You've Been Warned
Speech under fire
Friends of free speech, despair: A majority of college students believe universities should restrict which kinds of expression are allowed on campuses, and more than six in 10 favor mandatory trigger warnings.
These findings come from a new poll undertaken by McLaughlin & Associates and published in The New Criterion. While the overwhelming majority of respondents agreed in the abstract that free speech and intellectual diversity are important ingredients for healthy campus debate, they grew much more inclined toward censorship when asked about specific kinds of speech.
Half said universities should prohibit other students from publishing cartoons that criticize religious or ethnic groups. Fifty-two percent said people who engage in "hate speech" should be prohibited from speaking on campus. And 72 percent said racist, sexist, and homophobic language should lead to disciplinary action.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, many of the students who held these opinions were ignorant about the relevant laws. Just 68 percent were able to identify the First Amendment as the part of the Constitution that covers free speech, and a third of the respondents wrongly believed that hate speech is not protected. Thirty percent of liberal respondents thought the First Amendment should be done away with entirely.
The results did not always break down along ideological lines—moderates, for instance, were more likely than both liberals and conservatives to support speech codes. But it seems clear that the modern American left views the First Amendment with greater distrust than pro-speech liberals did in generations past.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "You've Been Warned."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
College kids with radical views? Oh no, the horror! My guess is that out of the sample, a lower than average amount of these kids even vote in their local and state elections, let alone national congressional elections. As they grow older, they'll cool down on these radical views just like every generation before them.
If only. Authoritarianism is quite popular. Maybe not this specific brand of authoritarianism, but still.
"...moderates, for instance, were more likely than both liberals and conservatives to support speech codes."
You may want to double-check your definition of "moderate."
How about our fascist colleges make the constitution a required course* just like they make the "check your privilege" courses required?
*Though I'm sure it would end up being by someone trying to convince the kiddos that the constitution doesn't mean what it says, and it can be changed based on the feelz, you ----ing oppressors!!
good certainly not all persons find period to be seated down again on the hang Mobdro APK all those video clips that you simply like quite one at a period. Mobdro Download nice.