Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Campus Free Speech

Rollins College Allegedly Suspends Conservative After He Challenged Islamic Student Who Threatened Gays

A Muslim student defended shariah law in class, but the professor went after the conservative Christian.

Robby Soave | 3.28.2017 12:10 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Polston
Marshall Polston / Facebook

Here's a bizarre story: Administrators at Rollins College in Florida suspended a conservative Christian student and banished him from campus after one of his professors—Areeje Zufari—reported that he was making her feel unsafe.

But according to the student, Marshall Polston, he was actually punished for disagreeing with the professor, and for voicing concerns about deeply offensive statements made by a classmate. This classmate, an unnamed male Muslim student, reportedly said that under shariah law, beheading was the appropriate punishment for gays and adulterers.

"It took a few seconds for me to realize that he actually said that, especially after what this community has faced with the tragic loss of life at Pulse," Polston told The Central Florida Post.

This student's comments understandably unnerved several members of Zufari's Middle Eastern Humanities class. Someone even notified the FBI.

Polston took his concerns to Zufari, who seemed unfazed by the comments.

Afterward, Polston was called to the dean of safety's office and informed of his suspension.

"In my judgment, your actions have constituted a threat of disruption within the operations of the college and jeopardize the safety and well-being of members of the College community and yourself," wrote the dean.

Officials ordered Polston to have no further contact with Zufari. The notice of suspension also prohibits Polston from contacting a named female student, for reasons unknown. (As far as I can tell, this named female student is not the student who made the comments about shariah law in class, since her gender is wrong.) Polston could not immediately be reached for comment.

Polston's feud with Zufari predates the shariah law episode. They clashed during a previous class period: Zufari purportedly asserted that Jesus was never crucified and his followers didn't believe he was a god. Polston challenged her, and then received a failing grade on an essay. When he inquired about the grade, Zufari retaliated by cancelling classes and reporting Polston to the dean for making her feel unsafe, according to Polston's account.

The discussion of shariah law took place at subsequent class meeting.

"Our university should be a place where free-speech flashes and ideas can be spoken of without punishment or fear of retribution," Polston told The College Fix. "In my case it was the total opposite… I came forward with the story because I know so many other students like me suffer under today's liberal academic elite."

In the story, 20-year-old Polston notes that he has traveled the Middle East (pictures from his Facebook profile support this) and even given a lecture at Salahaddin University. He has hired a lawyer and plans to contest the suspension.

He has already been accused of violating its terms. According to a campus safety report obtained by The College Fix:

"Student ______ stated to me that she looked out the back glass door of the classroom and saw Mr. Polston staring into the room. He briefly stopped then proceeded on his way. Campus safety was immediately notified and responded at 19:36 hours. A search was conducted but Mr. Polston was not found. Ms. Zufari's students were upset and did not feel comfortable being in the class. Ms. Zufari dismissed her class early at 20:07 hours."

Polston, however, was able to supply video evidence that he was at a restaurant 30 minutes away at the time.

Neither Rollins College nor Professor Zufari responded to a request for comment.

A couple points bear emphasis.

First, several conservative news outlets evidently thought the headline here was Professor Says Stuff We Don't Like About Jesus. But Zufari's comments, offensive though they might be to Christians, are hardly the most outrageous aspect of this story. Indeed, a university classroom is a perfect place to have a discussion about an historical figure, especially given that Zufari and Polston both seem to possess a certain level of expertise regarding the intersections of their respective religions, and regarding Middle Eastern history.

That said, it was of course wrong for Zufari to fail Polston on the basis of his disagreement with her, if that is indeed what happened.

The available reporting on the pro-shariah law student's comments leaves much to be desired. It's not completely clear whether he was merely stating the shariah law position on adulterers and gay people, or endorsing it. The reaction from other students—to call the FBI—suggests the latter, but this would not be the first time people overreacted to safety concerns at a university setting.

The purpose of a liberal arts college like Rollins is to teach and promote classically liberal Enlightenment values. Extremist interpretations of shariah law—including calls to violence against gays and adulterers—obviously violate liberal principles. Students who espouse such illiberal views should be challenged by other students, and by their professors. Rollins should not provide intellectual shelter to an Islamic extremist, if that's what's happening here.

Alas, it seems like Rollins has gone the way of so many other campuses. When students, professors, and administrators hear someone say something they don't like, they are more likely to report the speaker to the authorities than engage him or her in a productive dialogue. Everything that offends is a safety risk, or harassment violation. And standing up for the principle of free speech is retaliation. What a mess.

Stay tuned for updates.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Jeff Sessions Threatens Unconstitutional Action Against Sanctuary Cities

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Campus Free Speech
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (140)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

    Not a "to be sure" to be seen? Now i feel unsafe.

    1. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

      At least there was a "that said."

    2. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

      To be sure, this is why I avoided humanities classes loke the plague and stuck to STEM, where bullshit like this is minimal.

      1. SQRLSY One   8 years ago

        WHEN are we gonna talk about "freedom from sexual abuse" for all of the goats in goat-fuckers-infested-lands!?!?!

  2. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

    I've never heard of Rollins College until today.

    Note to Rollins College administrators: you know the saying "there's no such thing as bad publicity?" That's a bunch of bullshit. This is bad publicity.

    But I'm sure your shitty little nothing-burger of a college is a bastion of free inquiry and academic excellence. /sarc

    1. Inigo Montoya   8 years ago

      Rollins was great in Black Flag and Rollins Band, but obviously starting a college just got away from him.

      Then again, every educational institution now seems overrun with these SJW idiots, and even the adults are no longer being adults -- as this crazy prof obviously demonstrates.

      1. B.P.   8 years ago

        Keith Morris was a vastly superior Black Flag singer.

        1. Scarecrow Repair & Chippering   8 years ago

          How about his dancing?

    2. Haha, charade you are   8 years ago

      They actually have the best MBA program in the state.

  3. Mickey Rat   8 years ago

    It would appear that the professor is attempting to punish a student for having the gall to challenge her unorthodox viewpoints. Reporting him for publicly castigating a Muslim student stating or even defending Islamic law us just an excuse. That per sceptical on seems to have no business being a teacher.

  4. WakaWaka   8 years ago

    Way to throw in that subtle jab at the Daily Caller. You keep virtue-signaling

    1. Juice   8 years ago

      You keep being a conservative Republican.

    2. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

      So the student WAS suspended for disagreeing about the Crucifixion, then?

    3. $park? leftist poser   8 years ago

      Way to ferret out the nugget of hate.

      1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        Nugget of Hate was my nickname in college.

        1. $park? leftist poser   8 years ago

          Nugget of Hate is what I call my penis.

          1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

            Is that because of the shape?

            1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

              ...and the size, and how the ladies feel towards it.

          2. dean777   8 years ago

            you said it not us
            bv

    4. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

      I think it's fair to call out the Daily Caller for taking a story about a Muslim student seemingly endorsing Shariah Law and getting their panties in a bunch over the part where the professor said some icky things about Jesus instead. You'd think they would be all over the Shariah bit, but apparently even the conservative media is afraid to call out a Muslim for implicitly endorsing head chopping.

      1. ant1sthenes   8 years ago

        Sharia may or may not be a political disagreement, but the Jesus thing seems like a more clear cut case of religious discrimination.

      2. Marla Hughes   8 years ago

        There's no proof of either.
        Since the professor filed a police report and Polston apparently sent a threatening email to either her or the pretty Muslim girl listed in his suspension as a 'no contact', the facts will eventually come out one way or another.

      3. Bra Ket   8 years ago

        But the Jesus stuff was said by a professor (of some kind), a person in a position of authority and a representative of the college. And presumably students in that class, not to mention in all her past in future classes, are required to learn and regurgitate such views. From a political perspective that's a much bigger deal than what some asshole classmate said about some class topic one time.

        The Daily Caller version was also in chronological order, whereas the above flashes back to the Jesus episode. Timeline:

        1. student debates about Jesus.
        2. students gets failing grade, argues with teacher about it, gets reported the first time.
        3. other student says stuff about sharia
        4. our hero approaches teacher again, new argument
        5. student reported again, suspended this time.

        A lot clearer actually if you read the other article which is pretty succinct...

    5. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

      The Daily Caller epitomizes respectable journalism.

    6. Zeb   8 years ago

      How is it not a fair criticism? You are weirdly obsessed.

      1. Marshal   8 years ago

        Uh, because the story is about a nutty professor and the college which enables her?

        1. Zeb   8 years ago

          How is that a response to what I asked?

      2. Mickey Rat   8 years ago

        She allegedly gave hom a failing grade for publically disagreeing with her unconvential viewpoint. She was in no way seeking a discussion, as she was punishing dissent from her opinion. It says something about her character and her possible motivations for seeking to have him suspended.

        1. Calidissident   8 years ago

          The Daily Caller headline is misleading. It implies that the disagreement over Jesus directly preceded the suspension, but it was actually the conversation after the shariah law comments. I agree it's relevant, and it may have factored into him getting suspended, but it wasn't the immediate precursor the way it's portrayed in the headline.

          1. Mickey Rat   8 years ago

            Fair enough.

    7. Not a True MJG   8 years ago

      YOU'RE DOING GREAT WORK HERE, GUY

    8. Calidissident   8 years ago

      Does getting your panties in a twist every time a conservative person or group is criticized an example of virtue signaling? Genuinely curious here.

      1. Zeb   8 years ago

        I'm going to say that it is.

        1. Bra Ket   8 years ago

          You would probably know best Zeb, since you seem to be here to pick a fight with practically every single right-wing-leaning or anti-left-wing statement made here.

      2. MarkLastname   8 years ago

        Pfff, you're just virtue signaling by disdaining virtue signaling about virtue signaling.

        1. pan fried wylie   8 years ago

          I feel signaled.

        2. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

          What if I told you that all communication that discloses a value preference as its main goal is virtue signaling?

    9. Macy's Window   8 years ago

      Especially since it wasn't even an accurate jab at Daily Caller.

      Soave: "First, several conservative news outlets evidently thought the headline here was Professor Says Stuff We Don't Like About Jesus."

      In fact, the headline read, "Muslim Prof Insists Jesus Wasn't Crucified, Christian Student Suspended After Disagreeing."

      The emphasis was clearly on the fact that a student was suspended for disagreeing with a professor. There was no outrage at all about the professor's claim. Neither should there be as the professor just expressed the standard belief of 1 billion plus Muslims about Jesus's demise.

  5. B.P.   8 years ago

    Turning "I feel unsafe" into a weapon is going really well.

    1. dantheserene   8 years ago

      It's becoming a go-to tool for suppressing positions the wielder doesn't like.

  6. KerryW   8 years ago

    There's an update link in the Central Florida Post story -- apparently the professor has a past of radical Islamic activity.

  7. Akshar   8 years ago

    He should have claimed he was gay and felt threatened instead.

    1. Rhywun   8 years ago

      Pretty sure gays are below Muslims on the progressive victim stack.

      1. DOOMco   8 years ago

        and he's a conservative! that means you multiply the gay by -5.

  8. Catatafish & Woodchips   8 years ago

    "Extremist interpretations of shariah law?including calls to violence against gays and adulterers?obviously violate liberal principles."

    I'm just gonna sit over here and wait for an example of "moderate" shariah law.

    1. DOOMco   8 years ago

      They think light misogyny is just fine?

      1. Catatafish & Woodchips   8 years ago

        "We're just going to cut off your ears for being a man and also sporting that FABULOUS Donna Karan gown and bedazzled woven gladiator sandals."

        1. DOOMco   8 years ago

          ok, women can drive. but only while the sun is up.
          no gays though.

          1. John Titor   8 years ago

            Alright, we'll take the women sunshine drivers and no gays, but men are allowed to have pedophilic relationships with underage boys, because culture. Deal?

            1. jack sprat   8 years ago

              but we won't take the Irish!

            2. cc2   8 years ago

              But if they are underage boys it doesn't count as gay because reasons...

    2. BYODB   8 years ago

      This part of the article also gave me pause. I'm curious what an example of moderate Shariah law would be. Like, you only have to cover your hair instead of your entire body?

      1. MarkLastname   8 years ago

        You can stone gays with pebbles no more than 1 ounce in weight.

        1. The Laissez-Ferret   8 years ago

          Would that make them Fruity Pebbles?

          1. pan fried wylie   8 years ago

            afterwards, yes.

      2. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

        Wouldn't that entail having to cover your whole body anyway?

    3. Brandybuck   8 years ago

      Shariah Law is the Muslim equivalent of Jewish Halakah. There are rules in both about stoning people, and there are rules about how to properly kill animals for consumption (kosher, halal). The difference is not in the religions, the difference is in the cultures. It's pretty much only offshoots of one nomadic desert culture that want to impose Shariah Law on non-Muslims living in non-Muslim countries.

      Most of Shariah Law is moderate. How to prepare meat, divorce proceeding, property inheritance, etc. There are some radical bits, just as there are radical bits in Jewish Halakah. But the problem with Shariah Law has nothing to do with Shariah Law, but that there are people who want to impose it on others against their will.

      1. Paloma   8 years ago

        Nobody should stone gays under any law. If they do, it's a crappy law and a crappy culture.

      2. Careless   8 years ago

        Whereas those Muslim gays are totally asking to be murdered.

    4. EscherEnigma   8 years ago

      You know that the Bible and Torah also call for violence against gays and adulterers, right? I would be very surprised if none of the more "moderate" parts of Leviticus made it into the Quran.

      1. Macy's Window   8 years ago

        That must be why there is the big pile of dead gays outside the church down the street. The Lutherans have 'em stacked up like cordwood.

        1. MarkLastname   8 years ago

          It's almost as though EscherEnigma missed the point. Missing the people isn't actually seems to be a pathology with him.

    5. Fuck You - Cut Spending   8 years ago

      Under Sharia Law the professor should be stoned to death for being around a male that was not her husband.

      1. EscherEnigma   8 years ago

        1 Timothy 2:12: I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.

        The professor is in trouble no matter whether you're talking Torah, Bible or Quran.

        1. kevino   8 years ago

          The first problem with this quote (and your legal reference above) is that almost no one believes those edicts any more. Devote Christians and Jews left those ideas on the dung-heap of history. Sure, you may be able to find a few people who believe such nonsense, but I can find snake handlers, too. The Bible contains a lot of orders from God about how He wanted society built and how He ordered genocide. But that was in the past. So unless a reliable spokesperson from the Almighty comes down from heaven with fresh instructions, the people who try to live that way are outliers -- an extreme minority.

          Furthermore, even the outliers don't impose their rules on others. If Catholics decided to impose cannon law on all others and were threatening violence against apostates, then you'd have a point. But that isn't happening. What we DO HAVE and what we can clearly see are radical Islamic fundamentalists trying to impose their will on the rest of us. In the process, they don't appear to see or understand the humanity of others.

          "Middle Eastern humanities class" is a joke. "Middle Eastern Inhumanity" appears to be the predominant view.

          1. EscherEnigma   8 years ago

            So Christians can cherry pick and rationalize, but Muslims can't?

            Yeah, that sounds likely.

          2. DarrenM   8 years ago

            Most of those older passages from the Old Testament (or however those books are referred to) are more reciting history than explicit commandments. A story where John Doe was commanded to kill Bob is not the same as an explicit "Thou Shalt Kill Anyone Named Bob Now And Anytime In The Future".

    6. NCBlueJay   8 years ago

      There might not be a moderate sharia law, but there could certainly be a moderate interpretation of sharia law. If a lesbian Episcopalian minister can ignore Leviticus 20:13, then you could have a Muslim who ignores the unsavory passages of the Koran and hadiths. I've known some secular Muslims, including an openly gay one, who interpreted sharia in a very loosey-goosey way (i.e., "Just be a good person.") I'll take more of them. I'll also take people like Asra Nomani, Zuhdi Jasser, and Raheel Raza.

      I don't really care how a religious person rationalizes cherry-picking or explaining away his favorite ancient text. I only ask that he do it in a way that conforms with Western ideals. Christians mostly got their act together during the Enlightenment. Islam, which I recognize isn't monolithic, needs to do the same.

  9. John Titor   8 years ago

    Zufari purportedly asserted that Jesus was never crucified and his followers didn't believe he was a god. Polston challenged her, and then received a failing grade on an essay.

    Ah yes, the retarded arguments between Christians and Muslims in a class on theology, all too familiar. Less common for it to be between a teacher and student though.

    "My religion says this is true, my sources are all secondary sources based off of religious writings and commentaries designed to reinforce my faith, no I don't have anything like a primary source, impartial secondaries or archaeological evidence and I shouldn't have to provide them."

    This is why I prefer bitter, cynical historians.

    1. BYODB   8 years ago

      Why would the Roman government falsify their records indicating that they crucified some Jew named Jesus I wonder.

      1. Zeb   8 years ago

        Are there records? As far as I know there isn't a lot of actual historical evidence for Jesus existing as depicted in the Bible (even minus the son of god and miracle parts).

      2. Zeb   8 years ago

        OK, didn't take long to learn that there is a bit more historical evidence than I thought.

        1. MarkLastname   8 years ago

          Well there's Seutonius an Pliny the younger. The latter's letters to the emperor pretty well refute the Muslim professor's arguments.

          1. Slocum   8 years ago

            Not really. Pliny was born decades after Jesus is supposed to have died. He's a reliable source on early Christians, but that's all. The same is true, Tacitus and Josephus. And the independent historical evidence for the existence of Muhammad isn't much better. But in the end, it really doesn't matter--after all, Joseph Smith definitely existed, but that doesn't make me a Mormon.

      3. Unicorn Abattoir   8 years ago

        Because that's what governments do?

      4. gclancy51   8 years ago

        Evidence? The first writings on Jesus came decades after his death. For there to be no contemporaneous records of the man, particularly in the time of meticulous record-taking Romans, is a little bit...fishy...

  10. Catatafish & Woodchips   8 years ago

    "Extremist interpretations of shariah law?including calls to violence against gays and adulterers?obviously violate liberal principles."

    I'm just gonna sit over here and wait for examples of "moderate" shariah law.

    1. Catatafish & Woodchips   8 years ago

      Goddamn squirrels.

      1. DOOMco   8 years ago

        comments are terrible today. and yesterday. and last week.

        1. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

          comments are terrible today. and yesterday. and last week.

          FTFY.

  11. Marshal   8 years ago

    First, several conservative news outlets evidently thought the headline here was Professor Says Stuff We Don't Like About Jesus.

    Thank god you figured out how to demonstrate you're the reliable sort of libertarian who can work blame for conservatives into any story. I thought this one might be tough.

    I hear WAPO is looking so good timing on your part.

  12. DOOMco   8 years ago

    FUCK THIS BULLSHIT. FIX THE COMMENTS.

    1. Johnimo   8 years ago

      IT'S GETTING OBNOXIOUS, ISN'T IT?

      1. DOOMco   8 years ago

        did my all caps give it away?

    2. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

      ALL CAPS JUSTIFIED IN RESPONSE TO BULLYING AND AGGRESSION FROM THE SQUIRRELZ.

      1. DOOMco   8 years ago

        fix them or take them away. I really don't care at this point. if you can't make it work, just shut them down.

  13. fish   8 years ago

    The purpose of a liberal arts college like Rollins is to teach and promote classically liberal Enlightenment values.

    It's adorable that you still believe that!

  14. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    ...since her gender is wrong.

    Talk about offensive comments. That statement right there is straight up misogyny.

    1. pan fried wylie   8 years ago

      If her gender is wrong, I don't wanna be right.

  15. Johnimo   8 years ago

    Just don't use my tax dollars for the school or any of its students. That's my only demand. Then, let them sit around and love whatever form of radical nonsense they want. Students should find other schools where actual free speech is encouraged.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    But Zufari's comments, offensive though they might be to Christians...

    WHY IS THE OFFENSIVENESS OF THOSE COMMENTS QUALIFIED BUT THE OFFENSIVENESS OF THE SHARIA LAW COMMENTS OBJECTIVELY UNIVERSAL?

    Actually I don't really know what I'm bitching about here, I just wanted to point out the general subjectivity of offensive statements.

  17. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    Ms. Zufari's students were upset and did not feel comfortable being in the class.

    Doubtful. They didn't mind the early dismissal, though, because college students don't appreciate that they're actually taking on debt to pay for this bullshit.

  18. J Mann   8 years ago

    To be fair, if Zufari actually said "Jesus wasn't crucified" as an absolute statement, that's pretty much crankery. The broad consensus of historians is that the guy did exist and was crucified. On the other hand, if she said something like "there are some historians who dispute the Crucifixion and I think they're right" that's well within reasonable bounds.

    It sounds to me like she didn't like this kid "sealioning" her, but I think that's something you have to put up with if you want to challenge people's views at a college.

    1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

      Regardless of its actual historicity, Islam holds that the crucifixion was an illusion, because God would never let His second-favorite prophet get executed like that. In Islamic belief Issa ibn Maryam was taken directly to heaven right before getting nailed up on the cross.

      Muslims are down with the virgin birth, though.

      1. J Mann   8 years ago

        I didn't realize that was religious dogma. I trust that the party of science is outraged.

      2. Cyto   8 years ago

        It is actually pretty interesting reading. They take an entirely theologically based line of logic - that Jesus could not possibly have died, therefore the executioners failed. They seem to miss the entire point of the Crucifixion:

        For Jesus to die on the cross would have meant the triumph of his executioners; but the Quran asserts that they undoubtedly failed: "Assuredly God will defend those who believe"; (XXII, 49). He confounds the plots of the enemies of Christ (III, 54)

        But the entire point of the Christian version is that even death cannot overcome the power of God and God's plan - and with it the redemption of sin and sinners.

        A little motivated reasoning would lead one to conclude that Islamic scholars and the authors of the Qur'an lacked faith in the power of God (Allah) to overcome death - and so disbelieved the resurrection story, substituting their own versions - either sham execution or execution of some other person.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    This one is spewing hatred at me, de-railing class, and just sent me a hateful email threatening me?

    Seems like there should be evidence in that email of harassment.

    1. DarrenM   8 years ago

      He disagreed with her. Isn't that harassment enough?!

  20. NoVaNick   8 years ago

    The SJWs will need to decide soon on whose behalf they should be more outraged-LGBT people or Muslims-the two seem to be mutually exclusive so it can't be both. That said, should they encounter a gay Muslim (I have known at least one such person), what are they to do?

    1. wareagle   8 years ago

      They already decided. The Orlando shooting took care of that.

      1. Cyto   8 years ago

        Didn't they just decide that the Orlando shooting was not perpetrated by a Muslim, but by a self-loathing homophobe who was not affiliated with any Muslim groups but rather was motivated by hatred of Gays and an affinity for right wing politics?

        1. Entropy Drehmaschine Void   8 years ago

          Yes.

          Progtard assholes.

        2. Entropy Drehmaschine Void   8 years ago

          Yes.

          Damn Progtard assholes.

          1. Entropy Drehmaschine Void   8 years ago

            Damn squirrelz.

    2. B.P.   8 years ago

      I had a roommate who was a gay Druze who converted to Islam.

      1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        I knew a couple of gay Muslims in college - one was Bosnian, the other Iraqi Kurd. A person might almost start to think that each human being is a discrete individual, with his or her own perceptions, motivations, interpretations, desires, ideas, etc. But that's just crazy talk.

    3. Zeb   8 years ago

      Is there some law that says they all have to agree?

    4. EscherEnigma   8 years ago

      "The SJWs will need to decide soon on whose behalf they should be more outraged-LGBT people or Muslims-the two seem to be mutually exclusive so it can't be both."
      If Christians and Jews can learn to ignore the part of their holy books that calls for my death, Muslims can too.

      And whataya know... in America, the vast majority of all three groups have successfully done so!

      1. rxc   8 years ago

        But societies and cultures are deiven by the crazy ones who do not agree with the "vast majority". They drive the conversation and the society, unless they are pretty strongly stamped out. Which we don't like to do, in the west, in the name of diversity of thought and tolerance. Which is a good thing, for the vast majority of cases.

      2. MarkLastname   8 years ago

        And I've learned to ignore halfwits like you and I feel a lot better for it.

  21. Calidissident   8 years ago

    I really would like to hear how the university justified this. Either there's crucial info not being disclosed, or this is batshit crazy.

    1. DOOMco   8 years ago

      #floridaschool

    2. NoVaNick   8 years ago

      Academia has become a cult for SJWs nowadays, so nobody will speak against anyone, no matter how bad their behavior, so long as it is supporting their anti-western/Christian/male world view. If they dare to speak out, it will suck to be them.

  22. Unicorn Abattoir   8 years ago

    Polston, however, was able to supply video evidence that he was at a restaurant 30 minutes away at the time.

    Obviously this SOB got his twin brother involved in this conspiracy.

    1. Careless   8 years ago

      I really love how this story just gets worse and worse for the professor. By Grabthar's hammer, what an asshole.

  23. Raston Bot   8 years ago

    professor Zufari has a rather checkered history..

    http://www.centralfloridapost......-children/

    and the student has video evidence from a Chipotle's security camera that he was far far away when the professor claimed he was skulking outside her classroom? oh man she really fucked up.

    1. Marla Hughes   8 years ago

      No, he has a photo of him at the cash register at some take out place on some day or another. And a photo of a car driving out of the parking lot.

  24. AlmightyJB   8 years ago

    I like articles where I get to hate everyone.

  25. EscherEnigma   8 years ago

    There seems to be a lot of holes in this story.

    Shariah Law calls for beheading of gay folk? Well, the Torah and Bible don't specify method, but they call for killin' gay folk too. So right from the get-go, this story is missing details/context that would make it make sense. That the suspension also put a "restraining order" on a random different student is weird and unexplained.

    So I don't know what to make of this story, there's too much inconsistent weirdness going on. I think I'll leave it at "I don't want to go to Florida".

    1. NoVaNick   8 years ago

      I'd still rather live in Florida than California if I was forced to pick

  26. steve walsh   8 years ago

    Man, these fights among the protected classes (Muslims, Gays, Christians, Women), with the accompanying stack ranking & prioritization, are just delicious, in a schadenfreude sort of way.

    1. Macy's Window   8 years ago

      Too bad that "people who completely miss the point" aren't a protected class or you'd be the damned King.

  27. Bgoptmst   8 years ago

    http://frontdoor.valenciacolle.....d=azufari1

    https://z83i.imgup.net/areejzufar09e0.jpg

    The first link is the professors professional page. The second image is what it looked like before she removed the picture on the page. Free country and all, but its not an image that makes me think your a rational good actor.

  28. Longtobefree   8 years ago

    "The purpose of a liberal arts college like Rollins is to teach and promote classically liberal Enlightenment values."
    And there is a mandatory first year (evidently freshman is no longer allowed) class in the comparative values of the Easter Bunny and The Great Pumpkin.
    The purpose of all "higher" education is to brainwash.
    Abolish all student loans!

  29. Chip Your Pets   8 years ago

    It's a "Muslim Humanities" class according to the linked Central Florida Post article, not "Middle Eastern Humanities". Huge difference -- is this Reason trying to shore up the holes in its position by quietly misrepresenting the facts again?

    We're only getting one side of the story here, and this guy seems to have been looking to pick a fight from the getgo by trying to proclaim his faith in a class that's supposed to be about a different one. Mentioning what Sharia law says seems completely appropriate in the context.

    1. Meh.   8 years ago

      ^^^ This is so important, good catch. I really don't think anyone was deliberately trying to mislead, but it does change the whole premise.

    2. DarrenM   8 years ago

      I thought it was Middle Eastern. I'll have to find that article and go check again. I guess I didn't read closely enough.

    3. DarrenM   8 years ago

      https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/31885/

      "A police report filed by Zufari on March 23 states in part that:

      Zufari teaches Middle East Humanities class for Rollins on Thursday evenings. Zufari has been having problems with a student named Marshall Polston who has disagreed with her teachings. Zufari stated this student has openly disrupted class trying to correct her on her views, and has emailed her and texted her. He has also disagreed with her on a grade he received from her. Zufari stated Polston has not threatened to harm her in any physical manner, but wrote her a lengthy email which concluded that he 'would hate to get in contact with some national media personalities that I'm good friends with. I'm going to have to take it there or pursue legal options if you don't stop your harassment towards me.' Zufari states that Polston has also been suspended for one year from attending University of Florida for being disruptive. She states she is in fear of him and requested to report this. She completed a sworn statement and an extra patrol was placed in briefing for Rollins College and Zufari's Winter Park residence."

      1. DarrenM   8 years ago

        More here, but I did not see any reference to the class itself.

        http://www.orlandosentinel.com.....story.html

      2. DarrenM   8 years ago

        Includes the suspension letter to Polston.

        http://www.centralfloridapost......te-speech/

      3. Meh.   8 years ago

        Yeah, you're right, her university bio corroborates this.

      4. J Mann   8 years ago

        Here's a 2013 syllabus - at the very least, the class was "Middle Eastern Humanities" back then.

        http://bit.ly/2nPiqqY

  30. Snort   8 years ago

    I read this twice looking for what was said between Marshall Polston and the professor, Areeje Zufari. Somewhere in the middle of the second reading it became obvious to me this is a piece of propaganda favoring the conservative student. I never did find out what the conservative student said to either the professor or the female student, but I did find plenty where he claimed to be as pure as Jesus himself. The first two times I read it, the phrase "...according to the student..." didn't stick out. Then I realized why the conservatives student's comments that upset the professor and female student were missing. In my opinion the best matching propaganda technique is: Transfer. If you're interested visit Wikipedia and search for 'Propaganda Techniques'.

    1. Red Rocks Baiting n Inciting   8 years ago

      I never did find out what the conservative student said to either the professor or the female student, but I did find plenty where he claimed to be as pure as Jesus himself.

      The professor also claimed that the student sent a threatening email, yet didn't actually quote anything from said email as proof.

      If you're going to whine about "propaganda techniques," you might also want to investigate the phenomenon known as "confirmation bias."

    2. J Mann   8 years ago

      Nobody knows what was said - the professor hasn't said, and the student's suspension didn't tell him, so people are pretty much guessing. The article might be unclear if you didn't get that, but I doubt it's propaganda.

      Here's what has been reported so far:

      1) The suspension letter doesn't say what the conduct was, and Professor Zufari hasn't responded to requests to identify it. So everything after this is people trying to guess what exactly Polston was suspended for.

      2) There was a campus security complaint that Polston stared in the window of the classroom before leaving, but Polston says he has video proof he was somewhere else at the time. College Fix linked to the video, so assuming it's not fake, that seems like a non-starter.

      3) Polston guesses it was because he said the view that Christ was not crucified is not supported by the historical evidence, and that he complained about another student allegedly advocating for beheadings.

      4) Zufari had a facebook posting where she claimed that an unnamed student was "making my life hell this semester . . . spewing hatred at me, de-railing class, and just sent me a hateful email threatening me" But nobofy knows what the hatred or threats were, or if Zufari was complaining about Polston.

      https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/31853/
      .

  31. Red Rocks Baiting n Inciting   8 years ago

    I never did find out what the conservative student said to either the professor or the female student, but I did find plenty where he claimed to be as pure as Jesus himself.

    The professor also claimed that the student sent a threatening email, yet didn't actually quote anything from said email as proof.

    If you're going to whine about "propaganda techniques," you might also want to investigate the phenomenon known as "confirmation bias."

  32. J Mann   8 years ago

    Here's the kid's email to the professor. He sounds like a pain to handle, but unless "I'm going to go to the press or my lawyer about my unfair grade" constitutes a suspension-worthy threat, I'm not sure I see it.

    https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/31885/

  33. JunkScienceIsJunk   8 years ago

    When is this story going to be retracted or corrected?

  34. tuwuremos   8 years ago

    just as Gerald implied I am in shock that a person able to earn $7711 in 1 month on the computer . go now>>>>>>>>>>> https://qr.net/eyGRuC

  35. tuwuremos   8 years ago

    just as Gerald implied I am in shock that a person able to earn $7711 in 1 month on the computer . go now>>>>>>>>>>> https://qr.net/eyGRuC

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Mothers Are Losing Custody Over Sketchy Drug Tests

Emma Camp | From the June 2025 issue

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!