Google Wants Drones by 2017. Can FAA Act That Fast?
Google said last week that it hoped to begin delivering items by drone in 2017. The announcement was made at an air traffic control convention outside Washington, but the idea has been in the works at Google for a while:
In August of last year, the company officially announced that it was testing delivery drones in Queensland, Australia after The Atlantic published a report outlining the secretive program. A glimpse of one of the drones in action made its way onto the web in late October when a venture capitalist tweeted a short video from a Google event in Arizona.
What isn't clear is whether the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will be able to drum up some rules for use in time for Google to deliver anything. Although they've made an exeption for Amazon, the FAA's initial rules for private commercial use of drones seemed to make it difficult for innovation to blossom.
Nevertheless, engineers and business leaders say that you can't stop technology from developing on its own. For more watch, "Drone Boom: Why Drones Aren't Just for Dropping Bombs Anymore."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sure the FAA can act that quickly; they'd ban 'em by next Tuesday if they had the chance.
If Google's greasing the skids I can see something published by 2017.
A memo that says, "No!"?
It takes time to craft rules too stupid for people to follow.
Google and Amazon and FedEx and UPS can only move quickly because those greedy bastards want to make money by exploiting the materialistic desires of consumers. The FAA, being unconcerned with anything so crass as money, can and should take their time to do 20-year studies on the matter because their mandate covers the very souls of the flock God has appointed them to shepherd.
The FAA can't simply give people what the people want - they have to determine what the people should want, what is Good for them to want.
Wasn't that tried somewhere before and it didn't work?
In the immortal words of St. Thomas Aquinas: "Nessuno ha bisogno di ventitr? tipi di deodorante."
Was he the same one who said "Quale differenza, in questa fase, fa?"
+1 cazzo ecco perch
Now now, the US government simply wants to make sure no one gets harmed by these drones.
I'm sure if anyone is hurt by drones, it will be the government doing it. Cops with armed drones, what could possibly go wrong?
I'm worried about Modrons. Can Faa protect me from them?
By 'modrons' I'm assuming you mean the sexbots we're being warned about? And speaking of sexbots, is anyone other than a couple of the usual suspects here brave enough to attempt a Japanese sexbot - knowing what the Japanese consider sex? Or are we all waiting for the "American" sexbot - the one we know will be made in Mexico, just the way we like it?
Seeing what imaginary Halloween costumes did to the poor snowflakes, just imagine what horrors would be released on their delicate sensibilities by sexbots.
Please, let there by sexbots now!
I'd like my sexbot with tear glands, please.
No. But Primus can.
That would be optimal.
So, what's up with Mizzou?
No. Now,quit asking stupid questions with obvious answers.
the FAA's initial rules for private commercial use of drones seemed to make it difficult for innovation to blossom.
No
fucking
way.
As a licensed pilot, I can only qoute the FAAs motto.
We are not happy, till youre not happy.
http://www.CompletePrivacy.tk
"As a licensed pilot"
The bot is a drone?
Wow makes sense when you think about it.
It really does.
Jsut a minute!
I'm sure the tongue-locked faces of evil, the government and Google, will figure out a strategy that exploits the ignorance of those who vote and search.
Golden Draak bike ride with fuckface swim.
Happy Sunday, trolls.
Hmm, the brackets got scrubbed by the server. Still makes sense to me, though.
Hey, I don't have internet right now, can somebody look up the Cal score for me?
I don't have the internet right now either.
I had to send my comment in with smoke signals.
Last I heard, they were up 10-0.
You're going to be in for a big disappointment when you finally get internet again.
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go? to tech tab for work detail,,,,,,,
---------- http://www.4cyberworks.com
good idea. drones is comfortable and quickly.
lol, dont hold your breath
http://www.CompletePrivacy.tk