. At least militarily. Taiwan is not part of the US. The US does not even recognize Taiwan as a country (nor do most of the countries on the planet).