NYPD

Court Rules Against NYPD Union: Body Cam Footage Can Be Made Public

The NYPD's largest union was dealt a defeat in its attempt to make body cam footage confidential, but it says it might appeal.

|

Kevin Kurek/dpa/picture-alliance/Newscom

A panel of New York appellate judges ruled today that New York Police Department (NYPD) body camera footage can be made public under state law, denying an attempt by a police union to make such footage confidential.

The Patrolmen's Benevolent Association, the largest NYPD union, sued New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio and the NYPD last year to block the public release of body camera footage, arguing that the video was confidential under a New York law that exempts "personnel records" of police officers, correctional officers, and firefighters.

As Reason reported earlier this month, that statute, Section 50-a of New York's civil rights law, has been used to hide a vast array of records about police misconduct. A coalition of civil rights groups, community activists, and families of those slain by police officers are pushing the New York legislature to repeal the law this year.

The PBA's lawsuit was the most brazen in a long string of attempts to expand Section 50-a. Not even the NYPD—which until quite recently took a nearly unlimited view of the law—supported the PBA's interpretation of 50-a, and neither did a three-judge panel on New York's Supreme Court.

"While we recognize petitioner's valid concerns about invasion of privacy and threats to the safety of police officers, we are tasked with considering the record's general 'nature and use,' and not solely whether it may be contemplated for use in a performance evaluation," the court wrote. "Otherwise, that could sweep into the purview of 50-a many police records that are an expected or required part of investigations or performance evaluations, such as arrest reports, stop reports, summonses, and accident reports, which clearly are not in the nature of personnel records so as to be covered by 50-a."

Numerous media outlets and press freedom groups opposed the PBA's efforts. In a statement, the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) applauded the court's ruling.

"As the court recognized, the whole point of police body cameras is to promote police accountability and transparency," NYCLU Legal Director Christopher Dunn said in a statement. "The police union's extreme attempt to use section 50-a to block public access to body camera footage is a perfect example of why the law must be repealed."

Then NYPD itself celebrated the ruling, although the PBA says it might appeal. The New York Daily News reports:

"This ruling is an important step forward for transparency and affirms what the NYPD believes — not only is the public entitled to this information, but this footage overwhelmingly shows just how brave, skilled and dedicated our cops are every single day in the service of the people of New York City," [NYPD Commissioner James O'Neill] said in a statement.

PBA President Patrick Lynch said the union might appeal.

"We believe that the court's decision is wrong, that it will have a negative impact on public safety and on the safety or our members," Lynch said.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

20 responses to “Court Rules Against NYPD Union: Body Cam Footage Can Be Made Public

  1. Why the hell do police have unions?? It’s like a giant fraternity if the fraternity. Except the university administration in this analogy is also the fraternity. And they also carried guns and had the authority to lock you in cages and fine you.

    1. It’s not so much the existence of unions, but their behavior in protecting the thin blue line from any kind of accountability. And top that off with the local Prosecutor’s office, who work with on a daily basis, being the authority empowered to investigate police crimes. It’s incestuous in the extreme.

    2. Unions themselves have outlived their usefulness as I see it. When corporation cronies got their buddies to use the army to help them, unions were the only way to wield counter-power in any timely consistent fashion.

      But the only thing unions were ever good for was safety and working conditions. Once it became all about protecting their turf, they lost my sympathy. Jokes about plumbers not changing light bulbs just show how counter-productive they became.

      As as for government unions — a travesty in every which way. Even FDR thought they were illogical and wrong.

    3. Look. These people are benevolent. It says so right in their name. They exist only to serve their fellow man.

    4. Start working at home with Google. It’s the most-financially rewarding I’ve ever done. On tuesday I got a gorgeous BMW after having earned $8699 this last month. I actually started five months/ago and practically straight away was bringin in at least $96, per-hour. visit this site right here……. http://www.payshd.com

  2. Even in NYC logic prevails from time to time.

  3. A big F U to NYPD, while I’m here. Totalitarian, murdering scum.

    1. Like to add CPD to that sentiment, while I’m here.

  4. President Bernie Sanders will have this reversed.

  5. The Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, the largest NYPD union…

    How many unions do they have?

    1. Whatever number, that’s the number too many.

    2. Five.
      Patrolmen, sergeants, lieutenants, captains, and detectives each have a union.
      The patrolmen’s union is by far the biggest with about 2/3 of NYPD.

  6. Cops want “privacy”? WTF.

    Attention wanna-be coppers: the job comes with a badge AND a camera, and all you do is public domain. If you don’t agree look for some other job where you can bust doors and shoot dogs.

    1. Exactly. They need to eat a dick if they’re gonna come up with this privacy bullshit working a public job.

      1. Working a public job WITH PUBLIC FUNDING!!

  7. Hi everyone I just got paid $858o working off my computer this month. And if you think that’s cool, my divorced friend has twin toddlers and made over $9k her first month. It feels so good making so much money when other people have to work for so much less. This is
    what I do/??. http://www.Mesalary.com

  8. I receive loan amount of $50K Then i was told about the step of approving my requested loan amount, a my greatest surprise, the loan amount was credited to my bank account within 24 banking hours without any stress of getting my loan. contact at Calling or whatspp +917738214856
    abdullahibrahimlender@gmail.com
    Mr abdullah ibrahim

  9. Records paid for by the public belong to the public. Full stop.

    Unless there is a provable overriding security concern, any record generated by public employees should be available on request including disciplinary records.

    Nothing else is acceptable.

  10. hi Start working I essentially started three weeks past and that i makes $385 benefit $135 to $a hundred and fifty consistently simply by working at the internet from domestic. I made ina long yes you can essentially started three weeks past and that i makes $385 benefi>>>>>>>> http://www.2citypays.com

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.