Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Campus Free Speech

Pomona College Investigates Students for Posting Offensive Memes on Facebook

"You PC, bro?"

Robby Soave | 10.4.2017 10:20 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
PC
Screenshot via South Park

Students at Pomona College came under investigation last month for posting offensive memes in a closed Facebook group. Today good sense prevailed and the college decided not to punish the kids for their speech.

The group is called "U PC BREAUX"—a funny way of spelling "You PC, bro?," which is a South Park joke about the fratty enthusiasm and militance of some campus social justice types. Launching an investigation over some un-P.C. meme-sharing is exactly the kind of overreaction that South Park was mocking.

Many people, to be sure, would be offended by the group's content. As student Ross Steinberg told Inside Higher Ed:

Memes were posted about rape, genocide and, in one example, calling Immigration and Customs Enforcement to deport undocumented immigrants because they were being too loud, Steinberg told Inside Higher Ed. He said he had been randomly invited to the group, which contained about 300 members. Pomona enrolls about 1,650 students.

"Personally, I felt this is a big group on campus," Steinberg said. "This was a group in which people post hateful things…it really kind of normalizes that kind of thought."

Steinberg and others are free to expose participants to ridicule and condemnation. But Pomona's investigation hinges on whether irresponsible meme-ing constitutes a "bias incident," and that raises free speech considerations. Though Pomona is a private institution, it explicitly guarantees students that it will respect their free expression rights. The college's harassment code even binds administrators to the First Amendment:

Consistent with California Education Code Section 94367, the definition of harassment contained in this policy and its application to student speech shall be subject to the limitations of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 2 of the California Constitution.

As an educational institution, Pomona College is committed to the principle of free expression and the exploration of ideas in an atmosphere of civility and mutual respect. Thus, in keeping with the principles of academic freedom, there can be no forbidden ideas.

The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) sent a letter to Pomona urging them to abandon the probe. "Pomona students cannot be subject to investigation or punishment for reading, posting to, or being a member of a private Facebook group that permits, or even encourages, its members to share images and text offensive to other people," wrote FIRE's Adam Steinbaugh. "The threat of punitive measures implied from an investigation by administrators may please some members of the community, but it is fundamentally at odds with Pomona's policies and obligations."

This morning, Vice President for Student Affairs Miriam Feldblum sent an email to students announcing that the investigation was completed. The college determined that "the memes were bias-related and protected speech" and that there was no "basis to initiate an investigation into the Facebook group or individual students for possible violations of the Student Code or our Discrimination and Harassment Policy."

Feldblum's email clarifies that speech has to meet several criteria before it crosses the line between protected expression and impermissible harassment:

An act which is speech alone shall not be considered to violate this paragraph unless it is a threat of violence; or

(1) the speech, considered objectively, is abusive and insulting rather than a communication of ideas,

(2) the speech is directed at an individual and actually used in an abusive manner in a situation that presents an actual danger that it will cause an immediate breach of the peace by inciting a violent reaction by the individual to whom the speech is addressed and,

(3) the student intends the speech to be abusive and insulting rather than a communication of ideas.

As long as speech has to meet all three of those definitions to be considered harassment—objectively abusive, deliberately abusive, and inciting imminent violence—this is a suitable approach.

"This seems to be exactly what we wanted Pomona to do," Steinbaugh tells Reason. "It would be preferable that colleges not embark on investigations in the first place, but it's good to see a quick resolution."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: No, the U.S. Didn't Just Take a Stand for Executing Gay People

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Campus Free SpeechFree Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (47)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. loveconstitution1789   8 years ago

    One way to make college administrators suffer is to sue them into being fired.

    1. Marcus Aurelius   8 years ago

      The tried and true solution is to pick up their wives in the produce section, invite them to the frat party, and bang them til they say Dean.

      1. Quixote   8 years ago

        Yes, and one way to help keep some of our youth's prurient instincts in check on our college campuses is to have a nice little investigation from time to time. In this regard, they should also investigate any incidents of inappropriately deadpan "satire." Surely no one here would dare to defend the "First Amendment dissent" of a single, isolated judge in America's leading criminal "parody" case? See the documentation at:

        http://raphaelgolbtrial.wordpress.com/

  2. AlmightyJB   8 years ago

    If colleges would hold the line on the 1st Amendment everytime, all of the time, they would have less problems with snowflakes. Problem is that they give in to their demands which just encourages them. Once they allow it to get out of control then they're no longer in charge, the snowflakes are.

    1. AlmightyJB   8 years ago

      Compromising with bullies is not smart.

      1. Radioactive   8 years ago

        incoming bullets have the right of way...

    2. Rhywun   8 years ago

      It doesn't help that most college administrators agree with the snowflakes.

    3. p3orion   8 years ago

      "As long as speech has to meet all three of those definitions to be considered harassment?objectively abusive, deliberately abusive, and inciting imminent violence?this is a suitable approach."

      I'm not sure even this relatively reasonable standard fulfills the First Amendment. Enough heckler's vetoes of a given type of speech, and it will become "understood" to be deliberately and objectively abusive, and all that remains is for the most-easily-offended target of the speech to react violently a few times.

      An example: for some time now, referring to a black person using the "N-word" now essentially gives him a "Get out of jail free card" for any violent reaction he may take. This has descended down the slippery slope to a point that any speech objected to by perpetually-offended liberal snowflakes is considered by them to be tantamount to violence, and therefore excuses any ACTUAL violence they conduct in response.

  3. John   8 years ago

    I hope this nonsense hasn't blown over by the time I retire because I think using my GI bill to go back to college just to fuck with these people sounds so much fun. I can't imagine how much fun it would be to be drug in front of the thought police board for posting an "offensive meme". You could seriously drive some of these losers into a full mental breakdown.

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   8 years ago

      I like that idea

    2. Glide   8 years ago

      Pierce Hawthorne, is that you?

      1. John   8 years ago

        At first, I felt bad for not getting that reference. Then, I googled it and realized it was from a TV show.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    When you think about it, if words can be violence then memes are pretty much lynchings.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   8 years ago

      I thought that's what the Enlightenment was mostly about: words do not equal action. Guess it was all just a bunch of privileged patriarchy.

      String em' up.

      1. Brandybuck   8 years ago

        Free speech is white privilege!

    2. Chipper Morning, Mean Girl   8 years ago

      Should we call you Pillow Fist, then?

  5. Quo Usque Tandem   8 years ago

    Well this particular SJW outrage did not go as planned; I predict Anifa will be on it right away. Yell, scream, break some windows, and burn a car. That should get those administrators on the right track.

    1. Trollificus   8 years ago

      Yes, that would show, by the weird administrator-logic we've seen all over the country, that the memes in the *CLOSED FACEBOOK GROUP" caused violence and endangered students. Then action is taken, not against the perpetrators of the violence, but against whomever they are pissed off at.

      Remember that time Ann Coulter broke all those windows and started fires? Yeah, like that.

  6. Brian   8 years ago

    Listen: if college kids can't figure out how to have fun in college, I really don't care. It's their youth to waste.

    I hope they enjoy midlife crisis.

    1. Chipper Morning, Mean Girl   8 years ago

      I would watch a movie about Brian and John prowling for snatch on a Friday night during their college years.

      1. Marcus Aurelius   8 years ago

        Isn't that just Old School, but with a lot of uggos?

        1. Half-Virtue, Half-Vice   8 years ago

          Zing.

  7. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

    Many people, to be sure, would be offended by the group's content.

    Good to have you back, Robby.

    1. Chipper Morning, Mean Girl   8 years ago

      The Coif knows what the plebs want.

    2. dantheserene   8 years ago

      X-
      As soon as I reached that phrase, I knew who wrote it without looking at the byline. I assume he has "tbs" as a keyboard shortcut or something.

      1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        He's got a Word macro for it, which he doesn't need, because at this point he can type the whole phrase in under a tenth of a second, commas and all.

    3. mad.casual   8 years ago

      I admit to not having poured over every one of Robby's 'to-be-sures' but this seems like an uncharacteristically 'good shoot'? Like people actually would be offended by it. As opposed to the more trademark Soave 'spray and pray' tbs where he backhands liberty, defends oppression, and strives not to offend whiny people.

    4. Kevin47   8 years ago

      They are pretty obviously offensive (mocking suicide and child rape victims, for example), and not particularly funny for the most part. I wouldn't be happy with my kid at all if they posted to that group.

  8. Sevo   8 years ago

    "...Launching an investigation over some un-P.C. meme-sharing is exactly the kind of overreaction that South Park was mocking..."

    Sarcasm is no longer possible.

  9. John   8 years ago

    The 60s have been totally romanticized. But you can understand why they were. Sure, the good times were not what they are made out to be and anyone who has ever watched Gimme Shelter knows even the good parts had a serious dark side. But hedonism and sex are always easy to romanticize after the fact.

    That makes me wonder how well the current generation of SJWs are going to age as time goes on. They seem to be utterly miserable people who are incapable of having a good time. How exactly do you look back fondly on your days in college and that time the Facebook meme triggered you?

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   8 years ago

      "" How exactly do you look back fondly on your days in college and that time the Facebook meme triggered you?"'

      I'm guessing with a glass of wine, by the fire, in fetal position, crying uncontrollably. The facebook meme was the second worse, next to the time Hillary Clinton was robbed by the Russians to install the great satan Trump as president.

    2. Kevin47   8 years ago

      Some people look back on their college years and think about (GASP) the education they received.

      1. John   8 years ago

        Sure. But most people look back on their youth as a good time and generally romanticize it. So even if you don't romanticize college, it is a good bet your romanticize some part of your youth and that is my point.

        Beyond that, I look back on my college days as a fun time of my youth. That is not because (gasp) I didn't receive an education. It is because (double gasp) I view education as a lifetime project and college just one small part of that and in no way inclusive of "my education" whatever that is.

      2. jelabarre   8 years ago

        "When I think back
        On all the crap I learned in high school
        It's a wonder
        I can think at all"

        Paul Simon

    3. damikesc   8 years ago

      The 60s have been totally romanticized. But you can understand why they were. Sure, the good times were not what they are made out to be and anyone who has ever watched Gimme Shelter knows even the good parts had a serious dark side. But hedonism and sex are always easy to romanticize after the fact.

      That makes me wonder how well the current generation of SJWs are going to age as time goes on. They seem to be utterly miserable people who are incapable of having a good time. How exactly do you look back fondly on your days in college and that time the Facebook meme triggered you?

      Terrifying thought.

      Those 60's hippies are the ones promulgating these asinine policies. God knows what these fucking Benito Mussolini Jr types will do.

      1. John   8 years ago

        This is true. And God only knows.

  10. Rhywun   8 years ago

    Every time I hear the word "normalize" I want to drink myself stupid.

    1. Microaggressor   8 years ago

      Normalizing alcoholism. NOT OKAY.

  11. WakaWaka   8 years ago

    "Though Pomona is a private institution, it explicitly guarantees students that it will respect their free expression rights."

    Can something still be considered to be 'private' when all of the payments from its customers is subsidized by the federal government? And those payments are attached with mandated regulations? By this definition, Elon Musk is the greatest 'private' entrepreneur in the history of the world

    1. Rhywun   8 years ago

      I don't get it either. The only difference I can come up with is a different balance of tax dollars going to the student versus the institution.

    2. Kevin47   8 years ago

      I generally bristle at the notion accepting any federal aid, however indirectly, requires one to adhere to government mandates. In this case, any serious action would have constituted a breach of contract, as defined by various codes of conduct.

  12. Half-Virtue, Half-Vice   8 years ago

    So I assume the good people at Pomona College are just going to change the wording of the Student Code and the Discrimination and Harassment Policy so that this heinous loophole gets closed forever.

  13. Kevin47   8 years ago

    The investigation in question was based on allegations of specific harassment and threats. While there were a small number of students agitating for harsh repercussions regardless, the administration paid them no heed. Pomona really shouldn't be lumped in with the Oberlins of the world.

    1. Radioactive   8 years ago

      Oberlin's of the world unite, you have nothing to fear but every fucking thing in the universe...

  14. damikesc   8 years ago

    Steinberg seems like a hella cool guy. Really.

  15. imo   8 years ago

    Pomona College Investigates Students for Posting Offensive Memes on Facebook - Hit & Run : Reason.comis the best post by imo for pc Please visit imo app imo app snaptube for pc snaptube app

  16. Brianna Youn   8 years ago

    IRT is still examining U PC BREAUX and getting make ideas for further activities to Feldblum, such as a potential research, which could take two types ? a study of breaches of the college student rule or of pestering and discrimination according to Essay Help consultant. The student rule also prohibits learners from using university processing and network services to "display or transfer violent pictures ? or information to an recognizable individual or group of individuals

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How To Fix California's Self-Inflicted Homeowner's Insurance Crisis

J.D. Tuccille | 5.21.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Breathe It In

Charles Oliver | 5.21.2025 4:00 AM

By Trump's Logic, Biden Deserves Credit for a Dramatic Drop in Overdose Deaths

Jacob Sullum | 5.21.2025 12:01 AM

Subaru Is the Latest Carmaker To Hike Prices in Response to Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 5.20.2025 4:50 PM

What Kristi Noem Gets Wrong About Habeas Corpus

Billy Binion | 5.20.2025 4:33 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!