Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Gun Control

Friday Funnies: Gun Free Zone

Chip Bok | 10.9.2015 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: New Bipartisan Legislation Would Make Federal Sentences Less Mindlessly Punitive

Chip Bok
Gun ControlMass Shootings2nd Amendment
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (79)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Steve Forbes seems to be taking his impending doom in stride. But othering an illiterate ninja might not be the way to go.

  2. invisible furry hand   10 years ago

    If he went to a public school, no, he might not be able to read

  3. WTF   10 years ago

    Stop making fun of Obama's ISIL strategy!
    *SLAP!*

    1. invisible furry hand   10 years ago

      *slap!*

      1. Almanian's Rusty Woodchipper   10 years ago

        *SLAP!*

        1. straffinrun   10 years ago

          *slap!*

          1. Tionico   10 years ago

            BOOM!!

  4. JeremyR   10 years ago

    If you change the sign, it also works to parody open borders.

    1. Almanian's Rusty Woodchipper   10 years ago

      Now THAT'S funny!

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

      /sage

    2. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

      What we can do about mass shootings, build walls around everyplace!

    3. Zeb   10 years ago

      Or closed borders, for that matter.

  5. Almanian's Rusty Woodchipper   10 years ago

    I don't get it.

    Awful, therefore, perfect. Actually, this is less-than-fully awful, so it's not quite perfect. Which is perfect.

    Happy fucking Friday, Reasonoids.

    I hope you're all shot on the college campus not of your choice, or choke to death while swallowing an olive with your Rusty Woodchipper (because olives are not called for with that drink, and you're a dink for having an olive, so you deserve to choke to death).

    1. Lord Humungus   10 years ago

      Well that's not very nice! *glares at Almanian*

      1. Almanian's Rusty Woodchipper   10 years ago

        enjoy your olive

    2. Tonio   10 years ago

      Somebody is all grumpy this morning.

    3. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

      Yet another reason I only drink beer and straight whiskey.

    4. Tionico   10 years ago

      doubt I'll be shot on the college campus of my choice.... because I'll be carrying my own vessel of retribution. Against campus policy, for sure, but since I am no longer a student there the only thing they can do is "ask" me to leave their property, which I'll gladly do. When I was a student I risked expulsion, at which point I'd have sued. But it did not happen. Which made every Friday a pretty near perfect Friday.

  6. Florida Man   10 years ago

    I have a busy day so read this you animals.

  7. Will4Freedom   10 years ago

    Those drawings of scary guns are a violation of the No Tolerance policy. Bok is suspended until next Friday.

    Happy Friday, Gents.

    1. invisible furry hand   10 years ago

      hey!

      1. Almanian's Rusty Woodchipper   10 years ago

        PWND!

      2. Will4Freedom   10 years ago

        If you are a Lady (or one of the new fangled genders folks claim to be now-a-days)

        Happy Friday to you, as well.

  8. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

    Another college shooting being reported this morning:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....niversity/

    1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

      "The university's weapons policy bans students from openly carrying firearms without explicit permission from the school."

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/.....2030a1f581

    2. straffinrun   10 years ago

      NIU's policy not as bad as others, but still awful.
      https://nau.edu/police/policies/weapons/

    3. american socialist   10 years ago

      Eh... It's flyover country so I don't really care if pro-gun zealots make it easier to shoot up the place or your neighbors. Bo, did you see yesterday in California in a city with tough gun laws that the guy who saved all those people on that french train was attacked with a knife? It probably would have been better for all concerned if everyone was carrying a bazooka.

  9. Swiss Servator   10 years ago

    REQUIRES ADDITIONAL INFORMATIVE TEXT ON OBJECTS!

    1. Will4Freedom   10 years ago

      Better?

      GUNFREE ZONE
      CLEAR PLASTIC EGG WITH REVOLVER INSIDE
      Gunfree is selling said eggs in that zone over there

      UNKNOWN
      UNKNOWN
      UNKNOWN
      Looking for clear eggs with revolvers in them

      MALE
      45
      CAUCASIAN
      Giving directions to egg zone

      1. Will4Freedom   10 years ago

        Well, now I know what the reason comments do to XML.

        Please ignore the previous message. It was funnier with the XML tags, which were removed.

  10. SusanM   10 years ago

    Related (vaguely): A good person with a gun does bad:

    http://www.freep.com/story/new...../73468588/

    Police confirmed on Wednesday that a concealed pistol license (CPL) holder was not being threatened by a fleeing shoplifter when she decided to fire multiple shots at him in a Home Depot parking lot.

    And experts interviewed Wednesday doubted the shooting could have been justified.

    "It's my worst nightmare as a CPL instructor," said Doreen Hankins, owner of Detroit Arms, which holds CPL classes. "You have to know the entire situation before you pull that handgun out. And I don't see that a shoplifter at Home Depot fills any of those criteria."

    1. Moroni   10 years ago

      Actually she randomly fired shots at the vehicle that the shoplifter got in (dumb, dumb, DUMB!) and apparently didn't hit anyone.

      If a cop had done this Reason would be all over it.

      1. Florida Man   10 years ago

        My guess is she was shooting at the tire, since she flattened one of the tires.

        1. Moroni   10 years ago

          She fired "multiple shots" so it seems more likely that one of them just randomly hit the tire.

          1. Florida Man   10 years ago

            Not much of a shooter huh. You know you can fire multiple shots at the same target (the tire) right?

            1. Moroni   10 years ago

              It's possible she fired multiple shots at the tire and only hit it once. But from the available information that's not the most likely conclusion.

              Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy

      2. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

        There's no disputing what this person did was idiotic, but I think differential coverage of cops doing this sort of thing is warranted. They're supposed to be professionals and public servants after all.

        1. Moroni   10 years ago

          This isn't a matter of poor execution that can be chalked up to amateurism, it's a matter of choosing to put innocent people's lives at risk. Either cops are held to the same standard as "civilians" under the law or they're not.

          1. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

            Cops should be held to a *higher* standard imo. After all, they're given a higher level of privileges and authority.

            1. Moroni   10 years ago

              When it comes to execution of their duties, yes. Not when it comes to something like this.

              1. Florida Man   10 years ago

                Not a regular Reason reader either, huh.

            2. Cap'n Krunch   10 years ago

              And lots more training not to do this.

          2. Florida Man   10 years ago

            They're not. This lady will be put through the ringer, have no Union protection, and won't be paid while on trial. Also she can't ask for a bench trial with a judge she works with.

            1. Moroni   10 years ago

              Pretty sure she can ask for a bench trial, same as a cop.

              1. Florida Man   10 years ago

                With a judge she works with? Sweet. She'll be out in no time.

                1. Moroni   10 years ago

                  That doesn't even make any sense. Unless they're moonlighting as court clerks or bailiffs, cops don't "work with" judges.

                  If you're claiming that there's some special relationship because they're part of the same justice system and/or because they appear in court a lot, then scads of other professions are also "working with" judges and they can all request bench trials.

                  1. sarcasmic   10 years ago

                    It's called 'professional courtesy.'

                    Cops aren't afraid to go before judges anymore than judges are afraid to get pulled over. They both know they're going to get special treatment.

                  2. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

                    I've worked many a courtroom and judges absolutely work with the cops. Also, one of the juror challenges in Texas is whether you have faith that the p'leece are always telling the truth. Doubt that and you're out the side door with the hippies, brown people, atheists and mexicanos.

              2. Swiss Servator   10 years ago

                with a judge she works with

                Missed that, eh?

            2. sarcasmic   10 years ago

              Also she can't ask for a bench trial with a judge she works with.

              Or a jury trial with a couple dozen of armed, uniformed cops in the audience, staring coldly at the jury.

      3. Adam330   10 years ago

        That's because if a cop had done, the cop would have faced no consequences. This lady will face consequences.

        People, whether they are cops are not, are going to do dumb things. That's reality. The government can't stop that. The best it can do is impose consequences on those people.

    2. Jordan   10 years ago

      What a fucking idiot. Enjoy your prison time.

      1. Florida Man   10 years ago

        This wouldn't fly even in Florida. It has to be a forcible felony and the perp has to be confronting you.

    3. Florida Man   10 years ago

      Hankins, the owner of Detroit Arms, said of the shooting, "None of it makes sense. Even if it were law enforcement, they wouldn't do that."

      AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

    4. Zeb   10 years ago

      Yeah. Just goes to show that no amount of training can cure congenital idiocy.

  11. Stephdumas   10 years ago

    It reminds me of that skit I saw on Youtube.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7pGt_O1uM8

  12. Bo Cara Esq.   10 years ago

    As to the cartoon, what in the world is that supposed to be directly under his tie/above his pants?

    1. SusanM   10 years ago

      Symptoms of chlamydia?

    2. Pompey   10 years ago

      A serious cummerbund fail.

    3. Jordan   10 years ago

      Looks like the tentacle from Day of the Tentacle.

  13. Moroni   10 years ago

    Once again confirming the Friday Funnies as a laugh-free zone.

  14. Itchy Puss   10 years ago

    We can't have a gun-free zone without a gun-free nation.

    1. Florida Man   10 years ago

      Now you get it. Get rid of gun free zones.

      1. Itchy Puss   10 years ago

        I say get rid of guns.

        But I agree with all of you that if we are going to have guns, then get rid of all gun laws.
        Any gun law is STUPID with the presence of so many guns.

        The idea that you can keep guns out of the hands of retards (sandy hook shooting), crazies (Movie house shooting), or people that appear normal, have a crisis and then use a gun IS SILLY.

        If you want to have guns, fine, we'll live with the crime, the random shootings, and the occasional self defense.

        We will have EXPONENTIALLY more problems with guns, not less. And, we are seeing it all over the country.

        The NRA was right to push for government not to track gun violence or incidents. The facts would (and do) speak for themselves.

  15. american socialist   10 years ago

    We should probably make it mandatory for students at junior high school to concealed carry because it will make everyone safer.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MS91knuzoOA

    1. Itchy Puss   10 years ago

      How about those cowardly kindergarten and 1st grade students at the Sandy Hook Elementary school that didn't rush the shooter as prescribed by our friend Benny Carson.

      1. american socialist   10 years ago

        Your missing the point, librul asshole, and that is that we should start training 2-year olds to fire a glockenspiel so they'll be safer at school.

        1. american socialist   10 years ago

          Haha... A glock... Not a glockenspiel, but that will work too.

        2. Itchy Puss   10 years ago

          A person who knows his/her target is armed will mitigate that fact.

      2. simplybe   10 years ago

        I suppose you think you are being witty. What Carson was saying is that when faced with imiment death you might consider trying to do something instead of going quietly into the night. Only a Progressive would try to demean what was a valid point.

        1. Itchy Puss   10 years ago

          I know what he said. And had just a hand-full of those cowardly kids had attacked the shooter, many other kids would had survived.

          I'm surprised libertarians take this stand. Usually you guys are for the "I'm in it for me and fuck everyone else."

  16. simplybe   10 years ago

    The 2nd Amendment was put into our Constitution to protect the people from the Federal Government. It is the same reason that federal troops are not suppose to be deployed on American soil. The majority of those that fought in the Revolutionary War were Scot-Irish and were sick of being ruled by tyrants. All governments are fearful of the people being able to defend themselves. You can look at what our government did to Blacks, Mexicans and Indians to see why the average citizen defends the 2nd Amendment. The Federal Government is considered the world's biggest bully. If it were not for the 300,000,000 guns in private hands do you really think this country would still be a free. If you do you have a much lower standard of freedom than I do

    1. Itchy Puss   10 years ago

      The government is fully capable of going after every citizen with guns.

      The government has satellites, drones, airplanes, personnel, and the ability to financially ruin anyone.

      This is why people like me say the 2nd Amendment is useless. There's no meaningful way of us (as an individual, a family, a militia, or caucus) to be able to protect ourselves from the the Government.

      And I don't believe one second that the red-blooded gun owning american gives two shits of what happened to blacks, mexicans, and indians.

  17. Fizban   10 years ago

    OT: Was re-reading a fantasy novel from my childhood and came across this quote:

    Beware the engineers of society, I say, who would make everyone in all the world equal. Opportunity should be equal, must be equal, but achievement must remain individual.
    - Drizzt Do'Urden

    Evidently my libertarian views were being influenced well before I read Atlas Shrugged.

    1. HolgerDanske   10 years ago

      Of course, Drizzt would understand liberty much better than most, having increased his personal freedom immensely after leaving Drow society. I wonder if Drizzt's race was modeled on a specific type of human archetype..

      Drow were taught from an early age to trust no one, forging alliances only when they were confident that they could outmatch their ally if he/she decided to turn on them. The inherent pride in their own abilities quite often led to such alliances being forged, though they almost always ended badly when one party decided said alliance was no longer convenient. Even drow who escaped the cruelties of the Underdark found it more difficult to form long-term friendships than most races do.

  18. RodgerMitchell   10 years ago

    Why have laws since some people don't obey laws, right?

    Burglary-free zone
    Shoplifting-free zone
    Speeding-free zone
    Assault-free zone
    Murder-free zone
    Crime-free zone

    Hey, we don't need laws. Just ask the NRA. Their all-purpose solution to gun violence: No laws.

    1. Knarf Yenrab!   10 years ago

      This fallacy has been creeping up frequently for the past couple of years, so I'll bite.

      The actual crimes you detail are all crimes against a person ("speeding" is not a crime in any meaningful sense of the term, though negligent driving is). Murder harms an individual; we have a law to protect the individual from murder and compensate his family in the event of a murder. Battery harms an individual; we have a law to protect the individual from battery and compensate him should such occur.

      Gun-free zones do not deter crime; they encourage it by removing a disincentive for coercion. Gun-free zones do not protect law-abiding individuals; they render them helpless toward the physically strong or armed criminal. If you can understand why a law preventing people from wearing helmets while riding a motorcycle would put their lives in danger, you should be able to understand why a law preventing people from defending their persons with firearms would also endanger them while encouraging aggression from sociopaths.

      The most insidious aspect of legislation like this is that the individual who does choose to protect himself in violation of the law now must not only worry about a higher likelihood of assault ceteris paribus by criminals who falsely believe him to be defenseless, but also harassment and arrest by LEOs.

  19. Cap'n Krunch   10 years ago

    A customer at Waffle House in South Carolina shot an armed robber this morning. I'm sure it will lead to more calls for gun laws, as now some poor violent criminal (who I'm sure was only trying to feed his wife and family) has been harmed by a cruel, heartless citizen in a violent display of lack of passion.

  20. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

    So, what's happening in the Democratic People's Republic of the Congo these days? There are no private guns in a communist paradise, so no massacres either, right?

  21. Hank Phillips   10 years ago

    So, what's happening in the Democratic People's Republic of the Congo these days? There are no private guns in a communist paradise, so no massacres either, right?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Travel Crackdown Is Hurting Americans at Home and Abroad

Matt Welch | From the August/September 2025 issue

Superman Is About the Anti-War Vibe Shift

Matthew Petti | 7.18.2025 5:23 PM

Why Are Students Using AI To Cheat? Maybe Because They Shouldn't Be In College At All

Emma Camp | 7.18.2025 4:00 PM

Although Meth Is Irresistible, The New York Times Says, Addicts Often Prefer Small Cash Rewards

Jacob Sullum | 7.18.2025 1:45 PM

ICE Is Shipping Detainees to Hawaii as Bed Space on the U.S. Mainland Fills Up

Autumn Billings | 7.18.2025 1:24 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!