Police in Wiltshire, England, have apologized after it was revealed an officer told a newsstand owner to give him information on people who bought the "survivors" issue of Charlie Hebdo, asking for the names of four customers. In a statement, the department said the officer will face no disciplinary measures, but the department did delete the information from their systems.
They're using their Second Amendment rights to protect local businesses from riots and looting.
That rate is much lower than the numbers used in the horrifying projections that shaped the government response to the epidemic.
The Supreme Court could announce as early as Monday that it's revisiting qualified immunity, a doctrine that shields rotten cops from civil rights lawsuits.
Police departments exist to protect people's persons and property. The Minneapolis Police Department has failed to do either.
Are we seeing a tipping point where police begin to grasp why the public is so outraged?