Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Tulsi Gabbard

DNC Changes Debate Qualifications, Excluding Tulsi Gabbard

The Hawaiian representative's two delegates will no longer be enough to earn her a spot in the upcoming CNN/Univision debate in Phoenix.

Christian Britschgi | 3.6.2020 4:46 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Hawk dressed in dove white? | KEVIN DIETSCH/UPI/Newscom
Tulsi Gabbard (KEVIN DIETSCH/UPI/Newscom)

The qualifying criteria for the next Democratic debate are out, and they manage to exclude the only veteran and only woman of color left in the race: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D–Hawaii).

This afternoon, Politico reported that the candidates still in the running for the Democratic presidential nomination will need to have earned at least 20 percent of the delegates awarded thus far in order to participate in the March 15 debate hosted by CNN and Univision in Phoenix, Arizona.

That means that only former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.), who respectively have 48 percent and 41 percent of the delegates so far, will be on next Sunday's stage.

Despite her strong showing in the American Samoa caucuses where she won two delegates, Gabbard still falls short of that very high threshold.

Had the Democratic National Committee stuck with its criteria for the last debate it held on February 25—which only required each candidate to have won a single delegate—Gabbard would have qualified.

DNC Communications Director Xochitl Hinojosa foreshadowed this decision on Super Tuesday, saying on Twitter that "by the time we have the March debate, almost 2,000 delegates will be allocated. The threshold will reflect where we are in the race, as it always has."

We have two more debates-- of course the threshold will go up. By the time we have the March debate, almost 2,000 delegates will be allocated. The threshold will reflect where we are in the race, as it always has.

— Xochitl Hinojosa (@XochitlHinojosa) March 4, 2020

In response to the expected rule change, Gabbard tweeted Thursday about her campaign's foreign policy focus, and how that can't be separated from the domestic issues that have gotten the most attention in past debates.

I welcome the opportunity to raise & discuss the foreign policy challenges we face, like the new cold war/nuclear arms race, Turkey's efforts to drag the U.S. into a war with Russia over Syria, the coronavirus, & more. Domestic policy cannot be separated from foreign policy. https://t.co/jgVxSz1huX

— Tulsi Gabbard ???? (@TulsiGabbard) March 5, 2020

Biden and Sanders have sparred in the past over the former's initial support for the Iraq War, so there is some chance that the two candidates' contrasting foreign policy visions will be on display come the next debate.

Still, it might have been interesting to have Gabbard, an Iraq War veteran, up on stage to offer her own unique perspective on foreign policy. She's repeatedly argued that rising tensions between the U.S., Russia, and China is putting the country on the road to nuclear war.

A Bernie-Biden smackdown will likely feature less talk of a nuclear apocalypse and a lot more bickering about health care. That's enough to get anyone running for their fall out shelter.

Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Council of Dads Is a Derivative Dud

Christian Britschgi is a reporter at Reason.

Tulsi GabbardDebatesDebates 2020Election 2020
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (188)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. De Oppresso Liber   5 years ago

    Biden has been chosen by the high council. Its will must be done.

    1. Chipper Morning Wood   5 years ago

      No, the voters chose Biden. Don't ascribe to conspiracy theories what can be easily be explained as the intellectual sloth of the voters.

      1. De Oppresso Liber   5 years ago

        While I agree with your assessment regarding the current allotment of delegates, the voters did not change the debate entry rules at the last moment.

        1. R Mac   5 years ago

          Or the timing of when all the other candidates dropped out.

          1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

            Or Rachel Maddow

        2. Chipper Morning Wood   5 years ago

          I was only referring to Biden's rise.

          1. Sevo   5 years ago

            Nobody gets a "rise" from Maddow.

          2. Juice   5 years ago

            The one he gets when he sniffs children?

            1. Mother's lament   5 years ago

              Was Biden the prototype of Congressman David Dilbeck?

        3. BadLib   5 years ago

          There was no "last moment" change.

          The debate criteria hadn't been set yet - just as the criteria wasn't set for recent debates until fairly close to the debate. Of course the rules for inclusion don't remain the same from the first debate to the last debate - that would be absurd.

          When the DNC set the criteria for the next debate, they took into consideration the landscape -- and there were only three candidates left - one of whom has only garnered (based on NPR's analysis of currently counted votes) 0.14% of the total allocated delegates while the other two have received 47.53% and 41.02% of the total allocated delegates respectively. If Warren and/or Bloomberg had remained in the race, maybe the DNC would have lowered the criteria to include them (they have 4.58% and 4.37% of the total allocated delegates respectively) - but even that would have been a stretch. Note that even Warren and Bloomberg have over 30 times as many delegates as Gabbard while Biden only has 10 times as many delegates as Bloomberg so the gap is much smaller there.

          Gabbard simply isn't a contender and has zero chance of winning the nomination. The debates are not a venue for politicians to gain a national audience for some future run for office -- it's a venue to help voters evaluate those who have a possibility of being in the 2020 general election.

          Now we can actually have something resembling a debate instead of a bunch of people trying to talk over each other in hopes of getting a word in edgewise. It will be much more informative (and, frankly, entertaining).

          1. BadLib   5 years ago

            Argh.. My comment posted one level too far down...

            My kingdom for a 'preview' and 'five minute edit/delete' window.

            1. BigT   5 years ago

              The bad news is that it was posted at all. Apologists for the DNC are vermin.

          2. CE   5 years ago

            That sounds an awful lot like "making it up as you go along". Sports leagues don't change the criteria for the playoffs after each round, they publish them in advance.

          3. Red Rocks White Privilege   5 years ago

            The debates are not a venue for politicians to gain a national audience for some future run for office

            The fuck they aren't. If that was the case then Buttigieg, whose most notable political accomplishments were being mayor of a dingy-ass college town and getting beat in elections for DNC chair and state treasurer, would have made the stage. Of course, he inadvertently revealed during Iowa that he's got connections to some notable Democrat dark money organizations, but that certainly doesn't explain why he and Klobuchar, who were FAR more competitive in the early caucuses than Biden, suddenly dropped out within 48 hours of Super Tuesday and endorsed Sleepy Joe.

          4. John C. Randolph   5 years ago

            Gabbard simply isn’t a contender and has zero chance of winning the nomination.

            Of course not. She's the only remaining one in the clown car who isn't an absolute scumbag. She never had a chance in the party that nominated the likes of Bubba or Hillary Clinton.

            -jcr

      2. ravenshrike   5 years ago

        The DNC doesn't want the assassin on the debate stage changing their minds. One round with Tulsi would have the doddering old fool wandering in circles on live TV asking where he was. Which would effectively leave the dem primary voters with an interesting question, should they vote for the commie rat bastard or the dementia patient who should be in an old folks home. They still wouldnt vote for Tulsi of course because she's anti-war without being a commie rat bastard and she clearly loves America, whatever her political bent.

        1. Punk1981   5 years ago

          Brilliantly stated!
          She was the ONLY one that most right thinking people would consider, which is an automatic disqualification.
          The only veteran and only women...
          The Democratic Party is universally offensive.

          1. squid_hunt   5 years ago

            Yay for the libertarian case for identity politics!

    2. DrDave   5 years ago

      The fascist blood of the DNC prevailed again, as it did in 2016.

    3. DenverJ   5 years ago

      Doesn't count until there's yellow smoke.

      1. Mother's lament   5 years ago

        White smoke.

        Annuntio vobis gaudium magnum:
        Habemus Candidatum!
        Eminentissimum ac Reverendissimum Dominum,
        Dominum Joe,
        Sanctae partium Democratic princeps Biden,
        qui sibi nomen imposuit presidentum.

    4. icannotread   5 years ago

      In the middle of the debate uncle Joe forgets, asks where Tulsi is, and claims she'd make a great and sexy president.

      1. CE   5 years ago

        no, he just loses his train of thought, from fantasizing about smelling her beautiful hair.

        1. squid_hunt   5 years ago

          I consider that an acceptable response.

  2. Rich   5 years ago

    candidates still in the running for the Democratic presidential nomination will need to have earned at least 20 percent of the delegates awarded thus far in order to participate in the March 15 debate

  3. Eddy   5 years ago

    Biden's at 48% of the delegates? So, what are the odds Sanders will be able to catch up to that?

    1. Rich   5 years ago

      With or without the Milwaukee riots?

      1. Eddy   5 years ago

        What if they just made the streets run with beer, nobody would engage in any kind of political violence if they were filled with beer.

        /sarc

        1. Rich   5 years ago

          IIRC, the bars will be staying open until 0400.

          1. Eddy   5 years ago

            Great, then there should be no problem. When did drunken mobs ever become rowdy, especially with such a mellow German beverage?

            /sarc

            1. Nachtwaechter Staater   5 years ago

              um ...1923 ... in Munich ... OOOOOOOoHHHHHHHH ...

    2. CE   5 years ago

      Since Sanders has another 200 or so from his California win that haven't been officially allocated yet, pretty good.

      1. Juice   5 years ago

        Sanders will likely win the west coast states and maybe a few in the rustbelt.

  4. Mickey Rat   5 years ago

    The Democrats are a private organization, they can make their own rules as to who gets to use their platform.

    Is that not the way these things are supposed to work?

    1. Rich   5 years ago

      Yep. And some Democrats are more equal than others.

      1. squid_hunt   5 years ago

        There really is nothing sweeter than watching the supposed democratic party cheat people out of an hinest vote on national television. They have chosen the form of their own destruction.

    2. Kevin Smith   5 years ago

      Being free to make your own rules does not make you free from criticism for those rules

    3. Vernon Depner   5 years ago

      Yes. That's why we shouldn't have primaries. They're a sham.

    4. Chipper Morning Wood   5 years ago

      Yes, totally true. But then why are allowing private organization labels on the ballot? Aren't only individuals allowed to run?

    5. Shitlord of the Woodchippers   5 years ago

      I’m thrilled they’re doing this. It’s just one. Ore thing to get democrat voters to stay home on Election Day.

    6. Mother's lament   5 years ago

      "Is that not the way these things are supposed to work?"

      I'd like to see all organizations utilize libertarian principles. They're not just for governments.

      Also, I'm free to criticize their choices.

  5. speedylee   5 years ago

    It makes sense that later debates would have stricter requirements.

    1. Rich   5 years ago

      Like being able to count backwards from 99 by 7s, say, or being able to stand on one foot for 15 seconds?

    2. I'm Not Sure   5 years ago

      The Feats of Strength usually follows the Festivus Dinner and the Airing of Grievances.

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   5 years ago

        That should be quite a sight with Bernie and Biden. Next up, who can rip more sheets of paper in half at once, followed by the opening of jelly jars!

        1. Fat Mike's Drug Habit   5 years ago

          We should give them something more appropriate; like a shuffleboard competition or seeing who can get those damn kids off their lawn the quickest.

          1. Nardz   5 years ago

            No, the primary isn't over until someone pins Frank Costanza.
            These are the rules

          2. Conchfritters   5 years ago

            +1 shotgun Joe

      2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   5 years ago

        Everything is so terrible and unfair.

        Grievances aired. Let’s eat.

    3. Colossal Douchebag   5 years ago

      That's exactly what a sexist chauvanist pig would say.

    4. Vernon Depner   5 years ago

      Well, at least they've got a Jew.

  6. Dillinger   5 years ago

    ex post facto rules to keep the pretty chick off the stage w/the cast of Grumpy Old Men ... (D) is a manual on evil

    might be better to keep Tulsi away from Biden anyway

    1. Eddy   5 years ago

      For her sake or his?

      1. Dillinger   5 years ago

        hers.

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

          Tulsi can take care of herself. She's by far the most constitutionally vibrant candidate the Democrats have run in 30 years.

          1. Troglodyte Rex   5 years ago

            Except the Deez aren’t running her.

            The alleged party of women and minorities is looking a little hypocritical right about now.

            1. squid_hunt   5 years ago

              Yes, this relatively new development of hypocrisy in a national political party.

          2. Naaman Brown   5 years ago

            They aren't even allowing her a voice.
            Biden - Sanders - Gabbard would make an interesting debate.
            I could see Biden "stuttering" incoherently in response to Gabbard.

    2. Fat Mike's Drug Habit   5 years ago

      I have a feeling if Biden creepily sniffed her hair she'd beat the dementia out of him.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

        Reason needs a 'like' button.

    3. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   5 years ago

      "keep the pretty chick off the stage"

      You figure she's a 6?

      An incel 6, I could see.

      1. CE   5 years ago

        An incel 8. your mileage may vary.

        1. Shitlord of the Woodchippers   5 years ago

          That’s the most original thing Arty has ever said.

          1. FlameCCT   5 years ago

            RAK has his moments just like a broken clock or Creepy Uncle Joey!

      2. Mother's lament   5 years ago

        "Incel" is the leftist way to say "cuck".

    4. Shitlord of the Woodchippers   5 years ago

      Yep. A very diverse party. With only Statler and Waldorf on stage.

      1. Naaman Brown   5 years ago

        Make me wanna see a Cookie Monster and Big Bird debate.
        Brought to you be the letters D, N, C.

  7. Colossal Douchebag   5 years ago

    Way to go DNC! Shut another woman out. Nothing wrong with those optics!

    1. Rich   5 years ago

      Yep. The Dems are continuing their self-destruction.

    2. IceTrey   5 years ago

      The majority of Dem voters are women so I guess they're misogynistic sexists? More likely they know bitches be crazy.

      1. Shitlord of the Woodchippers   5 years ago

        And with great grandfather complexes.

    3. Hattori Hanzo   5 years ago

      What other woman was "shut out"?

      1. squid_hunt   5 years ago

        Anyone who has a little sister or daughter know if she didn't win it's because somebody cheated.

  8. MotörSteve   5 years ago

    She should show up anyway, and just start beating up DNC people. Because that would be awesome.

    1. Eddy   5 years ago

      There's a video game I'd buy.

      ...I mean, buy it so I could burn it in protest. Such mockery of the Democratic process has no place in the USA.

      1. SilentSkies   5 years ago

        There actually was a primary video game at one point. Tim Pool played it.

    2. BigT   5 years ago

      FOX should have her on the next night, giving her the chance to respond to the questions. THAT would be must see TV.

  9. IceTrey   5 years ago

    Who cares? She's done. It's only her ego running now.

    1. Rich   5 years ago

      We'll see if this applies to Bernie in a few days.

    2. Cy   5 years ago

      If even 1 of the 3 candidates gets Coronaed, she'd have a pretty good shot. Hell, this little stunt by the DNC might give her some momentum for screen time.

    3. Naaman Brown   5 years ago

      Biden and Sanders are old and mortal.
      They both look like the house they belong in should be a nursing home or hospice.
      There should be someone with a life expectancy running.

  10. Rich   5 years ago

    Hmm. Wasn't today the court date for her defamation lawsuit against Hillary ?

    1. BadLib   5 years ago

      Given that her ridiculous suit against Google was dismissed on Wednesday, I don't have high hopes for her equally ridiculous suit against Clinton.

  11. DRM   5 years ago

    What's in it for Biden to show up at the debate at all? The only thing it'd do is possibly give Sanders an opening to flip the race.

    So Biden should use Gabbard's exclusion as an excuse -- "If the only other actual Democrat with delegates still running is excluded, it's not an actual Democratic presidential debate" -- to skip it entirely.

    Heck, he could invite Gabbard himself to an "Actual Democrats" counter-debate scheduled for the same night. It's not like boosting her will hurt him much.

    1. Rich   5 years ago

      Beautiful.

    2. Rossami   5 years ago

      That's actually quite creative. And a remarkably good idea.

      Sanders is a pie-in-the-sky fool but without Warren to call him on it, the debate is all downside for Biden. A debate with Gabbard, though, would still get him publicity but basically risk free.

      1. DenverJ   5 years ago

        How is it risk free? She run circles around his senile old ass. It would be fun to watch her win the nomination, though.

        1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   5 years ago

          Run circles? She barely crawled. Now she's finished. Likely for good.

    3. BadLib   5 years ago

      Biden can focus on foreign affairs if he can steer the debate there. There is value in that as it can render Sanders less successful so Biden can start on his General Election campaign with a vengeance without have to worry about Sanders.

      Sanders is just out of step and has no real experience with foreign affairs (I don't count cozying up to socialist dictators to be "real experience" and I think most voters would share my view on that) and will look very weak.

      1. Nardz   5 years ago

        Buden is a fucking moron who's also showing his senility with growing frequency, while Bernie is a communist who has no other truck than "death to billionaires".
        Your clown ship is sinking fast

    4. Robert   5 years ago

      True. Sanders never turns down an invitation to appear, and Sanders appearing and talking by himself will sink himself.

  12. creech   5 years ago

    Listen up, Tulsi fanboys - she isn't going to sleep with you. If she looked like Janet Reno, you'd be ripping her positions (except for non-intervention) apart.

    1. R Mac   5 years ago

      Pretty sure I’ve seen plenty of negative comments in the past about her positions.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

      Her Medicare for all plan is the least worse, and since the glibertarian moment is... well, I can't even see it in my rearview anymore... that's saying something. Not happy with her position on guns, but no candidate will get much traction on that. And she's expressed continuous interest in working with the political opposition instead of calling them Russian assets. In today's political climate, she's pretty damned reasonable.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

        *least worst*

    3. DenverJ   5 years ago

      Listen up, Tulsi fanboys – she isn’t going to sleep with you.She might, you don't know. We're the right age for each other, and I still got game.

      1. DenverJ   5 years ago

        Huh, html fail. That's rare for me...

        1. BadLib   5 years ago

          Maybe you don't still got game? HTML is the first to go.

    4. CE   5 years ago

      Tulsi, positions, what were you saying?

  13. Earth Skeptic   5 years ago

    Exactly what color is Gabbard?

    1. Chipper Morning Wood   5 years ago

      Burnt sienna

    2. DenverJ   5 years ago

      White, according to the pic up top.

    3. FlameCCT   5 years ago

      Not sure about color although her race would be Pacific Islander.

  14. IceTrey   5 years ago

    She was born in American Samoa which means she's not a natural born citizen. Samoans are US nationals.

    1. Eddy   5 years ago

      I don't care, I want Samoa that.

    2. DRM   5 years ago

      She was born in American Samoa which means she’s not a natural born citizen.

      No, it doesn't. People born to a US citizen in an outlying US possession are natural-born citizens, and both of Gabbard's parents were US citizens, not just nationals.

      1. IceTrey   5 years ago

        Prove it.

      2. CE   5 years ago

        unlike John McCain, who was born in the Panama canal zone 2 years before the rules changed to make people so born natural born citizens.

        But then, George W. Bush and Dick Cheney both lived in the same state (same city even), so they couldn't run together either. Having a vacation home in Wyoming doesn't count.

        1. Ron   5 years ago

          babies born to military families stationed anywhere in the world have always been considered NBCs

  15. factsnotbs   5 years ago

    Those DNC hypocrites don't want us to hear all that boring anti-war stuff.

  16. Dan S.   5 years ago

    Calling her a "woman of color" seems ridiculous. She is 3/4 European and 1/4 Pacific Islander (Samoan). And she certainly looks white. Do we really want to perpetuate the antiquated "one drop rule" in defining these categories?

    But IceTrey makes a good point about her not being a "natural born citizen", only a natural-born "U.S. national". It's a distinction the Constitution's author's probably could never have imagined, but it exists.

    1. DRM   5 years ago

      Both of her parents were US citizens, so she's a natural-born citizen. In fact, both of her parents, and three of her four grandparents, were natural-born citizens; only one was just a national.

      1. IceTrey   5 years ago

        You have to be born in the country to citizens to be natural born. Samoa is a territory.

        1. Dan S.   5 years ago

          No, you have to be born in the country OR to citizens. Some restrictions apply if only one parent is a citizen, which is why the whole "birther" business about Obama got started. If both are citizens, you're good to go. I should have caught that she qualified on that score.

          1. CE   5 years ago

            Better call Saul (Goodman). He got his (mail order) law degree from the University of American Samoa.

          2. IceTrey   5 years ago

            Actually there is no legal definition of natural born citizen, no law nor federal case. No one alive knows what it means.

            1. DRM   5 years ago

              Sure we do, because it was already written down. Per Blackstone, the accepted authority on the law by the Founders:

              all children, born out of the king's ligeance, whose fathers were natural-born subjects, are now natural-born subjects themselves, to all intents and purposes, without any exception

              The only way that "natural born" in the Constitution can possibly mean anything other than what it did in Blackstone is if there is a contrary definition enshrined somewhere in US law. But you yourself say there isn't such a definition, so Blackstone controls.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   5 years ago

      Yeah I was struck by the WOC thing also. Christian beclowns himself with this silly woke shit. She lives in Hawaii. Pretty sure that color is a suntan.

    3. Mother's lament   5 years ago

      "Calling her a “woman of color” seems ridiculous. She is 3/4 European and 1/4 Pacific Islander (Samoan). And she certainly looks white. Do we really want to perpetuate the antiquated “one drop rule” in defining these categories?"

      I thought that about Obama.

  17. KenC   5 years ago

    Why is the embedded comment for the photo that you only see if you hover your mouse over the picture, read: "Hawk dressed in dove white?"

    1. Eddy   5 years ago

      You mean the alt-text?

      It's either an attempt at humor or a secret espionage code, I'm guessing it's an attempt at humor.

    2. Naaman Brown   5 years ago

      Oh crap. I missed that secret message. I'm late for revolution.

  18. zombietimeshare   5 years ago

    So the party of diversity, inclusion, and the common worker is down to these two clueless, bleached white, millionaire fossils. Too funny.

    1. IceTrey   5 years ago

      Obviously Dems are extremely racist.

  19. Unicorn Abattoir   5 years ago

    My plan is starting to come together. Now if I can just get Tulsi Gabbard and Nikki Haley to run on a 3rd party ticket...

    1. SQRLSY One   5 years ago

      Yes!!! This!!! I, too, would dearly LOVE to have Tulsi Gabbard and Nikki Haley get DOWN on my third-party ticket!!! And then again, get up on it, and down on it, and up and down, and up and down...

      LET'S GET DOWN TONIGHT!!!

      1. DenverJ   5 years ago

        That's not what "3rd party" means...

        1. CE   5 years ago

          How about a 3-way debate?

  20. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

    If I were a Democrat, I'd have quit over this. This is such transparent bullshit.

    1. Mother's lament   5 years ago

      Transparent bullshit is the medium your average Dem inhabits. Like water for a fish.

  21. Rossami   5 years ago

    Having a higher threshold as the race progresses makes sense. Deciding the threshold only after the results are in, though... I'm not willing to give them the benefit of doubt.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   5 years ago

      It's DNC-town, of course there are Shenanigans.

      My honest guess, the DNC is doing everything they can to prop up Biden. However, it seems to me that Tulsi would take more... shall we say, anti-establishment voters from Bernie, than she would Biden. Biden seems to just have a bunch of sclerotic, disgruntled Hillary voters. So it seems that they'd be hurting Bernie by bringing her into the race.

      1. DenverJ   5 years ago

        Bull. She'd end up pawning those two fools and win the nomination.

        1. DenverJ   5 years ago

          Ha! This stupid phone- I just accidentally flagged my own comment.

        2. WoodChipperBob   5 years ago

          I don't think she'd bother pawning them - they're not antiques, they're just old and beat up.

        3. Naaman Brown   5 years ago

          Pawning or pwning?

      2. Nardz   5 years ago

        They're terrified of Gabbard, but have no clue how to handle her.
        Si they hide

        1. Naaman Brown   5 years ago

          Oui they hide. Da, jawohl! Also we need an edit function, Reason.com!

  22. JAQO   5 years ago

    And?

  23. Longtobefree   5 years ago

    It would be a debate if there was a resolution to actually debate.
    These shenanigans are actually ill conceived joint press conferences, meant to showcase some out of touch TV talking head.

  24. Sevo   5 years ago

    BTW, I'm still getting the pop-up vid puffing mini-Mike for 'winning' American Samoa! Whoa!
    Damning with faint praise, right there.

    1. Naaman Brown   5 years ago

      Tulsi won two delegates v. one won by Mikey.
      That must hurt. Mikey's huge ego.
      I wonder if the $500,000,000 Bloomberg dumped into the economy will help Trump?

  25. I'm Not Sure   5 years ago

    So- they'll invite someone who isn't a Democrat to the debate but ignore someone who is? What a curious concept.

  26. CE   5 years ago

    Did we say anyone who earned a delegate was in? We meant an American delegate. Oh wait, American Samoa is in America? We meant a Super Tuesday STATE, like Alabama or Puerto Rico, not some island.

  27. Ken Hagler   5 years ago

    The only thing surprising about this is that they didn't also exclude Sanders.

    1. Apollonius   5 years ago

      They remember Chicago. They want to put off the riots as long as possible.

  28. Bramblyspam   5 years ago

    While I prefer Tulsi over Biden and Bernie, I honestly don't have a problem with the democrats excluding her at this point. It's transparently obvious to everybody that this race has come down to Biden vs Bernie, so let the voters get the closest possible look at the only two candidates with any realistic shot at the nomination.

    That's what I'd want, if I were an undecided democratic primary voter.

    1. Longtobefree   5 years ago

      The race is now clearly and openly Bernie vs the entire democratic party elite power structure.
      Which makes sense, as Bernie is not a democrat.

      1. BigT   5 years ago

        Neither a Democrat or democrat.

    2. Naaman Brown   5 years ago

      Wouldn't it be awful if Joe had a full-blown Old Timers Disease breakdown on camera before a national audience?

  29. Tony   5 years ago

    Despite her strong showing in the American Samoa caucuses where she won two delegates...

    The word "strong" is doing a an ass-ton of work in this sentence.

    1. Purple Martin   5 years ago

      Well, winning a third of the available delegates is a strong showing. Perhaps she should run for Governor of American Samoa.

    2. Longtobefree   5 years ago

      Twice as many delegates as the old white billionaire.

  30. Tony   5 years ago

    So the choice would be a debate between two people who might actually be the nominee or a debate between those two same people interrupted by a nonentity wasting everyone's time.

    1. Mother's lament   5 years ago

      You're so mad that she dared sue Hillary.

  31. Moderation4ever   5 years ago

    Tulsi Gabbard has gotten time on the debate stage and opportunities in caucuses and primaries. This is more than the Republicans have given to any of Donald Trump's primary challengers.

    1. Mother's lament   5 years ago

      Republican frontrunner Trump has received 93.35% of the vote.
      Of the Democratic frontrunners Biden only has 35.54% and Bernie 29.00%.

      Can you see the difference?

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   5 years ago

      No political party is going to do debates when the incumbent who is part of their party has a 95% approval rating with that party's members.

    3. some guy   5 years ago

      Obviously, Reason is Trump's pocket.

  32. I'm Not Sure   5 years ago

    Nobody needs a choice of more than two candidates.

    1. some guy   5 years ago

      Two is one too many.

  33. Reshufflex   5 years ago

    Why not have the debate on a park bench where these two old coots can feed the pigeons at the same time?

    1. Eddy   5 years ago

      Sitting on a park bench
      Two elder statesmen with bad intent

      1. Freddy the Jerk   5 years ago

        Nice. Also, the correct version of the 2nd line fits pretty well for Biden, no?

      2. Apollonius   5 years ago

        Two old statists with bad intent.

        And bad hair.

  34. Robert   5 years ago

    Seems silly to exclude any candidate when there are only 3 left.

  35. JamesA   5 years ago

    Tulsi never had a chance she did not portray the Evil intent from within her self the Democrats require for leading America straight into Hell!

    1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   5 years ago

      She never had a chance because she a candidate who drew support from Stormfront, which makes her incompatible in the party of educated, skilled, reasoning Americans residing in modern, successful communities.

      Her career as a Democrat has dissipated.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   5 years ago

        the party of educated, skilled, reasoning Americans residing in modern, successful communities.

        Is that what you call America's highly segregated urban shitholes?

      2. Mother's lament   5 years ago

        "she a candidate who drew support from Stormfront"

        The 21st century left advocates segregation, racial politics and the one-drop rule, while accusing white nationalist websites of rooting for a brown feminist half-breed.

        Maybe David Icke was right all along...

        1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   5 years ago

          The Stormers organized small donations to keep Gabbard on the debate stage, you bigoted rube.

          1. BigT   5 years ago

            If we’re judging candidates by their supporters, the senile B’s would be toast.

  36. Apollonius   5 years ago

    She would be in the debate if Bernie would give up his fair share of delegates.

  37. buybuydandavis   5 years ago

    "We'll tell you the score you need to make to qualify *after* we see your score."

    This is always the way it is with Dems. "Fairness" is post hoc rationalization for "our side wins".

    1. Mother's lament   5 years ago

      If it wasn't for double standards, the left wouldn't have any standards at all.

      1. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   5 years ago

        . . . and yet the liberal-libertarian alliance still stomps the deplorable clingers in the culture war.

        1. Colossal Douchebag   5 years ago

          You are boring, and an asshole.

  38. TianaWCockrell   5 years ago

    I earned $5000 ultimate month by using operating online only for 5 to 8 hours on my computer and this was so smooth that i personally couldn’t accept as true with before working on this website. if you too need to earn this sort of huge cash then come and be part of us. do this internet-website online ………... Read more  

    1. Longtobefree   5 years ago

      Good for you. Still, no place in the debates - - - -

  39. Pedro Martinez   5 years ago

    The ruminant herd rejected her because she doesn't chew the precribed cud.

  40. StackOfCoins   5 years ago

    To their credit the DNC has nothing to gain by letting her debate. That said their machinations are so transparent it should give anyone who thinks they are somehow inclusive pause.

  41. Hank Phillips   5 years ago

    The DNC wants men with service pistols to shoot people. So of course they will do anything to backstab the Hawaiian lady. In 1893 backstabbing the Hawaiian lady was an entrenched kleptocracy pastime. The jingle went: Good queen Lilliuokalani, please give Uncle Sam your little yellow hannie. Today's kleptocracy is the same two senile fossil parties. Just imagine how they view us.

  42. some guy   5 years ago

    So why did they choose 20% instead of 5% or 12% or any other number that also would have put only Biden and Sanders on the stage? Why not just say that only candidates with a shot at winning get a spot on stage and leave it at that? The theater that these parties go through is entertaining.

    1. StackOfCoins   5 years ago

      You know very well why. It's all bullshit, everything they do is bullshit. Frankly I'd kill myself if I had to be such a professional charlatan.

  43. patsymcruce   5 years ago

    Uptil I noticed the receipt which had said 8217 Buck , I even have faith ...That...My brothers buddy woz like truley taking home money part time from their laptop. . There neighbor has accomplished this for less than seventeen months and currently repayed the morgage on there mini mansion and acquired themselves a Subaru Impreza . test out here... More Read Here

  44. Butler T. Reynolds   5 years ago

    Woman of color? In that case, except for redheads, every white kid is a person of color after a week of band camp.

  45. tommhan   5 years ago

    It is a lot more entertaining looking at her than at those two old buzzards.

    1. Naaman Brown   5 years ago

      I'd rather wake up to Tulsi than to Joe or Bernie.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Why Free Movement Is Essential to a Free Society

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the August/September 2025 issue

Brickbat: Too Hot to Cool Off

Charles Oliver | 7.1.2025 4:00 AM

10 of the Worst State Laws Going Into Effect in July

Autumn Billings | 6.30.2025 5:40 PM

Pennsylvania Gives Amazon Potentially Unlimited Sales Tax Exemption

Joe Lancaster | 6.30.2025 4:35 PM

No, That Viral Study Doesn't Show You Can Improve Your Mental Health by Deactivating Instagram

Jack Nicastro | 6.30.2025 4:18 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!