Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

France Arrests Comedian Dieudonné for Condoning Acts of Terrorism on Facebook

54 arrested in crackdown; Interior Minister promises 'total severity' against free speech the government doesn't like

Matt Welch | 1.14.2015 9:12 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Yesterday I wrote about how the controversial and allegedly anti-Semitic French political comedian Dieudonné was being investigated by a Paris prosecutor over a Facebook post in which he wrote "I feel like Charlie Coulibaly"—mashing together the names Charlie Hebdo and Amedy Coulibaly, the mass murderer in the kosher supermarket. Well, today, Dieudonné has been arrested on suspicion of condoning acts of terrorism, a crime with a maximum penalty of seven years in prison and a €100,000 fine.

The arrest is part of a nationwide clampdown on free speech in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo massacre, reports The Wall Street Journal:

Since last week, French authorities have moved to crack down on those who glorify the attacks amid fears they could encourage would-be terrorists to act.

Several people across France have been arrested since the attacks for condoning terrorism, with some already sentenced in court. Kamal Belaidi was convicted to a four-year jail term on Monday after overtly supporting the killing of the three police officers and shouting "Allahu akbar" to police officers at the scene of a car accident he was involved in, the local deputy prosecutor Christophe Delattre said Tuesday.

"We must act with a total severity on those who express racism, anti-semtism or islamophobia—as Mosques were also targeted," French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said in a radio interview after Dieudonné's detention. The day before, Mr. Cazeneuve had said the comedian showed "irresponsibility, disrespect and a propension to fuel hatred and division simply unbearable."

A shocking 54 people have been arrested for speech offenses in the past week, reports the Associated Press. Jacob Sullum has a column this morning explaining why cracking down on speech is the exact wrong response to anti-speech violence. To which I would add two points:

1) As I argue in my latest editor's note on policing in America, most laws tend to be enforced more stringently on disfavored minorities. Muslims are the least favored minority in France*, which means that any crackdown is likely to come down disproportionately on their heads (despite the Interior Minister's nod toward "Islamophobia"), increasing both the perception and reality of unfairness. And to the extent that alienation and non-assimilation of the Muslim minority contributes to the pool of potential malefactors, that seems strategically unwise.

2) Any speech made criminally taboo will thrive unchallenged in the shadows, rather than be refuted and ridiculed out in the open. If you're alarmed by Dieudonné's infamous quenelle gesture, how popular do you think it will get if he's behind bars?

This is a worldwide teaching moment for free speech. France so far seems to be flunking.

* UPDATE: Zaid Jilani Tweets that "roma are the most disfavored" minority in France, Muslims second, and as I have no quick measurement to support either claim, let's let it rest there.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Sandy Hook Parents Sue School Over Safety Issues

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (55)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. wwhorton   10 years ago

    Methinks the French don't really get it.

    1. AlmightyJB   10 years ago

      I predict we'll see hate speech laws in this country within 20 years.

      1. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

        I think we already have them. But yes, there will be more.

        1. Zeb   10 years ago

          What hate speech laws do we have now?

          Hate crime laws are not good either, but they don't criminalize speech itself. I can't think of any laws that do.

          I'm optimistic about free speech, at least. Outside of some pretty well defined areas (advertising and electioneering), speech has been pretty consistently well protected by courts.

          1. SugarFree   10 years ago

            If speech is a predicate to charge a hate crime, we have de facto hate speech laws.

            1. Zeb   10 years ago

              I wouldn't say so. "Hate speech" is not itself criminal.
              I certainly don't defend hate crime laws. But there is a lot of room between that and criminalizing speech itself. And there is loads of precedent saying that hateful and offensive speech is protected.

              1. SugarFree   10 years ago

                And why I said de facto. But the fact remains that the enhanced penalties for a hate crime are being applied (in the vast majority of cases) because of speech.

                Hate crime laws are the camel's nose.

                1. Zeb   10 years ago

                  Maybe so. But I don't need to be gloomy about everything all the time. The fact is that an individual really can say, write or publish anything he wants to short of actual incitement to violence or malicious slander or revealing classified information without fear of punishment. And that is one right that seems to be better protected than it ever has been. It's probably the only constitutionally guaranteed right that has become stronger over the last 100 years. Yes, there are still loads of first amendment violating laws and rules out there. But in that specific area, at least, things are pretty good.

              2. Rebel Scum   10 years ago

                "Hate speech" is not itself criminal.

                It is if you can be given additional punishment because of the motive of your crime.

          2. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

            Beat someone up. Say nothing. What's the crime? What's the sentence?

            Beat someone up yelling, "I hate niggers, hate 'em, they need to DIE!" What's the crime? What's the sentence? That's right, several new crimes because of the speech. Longer sentence because of the enhancement. True, you needed to trigger the laws with the beating, but the laws on hate crimes separate out that particular statement as a separate criminal activity.

            You can find more, this was just one example that I didn't need to google for.

            1. Zeb   10 years ago

              the laws on hate crimes separate out that particular statement as a separate criminal activity.

              Does it? Can you be convicted of just the hate speech and not the assault?

              I remain optimistic. I think that most Americans still see why offensive and hateful speech must be protected and I think that the courts are generally pretty good on free speech (at least by individuals).

              1. PapayaSF   10 years ago

                We don't need hate speech laws, because we have Twitter mobs that hound people out of their jobs if they make a political donation against gay marriage, if they once said the word "nigger" after being mugged 30 years ago, etc. etc.

            2. Heedless   10 years ago

              You do need to violate the NAP first in order for the state to punish you for your words. That's far from ideal, but it doesn't appear to threaten the speech rights of the non-violent. Al Sharpton is in no danger of being arrested for a hate crime. Thank God for that.

  2. Citizen Nothing   10 years ago

    I am Charlie Coulibaly.

    1. ant1sthenes   10 years ago

      Je suis Spartacus.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        J'accuse!!!

  3. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

    "Allegedly" anti-semitic? Oh, please.

    1. Irish   10 years ago

      Yeah, he's anti-Semitic as fuck.

      That just shouldn't be illegal.

      1. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

        ^this

      2. Pseudo Nym   10 years ago

        "Formerly an anti-Semite was someone who hated Jews ... nowadays an anti-Semite is somebody who is hated by Jews." --Hajo Meyer as quoted in Graeme Murray and Chris Watt. "Auschwitz survivor: 'Israel acts like Nazis.' " 24 January 2010. heraldscotland.com

  4. Irish   10 years ago

    January 11: French March on behalf of free speech, journalistic freedom, and human rights

    January 14: French turn racist comedian into a martyr by arresting him over a Facebook post

    Je Suis un hypocrite!

    1. Ketogenic Paleo   10 years ago

      Looks like hilarity will ensue

    2. CE   10 years ago

      We are all Charlie. Just don't publish or say something we disapprove of, or you will go to jail.

  5. A Frayed Knot   10 years ago

    I loathe Dieudonne and I hope that one day a band of enterprising French hunt him down and beat the shit out of him. But by arresting him, France is simply turning him into a martyr and making him a sympathetic figure. Exactly the opposite of what should be done.

    And "allegedly" anti-semitic? Seriously? The man is by any definition a rabid anti-Semite.

    1. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

      Why not "allegedly controversial"? Matt, for your own good, put down the bong!

    2. LynchPin1477   10 years ago

      I loathe Dieudonne and I hope that one day a band of enterprising French hunt him down and beat the shit out of him.

      And if they beat him to death, would he suddenly become a symbol of free speech?

      People seem so twisted over this, when it really is quite simple. Violence is not the appropriate response to words, full stop.

      1. CE   10 years ago

        Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me. I think that's how the saying goes.

    3. Pseudo Nym   10 years ago

      "Formerly an anti-Semite was someone who hated Jews ... nowadays an anti-Semite is somebody who is hated by Jews." --Hajo Meyer as quoted in Graeme Murray and Chris Watt. "Auschwitz survivor: 'Israel acts like Nazis.' " 24 January 2010. heraldscotland.com

  6. pan fried wylie   10 years ago

    shouting "Allahu akbar" to police officers at the scene of a car accident he was involved in

    "On today's episode of When Keepin It Real Goes Wrong..."

    1. Citizen Nothing   10 years ago

      Heh heh.

  7. Rhywun   10 years ago

    The French seem uncomfortable with the fact that a rabid anti-Semite has such a following - if only they could disappear him.

    1. Swiss Servator, Winter...jetzt   10 years ago

      Off to Devil's Island!

    2. Pseudo Nym   10 years ago

      "Formerly an anti-Semite was someone who hated Jews ... nowadays an anti-Semite is somebody who is hated by Jews." --Hajo Meyer as quoted in Graeme Murray and Chris Watt. "Auschwitz survivor: 'Israel acts like Nazis.' " 24 January 2010. heraldscotland.com

  8. Ketogenic Paleo   10 years ago

    I know that guy's arrest is wrong but I can't get myself to care too much... maybe I'm letting emotions cloud my judgment but I don't think this temporary crackdown on pro-terrorism speech will have any real effect on freedom in France.

    This isn't by far the worst attack on free speech, unless they really have no evidence and got him for saying he felt like "Charlie Coulibaly" then that would be a pretty fucked up overreaction, even by the very low standards by which I hold these pro-censorship statists.

    The clamp-down on "hate speech" in general is unfortunate but so far no new anti-free speech legislation has been proposed. Or has it?

    1. Heedless   10 years ago

      Moments like this are when we need to be most vigilant about restrictions on speech. You're not the only one whose emotions are running hot right now, and it is tempting to put boot to a few obnoxious necks. The problem is that new laws restricting speech, or even new norms for how the existing laws are enforced, will continue to shake us long after that righteous glow of anger has faded. And the next neck steeped on may belong to someone you like.

      1. Heedless   10 years ago

        shake = shackle. Stupid autocorrect.

  9. Ken Shultz   10 years ago

    "A shocking 54 people have been arrested for speech offenses in the past week, reports the Associated Press."

    Fear is the mind-killer.

    1. Adans smith   10 years ago

      So your a Mother Superior now?

      1. Free Society   10 years ago

        Reverend Mother Ken Shultz loves to parrot that line.

      2. Zeb   10 years ago

        Reverend Mother, I think you mean.

        1. Free Society   10 years ago

          Mother Superior if I recall correctly, is the supreme head of the Bene Gesserit. Where as we all know that Reverend Mother Ken Shultz would only be fit for duty as a lowly breeding vessel. If not just as an axlotl tank.

    2. CE   10 years ago

      Liberte uber alles?

  10. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

    A comedian?

    "Allah has 99 names, but a Jew ain't one."

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      "You don't have to be crazy to gun people down en masse, but it sure helps!"

      "Thank you, don't forget to tip your Morals Police. Try the halal chicken."

  11. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Any speech made criminally taboo will thrive unchallenged in the shadows, rather than be refuted and ridiculed out in the open.

    WRONG. That's not how it works. When you ban something, people stop doing it and things immediately change for the better.

  12. MP   10 years ago

    Even though French law guarantees free speech, denying the holocaust and encouraging hatred is a criminal offense.

    Guarantee is apparently French for FYTW.

  13. Adans smith   10 years ago

    The French,carrying on the the works of Robespierre

  14. MJGreen   10 years ago

    Hahaha, what illiberal idiots. I'm glad we can return to hating France!

    1. Florida Man   10 years ago

      Right?!? It felt weird being Pro-France. What is this, 1861 South Carolina?

  15. mariuspacker   10 years ago

    Just before I saw the paycheck which was of $9215 , I did not believe that my brothers friend was really making money part time from their computer. . there sisters neighbor has done this 4 only about seven months and recently paid for the loans on their home and purchased a great Fiat Panda .
    all visit this page ******** http://www.jobsfish.com

    1. CE   10 years ago

      That Jobs Fish is really slippery. It keeps getting past the tightest of anti-spam nets on Reason. Somehow.

  16. sarah.twilliams   10 years ago

    my neighbor's ex-wife makes $77 hourly on the internet . She has been out of a job for nine months but last month her check was $18454 just working on the internet for a few hours. read.............
    ????? http://www.cashbuzz80.com

    1. Rasilio   10 years ago

      Out of work for 9 months? Makes large amounts of money on the internet?

      So she got knocked up by one of her Johns and her E-pimp made her take maternity leave?

      1. Swiss Servator, Winter...jetzt   10 years ago

        "E-pimp"

        Heh.

  17. CN_Foundation   10 years ago

    These artists volunteered to die. The only guarantee for absolute "free-speech" requires concurrently volunteering for execution by the offended where one of the offended people you line up to "kiss your axe" might "kill your axe" instead of kissing it.

    The killings or "CH massacres" were nothing but assisted suicides for artists refusing to act honorability. This suicide was not significantly different to cocking a revolver loaded with one round out of six and placing the barrel in your mouth and pulling the trigger. After hearing a click; These artists kept spinning the cylinder and repeating. Every dishonorable drawing simply added another live round.

    ONE SOLUTION!

    A law against murdering journalists and press operators who profit by printing dishonorable free-speech and perhaps establishment of an insurance fund for artists such that murdering an artist would benefit the artist's family?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!