Pennsylvania Law Would Ban Naming Police Officers Involved in Shootings For 30 Days
The bill sailed through the legislature, still needs governor's signature.


Pennsylvania lawmakers overwhelmingly approved a new bill last week—heavily backed by state and national police unions, including the Fraternal Order of Police—which would forbid the public release of the names of officers involved in shootings of civilians for 30 days, or until an internal police investigation is completed. The penalty for violating the government-wide gag order would be a second misdemeanor charge, however, exemptions would be made for the Attorney General and district attorney's offices.
The bill sailed through Pennsylvania's House 151-32 and 39-9 in the Senate, with a significant amount of Philadelphia-area lawmakers voting against it, according to Philly.com. Gov. Tom Wolf (D) still needs to sign the bill to make it law, but he has made no public indication of whether or not he will do so.
The bill was introduced by Rep. Marina White (R) as a means of providing officers involved in shootings "basic protection from threats" After voting in favor of the bill, Rep. Dominic Costa (D) declared, "We are the protectors of our protectors."
Last year, then-Philadelphia Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey changed the department's long-standing policy of releasing officers' names whenever it felt it was appropriate to limiting the delay to a maximum of 72 hours. Ramsey was quoted by NPR as saying, "I don't think you can shoot someone and expect to remain anonymous…and I do think that we have a responsibility as a police agency that work[s] for the people to provide that information, unless there are some extenuating circumstances."
If the bill becomes law, it would supersede Philadelphia's more transparent policy.
Writing of the proposed bill, the Cato Institute's Jonathan Blanks noted:
Current Pennsylvania law is bad enough as it is. Authorities already have the discretion to release or withhold the names of officers involved in use-of-force incidents. Without a timetable for release of officers' names, the process to get to the bottom of what happened can be a very lengthy one.
Transparency is also a problem for the Pennsylvania State Police, which makes public very little information about its officer involved shootings, nearly all of which are ruled justified.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
or until an internal police investigation is completed
I'm sure that won't be abused at all.
Next week. Pennsylvania will institute 52 week police investigation periods. Nothing like police getting
a 52 weeks paid vacation and then return to the job after people move on to the next police shooting
or unarmed citizens.
Well, Pennsylvania. Duh.
unless there are some extenuating circumstances
I have never, never, never, ever, not even once, heard one of these puppet shows of "increased transparency" for pigs that didn't include a little wiggle phrase at the end, completely and totally negating the entire thing. Curious isn't it?
Because the largest operating legal mob in the country couldn't possibly vomit up some bullshit about "extenuating circumstances" every single time, could they? The same way their in-house, private investigations always find that their murderings were warranted?
And people who are accused of shooting police won't have their name released until after trial, right?
What trial?
Seems I have a hole in my logic.
How's it going sarcasmic?
I wasn't aware that cops accused of shootings were getting killed at an alarming rate.
There's a war on police, mister! Don't you read the news?
Well, embarrassed at an alarming rate.
"That nonagenarian is coming right for us with a pencil!"
*blam, blam*
Police are capable of embarrassment?
Pencils are sharp dangerous things and sometimes they look like a gun! And sometimes those nonagenarians can move really fast! Also, he had a walker, and that can be used as a dangerous weapon! Good shoot!
They don't care if "it's a baby with a butter knife in his hand and his mother's titty in the other".
"The bill sailed through Pennsylvania's House 151-32 and 39-9 in the Senate"
Statists are going to keep on stating until they ruin the libertarian moment.
Never pick a fight with people who buy ink by the barrel.
-Mark Twain
Again - inquest juries for every death caused by government - public hearings to see if the death is the result of criminal behavior by anyone. Convene the jury as rapidly as possible.
Positive toxicological analysis= guilty.
The media will be outraged. They demand to know everything the government knows immediately, unless it's something bad about Clinton.
If they had balls, they'd stop showing mug shots on the local news.
Sometimes they do, if the mugshot might inflame the deplorables.
Now, now cop haters. There's no double standard. Other people accused of crimes are able to keep their names out of public records, right?
Our local news sites post peoples mugshots before they've even been to court much less convicted. Very neighborly.
We take privacy seriously in this country. You cannot expect a public employee to have his (her) name splattered all over the newspapers over some minor indiscretion like plugging a citizen.
Having less information doesn't make potential rioters less likely to riot.
Yeah, if that's the concern, screw it.
Hopefully, we're talking about non-rioters - you know, informed citizens who want to know what their government is doing. And to whom.
When the riots come, I'm going to cover my face with black shoe polish so they don't go after me.
Note to self: Stay as far away from my fellow JB as possible.
I will happily share my shoe polish. We can wear Ghanaian smocks .
Note to self: Stay as far away from my fellow JB as possible.
Note to self: Commence squirrel holocaust.
Wir mussen die N?ssen ausrotten.
Make Hit und Run squirrelfrei!
Yeah but I heard that Black Lives Matter is doing the lord's work by putting police under a spotlight, even if they are race baiting barpet bagging looters. Nevermind that support for the police is near an all-time high and that most of the reforms are just codifying police lawlessness.
I'm shocked. The most authoritarian statist state, protecting state thugs from scrutiny by the citizenry.
And let me guess, the sheep are fine with it?
Christ, I'm glad I escaped that shithole.
I escaped from PA to the other side of the globe. I wonder why people continue to reside in the USSA.
If you have a place that's more free, don't keep it a secret.
Philadelphia still sucks.
The legislators are doing the bidding of their masters. Isn't it becoming clear who is really in charge ?
this bill is the reason the iggles lost in overtime last night to the Cowboys
The legislators are doing the bidding of their masters. Isn't it becoming clear who is really in charge ?
Wait, what?
I have it on good authority that the police don't like being authoritarian bullies, but those mean old legislators keep passing laws over their objections. They're on our side, you know. They believe in freedom.
THEY'RE JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS!
Especially when they search your car when you're not there because it's parked by the side of the road while you're fishing.
This is why, whenever there is any effort to dial back on the drug war, you never see the police lobby against the effort. They are purely neutral and only do as the law tells them.
Mmmhm.
+ handcuffs
Only with a shovel.
You're really into that kinky shovel thing you have