Trump's Empty Bluster and Bombing
There's no actual foreign policy here.

When terrorism raises its head, governments often take steps that are supposed to make us safer—banning tiny knives from airplanes, putting metal detectors at stadium entrances, issuing "orange" alerts. Skeptics dismiss these measures as "security theater." They're a show, not a genuine obstacle to terrorists.
The Trump administration, obsessed with imagery, has adapted this approach to national security. The president tweets bellicose warnings to North Korea. The vice president goes to South Korea to don a bomber jacket and stare implacably across the Demilitarized Zone. An aircraft carrier steams toward the Sea of Japan—or rather, Trump claims it's doing so even as it heads the opposite direction, thousands of miles away.
Anyone who heard Donald Trump brag about his choice for defense secretary knows that half the appeal of James Mattis was his nickname, "Mad Dog," which the president used every chance he got. Had Mattis been known as "Peewee" or "Mouse," he would have been passed over.
With all the noise and spectacle, this presidency often seems less like an attempt at governance and more like a rehearsal for a Broadway musical. It's just not clear whether it will be a comedy or a tragedy.
Some of the props are real. When the military dropped the biggest conventional bomb in the U.S. arsenal on an Islamic State position in Afghanistan, it came as a surprise. But you know the Pentagon had Trump at "mother of all bombs." Once he heard about it, he had to use it.
The problem is that these gestures are no substitute for strategies. This sortie was meant to highlight our power in a way no one could miss. But what happens if you drop your biggest bomb and it doesn't win the war?
Those on the other side conclude that they can take the worst you can inflict. The rest of the world sees the same thing. It's known as shooting your bolt.
The most important question in fighting a war is often, "Then what?" It's one of many questions Trump doesn't spend hours contemplating. He certainly didn't let it delay his missile strike on a Syrian air base, which was supposed to punish President Bashar Assad's use of chemical weapons.
That attack sent a couple of signals. The first is that if Assad resorts again to chemical weapons, the U.S. may respond with military force. The second is that if the Syrian dictator uses other methods—as he has done in killing some 100,000 civilians—he has nothing to worry about.
Assad can take a hint. In the week after the missile strike, according to the Voice of America, the Syrian Network for Human Rights noted an increase in his use of cluster munitions, incendiary weapons and barrel bombs, which killed at least 98 civilians, 24 of them children.
The 22,000-pound bomb that hit a network of caves used by the Islamic State in Afghanistan was said to have killed 96 enemy fighters while causing no civilian casualties. The latter claim invites skepticism. George W. Bush and Barack Obama both declined to use this weapon because of its indiscriminate effects.
Bush considered it for taking out Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. In the end, the danger to innocent bystanders was deemed so great that it was left on the shelf—until now. Trump clearly thinks that worrying about civilian casualties makes you look weak.
But indifference to collateral damage doesn't mean he will succeed in Afghanistan or Syria. One huge conventional bomb, or two or five, won't defeat the Islamic State—which isn't even our chief enemy in Afghanistan. And deploying it against the Taliban, who have a wider and deeper presence, would doubtless spawn more terrorists than it would kill.
The missile strike and the giant bomb drop both amount to an admission of impotence. We can't win in Syria without dispatching a large number of ground troops, and so far Trump is not willing to do that. We haven't won in Afghanistan even with large numbers of ground troops.
Trump's loud but ineffectual tactics confirm to Assad and the Islamic State that winning matters more to them than it does to us. The North Koreans likewise understand that he has no good options for imposing his will.
They are all likely to realize that behind the act is a void. Trump blusters and bombs because he doesn't know what else to do.
© Copyright 2017 by Creators Syndicate Inc.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Although right must still be sleeping. Not a single mention of "cosmotarians" or liberal cocktail party conspiracies yet in a post that directly contradicts the will of Agent Orange.
Yeah H&R recently has been a haven for "libertarian" Trump supporters recently. It's absolutely amazing how deluded both his supporters and his detractors are.
"But you know the Pentagon had Trump at "mother of all bombs." Once he heard about it, he had to use it."
"WASHINGTON ? The U.S. commander in Afghanistan who ordered use of the "mother of all bombs" to attack an ISIS stronghold near the Pakistani border didn't need and didn't request President Donald Trump's approval, Pentagon officials said Friday."
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/wo.....ay-n746806
Ok, so big bad I'm the leader Trump abdicated his responsibility to be the commander in chief. Sounds like we got a cuckolded president.
What?
They didn't require his permission. Here, in lieu of reading the article, I'll help you out:
"The officials said that even before Trump took office in January, Gen. John Nicholson had standing authority to use the bomb"
He didn't "abdicate his responsibility". They had this authority before he took office.
There's plenty to criticize Trump about without having to make shit up.
There's plenty to criticize Trump about without having to make shit up.
I don't know if it's laziness or insanity or what, but people just can't help it, apparently. Same thing has happened with all recent presidents.
Trump is being ridiculed in South Korea over his claim that an armada was on route. They're comparing Trump to the North Korean dictator that guy you know whats his name, hmmm, Kim Kardashian no. Forget it.
American military commanders (in fact, all military commanders) have always used feints and mis-information to confuse the enemy. How many times did Lincoln change plans because he felt Washington, D.C. was going to be attacked?
Looks like somebody is celebrating 4/20 maybe a bit too hard.
Hopefully to the tune of Gangnam Style.
So what do you expect General Cheeto to do -- drop his massive and beautiful and greatest-ever penis on the sand naggers and rice eaters? He needs that penis. For when and if his escort wife comes to visit. Maybe this summer. Who knows? Meanwhile, there's always this:
Fox News Journalists Show Off Their Credentials
You know you want to peek.
https://youtu.be/654BnHvWnRA
Edgy!
the policy is " if you use chemical weapons you will be punished" I guess thats to complicated for Steve and others of his like
The president tweets bellicose warnings to North Korea. The vice president goes to South Korea to don a bomber jacket and stare implacably across the Demilitarized Zone.
And?
An aircraft carrier steams toward the Sea of Japan?or rather, Trump claims it's doing so even as it heads the opposite direction, thousands of miles away.
It's called bluffing. Also, Kim is fond of talking big and making threats. Perhaps he should get a taste of his own medicine, especially considering the US 'can' actually back it's threats/showings of force.
"especially considering the US 'can' actually back it's threats/showings of force."
A show of force may result in American casualties. We don't want that, do we?
"Trump blusters and bombs because he doesn't know what else to do."
He doesn't need to know what to do. He can get by simply following the neo-cons and military careerists that he's surrounded himself with.
Apparently the minority President has a thing about chemical weapons, He will bomb airports which will be operational withing tiona within hours after the bombing if the Syrian President uses such weapons but cluster bombs, barrel bombs, etc. can be used by the dictator against civilians with no response. The real question was why did he bother with the empty gesture? Dropping the "mother of all bombs on a cave network sounds interestiting and terribly macho but what was accomplished? Is ISIS any weakeror did he just eliminate some foot soldiers while the leaders remain in power? Force should have a direct effect otherwise it is merely empty grandstanding.
"The most important question in fighting a war is often, "Then what?" It's one of many questions Trump doesn't spend hours contemplating."
I am willing to bet he gets up a lot earlier than you do. How the fuck do you know what Trump contemplates? Are Reason writers now mind-readers?
real bullshit article.
my neighbor's aunt gets 79 every hour at home, she has been fired from work for seven months, the previous month her profit was 13294 just working at home 2 hours each day, check ?? JOB START ONLINE????-
my neighbor's aunt gets 79 every hour at home, she has been fired from work for seven months, the previous month her profit was 13294 just working at home 2 hours each day, check ?? JOB START ONLINE????-