Jesse Walker Asks What 'Conspiracy Theory' Really Means
In a paper presented at the Conspiracy Theory Conference at the University of Miami, Jesse Walker argues that the phrase "conspiracy theory" is constantly being stretched and narrowed. On one hand, it is frequently used to describe any apparently fringy thesis, even if the theory does not involve anyone conspiring. On the other hand, when a conspiracy fear exists not merely on the fringe but in the mainstream—from tales of terrorist plots to urban legends about gang initiations—the term "conspiracy theory" is much less likely to be deployed. The result is rhetoric that treats the "conspiracy theory" as something that exists primarily in the nether regions of politics, when in fact the phenomenon appears frequently across the ideological spectrum.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?