California Lawmakers Seek To Reinstate Affirmative Action by Repealing Proposition 209
Assembly Constitutional Amendment 5 is now in the hands of the state Senate.

In 1996 voters in California approved Proposition 209, a ballot initiative that amended the California Constitution to prohibit the state from "discriminat[ing] against, or grant[ing] preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the base of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education or public contracting."
"Racial preferences are dead," declared Ward Connerly, a leading advocate of Prop. 209, in a 1998 interview with Reason's Michael Lynch. "We are going back to what John F. Kennedy said in 1963, that 'race has no place in American life or law.'"
Nearly a quarter-century later, supporters of affirmative action are hoping to repeal Connerly's handiwork. As the Los Angeles Times reports, "California voters would be asked to erase the state's 24-year ban on affirmative action in November under a proposal approved [on June 10] by the state Assembly, with supporters arguing their effort is more important than ever amid nationwide protests for racial equality and justice."
Known as Assembly Constitutional Amendment 5, the proposal would explicitly repeal the language of Prop. 209, which can be found in Section 31, Article 1 of the California Constitution. "It is the intent of the Legislature," declares ACA5, "that California remedy discrimination against, and underrepresentation of, certain disadvantaged groups in a manner consistent with the United States Constitution and allow gender, racial, and ethnic diversity to be considered among the factors used to decide college admissions and hiring and contracting by government institutions."
The bill is now in the hands of the state Senate, which must ratify the measure by June 25 if it is going to appear on the November 3 ballot.
Related: "Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Affirmative Action in University of Texas Case."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good!
#LibertariansForRacialPreferences
#DiversityAboveAll
Will African-American students still be banned from taking racist IQ tests? Remember, if the data set doesn't show equality between the races and sexes, the data set is flawed and should be disregarded.
I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job.RET. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction on the given website.
See………….Money90
We must fight racism with racism.
Because the Democrats know where to get their best ideas.
I quit working at shoprite to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45 to 85 per/h. Without a doubt, this is the easiest and most financially rewarding job I've ever had.FSd I actually started 6 months ago and this has totally changed my life.
For more details visit..........Read More
We are simply correcting the mistakes of the past. How is favoritism toward African-American students in college admissions any different than reparations provided to Japanese-Americans who were wrongly interred during World War 2? We need to be better!
I know you're trying to be sarcastic but you're not very good at it. (In fairness, Poe's Law makes sarcasm very hard for everyone.) Please just try posting sincerely.
I'm to cynical to be sincere. Can't wait for the Black Lives Matter themed witch burning trials that will shortly be coming to American society!
Poe folk don't 'spect much
My tell tail heart bleeds for you.
Bad time to be an Asian trying to get into Calfornia schools if this passes.
The bill is now in the hands of the state Senate, which must ratify the measure by June 25 if it is going to appear on the November 3 ballot.
And if that happens, what are its chances of passing?
I was surprised when California passed 209 in the first place; otherwise I'd expect this mandated-racism amendment to pass in a landslide.
Prop 209 was passed in 1996 when racist white people still had an overwhelming control of the Californian government. Today, with legal and undocumented immigration, California is quickly becoming a progressive libertarian utopia.
Prop 209 was not passed by the government, it was an initiative and thus voted on by the people.
Ward Connerly is a Black Man. He championed it. To call Ward Connerly "racist white people" is to display you stupidity.
Saying that neutrality with respect to race is racist is like saying the first amendment is hostile to religion. And yes, back in the day some people actually argued that.
Black people can suffer from internalized white supremacy. This is the unfortunate outcome of a society that refuses to admit that American was founded as a white supremacist colonial state.
I think you have internalized too many Struggle Sessions.
I'm not claiming California to be clean as the wind driven snow, but acting like it was the hotbed of racism in the 90s is bullshit.
Oh wait, you're just a puppet account for Titania McGrath, aren't you?
117%
Sorry, I was getting coffee; where are the racism riots happening?
Check the Weather Channel for current local weather and race relations.
Yeah, but what about the 10 day forecast for race relations?
No more black ice reports.
What about drinking fountains? Will California consider race when setting up drinking fountains?
False equivalence.
Only when they're in cake shops.
And photographers' dark rooms are problematic.
Whereas in the past there were fountains for Whites only, now to catch up there will be fountains allowed for Blacks only. Progress!
Watch your mouth!
Point of order: he wasn't talking about Shaft!
"Racial preferences are dead."
Hmm. Come to think of it, why does California continue to permit *dead* people to be discriminated against and underrepresented in public employment, public education, and public contracting?
#ZombieSufferage
#ZombiesAreAmericansToo
#ZLM
It's remarkable how we as a culture over react to everything. We shut down our economy, the world's largest, for the flu and now we're going to throw out the Constitution to give the PRETENSE of hiring black people into higher positions. I don't think we need this, I don't think it's an issue to put into place such massive government-effort, we are killing ourselves for an ideology. It's amazing, really. I'm not sure the human race has ever witnessed such drama. I guess in spirit of Gay Pride Month (excuse me, LGBTQAI+ month) we're all drama queens now.
COVID is a cold, not a flu. #FactLivesMatter
Sure is nice to help all them black folks what can't help themselves get jobs - kinda funny though that a few hundred years ago when we gave them all jobs they didn't like that so good. Maybe it ain't about the jobs.
Asians are too good at getting jobs. We must correct this, comrade.
Violating equal protection under law is good if you are pandering to a minority.
And the dumpster-fire that is California continues.
So sad. I use to really like that place.
No more Chinese students in universities! They will be the ones to lose the most, apparently as it should be.
the diversity-worshippers have been furious for 24 years. this is their chance.
My daughter is half Chinese but one quarter Native American. Does this hurt her or help her? Such a nonsensical solution to bad schools.
Govts cannot discriminate or pass laws forcing people to discriminate or why have a Constitution and Bill of Rights. JC..this is ridiculous...and goes back to the very far left pushing cultural marxist bs.
Racial preferences are dead? I guess we are going back to what John F. Kennedy said in 1963 electrician fairfax va
Looking forward to making the percentages work for Catholics at Ivey League, the Media, Academia, and of course Hollywood.
Does Goldman Sachs have 47% Catholics in the boardroom? I mean if certain groups are over represented..time for them to step down..hell most of my university profs would have to step aside and allow other "groups" to take over. Doesn't matter if they are qualified or not.. Hey Facebook and Google..time your woke Ivy League folks stand aside for more Catholics...ha ha