Texas' Costly 'Operation Lone Star' Leaves Alleged Illegal Immigrants Trapped in Jail with No Due Process
Gov. Greg Abbott’s crusade is costing the state huge sums just to try to prosecute thousands of misdemeanor trespassing cases.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's border-control crusade is overwhelming court systems, leaving detainees stuck in jails for weeks or even months without due process, and generally isn't resulting in many convictions.
Abbott launched "Operation Lone Star" in March. Border enforcement is ordinarily the federal government's job, but Abbott decided to deploy the state's Department of Public Safety and the Texas National Guard to "deny Mexican Cartels and other smugglers the ability to move drugs and people into Texas."
Instead, according to media reports from multiple outlets, suspected illegal immigrants caught at the border are being arrested for misdemeanor trespassing and then being held in jail. And then…nothing, frequently. The Wall Street Journal reports that only 3 percent of the 1,500 people who have been arrested under Operation Lone Star have been convicted, all with guilty pleas of misdemeanor trespassing.
Texas does not have the authority to deport any of these people, so the rest are either still detained in jail or being released back into the community—the very outcome Abbott insists he was trying to stop.
A spokesperson for Abbott's office told The Wall Street Journal that his policy of jailing immigrants was a direct response to what Abbott calls President Joe Biden's "catch and release program," a common phrase among those who want tough enforcement.
Lacking any ability to deport these immigrants and apparently not being able to charge most of them with crimes other than trespassing and some property crimes (because they likely are not the drug cartel smugglers and human traffickers Abbott claims they are), many of them are just sitting in pretrial detention for weeks or months. Normally a person arrested in Texas for a nonviolent misdemeanor would be released or out on bail quickly, in a matter of days at most. That's not happening here.
In September, The Texas Tribune reported that hundreds of migrants weren't even being charged with crimes or provided with lawyers. State statute requires them to be charged or released within 30 days at most for trespassing charges. For a law-and-order type of guy, Abbott doesn't seem terribly inclined to enforce the state's own rules.
Meanwhile the courts on these border counties are being overwhelmed. Texas Monthly reports that Kinney County (population: 3,659), the ground zero for a lot of these arrests, hasn't had a jury trial in seven years. Kinney officials have filed charges against those they've detained, more than 1,000 migrants, but it's not entirely clear how they'll be able to arrange trials.
Abbott's crusade comes with costs, and they're considerable. Abbott shifted $250 million dollars from elsewhere in the budget (including the prison system itself) to fund this program. And the state legislature directed another $3 billion his way for border enforcement. Officials in Kinney County calculate that actually prosecuting all these immigrants will cost them $5 million, but Operation Lone Star's funding is sending only $3.19 million their way, according to Texas Monthly.
And look at what they're getting, according to The Wall Street Journal:
Of 170 Operation Lone Star cases resolved as of Nov. 1, about 70% were dismissed, declined or otherwise dropped, in some instances for lack of evidence, according to court records. The remaining cases ended in plea agreements during arraignments held via videoconference. The men were given sentences equal to or less than the time they had already served in jail.
In Val Verde County, the prosecutor dropped two cases when police body camera footage showed state troopers luring two immigrants onto private property so they could arrest them for trespassing.
This is big-government conservatism in action. A lot of money is being distributed to government employees. Citizens are being told there's a massive crisis that needs to be resolved. But to the extent that there is an actual crisis, this money is not, in fact, resolving it; it's instead imprisoning people in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights—which, yes, do apply to people in the United States illegally.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
But with a lot of cash.
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening… And i get surly a check of $12600 what's awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won't regret it! ……...........VISIT HERE
I am making $165 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience masses freedom now that i'm my non-public boss.
that is what I do...... Visit Here<b
I made over $700 per day using my mobile in part time. I recently got my 5th paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily.ZXv simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now……………… READ MORE
Seriously I don’t know why more people haven’t tried this, I work two shifts, 2 hours in the day and 2 in the evening…Fh And i get surly a check of $12600 what’s awesome is I m working from home so I get more time with my kids.
Try it, you won’t regret it........CASHAPP NOW
I am taking in substantial income two Hundred$ dollar online from my PC. A month ago I GOT check of almost $31k, this online work is basic and FEz direct, don’t need to go OFFICE, Its home online activity.
For More Information Visit…………Pays24
Instead, according to media reports from multiple outlets, suspected illegal immigrants caught at the border are being arrested for misdemeanor trespassing and then being held in jail.
And then…nothing, frequently.
For a minute I thought I was reading a story about the January 6 insurrectionists.
local story.
Exactly my thought.
No, they are not shooting them on sight for trespass.
They only shoot US citizens l
It's comedy gold watching you people try to play-act as liberals. Maybe it's a sign of progress, maybe it's fascist language-fucking.
I didn’t know pointing out hypocrisy was liberal. Talk about language-fucking.
Nobody has offered up one example of the Jan 6 terrorists being denied any due process.
“leaving detainees stuck in jails for weeks or even months”
January 6th was 10 months ago. People are still in jail for trespassing. Reason is not covering that story. Are you just being obtuse, or do you justify the difference because you hate them?
In Tony’s defense, he said one example. You offered multiples.
But they haven't been denied due process, right?
So it’s obtuse then.
Tony is a disingenuous, narcissistic sociopath of low intelligence. Good luck ever having an honest discussion with him.
True.
Yes, they have.
10 months should have seen them already tried, or charges dropped and released.
We're not talking about capital murder charge, just a misdemeanor.
The stupid is strong with you.
I agree that our criminal justice system is fucked, but it hasn't been any more fucked for these people than it has any other defendants who pose flight risks, has it?
Maybe the federal government could be bothered to do its job and enforce the immigration laws?
I suppose minor trespassing is not that big of a problem if it is not your property being trespassed upon.
Have any been released without being vaccinated?
You want due process? Send them the fuck home.
Texas is their home. Remember we stole Texas from Mexico in the 1830's, and then another big chunk of Mexico in 1848. Now I'm not suggesting that we give them back the land that is rightly theirs, but letting them live on it seems like good recompense.
My understanding is there are not a lot Mexican nationals coming in from Mexico anymore, unless you want to count all of the old "New Spain" as Mexico.
Aside from the observation that most do not come from Mexico, what world do you live in where Mexicans stealing land from native Americans gives them perpetual claim? They stole it, and we got it in a war.
Another fact - the average Guatemalan or Honduran has completed six years education. That fact comes from the governments themselves. The government folks in the US consider anyone under 21 to be a 'child' but almost all of the young men have been working for years and undertook the trip north unaccompanied, because they are considered to be adults in the society they come from.
Yes but in fairness a sixth year Honduran education is better then a 12 year Loudoun County education.
Cite?
I'm not sure obvious jokes need a citation.
Loudoun country curriculum:
Q What is 2 + 2?
A White men are racist
Q what is the longest river in the USA?
A White men are racist
Q What does the US Constitution say about abortion?
A White men are racist
We hear you Loudoun clear.
Don’t forget about calling yourself a trans female so you can get into the girl’s locker room and sexually assault them.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/loudoun-county-parents-worst-school-board-america
But JohannesDinkle got it.
First off, this kind of historical tit-for-tat is an impossible game, but as one person correctly noted, if you want to play it, "Then let's have a go. Where does Ankara send Kim Kardashian her reparations check?"
Secondly, you assume that all of these immigrants are from Mexico. They're not. So this isn't even a historical grievance game between Mexico and Texas. And let's pretend for a moment it was... would these immigrants be restricted to ONLY Texas if Babycakes retroactively declares Texas a sub-fiefdom of Mexico?
Oh, and just FYI, the Texas Revolution of 1835 was a ragtag group #resisting Mexico's Imperialist Hegemony. Whatever troubles we caused Mexico, we've repaid them in kind by naming a town after the general that lost it. It even has a Dairy Queen.
Just a note on my link, Google Earth was allegedly stolen technology from a German company. So you might want to boycott it.
Also quite a few Tejanos fought against the Mexican government. Should we invalidate their choice to fight along side the Evil White Supremacists for freedom from the Mexican government?
Internalized racism.
*drops microphone*
They should be tried, convicted and sentenced to manuel labor.
babycakes must be killallrednecks because he's the only one I have muted and both are greyed out.
After doxing someone’s dead friend it makes sense he’d change handles.
No, TX is not their home. They are illegal aliens. Ship their asses home. But tell you what babycakes, we can fly them business class instead of economy.
They deserve nothing whatsoever.
Build catapults along the border to send them home.
Babycakres you need to study your Texas history. “We” (the USA) did not steal Texas from Mexico.
Remember we stole Texas from Mexico in the 1830's, and then another big chunk of Mexico in 1848.
This is not a remotely accurate characterization.
When Mexico declared independence from Spain, and fought a long war to finally cement it, significant factions in both TX and CA saw that as also being their independence from Mexico.
The manner in which Polk and Tyler made sure we got involved in the civil war that was going on in Texas and northern Mexico was underhanded, and the actions of Fremont and Stockton in California after its peaceful surrender were unsavory, but California also had a significant percentage of its population, even pre-1844, that thought joining the US was not only inevitable, but desirable, considering the extremely poor manner in which Spain managed its colonies, particularly really far-flung and remote colonies like CA and TX.
In point of fact, Mexico was pretty on the fence about whether they even wanted CA, which was considered a huge disappointment and more of burden than a boon, and the total refusal of either Spain or Mexico to fortify CA in any way was a major factor in much of the local population feeling like CA becoming part of the USA was only a matter of time.
In point of fact, Mexico was pretty on the fence about whether they even wanted CA, which was considered a huge disappointment and more of burden than a boon,
Mexico was right.
Texas was stolen from Mexico in the same sense that the 13 colonies were stolen from England.
No, it isn't their home and it's stupid to claim that it is. Texas has a native hispanic population. They're called Tejanos. And nobody claims for a second that they're anything other than American. Saying that people from areas of Mexico that were never part of Texas have some sort of legitimate claim of residency in Texas is as asinine as claiming that Americans have an untrammeled right to traipse into the Philippines because they were once an American possession.
Texas has a native hispanic population. They're called Tejanos.
And in CA they're Californios. There aren't many of them, but those that there are . . . let's just say they don't tend to be Progressives.
I don't recall al those Haitians, Asians, Somalis being from the former territory . Someone clue me in as to when Haitians formerly resided in Texas. The same goes for the Chinese who also sneak across the border. Not to mention those from Guatemala and , El Salvador many who are members of MS 13. Oh yes, it was their land originally. NOT!
The entire narrative about Texas being somehow a native home for Mexicans is rubbish. Sheer rubbish. Just how many of those Indian tribes actually lived in that territory?
Any claim of ownership based on historical circumstances is going to draw an arbitrary line. Most Americans are relatively recent immigrants, so if you're drawing that line any time after 1492, you're picking winners and losers among a bunch of recent immigrants.
Even a lot of Mexicans are descended from post-1492 immigrants
Genetically pure indigenous people are rather thin on the ground continent-wide.
The Moreno, darker skinned Mexicans, are generally looked down upon in Mexico.
The tentacles of white supremacy are long and go deep.
No one cares about your weird fetish.
It isn’t rightfully theirs. In fact, we’ve been extremely patient and generous with them.
Yeah, well Mexico stole their country from Spain. . .
Another rousing meeting of Libertarians For Authoritarian, Bigoted, Cruel Immigration Policies And Practices!
Carry on, clingers. That is, carry on with complying with the rules established by better Americans and whining about it profusely and impotently.
This article would be more serious if Reason had discussed the J6 jailings in the last 10 months.
WTF does that have to do with immigration policy?
Not a single insurrectionist isn't receiving normal due process.
Did you read the article dummy? The part about due process?
Oh, so NOW due process matters?
It's always mattered, just not towards conservatives, or men, or white people, or any other group presently disfavored by the leftist mob Reason seems to cheerlead for.
Which alleged criminals are not receiving due process?
Ashli Babbitt?
Sure she was. The justice department and capitol police investigated the matter thoroughly and rendered judgments.
Don't ever change. You continue to prove the authoritarian nature of the left. Capital punishments for trespass.
Capitol punishment.
That was self-defense. You know, self-defense.
No. No it wasn’t.
Needs to sue the federal government for not doing its job.
How dare a state try to take care of a problem the Supremacy Clause federal government just ignores?! A good Libertarian knows that states don't have any rights to act different than the federal government dictates.
"Leaves Alleged Illegal Immigrants ---"
WOW
Reason finally admitted they were only alleged immigrants.
Do you think someone reached them as to the misinformation they were telling its readers ?
'Operation Lone Star' is a stupid name. They should have called it 'Operation Capitol Insurrection' and told people they were arresting right-wing fascists.
The former Nazis didn't resettle in South America for nothing.
Buenos aryans
Ha ha ha ha ha...that's not funny!
Not sure how to take your response here. Given the comment he was replying to it was top notch.
Was it a pearl clutching response...? or what are you trying to say here??
Are the Jan. 6 losers enjoying their time behind bars? Maybe some reflection that might make them better people than the bigoted, slack-jawed, antisocial hayseeds they were before Jan. 6?
Sociopath flag.
Texas Monthly reports that Kinney County (population: 3,659), the ground zero for a lot of these arrests, hasn't had a jury trial in seven years.
How could you build an impartial jury in a county that small?
Does that opinion apply to so-called impartial company employees that are expected to be impartial - assuming they only have 3,659 employees ?
So the star witness foe the prosecution Rosenkratz who the prosecution presented as a hero on the look out for an active shooter just admitted in court he aimed his weapon at Rittenhouse first before Kyle shot. Prosecutor literally facepalms
https://mobile.twitter.com/thevivafrei/status/1457774701673996298
Grosskreutz*
The case is over.
It should never have been tried in the first place. Video existed.
The Timcast today was hilarious. He played the clip of the prosecutor doing the facepalm.
It's like the prosecutor never reviewed any of the evidence and just said "fuck it, I'll wing it".
Now how long after this loss until the feds file charges with a civil rights charge?
While it's fun to watch the prosecution royally fuck this whole thing up, there's still no guarantee that Rittenhouse will be acquitted.
Some guy who claims to be related to George Floyd (PBUH) just threatened to get photos and doxx the jurors if Rittenhouse is acquitted.
A job Maxine Waters no longer is willing to do?
^This. There's no way that the establishment will let justice prevail. It fucks too many narratives.
Surely, St George the Meth Head is the Saint we need now.
You think he would be able to pull it off? Or would he choke?
I often take some of these links with a grain of salt, but this is explosive. This is huge. I agree with the lawyer in the video... "directed verdict", this should lead to immediate acquittal.
Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead
They should be treated in exactly the same manner as the Jan 6 detainees. How could any Democrat object to that?
"Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's border-control crusade is overwhelming court systems, leaving detainees stuck in jails for weeks or even months without due process, and generally isn't resulting in many convictions."
This sounds like an assertion, but where is the evidence. When you say it's "without due process", what do you mean exactly? It seems to me that you're accusing Texas of holding people for trial because they can't make bail, which doesn't violate anyone's due process rights. Are you saying that holding people for trial because they can't make bail is unconstitutional?
"Under Texas law, criminal defendants must be assigned an attorney within three days of asking for one. State statute also requires that defendants be released from jail if prosecutors delay cases by not filing charges quickly. For trespassing, the charge on which the vast majority of the imprisoned migrants were arrested, that deadline is set at 15 or 30 days, depending on the charge level.
Both of those deadlines have fallen by the wayside as Abbott, a former Texas Supreme Court justice and state attorney general, pursues his initiative for state police to arrest migrants suspected of illegally entering the country for state crimes such as trespassing or human smuggling. Since the effort began in July, about 1,000 migrants have been sent to two Texas prisons converted into immigration jails. On Friday, nearly 900 men remained locked up, prison officials reported.
----The Texas Tribune
https://www.texastribune.org/2021/09/27/texas-border-migrants-jail/
Some facts!
IF IF IF all 900 of those accused of trespassing (but not necessarily human trafficking) have been there for more than 30 days, they should be released.
Are more coming in as others are being released? How many of them have been there for more than 30 days?
"Jindal said her organization was assigned to represent about 50 of those men a week and a half ago, but many had been arrested in early August and sat in prison without attorneys for nearly six weeks."
----Ibidem
Doesn't this mean that those who were there in August have already been released? Even if they were jailed on the very last day of August, that means they were released weeks ago--if they were only there for six weeks.
And when they say "many", are they talking about the many among the 50 or many among the 900?
I'd also bet if they returned to Mexico, there'd be no prison involved.
I don’t care about convictions. I want them to sit for months and be miserable and tell their friends to turn around and go back home.
The goal is to reduce the flow, not build a stack of convictions.
"Texas does not have the authority to deport any of these people, so the rest are either still detained in jail or being released back into the community—the very outcome Abbott insists he was trying to stop."
There's this thing called a "deterrent". It's like the opposite of a moral hazard.
For instance, let's say the president issued an executive order that the United States wouldn't deport anyone who came to the U.S. as a child. Over the course of a few years, asylum seekers from the El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras went from less a thousand a year to 150,000 a month--with 80% of that 150,000 being either children or families traveling with their children. That would be an example of a moral hazard. That executive order provides an incentive to take a risk they wouldn't take without the president's guarantee.
A deterrent is like the opposite of moral hazard because it works against that kind of incentive. The idea is that if people are forced to bear the costs of the illegal things they do, then they're less likely to do that thing. So, for instance, if Abbot makes being an illegal alien in Texas a royal pain in the ass, more so than it would be elsewhere, they're likely to approach the border of the U.S. at some other state, and they're likely to avoid Texas as much as possible. This doesn't just work with illegal border crossings. It also works with armed robbery, drunk driving, etc.
If you don't want to go to jail for drunk driving in Texas, there's an easy way to avoid that, too. No, throwing people in jail for driving drunk in Texas won't solve the problem completely, but if there weren't any negative consequences for driving drunk in Texas, the number of people doing so would increase dramatically. I don't know if the benefits of Abbot's policies outweigh the costs and the downsides, but I know that disqualifying the best non-perfect solution, because some of the problem would still exist despite it, is irrational.
The president issued a libertarian executive order, recognizing that borders are bullshit social constructs that only serve to keep weed out of the deserving hands of the American
electorateclumps of cells that happen to reside inside those social constructs through a thing called "Life's Lottery".Get with the program and ignore Tuccille's article on America being free in an increasingly unfree world. America isn't free, it's just a geographic territory that, through Life's Lottery seems to appear to be more free than the stretches of geographic territories which are elsewhere. People have a right to come to this free geographic region and get away from their unfree geographic region!
So we can just send them all to your house, because your house is just a geographic territory that they have as much right to live in as you do.
By the way, those bullshit social constructs were just re-opened, according to the media.
This is big-government conservatism in action.
Donnie-Boy's legacy.
Because the Bushes, Cheney's, Romney's and McCain's were small government by comparison or something?
It's not so much that you're uneducated as maleducated.
Mostly he’s a lying, trolling, poster of kiddie porn.
Fuckin’ Abbott. Trying to be Trump but instead just pissing away money and accomplishing nothing. And violating state law to boot.
And yeah you can say it’s no big deal to break the law to hold those people, but as a Texan if he can do it to them he can do it to me.
They are doing it in DC , did you complain about that?
Yeah. I don’t like that either.
See, it’s possible to be consistent philosophically in all situations. You should try it.
It wasn't consistent. You advertised only one side until called out. Just like you did this weekend where you claimed trump was the only venom in government.
The dumbasses lying on cots behind bars for Jan. 6 crimes are among my favorite culture war casualties.
Let's hope every one of them is long-term unemployed and loses a house.
Deterrence by example is sometimes necessary.
Don't citizens have constitutional rights, whereas foreigners illegally residing in the country don't?
Not exactly, they have some protections under the constitution. So they have a right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment for instance but they don't have the right to vote. 14th Amendment Sect 1, I think covers it (not an attorney).
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
That doesn't seem to cover illegals.
That doesn't seem to cover illegals.
Nor should it.
The Constitution was written for "We, The People of the United States", not those, who come here, against the laws made pursuant to its mandate.
Those going through the prescribed immigration process, are "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S., but anyone, who hasn't, is not deserving of the Constitution's protection, including "due process".
SCOTUS decisions that say they do are as bad as "Dred Scott" or "Korematsu" and should call for impeachment of any justice, who doesn't rule to have such edicts overturned.
Trying to be Trump? That sounds a lot like Trump's whole MO.
Thomas Sowell on Twitter:
Borders are terrible places for limited government.
Illegal Immigrants Trapped in Jail with No Due Process
Are illegal immigrants constitutionally afforded due process?
I thought that was only for American citizens (except iNsurrEctionisTS of course).
Well, realistically, yes. I don't have any problems with treating illegal immigrants like human beings and giving them all the due process anyone should be afforded if they find themselves in court. However, that doesn't change the fact "release" may often mean being "sent back to country of origin".
Well, I mean, if you could determine that they are absolutely illegal immigrants. Perhaps they're not. I would also argue we have a little concept of human rights. Or are you in favor of Guantanamo too?
Nothing like "libertarians" arguing against any kind of application of basic rights.
That's not the point. Also, due process isn't a human right, and human rights usually aren't extended to people knowingly committing criminal acts..
I mean you of all people, who advocates the death penalty for trespassing, shouldn't be pretending otherwise when it comes to border jumping.
"human rights usually aren't extended to people knowingly committing criminal acts."
Look at the big brains on this one.
What is your point, Tony?
Human rights are generally extended to criminals. Didn't know if you knew that.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Yes. "Any person" gets due process.
No, it says "All persons born or naturalized"..."and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,".
Not any person.
Pretty limited, actually.
Unless you're a complete dumbass.
Retired reader as well, I take it.
Sentence 1 (the one you're quoting): All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Sentence 2 (the one with the due process clause): No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Just like the Jan. 6th protestors. Seems to be a common occurrence is Biden's America.
Which insurrectionists are being treated unconstitutionally?
I'll note that none of these "insurrectionists" have been charged with that offense.
I'd say the people arrested in connection to the events of January 6 are being subject to excessive bail, having excessive fines imposed or being required, or having cruel and unusual punishments inflicted, all prohibited by Amendment 8 to the U.S. Constitution.
Also Amendment 6, having been denied a speedy trial.
Make it as uncomfortable for the illegals as possible. The word will get back to the others who will then think twice before attempting to enter the states ILLEGALLY.
Short of civilian militia groups manning the border, Abbot is trying to do what he can to stem the flow of ILLEGALS into the country.
I’d be happy if a militia guarded the border with woodchippers.
It would send an unambiguous message when the first remains are sent back to Mexico.
sent back to Mexico
By catapult.
::spits out beverage:: haha
If you're a libertarian, and you believe in maximizing individual liberty at all costs, you have to make a lot of effort to justify borders at all, it seems to me, let alone harsh restrictions on who can cross and harsh treatment of people who do, which even under US law is considered a minor infraction.
You don't get to be for maximum individual liberty but just for yourself and people you're comfortable being around. That's not how being an adult works.
Open borders are great…without a first class cradle to grave welfare system on one side.
So individuals don't deserve the liberty to move to another country because of the social policies of that country?
They do when the folks in the other country have the liberty to be free from being forced to pay for them (and others already there).
I encourage you to move to Dagestan and preach this to them.
Just wondering when all the government force ends and the liberty begins with you people.
The question is when should government use force.
I thought the question was how do we minimize government force?
The base should be not at all.
you believe in maximizing individual liberty at all costs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8Afcdzuk-Q
Well gee, that sucks for them. So maybe they shouldn't come here illegally? Crazy thought, I know.
So? They're illegals, who cares if they don't like their accomodations? The best they can (or should) hope for is being deported.
I find it humorous that there is SOOOOOOO much illegal immigration that it's plugging up the entire state of Texas court systems yet the painted moral of the story is "Just let them get away with it".
Yes it is the federal governments JOB... Why aren't they doing their Job? Seems funny they insist they need every last working $1 the citizens create but can't seem to find enough resources to do their BASIC JOB.
Gosh 3.1T divided by 1,954 miles is $1,586,489,252 / mile?! WTF!
An army of un-armed state-less combatants is still an army. You can surrender your own future to them, but you will not steal mine for them.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's border-control crusade is overwhelming court systems, leaving detainees stuck in jails for weeks or even months without due process, and generally isn't resulting in many convictions.
It's all Joe Biden's fault. Reason forgets to mention that.
Reason cares about open borders...the Fed, attack on the Bill of Rights, foreign wars, and degenerate behavior is not a problem.
I'm starting to think conservatives are a bunch of big government loving jerks.
When it comes to Constitutional Government they aren't anarchists.
If the National Government isn't there for Nation Defense what excuse does it have for even existing?????
Reason wants people to believe illegally entering a country is no different from a 12 year old trespassing to retrieve a foul ball from his neighbor's backyard.
"trapped in jail with no due process", sounds like a pretty good deterrent to me.
Border enforcement is ordinarily the federal government's job
And if they they were doing it, we wouldn't have this problem.
Trapped in Jail with No Due Process
The "due process" to which they are entitled is immediate deportation. Being allowed to stay here in jail is leniency.
Its pretty easy..if you are here illegally you are deported. If you employ someone illegal you are fined $100K no matter the size of the company. The problem at the border ends in 48 hours..
So I'm from some Central or South American worker's paradise, whose thugocracy is kept in power by the chattering classes and their friends in State. The great state of Texas is offering me free room and board for a couple of months, and then in all likelihood setting me free. This is supposed to act as a deterrent to my sneaking into the United States?
Nice Blog, keep it up for more information like this. accounting training
Nice Blog, keep it up for more information like this. best distance learning courses in uk
Thanks for sharing valuable information
Thanks for such post and please keep it up..
“Nice info!”