Your Friday Cliffhanger: Will Trump Sign or Veto the Omnibus? (UPDATE: Trump Signs)
The president wants his border wall funding.

What a difference 48 hours makes. Here's President Donald Trump on Wednesday, tweeting about the $1.3 trillion ominbus spending deal:
Got $1.6 Billion to start Wall on Southern Border, rest will be forthcoming. Most importantly, got $700 Billion to rebuild our Military, $716 Billion next year…most ever. Had to waste money on Dem giveaways in order to take care of military pay increase and new equipment.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 22, 2018
Between then and now, after announcing John Bolton will be his new national security advisor and also insisting he could take former Vice President Joe Biden in a fight (Biden started it, Mom!), he seems to have changed his tune:
I am considering a VETO of the Omnibus Spending Bill based on the fact that the 800,000 plus DACA recipients have been totally abandoned by the Democrats (not even mentioned in Bill) and the BORDER WALL, which is desperately needed for our National Defense, is not fully funded.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 23, 2018
The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program has been jeopardized because Trump insists on trying to use it as leverage to fund the border wall and push through other anti-immigration policies.
Wednesday's tweet seemed like an acknowledgment from Trump that he wasn't going to get everything he wanted all at once. The border wall's initial funding reminds me of the high-speed rail construction in California. They only have a tiny portion of what they need to build the unnecessary boondoggle, but they figure once it gets started they'll get more money.
Those fiscally responsible conservatives of the House Freedom Caucus sent a letter to Trump asking him to veto the $1.3 trillion spending bill. Oh, wait—scratch "fiscally responsible." They want him to veto the omnibus because it doesn't provide enough money to build the wall:
Members of the @freedomcaucus sent the below letter to the WH:
"Mr. President, we urge you to remember the countless forgotten men and women of America who placed their faith in you to change business as usual in Washington, D.C. We urge you to join us and reject this omnibus." pic.twitter.com/eO0B1PfCYl
— Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) March 22, 2018
Congress recessed with the assumption that Trump would sign the bill, The Wall Street Journal notes. If he vetoes the legislation, the federal government will run out of funding at midnight.
There are much better reasons to veto the omnibus than the terrible border wall (which will not work). Eric Boehm noted yesterday all the ridiculous spending in the bill. I also noted legislation embedded deep into the spending bill that would weaken citizens' data privacy and potentially subject them to more secret government surveillance, and not just from the American government. Those concerns do not seem to be playing in the president's mind. Stay tuned.
UPDATE: At a press conference at 1:30 p.m. Trump announced he was signing the bill, but he's not happy about it. He insisted that the spending was necessary to "rebuild" a "depleted military." He said he would not sign omnibus bills like this in the future. He also called on the Senate to get rid of filibuster rules so bills could move forward with a simple majority. He also called on Congress to give him the authority of a line-item veto.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Those fiscally responsible conservatives of the House Freedom Caucus sent a letter to Trump asking him to veto the $1.3 trillion spending bill. Oh, wait?scratch "fiscally responsible." They want him to veto the omnibus because it doesn't provide enough money to build the wall"
Because nothing says "freedom" like a giant, expensive wall
If you wanted Trump to veto the bill, would you appeal to him based on your ego or his?
Neither, just make sure you're the last person to talk to him.
Hey, if it worked for the Chinese, it will work here! How much you wanna bet that Trump's wall will repel 100% of all Mongolian invasions?
How do we define 0/0. This is core to my willingness to make the bet.
So would you support the bill if there was a net decrease of $200 billion, but included funding for the Wall?
The words, "fuck you, cut spending" come to mind.
What? I thought Canada was paying for The Wall.
Borrow and spend until the music stops.
There will be a large world war over this eventually and absolute domestic unrest and class warfare.
Arm yourselves.
So Twilight 2050 instead of Twilight 2000?
Vampires should not sparkle, no matter what year it is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twilight:_2000
No vampires or purple alicorns here.
Don't forget the race war aspect too!
DO IT DO IT DO IT
If only for the lulz.
Eric Boehm noted yesterday all a small portion of the ridiculous spending in the bill.
FTFY
"We got da bill, boss, where ya want me to put da forklift?"
"Take it back to Congress, I'm vetoing it - it isn't big enough!"
Fight! Fight! Fight! Fight!
Schrodinger's Omnibus. Trump has both signed and vetoed the spending package. Why be in a hurry to observe what he done and collapse the wave function into merely one or the other?
The wave function is built with cheap foreign parts. It is always collapsing! Sad!
What we need is a tariff on imported quantum probabilities. MAGA
Those damn Mexicans are always quantum tunneling into this country.
To be sure, the evidence for that consists primarily of uncertainties.
From the odor in the media and the "Ban Energy" side of Congress, I'm more noisomely reminded of Schroedinger Scat.
Anyone else worry about what Trump Unchained wants to do that he hasn't been able to do because he hadn't fired everyone around him yet?
Cover everything in the Oval Office in gold leaf, probably.
I thought he'd already have moved the seat of power to Manhattan and turned "The Dump" into a novelty hotel and casino by now.
That's for the second term.
I'm hoping he has all you dummies put to death by his second term.
Meant to say 'commies', but dummies works too.
Well Tony, I'm hopeful he appoints an AG to replace Sessions that will focus on putting progressives like you in prison for your treason and sedition.
Well I only have warm feelings for you. I hope someday you will find the cousin of your dreams and marry her.
This is an example of how mystical nationalsocialists alienate voters. That's not such a bad thing, but the teevee has told voters since the Nixon Anti-Libertarian law that the only alternative to prohibitionist bigots bent on coercing women and exterminating foreigners is to vote for communists or Fabian socialists.
What's wrong with coercing women and exterminating foreigners? Those are both as American as apple pie! They go back to BEFORE the founding of the country even!
Exactly WTF is wrong with the US military that needs "rebuilding"?
We're selling much of our equipment to the Saudis, DUH!
Have you seen the status of our naval fleet? Lot of those ships need replacing.
Lots and lots of military contractors in lots and lots of congressional districts need job security. Won't someone think of the contractors??
Trump's building up the suspense with a 1:00 news conference.
"Yes, this bill is yuge, but we can make it yuger!"
I'd favor a veto in hopes of getting rid of the CLOUD Act alone.
The odd's that Trump will veto this monstrosity seem to be zero, but maybe he's brave enough to shut down the FedGov to get what he wants so lets call it a 1% chance.
Another win for the 99%.
Damn I hate being right...
UPDATE: At a press conference at 1:30 p.m. Trump announced he was signing the bill, but he's not happy about it.
THAT MAKES ALMOST ALL OF US, DONALD.
He has to sign it to find out what's in it.
Lame. Presidential vetos should be used WAY more for this kind of thing, ESPECIALLY by so called conservatives.
If Trump really wanted to reign in spending, he could literally just veto every spending bill sent his way that didn't include major cuts to shit. He could publicly announce that if the senate Republicans go in cahoots with Dems to repass it with a veto proof majority, their constituents should vote every single person out. Basically just say enough is enough, I'm ending this shit NOW. The shit storm would put the fear of god into the senate Rs and they might finally grow spines, and the Ds would basically have no choice but to capitulate or be willing to shut the government down for realz. Half the country would throw a party, and the other half would cry like it was election night all over again!
But they've all been pussies.