Public Option Revived
State-run insurance
In September 2009 President Obama pitched the Affordable Care Act to the nation by lamenting that "in 34 states, 75 percent of the insurance market is controlled by five or fewer companies. In Alabama, almost 90 percent is controlled by just one company." The result, he said, was more expensive insurance and lower-quality coverage; Obamacare would solve this problem by creating insurance exchanges that would be attractive to insurers, thus giving people more options.
In 2016, Obamacare is the law of the land, and in several exchanges, the number of insurers is dwindling. In April, after months of warnings, UnitedHealth, the nation's largest health insurer, announced it would pull out of most of the state exchanges where it had been operating. Weeks later, Humana announced it was quitting the exchanges in Alabama and Virginia.
Consequently, a report by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that some 650 rural counties in Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, Arizona, Oklahoma, and elsewhere were likely to have just one carrier next year. In Wyoming, Alaska, and Alabama, the exchanges will feature no competition anywhere in the state.
In a July article for the Journal of the American Medical Association, President Obama proposed addressing this issue by creating a government-run insurance plan—the "public option"—to be sold alongside private health plans.
But the health law already tried a nonprofit substitute for the public option: co-ops. Most of these have already failed, and more are likely to shut down in the future, leaving taxpayers on the hook for billions of dollars in federally backed loans. Now the president wants more government intervention into a problem Obamacare failed to solve.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Public Option Revived."
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?