Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Adam Ramers

Donate

Election 2016

Just Like Daddy: Eric Trump's Ballot Selfie Tweet Stirs Controversy

Donald's son appears to break silly New York "ballot selfie" law, which carries a potential fine of $1,000 and up to one year in prison.

Eric Boehm | 11.8.2016 4:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Another member of the Trump clan might have landed himself in trouble over his use of Twitter.

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump frequently has touched off controversy with his seemingly unfiltered use of Twitter before and during the 2016 campaign, but it was Donald's son Eric who might have broken New York state law on Tuesday by tweeting a photo of his ballot.

"It is an incredible honor to vote for my father! He will do such a great job for the U.S.A.!" Eric Trump posted to Twitter on Tuesday morning, along with a photo of his ballot and a "Make America Great Again" hashtag. The tweet was later deleted.

In case anyone missed it or they delete it here's a screengrab of @EricTrump tweeting a photo of his ballot pic.twitter.com/dvQHPsjWf9

— S (@sara_m_g) November 8, 2016

Eric apparently wanted the world to know that he did indeed vote for his father, for whom the younger Trump has been a frequent surrogate during the campaign. The problem: under New York law, so-called "ballot selfies" are illegal and carry a fine of up to $1,000 and up to a year in prison.

Those punishments are pretty absurd, but it's rather unlikely that Eric Trump—or other famous ballot-selfie-takers like Justin Timberlake, who seemingly violated Tennessee law by posting a picture of his ballot last week—will face any form of punishments. Still, state laws against pictures of filled-out ballots have drawn attention this year as arcane election rules have collided head-on with the quintessential millennial activity of selfie-taking to commemorate even the most mundane of experiences.

Some states are overturning ballot selfie bans. A federal judge in Michigan ruled last month that a law prohibiting ballot selfies was a violation of the First Amendment. Similar laws were tossed by federal judges in Colorado and Kentucky just days before the election.

A similar First Amendment legal challenge to New York's ballot selfie law was launched days before the election, but a federal judge upheld the law.

According to the Associated Press, there are 17 states where ballot selfies are currently illegal (including Eric Trump's home state of New York) and 13 other states where the legality is not clear.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Anti-Vermin Measure on Ballot in Florida

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

Election 2016
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (31)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Brett L   9 years ago

    Oh noes! $1000? What will he do?

  2. DenverJ   9 years ago

    I understand the reasoning: if I pay you $200 to vote a certain way, I want proof that you voted that way.

    1. Brett L   9 years ago

      But if I stand to inherit a real estate empire*, I'll take the fine.

      *I would get real cash money from Don, Sr., not a promise.

  3. That's A Bingo!   9 years ago

    Bigger scandal: He can't stay within the lines.

    1. waffles   9 years ago

      My thought exactly.

    2. Rhywun   9 years ago

      I didn't know NY has bubble-form ballots now. Last time I voted it was those hand-cranked rubegoldbergian machines.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   9 years ago

    Election: Nullified.

    We'll have to do it all again.

  5. esteve7   9 years ago

    Isn't the whole point is you can't force someone to prove they voted one way? IE - I make you take a picture of you and your ballot to make sure you voted for the right candidate

    1. Agammamon   9 years ago

      How does the law stop that?

      Is it through the same mechanism that keeps people from bringing guns into 'gun-free zones'?

  6. Hugh Akston   9 years ago

    How much of an honor can it be if he didn't even put an exclamation after the bubble?

    1. Citizen X   9 years ago

      He didn't fill it in in the shape of a heart or a star, either.

  7. T.F.G.   9 years ago

    Clearly Photoshopped anyway. I just have a hard time believing he voted for Trump.

  8. ant1sthenes   9 years ago

    So, now Reason writers are calling Trump "daddy" too? Buncha Johnny-come-latelies.

    1. Hugh Akston   9 years ago

      They're just getting ready for his first executive order after he takes office.

  9. RBS   9 years ago

    The Twitter feed of @sara_m_g.

    1. Crusty Juggler   9 years ago

      She drinks beer and bourbon!

  10. Agammamon   9 years ago

    I'm sorry, was there a point to this article?

    Do we *care* that he broke this law?

    1. Hugh Akston   9 years ago

      Here at the libertarian website we have a care about laws that abrogate peoples' liberties, including this NY law that is a clear violation of the First Amendment.

      1. T.F.G.   9 years ago

        So we are happy he broke the law.

        1. RickC   9 years ago

          But did he have intent to break the law or was he just negligent and careless?

          1. T.F.G.   9 years ago

            It's like he doesn't even respect rule of law.

            1. RickC   9 years ago

              It's not like he was a certain Secretary of State or President, neither of whom has shown any respect for the rule of law.

      2. Agammamon   9 years ago

        Except the article isn't about the law. Which has already been covered. Its written to focus on DTJr *breaking* the law as if that was important.

  11. Africanis   9 years ago

    He must contemplate his actions on the Tree of Wool, CRUCIFY HIM!

    1. Africanis   9 years ago

      My bad tree of Woe.

      1. Hugh Akston   9 years ago

        The Tree of Wool is even worse. They won't let you wear an undershirt when they nail you to it.

        1. dschwar   9 years ago

          And when it rains, that sucker starts to feel really heavy.

  12. Cynical Asshole   9 years ago

    Behold the field where I harvest my fucks and see that it is barren.

  13. Pan Zagloba   9 years ago

    Wait, it says TELUS? THE IDIOT IS FROM CANADA!

    Not. Like. This!

  14. jester   9 years ago

    Trump loses lawsuit.
    Clinton loses pantsuit.
    'Swear it was in the closet.'

  15. BigT   9 years ago

    under New York law, so-called "ballot selfies" are illegal and carry a fine of up to $1,000 and up to a year in prison.

    Was this a worse crime than what got Eric Garner pig-murdered?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 444 donors, we've reached $281,093 of our $400,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

All Donations NOW Being Matched! Donate Now

Latest

Help Reason Be Your Antidote to Lousy Journalism!

Matt Welch | 12.4.2025 1:00 PM

Why Are 38 Percent of Stanford Students Saying They're Disabled?

Emma Camp | 12.4.2025 12:12 PM

New Legal Trouble for a Father Still Mourning His Son

Lenore Skenazy | 12.4.2025 11:55 AM

Federal Judge Confirms What We Already Knew: DHS Is Breaking Its Own Rules in D.C. Immigration Arrests

Autumn Billings | 12.4.2025 11:37 AM

The Dell-Trump Alliance

Liz Wolfe | 12.4.2025 9:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks