Vive La Trump? Definitely Not Yet.
The U.S. could be on the path to French-style economic sclerosis.

There is a lot of debate over President Donald Trump's record after his first 100-plus days in office. Defenders of the president point to his successful efforts on deregulation, the successful appointment to the Supreme Court of Neil Gorsuch and his steadfast desire to implement substantial tax reform. Critics point to his insistence on counterproductive immigration and trade policies, an incoherent foreign policy, and his overall lack of policy acumen. One thing is for sure, however: The United States is headed toward French-style economic sclerosis if Washington continues its reckless spending spree.
My native France is an economic mess. It might sound wonderful to some that the French are "entitled" to health care, can retire at age 60, have to work for only 35 hours a week and get "free" education. But this spending comes at a cost; 57 percent of the French economy (as measured by the gross domestic product) is spent every year by the government. To pay for it, you need more taxes—and not just high marginal income tax rates and payroll taxes. The French also pay a 20 percent value-added tax, pay a 33.33 percent corporate income tax and have hundreds of other punitive revenue-generating measures.
French policymakers have responded to the resulting sluggish economic growth and persistently high unemployment by making the market for labor horrifyingly inflexible and insulating workers from the competitive market forces that generate long-term prosperity. This results in stubbornly high unemployment rates, mounting debt and the exodus of intelligent French brains to other countries with brighter economic prospects. The mood has become so grim that more than 10 million French voters just turned to the National Front party of Marine Le Pen for hope.
Although Le Pen lost to centrist Emmanuel Macron, little will change unless major reforms are made to the debilitating French welfare system, which pays people not to work while providing handouts for everything from the rent to subway tickets. It's admittedly hard for me to be optimistic, given how ingrained government dependency is in France. But my bigger concern is that the United States is on the same path—even if there's a substantial reduction in red tape here and Trump is able to implement reforms to a tax code that currently suffocates job producers and disincentivizes working, savings and investment. Although we can still pat ourselves on the back for not having fully embraced France's combination of big government and low growth, any hope for 3 or 4 percent annual economic growth that Trump officials are relying on will fade if federal spending—and its byproduct, debt—isn't curtailed.
Unfortunately, there remains scant evidence that the Trump administration is interested in pursuing the measures necessary to bring federal spending and debt under control. Trump never misses a chance to tout his alleged deal-making prowess, but his administration's first budget negotiation just ended with higher spending and Democrats getting most of what they wanted. Then there's the American Health Care Act (already being labeled "Trumpcare"), just passed in the House. Despite what its apologists claim, even if it were to be signed into law as is, it wouldn't get rid of Obamacare. Sure, Trumpcare would cut taxes, but as we've seen in the past, tax cuts don't last long if spending continues to flow unabated.
Indeed, if critics are correct, Trumpcare could end up making health care in this country worse. That outcome would most likely translate into more government spending (including potentially massive bailouts), and promised cuts to Medicaid could actually turn into an expansion of a program that is already a budgetary problem at both the federal level and the state level. Oh, did I mention the not-so-small problem of the fact that Social Security and Medicare are consuming an ever greater share of budgetary resources? The president says he remains committed to leaving those programs untouched, which would be the height of fiscal irresponsibility.
Should all of this blow up on Trump and the GOP, the predictable response from Democrats and their allies on the left would be to push for more wealth-destroying taxes, including the implementation of a value-added tax on top of the current tax morass. It could also mean more pressure to achieve the left's dream of a completely government-run single-payer health care system.
Vive la Trump? Definitely not yet.
COPYRIGHT 2017 CREATORS.COM
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Mitch McConnell gets 90% of the credit for Gorsuch, 9% for the guy who handed Trump the list of judges, and 1% to Trump for being able to read the list.
I think you mean the aide who read the list to Trump.
I'm making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.
This is what I do,.,.,.,.,... http://www.webcash10.com
Oh my god get that picture the FUCK off of my internet.
? Get out of my internet...and into Crusty's car ?
Crusty's brought worse back to the ol' chinchilla cage in the wee hours of a desperate Sunday morning.
With Crusty's assortment of wigs, girdles, stage makeup, and caulk guns, even the median-peddling hobo has been called upon to answer the call of duty on those exiguous nights.
"Anything warm and concave," is Crusty's motto. And "warm" is optional.
Vive les Etats Unis!
Part of the problem is thinking any politician is our savior. Trump is a means to an end- shrink government as much as he can before his two 4 years terms are over.
shrink government as much as he can before his two 4 years terms are over
Oh man, you're in for a rough next couple of years.
Are you retarded CX, or are you just not familiar with the old saying "you have to increase spending across the board to cut spending"?
I was never very good at the more complicated mathematics.
Truth be told, this is the most common dieting plan amongst Americans trying to fit into their old clothes.
My metric is cut shrink government at all.
EO that two regulations would be repealed for every one regulation adopted
Trump EOs
Baby steps with so many Democrats and RINOs in Congress.
If Trump isn't a RINO, then who is? Trump's not going to shrink the government. I'd also be surprised if the promised effects of that EO are realized, things generally don't work that simply in DC.
Trump has already shrunk government. He issued EO that 2 rules be repealed for every 1 proposed.
Is Trump going to shrink government like us Libertarians want? Absolutely not. I will take a no government growth in 8 years under Trump as a win for smaller government.
Part of this is not even up to Trump, its Congress and they are the spending problem as they control the purse- not Trump.
If you have not seen a difference in how Trump is changing Washington, then I am not sure what you are looking for. At the same time, Trump is setting up certain government functions to expand, like the military.
I'll just leave this here:
In 1942 [Earl] Warren ran successfully for Governor of California as a Republican and was reelected in 1946 and 1950. He ran for Vice President of the United States in 1948 on the Republican ticket with Thomas Dewey, who lost to the Democrat, Harry Truman. Not known as a brilliant lawyer, Warren nevertheless developed a national reputation for integrity and decency. In 1953, President Dwight Eisenhower appointed him Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, commenting, "He represents the kind of political, economic, and social thinking that I believe we need on the Supreme Court." In the next few years Warren led the Court in a series of liberal decisions that revolutionized the role of the Court. Eisenhower later remarked that his appointment was "the biggest damned-fool mistake I ever made."
I ain't drinking the Kool-Aid on Gorsuch just yet.
Not known as a brilliant lawyer, Warren nevertheless developed a national reputation for integrity and decency.
So, nothing at all like Gorsuch then?
Yes! We will have to wait and see about Gorsuch. However, I'd bet a bundle that he's not as bad as Earl Warren. OMG ? it's a real stretch to imagine he could interpret the Constitution, with his originalist's mind, as badly as did Warren.
As Attorney General, Warren is most remembered for being the moving force behind Japanese internment .
Would have pants-less phone sex with.
Yeah, but would you grab by the pussy throat and ride down the stairs?
The chinchilla cage is only one story high.
??????O ..My last month paycheck was for 11000 dollars... All i did was simple online work from comfort at home for 3-4 hours/day that I got from this agency I discovered over the internet and they paid me for it 95 bucks every hour... This is what I do...??????? ?????____BIG.....EARN....MONEY..___???????-
Trump may want to shrink government, but do the rest of the Establishment! The good cop bad cop routine is for the benefit of the masses. This will be our one chance, just hope Trump keeps trudging in the right direction.
I basically profit close to $12k-$14k every month doing an online job. For those of you who are prepared to do easy at home jobs for 3h-5h each day at your house and earn valuable paycheck while doing it?
Then this work opportunity is for you -
my classmate's mom makes $85 an hour on the laptop . She has been fired from work for ten months but last month her income was $16692 just working on the laptop for a few hours -