New Year, New Logo at Reason!
2018 marks the 50th anniversary of Reason and we're celebrating with a typographical facelift.

If you look to the upper left-hand corner of this page or to the bottom of the image to the right, you'll notice something different: a new Reason logo.
New year, new logo, right? Subscribers to the electronic edition of Reason have already gotten the news (please join them by signing up for a year of the magazine of "Free Minds and Free Markets" for as little as $14.95).
Our new logo combines elements the one that we debuted in December of 2001 and our original logo that debuted in 1968, the year Reason began publishing. Designed by our art director Joanna Andreasson in conjunction with Reason magazine's Editor in Chief Katherine Mangu-Ward, I hope you agree that the new logo—which we'll be using across all our platforms (print, online, video, podcasting)—is pretty damn swell.
New logos are like new hairstyles: They're almost always overdue and they're almost always a marked improvement of whatever they're replacing (not always, almost always). I know that as the editor in chief of this site, I'm especially happy to add something new to our legacy of online logos.
Here's a quick summary: In the early days of the web, we pursued a tried-and-true strategy of simply copying our print mag's logo and slapping Online on it, so there would be no confusion between the print and cyberspace editions! This iteration lasted from our launch circa 1994 through our first print redesign in decades, which happened in 2001.
We got a great new logo as part of our 2001 redesign, overseen by Wired co-founder Louis Rossetto, who brought in Erik Spiekermann and Susanna Dulkinys to radically change the look and feel of our print mag. We still felt a need to differentiate the online content by reminding web readers that they were in fact online and not reading a paper-and-ink publication. This version kept the faith until 2008.
We reskinned the site in 2008 and 2009 and decided to take the (obvious step) of using our site logo as a reminder of our URL (how else would you know where you were?). That said, we also felt a need to make it pop by mocking it up on a piece of paper that was draped on top of the site's design elements.
In 2010, we kept the ".com" extension but reduced the size of the logo to allow more space to be given to our content. Which makes sense. Readers generally knew where they were.
And now, we're happy to unveil our latest and greatest website (and magazine!) logo so far:
Hope you enjoy it.
2018 marks the 50th anniversary of Reason, and we'll be celebrating throughout the year by calling attention to the last half-century of prescient journalism we produced while laying out a vision of a glorious libertarian future in which people are free to pursue happiness as they define it. Through it all, we'll remain loyal to the founding ideals articulated by Lanny Friedlander (1947-2011) in our very first issue:
Introducing REASON: We accept the responsibility that others have defaulted on. Others preferred to smear the issues with irrelevancies and falsifications. We don't. Others preferred to be incomprehensible and incoherent. We don't. Others preferred to ignore your mind. We won't.
When REASON speaks of poverty, racism, the draft, the war, student power, politics, and other vital issues, it shall be reasons, not slogans, it gives for conclusions. Proof, not belligerent assertion. Logic, not legends. Coherance [sic], not contradictions. This is our promise; this is the reason for REASON.
Reason is published by the Reason Foundation, a 501(c)3 nonprofit. Donations are tax free, so if you're looking to redirect some money from Uncle Sam and toward an organization fighting to reduce the size, scope, and spending of government and to increase individual freedom and flourishing, please think about making a year-end gift.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Designed by our art director Joanna Andreasson in conjunction with Reason magazine's Editor in Chief Katherine Mangu-Ward
If that meeting took longer than 15 seconds someone is getting overpaid.
"How about arial?"
"Something bolder."
"Bold arial?"
"You've done it again, Joanna!"
confusing arial and helvetica? what kind of cosmos are you people?
At least it's not Comic Sans
It SHOULD be Comic Papyrus
Oh my god.
YOU STILL CAN'T SPELL TREASON WITHOUT REASON NO MATTER WHAT FONT YOU USE. Except maybe Wingdings.
If the printed the T, it would be seen as tacit approval of Trump.
reason with progs is the motto
Reason *for* progs?
I thought it was "woke minds and intersectional solidarity"? It's even in the video linked with your name
lol
Really, I thought it was "I suck Trump's dick for crack free."
Oh wait that's the glibs' logo.
Homophobe.
Lol you people really do have the worst comebacks. Yeah, it's dicksucking I'm denigrating there.
If you use felatio on the same gender as a derogatory term then you are a homophobe.
Yeah, no, but I'm sure someday all the conservative whining will work for something other than making you look like a dork.
You're on a site called reason...dork. Great comeback.
Hmmm...that's a rather aggressive remark considering I was just pointing out what was said in a video. Maybe Reason's new slogan could be "Hail Rataxes Blows Us on the Reg"
Haters gonna hate, even retarded homophobes.
I know you're feeling bad about yourself because you got bullied this morning for not thinking Trump was THE GREATEST. Maybe you shouldn't take it out on the place that's not full of slavish idiots?
Rataxes hate reads Glibs. Yeah, that's totally normal
I bet he beats off to comments.
Says the guy who is hate-commenting here.
You would not be able to say such filth at the Glib site. They are certified family friendly.
They are also certified "no fighting amongst ourselves because that would hurt someone's fee-fees." It's the safest space.
"Oh wait that's the glibs' logo."
Glibs aren't pro-Trump.
They have running a running feature making fun of the guy, actually. See "The Hat & The Hair", a Glib comic in which the two argue over whatever stupid thing Trump said the week before.
That being said, the way Trump keeps deregulating, slashing taxes, doing the right thing on net neutrality, avoiding an invasion of Syria, un-staffing the Title IX speech police, etc., etc., etc., if Trump isn't making you more of a friend, then there's something wrong with . . . you.
If your libertarianism is all about opposing Trump, that doesn't mean other people who swing either way depending on the issue aren't libertarians. My libertarianism wasn't all about opposing Obama. I actually agreed with him . . . once or twice.
Dude, the site is public for anyone to read, and the commenters are up Trump's ass and take criticism of him personally.
Also public for anyone to read are the dozens of comments about how the Alabama special election was stolen from Roy Moore. So tell me again how libertarian the glibs are.
What the hell are you reading?
Look there is another article making fun of Reason- quick run and attack. God, you're a strange person
What the hell are you reading? Next you're going to tell me it's not full of sexism and xenophobia.
"Jokes are worse than Hitler"
Sure, they're just jokes.
Like I said, the site is public for anyone to read.
No one other than an over sensitive cosmotarian or progressive (but, I repeat myself) would think anything in the comments or the articles is xenophobic or sexist or any -ism.
You don't like them- fine. But, don't start smearing people because you don't like their politics.
Wow, you're more delusional than I thought possible.
The only thing that cosmotarians are good for is attacking other people that don't accept their watered down progressive opinions.
Meanwhile, the Glib staff has more diversity than Reason. So there's that
How's that?
The Glib exodus coincided with a deep drop in respect for the news media nationally. I think it was basically part of a wider national trend with disgust for the media both before and after the last election.
"WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Americans' trust and confidence in the mass media "to report the news fully, accurately and fairly" has dropped to its lowest level in Gallup polling history, with 32% saying they have a great deal or fair amount of trust in the media. This is down eight percentage points from last year."
----Gallup
Two Weeks Before Trump was elected
http://news.gallup.com/poll/19.....w-low.aspx
Glibs are mostly issue rather than personality driven, but even more than that, they're highly sensitive to what they see as intellectual corner cutting and hypocrisy--even when they agree with the conclusions.
They grill each other over intellectual sloppiness, and over the years of excellent quality work, here, they came to expect more than what they were getting from a number of newer writers. TDS was just one aspect of that. It exposed to the light what had been under the surface before. Sort of like finding out that Weigel thought we should all go light ourselves on fire.
P.S. The Glibs logo is a guy with a monocle.
Glibs are mostly issue rather than personality driven
Ken, this is the funniest thing you have ever said. In your whole life.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Some of them come after me for going after Rand Paul, but even that's mostly how he voted on an issue. They're certainly more protective of Rand Paul than they are of Trump.
If Trump were doing something especially anti-libertarian, that would be one thing. Like I said, Trump keeps doing libertarian things over and over and over again. If you focus on his tweets (why would anybody do that?), he may seem especially bad, but people really shouldn't take those so seriously.
They're intended to provoke tabloid headlines, and they should be taken about that seriously.
Anyway, I don't think anybody over there is pro-Trump, as you think of it. He is, however, the most libertarian president we've seen in at least 24 years. When he does something awful, all the glibs will jump on him for it--but don't expect to see that kind of outrage in response to one of his tweets.
We protect the Randster like you do the rapey baby otters.
Rand Paul voted against a bill that cut spending by $1.022 trillion, and the allegations against those (adult) otters have never been proven in court.
Virtue signaling at its finest laziest.
*too lazy to respond*
I liked the old logo.
Same, and I will never, ever like or approve of the new logo.
I feel it will grow on me. Like cancer or a type of skin fungus.
Dude, go to a doctor.
I apply ointment
You're hired.
Bad news, Chipper - he means he applies the ointment to himself.
I don't know man, the orange "r" looks smaller than the other characters.
At least this logo will be hard for anyone to copy!
When I saw the link to this article with the new logo, I didn't even realize it had changed at first. I was really expecting something a tiny bit more adventurous to lead us into the future.
Yeah, how about a porcupine humping a pile of money? Now that would be a bold statement.
Back to basics. I like it. That Trebuchet font was looking a little tired.
Yeah, it's all right.
It's not bad, don't listen to the naysayers. In this era, if your new logo doesn't invite comparisons to private body parts it can be considered a success.
+1 snack dick
ha, I was actually thinking of the Uber logo but that is a great scene
"Free Minds and Free Markets" sounds too right wing.
Might I propose:
Cucked as Fuck
Chicken syphilis, man. What a shame.
Chicken syphilis man, what a shame.
Not one of the better entries in the MCU.
We know his weakness.....he cannot resist a plump poultry cloaca. But what are his powers? Is he like Spiderman, but he shoots chickenshit from his palms?
He can yell CUCK louder than anybody else on the planet.
I'd swear the favicon was orange on white yesterday - I liked that. Now it's white on orange again, like the old one 🙁
Anyway, I wonder if WordPress has an orange and white theme....
reason is slowly removing the orange from the logo. Too close to Trump's hair color?
Okay, the font sucks. I can see getting rid of the orange box. But why the font change?
Needs a cosmo in the logo.
Rearrange the letters in "Reason" to spell "Earn so," as in "we earn so much from our fundraisers we don't care if you stupid commenters like our logo."
Is the logo copyrighted ?
I think you had it right with the lowercase r in an orange rectangle. That didn't need to be fixed or changed.
I bet this article convinced a few people that their donations would be better spent at the CATO institute, Institute for Justice, or ACLU. A great way to generate recognition, loyalty, and traction with an audience is to give them something classic they can hold on to. I'm sick of all these corporate douchebags trying to freshen their image up, when their image was bold, classic, and successful to begin with. I don't know, maybe changing the logo will lure in some new readers who think this is different than the old reason, but if they're that dumb, libertarians might be talking over their heads. The new logo is just as great and/or lame as the prior one. Your readers care about the content.
yarh..great design! the last one is the best one. I love it!