The Clinton Investigation Enters a Dangerous Phase (New at Reason)
The presumptive Democratic nominee faces a prudent legal but treacherous political decision.

Just as Hillary Clinton seems likely to confirm

her long-held status as the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, the FBI investigation into her use of a private email server for official State Department business is reaching its penultimate phase.
The former Secretary of State has repeatedly insisted she can't wait to speak with federal investigators, but Andrew Napolitano argues, Clinton faces a potential "perjury trap" if she agrees to be interviewed by the FBI without knowing what potentially incriminating evidence they have amassed. As Martha Stewart can attest, lying to federal investigators is a crime, and even an unwitting misstep can be prosecuted.
But, if Clinton declines to be interviewed, which Napolitano describes as "a prudent legal but treacherous political decision," the fallout could be disastrous for her presidential campaign prospects.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?