Detroit Police Arrested a City-Commissioned Artist Because He Didn't Have a Permit
A city official even vouched for Sheefy McFly, but police arrested him for resisting.

A Detroit artist hired to combat illegal graffiti was arrested by police officers over a misplaced permit.
In 2017, the city began an art program called City Walls. The program aimed to cut down on illegal graffiti by teaming up with local artists and giving them permission to create murals throughout the city. The program was designed, in part, "to provide a positive cost benefit to the public via art versus the cost of blight remediation."
Artist Sheefy McFly, whose real name is Tashif Turner, was hired as part of the initiative.
While working on his art on Wednesday, however, McFly ran into some trouble. The Detroit Free Press reports that two police officers approached McFly while he was in the middle of a days-long project. Officers mistook him for a vandal; McFly did not have his city-issued permit at the scene.
McFly attempted to explain to officers that he had permission to paint, but the situation escalated with the arrival of an estimated four or five police cars. A city official even appeared on the scene to corroborate McFly's story. According to the police spokesperson, police determined arrested McFly for resisting, obstruction, and an outstanding traffic warrant.
He shared an impassioned post from his mother, noting the overaction from police simply because he was painting a mural. "He could have been KILLED over paint brushes and spray cans," she wrote.
"Worst thing about it is they humiliated me dog. They treated me like a criminal in front of my artwork I did for my city pulled up [seven] Cars deep. They took me to jail [and] treated me like a felon. I'm just a Artist bro," he tweeted of the incident.
McFly's experience is more than a simple misunderstanding. It raises the question of how much government permission is enough government permission. Police remained undeterred because of a lack of paper despite the fact that McFly had a representative from the city speak up in his favor, who likely had very little reason to lie.
There's also something to be said about the police response overall. The creation of art, even illegal art, is not deserving of an army of squad cars. Even more concerning is the way an attempt to explain to officers that a crime was not being committed rose to an obstruction charge. The way McFly was approached and his subsequent arrest were likely disproportionate responses to what was perceived as a low-level crime in action.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
""It raises the question of how much government permission is enough government permission. Police remained undeterred because of a lack of paper despite the fact that McFly had a representative from the city speak up in his favor, who likely had very little reason to lie."'
Sounds like some bullchit
They arrested him for the non-crimes of "resisting" and "obstructing." That is cop-speak for "the prole failed to show proper deference to us, and pissed us off."
Papers please, citizen. Now.
It's called contempt of cop.
"Failure to fellate police officer on command."
""Papers please, citizen. Now."'
Regular ID, Real ID complaint, or Enhanced?
Did the person from the city have id that proved he was from the city, any moron can claim to be anything they want. You have to have your permit on site
Your papers must always be in order.
-Michael Wayne Godwin
McFly? To fix this, go Back to the Future?
If the police did their job, the city wouldn’t need to hire artists.
Everett: You can't do this! We just got pardoned by the governor hisself!
Delmar: It went out on the radio!
Sheriff Cooley: Is that right? Well, we ain't got a radio.
Is you, or is you not, got the graffitti permit?
Hello, McFly?!
It’s what the cops do! That’s all they know.
And it’s no wonder they also disrespected your dog. Count yourself lucky they didn’t shoot him while they were at it because barking made them feel threatened.
It's what they do, it's all they do, and they absolutely will not stop...
"You say yer an artist, huh? Well then, draw me a pitcher, boy."
So the city hired an'artist' who is such a poor businessman that he did not have the required permits at the work site, and this is somehow the cops fault?
But then, it does say Detroit, so - - - - - -
Yeah I know some artists.
They are generally poor businessmen.
The cops just needed to check it out and leave him alone. He was painting a wall and obviously had you know paint and art supplies. No harm to anyone. He is an artist with a website and all that.
Cities commission artists all the time. This guy might not be Picasso with that statue on Daley Square. Then again Picasso was a kinda out there guy.
I bet he was dressed like an vandal too. He sure sounds like it in the quote. He deserved it.