Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Nanny State

Brickbat: There Once Was a Vote in Nantucket

Charles Oliver | 4.20.2015 6:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Public Domain

Voters in Nantucket, Massachusetts, have banned helium balloons. Those who introduced the measure at a town council say the ban will protect marine animals, which mistake the balloons for food.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: There Once Was a Vote in Nantucket

Charles Oliver is a contributing editor at Reason.

Nanny State
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (33)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    "I think their heart was in the right place ... but a ban on balloons is going a little crazy," said Glowacki. "I didn't think it would ever pass."

    But then he was reminded he lives in Massachusetts.

    1. Charles Easterly   11 years ago

      Saigon...

      1. A Horse Called Trigger   11 years ago

        Shit, I'm still in Nantucket.

  2. invisible furry hand   11 years ago

    As long as the kids can still huff helium and talk funny, then freedom is not yet wholly dead.

    Money quote from the article: "Personally, it's not going to affect me a lot, because I'm a balloon twister and I don't use helium."

    1. Swiss Servator...burn B??gg!   11 years ago

      Balloon twisters...one step above Juggalos.

      1. Charles Easterly   11 years ago

        Whoop whoop!

    2. kV   11 years ago

      Don't worry, you're turn is coming.

      1. Ted S.   11 years ago

        I agree. He is turn is coming.

        1. Almanian!   11 years ago

          All you're turn are belong to us

        2. Roger the Shrubber   11 years ago

          I've been saving this for you.

          1. Almanian!   11 years ago

            Lets call the whole thing off

    3. Robert   11 years ago

      No, if you read the story, it outlaws the sale & use of all balloons, as long as they're made of latex, plastic, or Mylar & can be inflated with a lighter-than-air gas?which means all balloons. Helium's got nothing to do w it.

  3. GroundTruth   11 years ago

    Good one for the day that the people of Massachusetts celebrate "Patriots Day" (the Battle of Lexington and Concord - the shot heard 'round the world).

  4. Cyto   11 years ago

    This isn't such a huge brickbat. Nantucket is a coastal community and there is a lot of noise about endangered animals being harmed by balloons and plastic bags. Whether it is justified noise, I couldn't say.

    Also, it sounds like they exercise direct democracy in Nantucket - so the nanny in this case really is "us".

    1. Marshall Gill   11 years ago

      Since I do not live in Nantucket, and don't vote there, I am going to say the nanny in this case is really "them".

    2. Pope Jimbo   11 years ago

      Maybe if they hadn't dumped their untreated sewage (filled with used condoms) into the ocean, the sea animals might not have developed a "taste" for deflated rubber bags with a creamy center.

      That is the reason they are wolfing down those balloons.

      If only we had heeded the Catholics and banned condoms. None of this would be happening.

  5. JeremyR   11 years ago

    Honestly, we should ban helium balloons period, because we have a finite supply of helium and we will probably need it for important things in the future. Once it runs out, it runs out.

    Just wasting it on balloons and other trivial stuff is completely insane.

    1. Radioactive   11 years ago

      soooo where do you think Helium comes from in the first place? Helium mines? Helium farms or Helium factories...the monumental ignorance associated with this post is positively stupefying...you tool.

      1. Charles Easterly   11 years ago

        Sarcasm can be fun, Radioactive.

        And to answer your questions, helium is exceedingly rare and difficult to mine, harvest, and produce:

        http://education.jlab.org/glossary/abund_uni.html

        1. NidhoggRocketman   11 years ago

          See my post below. Helium on earth is, in fact, mined, and is a nonrenewable resource.

          1. Radioactive   11 years ago

            only of concern if your zeppelin is sagging

      2. BigT   11 years ago

        Never fear, Top Men have saved us!

        http://m.phys.org/news/2013-09.....rtage.html

      3. NidhoggRocketman   11 years ago

        Helium is actually a nonrenewable resource on Earth. Yes, it's the second most abundant element in the universe, but it is so light that on Earth, any helium that escapes into the atmosphere tends to bleed off into space. Helium is, in fact, found underground in air pockets, typically mixed in with natural gas. It forms on Earth via alpha decay of radioactive elements, but this process is rather slow, hence helium reserves on earth are finite. Once they run out, the only way to get helium will be to bring it back from space.

        Though who knows how much there really is? The loons have been saying we've hit peak oil for decades and that hasn't exactly panned out. I have no reason to believe we've hit peak helium. My point is that yes, helium is, in fact, mined alongside natural gas and there is only so much on Earth.

  6. straffinrun   11 years ago

    Ah, phuket. I got nothing.

    1. BigT   11 years ago

      If you got nothing in Phuket you really are a sad case.

  7. Libertarian   11 years ago

    Ontario: Canada's Massachusetts!

    "Ontario is expected to make history soon by becoming the first jurisdiction in Canada to ban menthol-flavoured tobacco products."

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com.....e24011120/

    1. Rich   11 years ago

      RACIST!

      1. Almanian!   11 years ago

        ^^ THIS

        *burns awful, awful Craven M*

        I used to smoke Craven M's when I was, like, 12. It weaned me off both Menthol AND Canadian sawdust sticks (AKA "cigarettes"). Marlboro Man for...30-sih years, till I finally quit.

  8. Rich   11 years ago

    Leonard said stray balloons may seem like they've floated away for good, but descend to the ground when they deflate.

    Not necessarily. For instance, they could be sucked into a jet engine or get caught on a high-voltage line.

  9. Rich   11 years ago

    I hate to burst Nantucket's bubble, but hey dropped the ball on this one. Rather than *banning* helium balloons, they should have required tagging with chips registered to the purchaser, who would have to return the entire balloon (*perhaps* not the helium) within two working days or face stiff fines. Additionally, with GPS technology, loose balloons could be tracked and the purchaser fined according to distance traveled and importance of landing location. Think of the JOBS!

    1. Charles Easterly   11 years ago

      Federal government to Rich: "You're hired."

      1. Rich   11 years ago

        *** perks up ***

        As a *consultant*?!

        1. Rich   11 years ago

          the ban will protect marine animals, which mistake the balloons for food.

          Another modest proposal: Make the balloons out of marine animal food.

          That will be $5000, please. Tax-free, of course.

          1. Marshall Gill   11 years ago

            $5000?! Have you lost your mind! Surely that speck of wisdom is worth at least $50,000, we wouldn't want any government consultants starving to death!

            1. Pope Jimbo   11 years ago

              No doubt. Any respectable government grant reviewer will snort with derision at a request for a mere $5K.

              1. Rich   11 years ago

                $500*K*!! It was a typo!!

                *** files protest ***

    2. Pope Jimbo   11 years ago

      Two working days seems like it would be a bit short.

      When my kids were smaller and lost one of their balloons when it floated to the top of a vaulted ceiling it was almost a week before their wailing stopped being funny.

  10. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

    Hey kid, wanna buy a helium ballon? /Ice cream truck dude

  11. Robert   11 years ago

    Couple of strange things about this. 1st, helium has nothing to do with it if the problem is the balloon material over the ocean. 2nd, the ordinance doesn't ban helium balloons, it bans balloons that can be inflated with a lighter-than-air gas, whether they're inflated or not, let alone w a lighter-than-air gas?meaning it bans balloons, period?which actually makes more sense in its effect, but the whole reference to the gas is irrelevant.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Lindsey Graham's Death Marks the End of an Era of Interventionist Foreign Policy

J.D. Tuccille | 7.15.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Reading, Writing, and Gender Studies

Charles Oliver | 7.15.2026 4:00 AM

By Blessing Corruption, Todd Blanche Has Disqualified Himself From the Job He Wants

Jacob Sullum | 7.15.2026 12:01 AM

New York Becomes the First State To Ban New Data Centers

Tosin Akintola | 7.14.2026 6:13 PM

As U.S. Starts 'New' Iran War, Lawmakers Want Answers About Deadly Elementary School Strike

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.14.2026 4:34 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason