Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Ted Cruz

Ted Cruz Defends Dildos on CNN, Calls Himself 'One of the Most Libertarian Members of the Senate'

Cruz is walking back earlier support for sex-toy sales bans after his account liked a porn tweet on Twitter Tuesday.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 9.13.2017 6:01 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
modified from Robin Jerstad/ZUMA Press/Newscom

Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz is walking back earlier support for sex-toy sales bans after a "staffer" liked a porn tweet on Twitter Tuesday morning.

Cruz's account liking the porn-clip, from the account @SexuallPosts, was quickly picked up by folks on Twitter. On Wednesday, Cruz went on CNN to talk about the faux-pas, which he attributed to an unnamed communications staffer who made a mistake.

When Bash asked about his earlier support for a Texas law banning the sale of sex toys, Cruz called the law "stupid" and said he was just doing his duty.

"I worked for the attorney general," said Cruz. "The attorney general's job is to defend the laws passed by the Texas legislature. One of those laws was a law restricting the sale of sex toys, which is a stupid law."

"Consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want in their bedrooms," Cruz continued, going so far as to suggest he is "one of the most libertarian members of the Senate."

This is—just in case anyone needs a reminder—patently false; Cruz's "libertarianism" is opportunistic, and he turns it on and off as it suits him. But for now, at least, we can all enjoy watching Cruz squirm.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Did Arizona Fund Medicaid Expansion With an Unconstitutional Tax? Supreme Court Will Decide.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Ted CruzSexPornographyNanny State
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (78)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Crusty Juggler - Lawbertarian   8 years ago

    Dildos. Ted Cruz. Squirm.
    Dildos. Ted Cruz. Squirm.
    Dildos. Ted Cruz. Squirm.
    Dildos. Ted Cruz. Squirm.
    Dildos. Ted Cruz. Squirm.
    Dildos. Ted Cruz. Squirm.
    Dildos. Ted Cruz. Squirm.

    1. Hugh Akston   8 years ago

      That's not how SEO works dude.

      1. Chipper Morning, Mean Girl   8 years ago

        It's Crusty's "to do" list.

    2. BestUsedCarSales   8 years ago

      Consenting

  2. Unlabelable MJGreen   8 years ago

    It's "attorney's general job."

  3. Leo Kovalensky   8 years ago

    Yuck
    Yuck
    Yuck
    Yuck
    Yuck
    Yuck
    Yuck

  4. Hugh Akston   8 years ago

    "I worked for the attorney general," said Cruz. "The attorney general's job is to defend the laws passed by the Texas legislature. One of those laws was a law restricting the sale of sex toys, which is a stupid law."

    "Attorneys general have no discretion in which laws they defend and to what extent. The infinite time and resources at their disposal are more a prison than a blessing."

    1. Bubba Jones   8 years ago

      He wasn't the attorney general. He didn't get to set AG policy.

  5. Square = Circle   8 years ago

    Cruz continued, going so far as to suggest he is "one of the most libertarian members of the Senate."

    Unfortunately, what Cruz says is 100% true.

    *walks away quietly sobbing*

    1. mad.casual   8 years ago

      Damn you and your conciseness!

    2. SIV   8 years ago

      Yeah ol' Lyin' Ted still ranks about 4th, at worst. He's well ahead of reason's fave authoritarian Mormon Deep State centrist Jeff Flake.

      1. BYODB   8 years ago

        Flake also voted to table the discussion of repealing the AUMF, so yes he is another example of a fraud right alongside Cruz.

        1. BYODB   8 years ago

          Also, just to point it out, there were Democrats who voted against tabling the discussion. Just want to point out that there are Democrats who are apparently on board with at least having that talk which is heartening to some degree.

    3. Bubba Jones   8 years ago

      Yeah. This amuses me. If this is how we treat our "friends" who is going to join us?

      1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

        Come on, you need a few initiation rituals (aka hazing) to see who's worthy of being in the club.

        /sarc

        1. Telcontar the (Obama) Birther   8 years ago

          "Oh yeah, noob? Well, if you're so libertarian, let's see you inject these syringes of heroin! What, you scared of needles, BOY?"

          1. BestUsedCarSales   8 years ago

            I only smoke drugs. What kind of pussy are you that's afraid of smoke?

            1. Telcontar the (Obama) Birther   8 years ago

              What do you think we're injecting? Real men only use aerosolized heroin- the risk of an embolism gives the high that extra "oomph" of testosterone.

            2. Chipper Morning, Mean Girl   8 years ago

              And by "drugs", BUCS means his wife's pubic hair.

              1. Telcontar the (Obama) Birther   8 years ago

                Well, that explains why he's used to pussies that aren't afraid of smoke.

    4. Chipper Morning, Mean Girl   8 years ago

      "I am one of the least dangerous parasites, " said the e. coli.

  6. mad.casual   8 years ago

    These;
    Cruz continued, going so far as to suggest he is "one of the most libertarian members of the Senate."
    ...
    Cruz's "libertarianism" is opportunistic, and he turns it on and off as it suits him.

    Don't justify:
    This is?just in case anyone needs a reminder?patently false;

    He's certainly no Rand Paul. He's certainly both more libertarian (and actually in the Senate) when compared to John McCain, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, Mike Huckabee, Carly Fiorina, Rick Perry, Ben Carson, etc., etc.

    His statement is, at best, conditionally false.

    1. SchillMcGuffin   8 years ago

      Indeed. Give me an opportunistic libertarian over a principled socialist any day of the week.

  7. Agammamon   8 years ago

    I've come to realize that 'duty' truly is a bad word.

    Think of how much evil throughout history has been facilitated by people 'just doing their duty'.

    1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

      For that matter, consider the crimes committed in the name of "justice" or "liberty." It's criminals abusing words. But the words themselves describe good things.

      1. Agammamon   8 years ago

        They're not abusing anything - what is 'justice' except what the powerful say it is? What is liberty except what the powerful say it is?

        You're *told* if you'll get justice, you're *told* what that justice will be, you're *told* that if you aren't satisfied to just suck it up, and you're told that if you don't get it at all then too bad.

        1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

          OK, but if you're still capable of being indignant at injustice, maybe justice is a real concept even if unjust people try to distort it.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    ...Cruz's "libertarianism" is opportunistic, and he turns it on and off as it suits him.

    EVERYONE'S LIBERTARIANISM IS OPPORTUNISTIC.

  9. HeteroPatriarch   8 years ago

    Sadly, he is actually one of the most libertarian members of the Senate. Top 5, at least.

    1. Get To Da Chippah   8 years ago

      It might be more fair to say that he is tied for 5th with 95 other senators.

      1. SIV   8 years ago

        Name 2, 3 and 4

        Even putting Mike Lee at #2 (he's in the top 4 anyways) is questionable.

        1. 68W58   8 years ago

          FreedomWorks ranks Cruz in the top 20 with a score of 90-not sure what other metric to use but he is easily better than most members of the Senate.

          http://congress.freedomworks.o.....enate/2017

          1. SIV   8 years ago

            I was too lazy to look but I recall lyin' Ted being one of only 3 or 4 votes against some bipartisan tyranny.

            1. p3orion   8 years ago

              "Lyin' Ted"? Do you REALLY want to channel Donald Trump, or do you too think Ted's lying about his father's involvement in the JFK assassination?

  10. Don't look at me.   8 years ago

    It's like saying I'm the nicest nazi.

    1. Chipper Morning, Mean Girl   8 years ago

      That reminds me of a story. One of our family friends lived through WW2 and personally witnessed some horrendous shit which I will not get into. Let's just say he was not fond of nazis. When he first came to the US, he worked the night shift in a 7-11 in California and was robbed several times. So he was not fond of the 7-11 clientele. He said that one time there was some kind of nazi convention in town and a big group of nazis walked into the 7-11, all decked out in uniforms with swastikas on their arm. At first he was terrified, but he said they turned out to be some of the nicest and most polite people he's ever met. How the times have changed, huh?

  11. Calidissident   8 years ago

    One thing missing is his vote on tabling debate on Rand's move to get a vote on the AUMF.

  12. Stormy Dragon   8 years ago

    "I worked for the attorney general," said Cruz. "The attorney general's job is to defend the laws passed by the Texas legislature. One of those laws was a law restricting the sale of sex toys, which is a stupid law."

    "I believe executive branch officials have a duty to enforce all laws, no matter how stupid or liberty destroying. Please vote for me to be President."

    1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

      If the legislature adopts an unconstitutional law, I don't think the executive should automatically defend it. The state AG, for example, could say the law is unconstitutional and submit himself to being sued or impeached, as the case may be.

      If the legislature isn't able to successfully impeach the AG in these circumstances, maybe that's a sign the law isn't all that constitutional.

      1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

        But let's say the voters themselves, the same people who elected the AG, approve a law - then if there's an ethical way to defend that law in court the AG owes it to the people to do exactly that.

        1. Agammamon   8 years ago

          The AG doesn't owe it to anyone to make the effort to enslave others for their benefit.

        2. EscherEnigma   8 years ago

          "[...] the AG owes it to the people to do exactly that."
          Is it better to dishonestly defend a law you think is bad, or to stand aside and let someone who believes the law is good to honestly defend it?

          And it's not like laws are people. People are entitled to a lawyer in criminal cases. Laws aren't.

        3. Curt2004   8 years ago

          Oh, is that what they swear to do when they take the job?

      2. Bubba Jones   8 years ago

        Ted wasn't the AG. He worked for the AG.

        1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

          Ted wouldn't be the one to get impeached, so the AG would have to review his work to make sure it's legit.

          1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

            Or maybe they'd both have been impeached, or maybe the legislature would have ignored the whole thing, I don't know how Texas politics works.

  13. Bubba Jones   8 years ago

    You lost me at claiming Cruz isn't libertarian because he doesn't conflate it with open borders.

    NO TRUE MEXICAN

    1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

      There are two other legs on Reason's three-legged stool...I don't think Cruz looks good on those things either.

    2. Stormy Dragon   8 years ago

      He's not Mexican. He's Canadian.

  14. Aloysious   8 years ago

    When I woke up this morning, I never imagined that I would see a graphic of a dildo wearing a cape.

    Today has been seized.

    1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

      I woke up this morning, had a bit of the grape
      I said I woke up this morning, and had a bit of a grape
      I must have got the DTs, because I saw a dildo wearing a cape.

      1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

        ALTERNATE VERSION: got in a bit of a scrape...I must have had the DTs because etc.

        1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

          STEVE SMITH VERSION:

          Woke up this morning, looking for something to rape
          I said I woke up this morning, mama, looking for something to rape
          But I felt inadequate after I saw a dildo wearing a cape

  15. Carlos Inconvenience   8 years ago

    So, according to Ms. Brown, who ARE the most libertarian members of the Senate, after Rand Paul that is?

    1. MSimon   8 years ago

      Nancy Pelosi?

    2. damikesc   8 years ago

      Jeff Flake. Obviously.

  16. Juice   8 years ago

    It's not like he cared or anything.

    Denver nurses suspended for opening body bag to admire man's genitals

    1. MarkLastname   8 years ago

      Looks like we've spotted a Crusty sock puppet!

    2. BestUsedCarSales   8 years ago

      My first instinct is that's disgusting, my second instinct is that his junk must have been magnificent if being a corpse barely diminished them.

      My third instinct was that it reminds me of that Sexy Losers arc about a necrophiliac working at a morgue.

      1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

        I think if they'd had sex with the body they'd have received more than a suspension.

        1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

          Unzipping a body bag to ogle a guy's junk is bad enough, but unzipping themselves in order to commit the act of necrophilia could have gotten them arrested or out of the nursing biz.

          1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

            But at least they'd have been able to star in Rigor Mortis II: The Dick and the Dead.

            1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

              If I were really tasteless I'd link to the Rolling Stones' *Start Me Up* at this point.

  17. Jerryskids   8 years ago

    Back when the campaign started, Cruz was about third on my list of preferred candidates due to his TEA Party connection, but when he broke out the Bible and went hard after the evangelical votes that was it. He says it's a stupid law now, he wasn't talking that shit during the campaign.

  18. Bra Ket   8 years ago

    So reason wants him to stand fast on his opposition to sex toys?

    By the way he didn't "walk back his earlier support", he outright repudiated it, calling the law stupid.

    1. Sports Reporter Charles Manson   8 years ago

      And while I don't think he was obliged to defend every act of the Texas legislature, if he thought this particular statute, no matter how dumb, was constitutional, his job was to defend it against people who wanted it struck down as unconstitutional.

      1. damikesc   8 years ago

        That's what I don't get about this outrage. Does anybody assume lawyers agree with everything a client does? A law being dumb shouldn't be enough to qualify it as "unconstitutional"

  19. damikesc   8 years ago

    You're aware the AG job is to defend laws passed by the government, right? Doesn't mean, outside of our last two terrible two AG, that the AG agrees.

    1. EscherEnigma   8 years ago

      Are you aware that has never been an iron-clad rule, that AGs have always had the discretion to pass on cases, have never been obligated to seek appeal after appeal up to the Supreme Court (state or fed), and have always had the option of stepping aside and letting a group that actually thinks a law is legit to defend it?

      Pretending this is a modern liberal/whatever invention is to ignore history in favor of a partisan bias.

      1. damikesc   8 years ago

        Are you aware that has never been an iron-clad rule, that AGs have always had the discretion to pass on cases, have never been obligated to seek appeal after appeal up to the Supreme Court (state or fed), and have always had the option of stepping aside and letting a group that actually thinks a law is legit to defend it?

        Pretending this is a modern liberal/whatever invention is to ignore history in favor of a partisan bias.

        Never been an iron-clad rule that they couldn't hold their dick in their office the entire time they're there --- yet they do not.

        AG regularly defend laws they might not like or agree with because that is the job of the AG. To pretend that this is some new thing is just a case of sheer historical ignorance.

  20. mad.casual   8 years ago

    OK, on my way home, NPR had a decent piece about how, in the tax reform debate, Ted Cruz put forth three axioms (according to NPR);
    1. Lowering both the corporate and the individual rate. - Libertarian win.
    2. Simplifying the code to fit on a postcard. - Libertarian win.
    3. Immediate Expensing (paying capital taxes up front). - Libertarian tie.

    *NPR* did a great breakdown of how Immediate Expensing will help companies and industries tied to capital and production but is a moot point for companies that aren't necessarily making heavy investments like that. No word on any twitter or porn/dildo 'scandal'. It was neutral, it highlighted and clarified libertarian propositions from a right-wing opportunistic libertarian and did so without being idiotically scandalous. Fucking Reason.

    1. TW   8 years ago

      So basically NPR focused on substantive issues while Reason is focusing on nonsense.

      1. Carlos Inconvenience   8 years ago

        Another example of Reason afraid of offending the "cool kids" by not shunning a republican.

  21. EscherEnigma   8 years ago

    As long as we're ragging on Cruz, when he was Solicitor General in Texas back in 2003, his office argued in favor of sodomy laws in front of the SCOTUS.

    So sure, he didn't personally make the argument like he did with dildos. But "the buck stops here" and all that jazz. His office argued that Texas should totally be allowed to jail people because gay sex is icky.

    1. damikesc   8 years ago

      As long as we're ragging on Cruz, when he was Solicitor General in Texas back in 2003, his office argued in favor of sodomy laws in front of the SCOTUS.

      So sure, he didn't personally make the argument like he did with dildos. But "the buck stops here" and all that jazz. His office argued that Texas should totally be allowed to jail people because gay sex is icky.

      He was the STATE'S attorney. Not an individual party, but the state. His client was the state. So, he argued the state's case in front of a court, as was his job.

      His OPINION meant jack shit. He wasn't there to provide input on the law.

      1. EscherEnigma   8 years ago

        Even if you want to make the (wrong) argument that an AG is obligated to defend a law, there is no requirement for them to appeal all the way to the SCOTUS. They are fully complying with their obligations to say "we tried, we lost, we accept the Court's verdict".

  22. Bacon-Magic glib reasonoid   8 years ago

    "This is?just in case anyone needs a reminder?patently false; Cruz's "libertarianism" is opportunistic, and he turns it on and off as it suits him. But for now, at least, we can all enjoy watching Cruz squirm."

    I know there's a whole website that claims "libertarianism".

  23. Sigivald   8 years ago

    "The attorney general's job is to defend the laws passed by the Texas legislature. One of those laws was a law restricting the sale of sex toys, which is a stupid law."

    Cruz is no libertarian (ref. above jokes about how Reason is bad at being libertarian, because hilarious).

    But he's dead right about the AG's job.

    Defending stupid laws is their job; removing stupid laws is the Legislature's.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!