Numbers Betray Export-Import Bank Advocates
Cronyism rears its again head.
It's amazing what can be done to a cause in a mere four years. Back in 2015, there was widespread agreement in Congress that the Export-Import Bank—the U.S. government's export credit agency—was nothing but a crony bank, mostly serving the greedy interests of Boeing and other large companies. As a result, Congress let the bank's charter expire. It was reauthorized a few months later but in a much-diminished form, operating at 15 percent capacity.
Fast-forward to 2019. Today, Ex-Im Bank's full lending abilities are restored, and it's celebrated by some as a necessary source of job creation and economic growth. This change was particularly visible during a hearing this week before the House Committee on Financial Services called, "Promoting American Jobs: Reauthorization of the U.S Export-Import Bank."
Anyone who attended the hearing or tuned in to the livestream got an earful from special interests whose organizations benefit from the bank's backing of foreign and domestic loans. We Americans were assured that these subsidies are essential, not only to the health of U.S. exports and American small businesses but are also a veritable boon to our very economy.
There wasn't much pushback on assertions made by members of the committee and witnesses that Ex-Im is a lender of last resort—that without it, small businesses have trouble exporting, or that it's an essential tool to fight China's state capitalism. The event was a true bipartisan love fest. Ironically, this committee is the same one that led the charge against Ex-Im back in 2014 and 2015. Under the leadership of then-Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R–Texas), every aspect of the bank's activities was scrutinized, which ultimately led to Ex-Im's (temporary) demise.
But to hear it now, the Ex-Im Bank is all about small businesses and prosperity. A thorny problem for those supporting Ex-Im's revival is that we now have nearly a half-decade's worth of data on what happened to U.S. exports, economic growth, jobs, and beneficiaries while the institution was mostly dormant between 2015 and 2019. During that time, the bank didn't have enough board members to authorize deals above $10 million and, as a result, its activities dropped from $21 billion in 2014 (the last year the bank functioned at full capacity) to $3.6 billion in 2018.
This shows that, contrary to the House committee's fantasy, a fully functioning Ex-Im isn't all about small businesses. Back in 2014, 65 percent of the bank's activities benefited 10 giant companies. Boeing alone got 40 percent of Ex-Im's largesse. On the foreign side, the bank's clients belong to a who's who list of large, wealthy, successful, and often state-owned companies. Indeed, in 2014, about 30 percent of the bank's activities—or $5.9 billion—went to 10 state-owned foreign companies. The unconditional winners of American subsidies to foreign-government-owned companies were Air China (top recipient in 2014) and Mexico's oil and gas giant, Pemex (top recipient from 2007 through 2013).
Most of this profligacy ended between 2015 and 2018. During that time, the share of funding that benefited large firms dropped by 93 percent. The share of activities showered on the top 10 state-owned companies collapsed to 0.5 percent or only $16.6 million. China went from being the No. 1 destination of Ex-Im deals in 2014—with 11 percent of its activities or $2.3 billion—to receiving $34.2 million (1 percent of Ex-Im financing) in 2018. In effect, the U.S. government stopped most of its subsidizing of Chinese companies. Also, the share of Ex-Im activities going to small businesses went up from 25 percent in 2014 to 66 percent in 2018.
Better yet, once Ex-Im stopped extending giant deals to giant companies, American taxpayers' liability fell from $112 billion in 2014 to $72.5 billion in 2018. U.S. exports continued to grow without being impacted whatsoever by Ex-Im limitations, and many beneficiaries of the bank had their best year ever in 2018, demonstrating that none of these subsidies are necessary for their success.
You'd think the committee would celebrate these developments. Yet, they didn't. Instead, they celebrated Ex-Im being restored to its full potential, pretended it exists for the sake of small businesses, and insisted that its charter be reauthorized again on Sept. 30. It was the perfect display of Congress picking winners and losers, ignoring the facts, and continuing to grow the size and scope of government.
COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In some ways, Trump is the cronyist President I can think of, other than some of the late 1800s ones who are so forgettable. But on the other hand, the current crop of Dems make Trump look like an amateur because his cronies are just imaginary business interests, the ones he claims to be helping with his tariffs; the Dem cronies are every power-grabbing fascist in existence, salivating over trillions in new spending control. I will say that for Trump: I don’t think he’s anywhere near as corrupt as the current Dem candidates, or even Obama or the Bushes or Clintons for that matter.
Trump’s biggest flaw is his arrogance that says “I am right. I am the smartest guy in the room” which precludes him ever learning even the most basic economics. Principles? Just him pulling the levers.
It is kind of funny how, for instance, the NRA went all the way with him, even throwing bump stocks under the bus because they hated Dems so much; now it appears he’s about to throw suppressors under the bus, and the NRA will have swallow and pretend they want more. The Trumpistas here are so enthralled with the-guy-who-beat-Hillary that they can’t see his tariffs for what they are, and soon they will have to swallow like they love it too.
Funny that ctrl-F finds not one reference to Trump in this article.
And yet the first two comments are entirely about Trump
There’s a fine example of a politician fanboy. Doesn’t matter who the politician is, they are so infatuated with their own particular one that they refuse to even acknowledge any possibility of flaw in their sample.
[…] We have the numbers. It’s all about crony capitalism with some of our largest companies. […]
[…] Click here for the article. […]
It seems to me that you can participate in the financial market independently. It is safe to do this with the help of this service https://justforex.com/. I myself trade on forex
Thanks admin for giving such valuable information through your article . Your article is much more similar to https://www.mcmbackpackonsale.com/mcm-small-essential-visetos-original-backpack-in-brown.html word unscramble tool because it also provides a lot of knowledge of vocabulary new words with its meanings.