The Paranoid Presidency
Many presidents have spouted conspiracy theories. What's different about Trump is the way he does it.


Donald Trump is famously prone to conspiracy theories, but that in itself isn't unusual in the executive branch. "Indeed, there's a long history of presidents and their inner circles obsessing about malevolent cabals. What's different about Trump isn't the fact that he talks about dubious conspiracies. It's the way he talks about them."
Who am I quoting there? Why, I'm quoting myself! Yep, this is one of those Hit & Run posts where we promote a piece we published elsewhere. In this case, The New Republic asked me to write something about presidential paranoia, and I obliged with a story that hops from John Quincy Adams' obsession with Masonic plots to Richard Nixon stewing about the Jews to Donald Trump's dark speculations about the death of Antonin Scalia. What makes Trump stand out, I argue, isn't the content of his theories so much as the fact that he spouts them without regard for elite mores:
Conspiracy theories tend to be disreputable. Indeed, in most circles of respectable opinion, the very phrase conspiracy theory is used as a pejorative. So when high-level officials embrace a position considered to be taboo, they often prefer not to talk about it. John Kerry has long rejected the official story about JFK's assassination, but when Meet the Press brought up the subject in 2013, the secretary of state clammed up. "I just have a point of view," Kerry demurred. "And I'm not going to get into that."
Our new president, to the delight of his supporters, presents himself as a man unshackled by such mores of polite society. Richard Nixon may have been prone to seeing plots everywhere, but it's hard to imagine him publicly promoting a transparently phony theory tying Rafael Cruz to Lee Harvey Oswald; it's harder still to picture him backing up his claims by citing the National Enquirer. For Trump, neither the story nor the source is something to be ashamed of.
There's a strong chance, of course, that Trump doesn't actually believe the Enquirer story, and that he only brought it up because Ted Cruz happened to be his chief political foe that day. That's where his cynicism comes in. Trump doesn't just spout unsubstantiated accusations; he often drops them as quickly as he brings them up, as though it never really mattered if they were true.
The full article is here. My book on conspiracy theories is here. And the last article I wrote for The New Republic is here. It's from March of 1998, so my appearances there, like the ancient Greek calendar, appear to be based on a 19-year cycle.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
He should have shut his mouth after talking about dialing back regulations, putting businessmen in cabinet positions, and not wanting war with Russia. The more he talks, the more he sounds like another neo-con,. And trade wars and protectionism does not work.
I feel more and more than Trump would have probably ended up being a crazy guy working in the lumber section of Lowe's had he not been born rich.
He probably would have been in porn.
I don't know about that. You know what they say about guys with small hands. He might have been in the porn industry, but not as an actor. Maybe as a props guy, or boom operator (who's always getting the boom mic in the picture) or something.
Trump is too bloated and insecure for porn.
Uh he is 70 now...what about when 30?
You made the same case for Trump over in the comments section of Fox News. Why are you posting the same things twice in two places?
Link please
Thanks for the input bo cara
Are you lying to convince others, or yourself? Did I hurt your feelings when I said I wouldn't respond to you any longer? Sorry dude. If moderators at Reason were to reveal that my ip address and bo cara's were different, would you and your echo chamber cohorts promise to never post on the internet ever again? If they confirm I'm "bo", I have to swim out to sea and never return. I'm down for such a wager.
There is more than one IP address one can use. Different device, moving etc
Uh-huh. You sound like a real tech wizard. Your comments are to comments that fake news is to news. It's a new phenomena. Fake comments.
I saw someone with your handle posting in the fox news section. Their prose is identical do yours.
Why do you read the fox news comment section? What is the matter with you?
Mebbe you moved to a new city and got a new profession lol. That would mean a new ip.
Also can you have reason ip check u and bo since ya brought it up
Why do you post in it? Which is worse?
Please provide a link to which article you mean and what the handle is
Would like to see the results...you wanted it so will take that bet
Please provide evidence that I am "Bo Cara".
You said you would contact reason to get the IP addresses for a bet. Please proceed i give you my blessing
I never said I would be the one who gets them to do it. I don't care enough to go through that trouble. However, If they are reading this, please feel free to release the ips of me and this bo.
So you are backing out...got it.
What is your profession? (this time)
I said I wouldn't respond to you any longer?
Great job on that front...
Lol. He took it personally the other day when rufus and i said obama was an empty suit....he demanded to know my view on trump for some reason as if that is the only way you can have an opinion on obama
Oh, look, it's the ardent Fox News supporter.
Ever since I mentioned that I didn't like Fox News, this guy has been stalking me in the comments section.
You never brought up fox news til today
lol, right. The other day you got so mad over me disparaging Fox News for being pro Trump. You said that they weren't pro Trump enough.
What? when?
Link it
Link to proof that I am Bo Cara.
you said you are on the fox news comment section
I'm honestly having a hard time telling who's stalking who. Maybe you should both STFU and stop shitting on the comment threads.
DON'T MAKE ME PULL THIS BLOG OVER!
Partisan hacks often have a hard time grokking the concept that it's possible to think that both Obama and Trump are empty suits, so the default assumption is that if you criticize one then you must support the other, I guess. Who the fuck knows?
I agree with this CA
I'm not as rigid as Trump and Sessions, I'm afraid.
Konima-
Try some "Viagra"...
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/.....180955203/
Ol' John Quincy believed in all kinds of crazy shit. This one is my favorite.
Great correction at the end of that piece.
Yeah, I got a chuckle out of it as well.
JW: "Navel-Observatory in Washington, D.C." in Smithsonian article.
Damnit Reason! If I come here and see one more story about Trump, I may have to put my time to more productive use.
Yeah, they must be running so many Trump stories because the view counts indicate that it isn't working.
Not what he said at all but not surprised you don't understand
What profession are you this time and why the change in name?
If you weren't so lost in examining everything at the surface level, as you do over in the comments section of Fox News, you would understand that I understood his point. Whether or not he reads any longer is irrelevant, because Reason isn't trying to attract the Fox News audience that you seem so fond of.
Seriously what is your obsession with fox news and where was this brought up?
I missed that admittedly.
lol, you missed it? How flustered are you over all of this that you can't even admit you love Fox News when you post there and claim that your favorite talking head is Sean Hannity.
Post where? Please link it...thanks
I admit i black out a lot and sleep walk so may have
At least you admit what I said is true. No need to be angry about it.
I am not but thanks
I know, right? It's not like he's recently been elected to a high political office with an out-sized amount of power or anything like that. Why not focus on people who actually have political power? /sarc
Now it's the way he says things even though they're in line with what we've already seen?
Bah.
The New Republic, huh.
"""""My book on conspiracy theories"""
Does it include some of my favorite conspiracy theories
1. That some colonialists in the America would conspire to overthrow King George the 3rd's lawful rule using force.
2. That some southerners would conspire to leave the American Union and be even willing to use force?
3. That the Japanese would conspire to bomb Pearl Harbor?
4. Or this really crazy theory the 11 Muslims would conspire to fly airplanes into buildings?
Or this really crazy theory the 11 Muslims would conspire to fly airplanes into buildings?
Eleven? Did you think the other eight were innocent?
They were just using up their frequent flier miles
They were just using up their frequent flier miles
That coaxed a literal LOL out of me.
I finally read the book last week and I enjoyed it.
There's also the fact that Trump really is the target of conspiracies on the part of the MSM, the deep state, and deep-pocketed globalists.
He does have a legitimate reason to be suspicious but he could also attempt, just once, to rise above the petulance of the retards in the media and talk about grown up stuff. He just sounds like a cry baby and for some reason plays into the hands of some of this stuff while completely making a fool of the MSM on others.
His strategy worked however and may continue to work. After all, no one believes a single thing that is reported anymore.
Agreed. He needs to kill them with kindness. But he is a baby
Is the left's neo-McArthyism a conspiracy or mass insanity?
Did you know that no one in Hollywood lost their jobs after the McCarthy stuff? Just one director who was an ardent capitalist and ratted out the communists.
McCarthy had nothing to do with Hollywood. He was after people in government
The Hollywood thing was the House Un-American Activities committee and though they did not actually fire anyone either
One does not get to write for the New Republic by pointing out the Left's mass insanity, bigot
mass hysteria
Most progs I know buy into equally crazy conspiracies. My sister-in-law refused to send her son to a DC charter school because one of the board members has ties to the Koch Bros. She says they are trying to destroy all forms of government starting with the public schools.
What is funny they worry about school choice destroying public school system. Wouldnt this mean the progs dont have a high opinion of public schools?
I saw you say something about progs over in the comments section of Fox News.
Link it...may have been on my meds and don't remember,
Also who is following who??
I don't take meds, so my judgement isn't shrouded.
They want public schools to keep the dark-skinned kids away from their precious snowflakes, who they usually send to private schools. This seems to be changing with the hipsters though, who seem more dedicated to education equality-at least until they start to worry about Declan and Anais getting into Harvard.
As we now know the FBI failed. The highest levels of our government are influenced by pedophiles who practice their pederasty in pizza parlors.
Well now you've done it. If you can find Liz Conklin she may let you into her safe house.
The Domino's Effect?
Konima|2.28.17 @ 10:32AM|#
Are you lying to convince others, or yourself? Did I hurt your feelings when I said I wouldn't respond to you any longer?
Konima (BO) this worked out well for you i think...lol
It's funny. Whenever someone over in the comment section of Fox News says something anti-trump, you claim it's just one person on a smurf account. Every time.
Konima will do your bet...please initiate what you said (even though you can change IP addresses relatively easily)
Konima
the proof that you are Bo is that you are responding to these accusations with relative frequency (like how you said you wouldn't respond to me any longer only to have 15+ more posts and going lol). And clearly taking it to heart.
If you weren't Bo, this would not bother you so much as you wouldn't even know or care.
I think a few people who have arrived in the last few months are socks.
And it sure is a hoot watching them tie around each other.
Tune in to Rachel Maddow on MSNBC if you really want to see some conspiracy theories.