Three Women
Lisa Taddeo explores the question of free will and the extent of female sexual and romantic autonomy.

Three Women is a strange beast. Lisa Taddeo's surprise sociological summer hit examines the intimate lives of—unsurprisingly—three women: Maggie, Lina, and Sloane. Central to the real-life study is the question of free will and the extent of female sexual and romantic autonomy.
The book is peculiarly written, by turns academic and flowery. Taddeo is also a novelist, and it shows, not always in ideal ways for a nonfiction medium. But the neutral hyper-close scrutiny she affords her subjects feels pleasingly precise and scientific at a time when every TED Talk seems to be framed around a perfectly illustrative trendline or factoid.
The interwoven narratives offer an interesting way out of the tangle of lies, damned lies, and statistics that govern so much of our thinking about relations between the genders and about the roles of personal choice, state coercion, and cultural expectations.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Taddeo is also a novelist, and it shows, not always in ideal ways for a nonfiction medium. But the neutral hyper-close scrutiny she affords her subjects feels pleasingly precise and scientific
"Feels pleasingly precise and scientific". So it's not factual, but it's truthy?
accidental-autobiography?
Unauthorized autobiography?
https://amzn.to/32rs6cu
Google pay 370$ reliably my last pay check was $52000 working 10 hours out of consistently on the web.My increasingly youthful kinfolk mate has been averaging 16k all through continuous months and he works around 24 hours reliably.I can't trust in howdirect it was once I attempted it out.This is my essential concern...:)
for more info visit any tab this site..….. ☛ http://earny.xyz/90aN
The older I get the less I believe in this "free will" thing.
Well, you had to say that.
I did a double-take when I thought the subject line read “Sexual Anatomy.” Autonomy is interesting, too, especially these days, but it’s interesting in a different way.
This review is very short. Maybe it’s a teaser for a longer review that’s dropping later?
It's not a review. It's barely even a blurb.
It might be helpful if the review mentioned anything the book has to say about the buzzwords it is supposedly about.
Yeah, I don't know what the point of this was.
Is there any sex?
Of course!
Oh, you mean in the book, I don't know, I haven't read it.
"the question of free will and the extent of female sexual and romantic autonomy."
So it finally answers the question of whether one can actually love a vibrator?